Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-7jkgd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-27T09:23:58.592Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - The King's Peace and the Second Athenian Confederacy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

By
Robin Seager
Edited by
D. M. Lewis ,
John Boardman ,
Simon Hornblower  and
M. Ostwald
D. M. Lewis
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
John Boardman
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Simon Hornblower
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
M. Ostwald
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania
Get access

Summary

THE SUPREMACY OF SPARTA

The Peace of Antalcidas had humbled Sparta's enemies and left them impotent, at least for the time being. The breaking of the Theban hold over Boeotia was followed by the refoundation of Plataea (Paus. IX. I. 4), which probably took place at this time rather than after the seizure of the Cadmea, the citadel of Thebes, and it is likely that Thebes was forced into alliance with Sparta (Isoc. XIV.27, Plut. Pel. 4.5). This has been doubted, but the absence of any allusion to the alliance at the time of the Theban negotiations with Olynthus and the trial of Ismenias is not sufficient to prove that it did not exist.

The Corinthian War was over. Now, as she had in 421 and 404, Sparta turned her attention to the conduct of her friends in the war. Her aim (Xen. Hell. v.2.1) was to punish those of her allies who had favoured the enemy and make such disloyalty impossible for the future. The first victims of her displeasure were the perennially restive Mantineans, who had shown their unreliability in various ways. They had evaded military service under pretext of a sacred truce, shown little enthusiasm when they had served, rejoiced at Sparta's military failures and even supplied the Argives with corn. Therefore, in 385, Sparta issued an ultimatum. Mantinea must dismantle her fortifications: compliance would be accepted as retrospective proof of loyalty. The Mantineans refused, and so an expedition was mounted. Agesilaus was reluctant to command, allegedly because of Mantinea's services to his father, so Agesipolis led the Spartan army, even though his father Pausanias had been on good terms with the leaders of the Mantinean people (Xen. Hell. V.2.3).

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Ancient History
, pp. 156 - 186
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Accame, S. La lega ateniese del secolo IV a.C. Rome, 1941 Google Scholar
Andrewes, A. ‘Diodorus and Ephorus: one source of misunderstanding’, in Eadie, J. W. and Ober, J. W. (eds.) The Craft of the Ancient Historian: Essays in Honor of Chester G. Starr, 189–97. Lanham Md., 1985 Google Scholar
Buckler, J. ‘Dating the peace of 375/4 B.C.’, Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies 12 (1971)Google Scholar
Buckler, J. ‘The alleged Theban–Spartan alliance of 386 B.C.’, Eranos 78 (1980)Google Scholar
Buckler, J. ‘The re-establishment of the boiotarchia (378 B.C.)’, American Journal of Ancient History 4 (1979)Google Scholar
Buckler, J. ‘Theban treaty obligations in Inscriptiones Graecae, Berlin, 1873– II 2 40: a postscript’, Historia 20 (1971)Google Scholar
Burn, A. R. ‘Helikon in history: a study in Greek mountain topography’, Annual of the British School at Athens 44 (1949)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnett, A. P. ‘Thebes and the expansion of the second Athenian confederacy: Inscriptiones Graecae, Berlin, 1873– 112 40 and Inscriptiones Graecae, Berlin, 1873– 112 43’, Historia 11 (1962)Google Scholar
Cargill, J. The Second Athenian League. Berkeley–Los Angeles–London, 1981 Google Scholar
Cawkwell, G. L. ‘Agesilaus and Sparta’, Classical Quarterly n.s. 26 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cawkwell, G. L. ‘Epaminondas and Thebes’, Classical Quarterly n.s. 22 (1972)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cawkwell, G. L. ‘Notes on the failure of the second Athenian Confederacy’, Journal of Hellenic Studies 101 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cawkwell, G. L. ‘Notes on the peace of 375/4’, Historia 12 (1963)Google Scholar
Cawkwell, G. L. ‘The date of I.G. II2 1609 again’, Historia 22 (1973)Google Scholar
Cawkwell, G. L. ‘The foundation of the second Athenian confederacy’, Classical Quarterly n.s. 23 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, M. ‘The date of Inscriptiones Graecae, Berlin, 1873– II 2 1604’, Annual of the British School at Athens 85 (1990)Google Scholar
Coleman, J. E. and Bradeen, D. W. ‘Thera on I.G. 112, 43’, Hesperia 36 (1967)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, J. K. ‘The date of Inscriptiones Graecae, Berlin, 1873– 112 1609’, Historia 18 (1969)Google Scholar
Gray, V. J. ‘The years 375–371 b.c.: a case study in the reliability of Diodorus and Xenophon’, Classical Quarterly n.s. 30 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hack, H. M. ‘Thebes and the Spartan hegemony, 386–382 B.C.’, American Journal of Philology 99 (1978)Google Scholar
Hampl, F. Die griechischen Staatsverträge des 4. Jhdts. v. Chr. Geb. Leipzig, 1938 Google Scholar
Judeich, W. ‘Athen und Theben vom Königsfrieden bis zur Schlacht bei Leuktra’, Rheinisches Museum N.F. 76 (1927)Google Scholar
Lauffer, S. ‘Die Diodordublette XV 38 = 50 über die Friedensschlüsse zu Sparta 374 und 371 v.Chr.’, Historia 8 (1959)Google Scholar
Legon, R. P. ‘Phliasian politics and policy in the early fourth century B.C.’, Historia 16 (1967)Google Scholar
Mitchel, F. W. ‘The Nellos (IGII2 43 B 35–38)’, Chiron 11 (1981)Google Scholar
Mosley, D. J. ‘The Athenian embassy to Sparta in 371 B.C.‘, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 188 (1962)Google Scholar
Mosley, D. J. ‘Theban diplomacy in 371 B.C.’, Revue des études grecques 85 (1972)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pédech, P. ‘La date de la bataille de Leuctres’, Rivista storica dell'antichitá 2 (1972)Google Scholar
Piccirilli, L. ‘Fliunte e il presunto colpo di stato democratico’, Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa, Classe di Lettere e Filosofia ser. III. 4 (1974)Google Scholar
Roos, A. G. ‘The peace of Sparta of 374 B.C.’, Mnemosyne ser. 4, 2 (1949)Google Scholar
Ryder, T. T. B. ‘Athenian foreign policy and the peace-conference at Sparta in 371 B.C.‘, Classical Quarterly n.s. 13 (1963)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryder, T. T. B. Koine Eirene. London, 1965 Google Scholar
Seager, R. ‘The King's Peace and the balance of power in Greece, 386–362 B.C.’, Athenaeum 52 (1974)Google Scholar
Sordi, M. ‘La pace di Atene 371/0’, Rivista di filologia e d'istruzione classica 79 (1951)Google Scholar
Sordi, M. ‘La restaurazione della lega beotica nel 379–8 a.C.’, Athenaeum 51 (1973)Google Scholar
Stroud, R. S. ‘An Athenian law on silver coinage’, Hesperia 43 (1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thiel, J. H. ‘De synoecismo Boeotiae post annum 379 peracto’, Mnemosyne ser. 2, 45 (1926)Google Scholar
Thompson, W. E. ‘The politics of Phlius’, Eranos 68 (1970)Google Scholar
Tuplin, C. J. ‘Lysias xix, the Cypriot war and Thrasybulus’ naval expedition’, Philologus 127 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuplin, C. J. ‘The Athenian embassy to Sparta, 372/1’, Liverpool Classical Monthly 2 (1977)Google Scholar
Tuplin, C. J. ‘The fate of Thespiae during the Theban hegemony’, Athenaeum 64 (1986)Google Scholar
Tuplin, C. J. ‘Two proper names in the text of Diodorus book 15’, Classical Quarterly n.s. 29 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuplin, C. J. , ‘Timotheus and Corcyra: problems in Greek history 375–373 B.C.’, Athenaeum 62 (1984)Google Scholar
Wilson, C. H. ‘Athenian military finances, 378/7 to the peace of 375’, Athenaeum 48 (1970)Google Scholar
Woodhead, A. G. ‘ Inscriptiones Graecae, Berlin, 1873– II 2 43 and Jason of Pherae’, American Journal of Archaeology 61 (1957)Google Scholar
Woodhead, A. G. ‘Chabrias, Timotheus and the Aegean cities, 375–373 B.C.‘, Phoenix 16 (1962)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zahrnt, M. Olynth und die Chalkidier. Munich, 1971 Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×