Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T05:58:26.823Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

24 - Cooperation and Punishment

from Part IV - Intimate and Everyday Life

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2023

By
Anni Kajanus  and
Charles Stafford
Edited by
James Laidlaw
James Laidlaw
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Get access

Summary

This chapter focuses on questions related to human cooperation, focussing in particular on punishment as a means of enforcing cooperation. We take child development processes as a means to investigate this, drawing on fieldwork material from China and Taiwan. As anthropologists would expect, we find that: (a) cooperation is not only a cultural phenomenon but also a historical and political one; (b) reciprocity is a key feature of human cooperation, but the manifestations of this in particular fieldsites are highly variable and sometimes surprising; and (c) cooperation in one domain of life tends to spill over into other domains of life. As noted, however, we go beyond standard anthropological accounts of cooperation by adding a set of questions regarding punishment and child development – questions that, in turn, may help bring the anthropological study of cooperation into closer dialogue with work being done by scholars in other disciplines on this important topic. The goal is to develop comparative questions about ethical life: ones anchored in species-level understandings of what it is to be human and to engage in human cooperation.

Keywords

cooperationpunishmentlearningcognitionkinshipevolutionChinaTaiwan
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook for the Anthropology of Ethics , pp. 610 - 628
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Astuti, Rita. 2022. ‘Psychological Essentialism: An Anchoring for Anthropological Comparison’, in Gellner, David N. and Martinez, Dolores P. (eds.), Re-Creating Anthropology: Sociality, Matter, and the Imagination. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Børge., Bakken 2000. The Exemplary Society: Human Improvement, Social Control, and the Dangers of Modernity in China. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bloch, Maurice and Sperber, Dan. 2002. ‘Kinship and Evolved Psychological Dispositions: The Mother’s Brother Controversy Reconsidered’. Current Anthropology, 43(4), 723–48.Google Scholar
Boyd, Robert and Richerson, Peter B.. 2009. ‘Culture and the Evolution of Human Cooperation’. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B, 364: 3281–8.Google Scholar
Bshary, Redouan and Grutter., Alexandra S. 2005. ‘Punishment and Partner Switching Cause Cooperative Behaviour in a Cleaning Mutualism’. Biology Letters, 1: 396–9.Google Scholar
Candea, Matei. 2018. Comparison in Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carsten, Janet, ed. 2000. Cultures of Relatedness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fechter, Anne-Meike. 2014. ‘“The Good Child”: Anthropological Perspectives on Morality and Childhood (Introduction to Special Issue)’. Journal of Moral Education, 43(2): 143–55.Google Scholar
Guala, Francesco. 2012. ‘Reciprocity: Weak or Strong? What Punishment Experiments Do (And Do Not) Demonstrate’. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35(1): 1–59.Google Scholar
Harris, Olivia. 2007. ‘What Makes People Work’, in Astuti, Rita, Parry, Jonathan, and Stafford, Charles (eds.), Questions of Anthropology. Oxford: Berg, London School of Economics Monographs on Social Anthropology, volume 76: 137–65.Google Scholar
Henrich, Natalie and Henrich, Joseph. 2007. Why Humans Cooperate: A Cultural and Evolutionary Explanation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Itéanu, A. and Moya., I. 2015. ‘Special Section: Comparison Made Radical – Dumont’s Anthropology of Value Today’. Hau: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 5(1): 113–250.Google Scholar
Jensen, Keith. 2010. ‘Punishment and Spite, the Dark Side of Cooperation’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 365: 2635–50.Google Scholar
Jordan, Jillian J., McAuliffe, Katherine, and Warneken., Felix 2014. ‘Development of in-Group Favoritism in Children’s Third-Party Punishment of Selfishness’. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(35): 12710–15.Google Scholar
Kajanus, Anni. 2018. ‘Playing Ball: Cooperation and Competition in Two Chinese Primary Schools’, in Stafford, Charles, Judd, Ellen R., and Bell, Eona (eds.), Cooperation in Chinese Communities. Morality and Practice. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Kajanus, Anni, McAuliffe, Katherine, Warneken, Felix, and Blake., Peter R. 2019. ‘Children’s Fairness in Two Chinese Schools: A Combined Ethnographic and Experimental Study’. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 177: 282–96.Google Scholar
Keane, Webb. 2015. Ethical Life: Its Natural and Social Histories. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lu, Hong and Miethe., Terance D. 2003. ‘Confessions and Criminal Case Disposition in China’. Law & Society Review, 37: 549–78.Google Scholar
McAuliffe, Katherine, Jordan, Jillian J., and Warneken., Felix 2014. ‘Costly Third-Party Punishment in Young Children’. Cognition, 134: 1–10.Google Scholar
Munro, Donald. 1977. The Concept of Man in Contemporary China. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Center for Chinese Studies.Google Scholar
Raihani, Nichola A., Thornton, Alex, and Bshary, Redouan. 2012. ‘Punishment and Cooperation in Nature’. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 27(5): 288–95.Google Scholar
Richerson, Peter J. and Boyd., Robert 2005. Not by Genes Alone: How Culture Transformed Human Evolution. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Richerson, Peter, Baldini, Ryan, Bell, Adrian V., Demps, Kathryn, Frost, Karl, Hillis, Vicken, Mathew, Sarah, Newton, Emily K., Naar, Nicole, Newson, Lesley, Ross, Cody, Smaldino, Paul E., Timothy, M. Waring, and Matthew Zefferman., 2016. ‘Cultural Group Selection Plays an Essential Role in Explaining Human Cooperation: A Sketch of the Evidence’. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 39: e30.Google Scholar
Santos, Laurie R., Hauser, Marc D., and Spelke., Elizabeth S. 2002. ‘Domain-Specific Knowledge in Human Children and Nonhuman Primates: Artifacts and Foods’, in Bekoff, Marc, Colin, Allen, and Burkhardt (eds.), Gordon, The Cognitive Animal: Empirical and Theoretical Perspectives on Animal Cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press: 205–15.Google Scholar
Spelke, Elizabeth. 2012. ‘Forum’, in Tomasello (ed.), Michael, Why We Cooperate. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Stafford, Charles. 1995. The Roads of Chinese Childhood: Learning and Identification in Angang. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stafford, Charles. 2010. ‘The Punishment of Ethical Behaviour’, in Lambek, Michael (ed.), Ordinary Ethics: Anthropology, Language, and Action. New York: Fordham University Press: 187–206.Google Scholar
Stafford, Charles. 2018. ‘Kin and Non-Kin Cooperation’, in Stafford, Charles, Judd, Ellen, and Bell, Eona (eds.), Cooperation in Chinese Communities: Morality and Practice. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Tomasello, Michael. 2009. Why We Cooperate. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tomasello, Michael, Melis, Alicia P., Tennie, Claudio, Wyman, Emily, and Herrmann., Esther 2012. ‘Two Key Steps in the Evolution of Human Cooperation: The Interdependence Hypothesis’. Current Anthropology, 53(6): 673–92.Google Scholar
Regolin, L. and Vallortigara., G. 1995. ‘Perception of Partly Occluded Objects by Young Chicks’. Perception & Psychophysics, 57: 971.Google Scholar
van der Veer, Peter. 2016. The Value of Comparison. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Warneken, Felix. 2015. ‘Precocious Prosociality: Why Do Young Children Help?’ Child Development Perspectives, 9(1): 1–6.Google Scholar
Warneken, Felix and Tomasello., Michael 2006. ‘Altruistic Helping in Human Infants and Young Chimpanzees’. Nature, 311: 1301–2.Google Scholar
Warneken, Felix and Tomasello., Michael 2007. ‘Helping and Cooperation at 14 Months of Age’. Infancy, 11(3): 217–94.Google Scholar
Polly., Wiessner 2005. ‘Norm Enforcement among the Ju’/hoansi Bushmen: A Case for Strong Reciprocity?’. Human Nature, 16: 115–45.Google Scholar
Zhao, Weili. 2015. ‘Historicizing Chinese Self-Reflection As a Technology of Confession’, in Fejes, Andreas and Nicoll, Katherine (eds.), Foucault and a Politics of Confession in Education. London: Routledge: 175–88.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×