Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T09:14:55.299Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

16 - Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2-Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF)

from Part II - Specific Clinical Assessment Methods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 December 2019

Martin Sellbom
Affiliation:
University of Otago, New Zealand
Julie A. Suhr
Affiliation:
Ohio University
Get access

Summary

The MMPI has been a mainstay of psychological assessment for nearly eight decades, a testament to the richness and clinical utility of the test. We begin this chapter by tracing the history and evolution of the MMPI instruments, including the rationale for and development of the MMPI-2-RF. First, we provide an overview of the test scales and the documents available to guide its administration, scoring, and interpretation. Next, we give an overview of the psychometric features of the MMPI-2-RF scales and a review of the literature on its use in a broad of applied settings. We then review the literature on multicultural considerations when using the MMPI-2-RF. A brief description of the adolescent version of the inventory, the MMPI-A-RF, is followed by a concluding section that illustrates MMPI-2-RF interpretation with a case study.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adler, T. (1990). Does the “new” MMPI beat the “classic”? APA Monitor, April, pp. 18–19.Google Scholar
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. L., Sellbom, M., Ayearst, L., Quilty, L. C., Chmielewski, M., Bagby, R. M. (2015). Associations between DSM-5 Section III personality traits and the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory 2-Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF) scales in a psychiatric patient sample. Psychological Assessment, 27, 811815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, J. L., Sellbom, M., Bagby, R. M., Quilty, L. C., Veltri, C. O. C., Markon, K. E., & Krueger, R. F. (2013). On the convergence between PSY-5 domains and PID-5 domains and facets: Implications for assessment of DSM-5 personality traits. Assessment, 20, 286294.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, J. L., Sellbom, M., Pymont, C., Smid, W., De Saeger, H., & Kamphuis, J. H. (2015). Measurement of DSM-5 Section II personality disorder constructs using the MMPI-2-RF in clinical and forensic samples. Psychological Assessment, 27, 786800.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anestis, J. C., Finn, J. A., Gottfried, E. D., Arbisi, P. A., & Joiner, T. E. (2015). Reading the road signs: The utility of the MMPI-2 Restructured Form Validity Scales in prediction of premature termination. Assessment, 22, 279288.Google Scholar
Anestis, J. C., Gottfried, E. D., & Joiner, T. E. (2015). The utility of MMPI-2-RF substantive scales in prediction of negative treatment outcomes in a community mental health center. Assessment, 22, 2335.Google Scholar
Arbisi, P. A., Polusny, M. A., Erbes, C. R., Thuras, P., & Reddy, M. K. (2011). The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory 2 Restructured Form in National Guard soldiers screening positive for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and mild traumatic brain injury. Psychological Assessment, 23, 203214.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Archer, R. P., Maruish, M., Imhof, E. A., & Piotrowski, C. (1991). Psychological test usages with adolescent clients: 1990 survey findings. Professional Psychology Research and Practice, 22, 247252.Google Scholar
Archer, E. M., Hagan, L. D., Mason, J., Handel, R. W., & Archer, R. P. (2012). MMPI-2-RF characteristics of custody evaluation litigants. Assessment, 19, 1420.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Archer, R. P., Handel, R. W., Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Tellegen, A. (2016). Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory – Adolescent Restructured Form (MMPI-A-RF): Administration, scoring, interpretation, and technical manual.Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Avdeyeva, T. V., Tellegen, A., & Ben-Porath, Y. S. (2011). Empirical correlates of low scores on MMPI-2/MMPI-2-RF Restructured Clinical Scales in a sample of university students. Assessment, 19, 388393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayearst, L. E., Sellbom, M., Trobst, K. K., & Bagby, R. M. (2013). Evaluating the interpersonal content of the MMPI-2-RF Interpersonal Scales. Journal of Personality Assessment, 95, 187196.Google Scholar
Ben-Porath, Y. S. (2012). Interpreting the MMPI-2-RF. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Forbey, J. D. (2003). Non-gendered norms for the MMPI-2. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Tellegen, A. (2008/2011). Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2- Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF): Manual for administration, scoring, and interpretation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Block, A. R., & Ben-Porath, Y. S. (2018). MMPI-2-RF (Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 Restructured Form): User’s guide for the Spine Surgery Candidate and Spinal Cord Stimulator Candidate Interpretive Reports. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Block, A. R., Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Marek, R. J. (2013). Psychological risk factors for poor outcome of spine surgery and spinal cord stimulator implant: A review of the literature and their assessment with the MMPI-2-RF. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 27, 81107.Google Scholar
Block, A. R., Marek, R. J., Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Ohnmeiss, D. D. (2014). Associations between MMPI-2-RF scores, workers’ compensation status, and spine surgery outcome. Journal of Applied Biobehavioral Research, 19, 248267.Google Scholar
Brown, T. A., & Sellbom, M. (in press). The utility of the MMPI-2-RF validity scales in detecting underreporting. Journal of Personality Assessment.Google Scholar
Butcher, J. N. (1972). Objective personality assessment: Changing perspectives. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Butcher, J. N., Dahlstrom, W. G., Graham, J. R., Tellegen, A., & Kaemmer, B. (1989). Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2): Manual for administration and scoring. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Butcher, J. N., Graham, J. R., Ben-Porath, Y. S., Tellegen, A., Dahlstrom, W. G., & Kaemmer, B. (2001). MMPI-2: Manual for administration and scoring (rev. ed.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Butcher, J. N., Graham, J. R., Williams, C. L., & Ben-Porath, Y. S. (1990). Development and use of the MMPI-2 Content Scales. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Butcher, J. N., Williams, C. L., Graham, J. R., Archer, R. P., Tellegen, A., Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Kaemmer, B. (1992). Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI-A): Manual for administration, scoring and interpretation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Camara, W. J., Nathan, J. S., & Puente, A. E. (2000). Psychological test usage: Implications in professional psychology. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 31, 141154.Google Scholar
Capwell, D. F. (1945). Personality patterns of adolescent girls. II. Delinquents and non-delinquents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 29, 284297.Google Scholar
Choi, J. Y. (2017). Posttraumatic stress symptoms and dissociation between childhood trauma and two different types of psychosis-like experience. Child Abuse and Neglect, 72, 404410.Google Scholar
Corey, D. M., & Ben-Porath, Y. S. (2014). MMPI-2-RF (Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2-Restructured Form): User’s guide for the Police Candidate Interpretive Report. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Corey, D. M., & Ben-Porath, Y. S. (2018). Assessing police and other public safety personnel using the MMPI-2-RF. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Corey, D. M., Sellbom, M., & Ben-Porath, Y. S. (2018). Risks Associated with Overcontrolled Behavior in Police Officer Recruits. Psychological Assessment, 30, 16911702.Google Scholar
Crighton, A. H., Tarescavage, A. M. Gervais, R. O., & Ben-Porath, Y. S. (2017). The generalizability of over-reporting across a battery of self-report measures: An investigation with the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Invemtory-2 Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF) and the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) in a civil disability sample. Assessment, 24, 555574.Google Scholar
Dahlstrom, W. G., Welsh, G. S., & Dahlstrom, L. E. (1972). An MMPI handbook, Vol. 1: Clinical interpretation (rev. ed.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Detrick, P., & Chibnall, J. T. (2014). Underreporting on the MMPI-2-RF in a high demand police officer selection content: An illustration. Psychological Assessment, 26, 10441049.Google Scholar
Forbey, J.D., & Ben-Porath, Y.S. (1998). A critical Item set for the MMPI-A. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Gilberstadt, H., & Duker, J. (1965). A handbook for clinical and actuarial MMPI interpretation. Philadelphia: Saunders.Google Scholar
Glassmire, D. M., Jhawar, A., Burchett, D., & Tarescavage, A. M. (2016). Evaluating item endorsement rates for the MMPI-2-RF F-r and Fp-r scales across ethnic, gender, and diagnostic groups with a forensic inpatient unit. Psychological Assessment, 29, 500508.Google Scholar
Grossi, L. M., Green, D., Belfi, B., McGrath, R.E., Griswald, H., & Schreiber, J. (2015). Identifying aggression in forensic inpatients using the MMPI-2-RF: An examination of MMPI-2-RF scale scores and estimated psychopathy indices. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 14, 231244.Google Scholar
Handel, R. W., Ben-Porath, Y. S., Tellegen, A., & Archer, R. P. (2010). Psychometric Functioning of the MMPI-2-RF VRIN-r and TRIN-r scales with varying degrees of randomness, acquiescence, and counter-acquiescence. Psychological Assessment, 22, 8795.Google Scholar
Harkness, A. R., Finn, J. A., McNulty, J. L., & Shields, S. M. (2012). The Personality Psychopathology Five (PSY–5): Recent constructive replication and assessment literature review. Psychological Assessment, 24, 432443.Google Scholar
Harkness, A. R., & McNulty, J. L. (1994). The Personality Psychopathology Five (PSY-5): Issues from the pages of a diagnostic manual instead of a dictionary. In Strack, S. & Lorr, M. (Eds.), Differentiating normal and abnormal personality (pp. 291315). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Harkness, A. R., McNulty, J. L., & Ben-Porath, Y. S. (1995). The Personality Psychopathology Five (PSY-5): Constructs and MMPI-2 scales. Psychological Assessment, 7, 104114.Google Scholar
Hathaway, S. R. (1960). Foreword. In Dahlstrom, W. G. & Welsh, G. S. (Eds.), An MMPI handbook: A guide to use in clinical practice and research (pp. viixi). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Hathaway, S. R. (1972). Where have we gone wrong? The mystery of the missing progress. In Butcher, J. N. (Ed.), Objective personality assessment: Changing perspectives (pp. 2143). Oxford: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hathaway, S. R., & McKinley, J. C. (1940). A multiphasic personality schedule (Minnesota): I. Construction of the schedule. Journal of Psychology, 10, 249254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hathaway, S. R., & McKinley, J. C. (1942). A multiphasic personality schedule (Minnesota): III. The measurement of symptomatic depression. Journal of Psychology, 14, 7384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hathaway, S. R., & McKinley, J. C. (1943). The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Hathaway, S. R., & Monachesi, E. D. (1951). The prediction of juvenile delinquency using the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory. American Journal of Psychiatry, 108, 469473.Google Scholar
Hoelzle, J. B., & Meyer, G. J. (2008). The factor structure of the MMPI-2 Restructured Clinical (RC) Scales. Journal of Personality Assessment, 90, 443455.Google Scholar
Ingram, P. B., & Ternes., M. S. (2016). The detection of content-based invalid responding: a meta-analysis of the MMPI-2-Restructured Form’s (MMPI-2-RF) over-reporting validity scales. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 30, 473496.Google Scholar
Kauffman, C. M., Stolberg, R., & Madero, J. (2015). An examination of the MMPI-2-RF (Restructured From) with the MMPI-2 and MCMI-III in child custody litigants. Journal of Child Custody, 12, 129151.Google Scholar
Kim, S., Goodman, G. M., Toruno, J. A., Sherry, A. R., & Kim, H. K. (2015). The cross-cultural validity of the MMPI-2-RF Higher-Order scales in a sample of North Korean female refugees. Assessment, 22, 640649.Google Scholar
Koffel, E., Kramer, M. D., Arbisi, P. A., Erbes, C. R., Kaler, M., & Polusny, M. A. (2016). Personality traits and combat exposure as predictors of psychopathology over time. Psychological Medicine, 46, 209220.Google Scholar
Kotov, R., Krueger, R. F, Watson., D., Achenbach, T. M., Althoff, R. R., Bagby, R. M., et al. (2017). The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): A dimensional alternative to traditional nosologies. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 126, 454477.Google Scholar
Laurinaityte, I., Laurinavicius, A., Ustinaviciute, L., Wygant, D.B., & Sellbom, M. (2017). Utility of the MMPI-w Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF) in a sample of Lithuanian male offenders. Law and Human Behavior, 41, 494505.Google Scholar
Lee, T. T. C., Graham, J. R., & Arbisi, P. A. (2018). The utility of MMPI-2-RF scale scores in differential diagnosis of Schizophrenia and Major Depressive Disorder. Journal of Personality Assessment, 100, 305312.Google Scholar
Lee, T. T. C., Sellbom, M., & Hopwood, C.J. (2017). Contemporary psychopathology assessment: Mapping major personality inventories onto empirical models of psychopathology. In Bowden, S. C. (Ed.), Neuropsychological assessment in the age of evidence-based practice: Diagnostic and treatment evaluations (pp. 64–94). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Locke, D. E. C., Kirlin, K. A., Thomas, M. L., Osborne, D., Hurst, D. F., Drazkowsi, J. F., et al. (2010). The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory–Restructured Form in the epilepsy monitoring unit. Epilepsy and Behavior, 17, 252258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locke, D. E. C., Kirlin, K. A., Wershaba, R., Osborne, D., Drazkowski, J. F., Sirven, J. I., & Noe, K. H. (2011). Randomized comparison of the Personality Assessment Inventory and the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2, in the epilepsy monitoring unit. Epilepsy and Behavior, 21, 397401.Google Scholar
Marek, R. J., Ben-Porath, Y. S., Epker, J. T., Kreymar, J. K., & Block, A. R. (2018). Reliability and Validity of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2-Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF) in Spine Surgery and Spinal Cord Stimulator Samples. Journal of Personality Assessment.Google Scholar
Marek, R. J., Ben-Porath, Y. S., Merrell, J., Ashton, K., & Heinberg, L. J. (2014). Predicting one and three month post-operative somatic concerns, psychological distress, and maladaptive eating behavior in bariatric surgery candidates with the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Iniventory-2 Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF). Obesity Surgery, 24, 631639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marek, R. J., Ben-Porath, Y. S., Sellbom, M., McNulty, J. L., & Heinberg, L. J. (2015). Validity of Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2-Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF) scores as a function of gender, ethnicity, and age of bariatric surgery candidates. Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases, 11, 627636.Google Scholar
Marek, R. J., Ben-Porath, Y. S., Van Dulmen, M., Ashton, K., & Heinberg, L. J. (2017). Using the pre-surgical psychological evaluation to predict 5-year weight-loss outcomes in bariatric surgery patients. Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases, 13, 514521.Google Scholar
Marek, R. J., Ben-Porath, Y. S., Windover, A. K., Tarescavage, A. M., Merrell, J., Ashton, K., Lavery, M., & Heinberg, L. J. (2013). Assessing psychosocial functioning of bariatric surgery candidates with the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2-Restructured Form. Obesity Surgery, 23, 18641873.Google Scholar
Marek, R. J., Block, A. R., & Ben-Porath, Y. S. (2015). The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2-Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF): Incremental validity in predicting early post-operative outcomes in spine surgery candidates. Psychological Assessment, 27, 114124.Google Scholar
Marek, R. J., Tarescavage, A. M., Ben-Porath, Y. S., Ashton, K., Heinberg, L. J., & Rish, J.M. (2017). Associations between psychological test results and failure to proceed with bariatric surgery. Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases, 13, 507513.Google Scholar
Marek, R. J., Tarescavage, A. M., Ben-Porath, Y. S., Ashton, K., Rish, J. M., & Heinberg, L. J. (2015). Using presurgical psychological testing to predict 1-year appointment adherence and weight loss in bariatric surgery candidates: Predictive validity and methodological considerations. Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases. 11, 11711181.Google Scholar
Marks, P. A., & Seeman, W. (1963). The actuarial description of abnormal personality: An atlas for use with the MMPI. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.Google Scholar
Martinez, U., Fernandez del Rio, E., Lopez-Duran, A., & Becona, E. (2017). The utility of the MMPI-2-RF to predict the outcome of a smoking cessation treatment. Personality and Individual Differences, 106, 172177.Google Scholar
Martinez, U., Fernandez del Rio, E., Lopez-Duran, A, Martinez-Vispo, C., & Becona, E. (2018). Types of smokers who seek smoking cessation treatment according to psychopathology. Journal of Dual Diagnosis, 14, 5059.Google Scholar
McNulty, J. L., & Overstreet, S. R. (2014). Viewing the MMPI-2-RF structure through the Personality Psychopathology Five (PSY-5) lens. Journal of Personality Assessment. 96, 151157.Google Scholar
Meehl, P. E. (1945). The dynamics of “structured” personality tests. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1, 296303.Google Scholar
Meehl, P. E. (1956). Wanted – a good cook-book. American Psychologist, 11(6), 263272.Google Scholar
Meehl, P. E. (1972). Reactions, reflections, projections. In Butcher, J. N. (Ed.), Objective personality assessment: Changing perspectives (pp. 131189). Oxford: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Meyers, J. E., Miller, R. M., & Tuita, A. R. R. (2014). Using pattern analysis matching todifferentiate TBI and PTSD in a military sample. Applied Neuropsychology: Adult, 21, 6068.Google Scholar
Mihura, J. L., Roy, M., & Graceffo, R. A. (2017). Psychological assessment training in clinical psychology doctoral programs. Journal of Personality Assessment, 99, 153164.Google Scholar
Moultrie, J. K., & Engel, R. R. (2017). Empirical correlates for the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2-Restructured From in a German inpatient sample. Psychological Assessment, 29, 12731289.Google Scholar
Myers, L., Lancman, M., Laban-Grant, O., Matzner, B., & Lancman, M. (2012). Psychogenic non-epileptic seizures: Predisposing factors to diminished quality of life. Epilepsy and Behavior, 25, 358362.Google Scholar
Myers, L., Matzner, B., Lancman, M., Perrine, K., & Lancman, M. (2013). Prevalence of alexithymia in patients with psychogenic non-epileptic seizures and epileptic seizures and predictors in psychogenic non-epileptic seizures. Epilepsy and Behavior, 26, 153157.Google Scholar
Neal, T. M., & Grisso, T. (2014). Assessment practices and expert judgment methods in forensic psychology and psychiatry: An international snapshot. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 41, 14061421.Google Scholar
Pinsoneault, T. B., & Ezzo, F. R. (2012). A comparison of MMPI-2-RF profiles between child maltreatment and non-maltreatment custody cases. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 12, 227237.Google Scholar
Resendes, J., & Lecci, L. (2012). Comparing the MMPI-2 scale scores of parents involved in parental competency and child custody assessments. Psychological Assessment, 24, 10541059.Google Scholar
Sellbom, M. (2016). Elucidating the validity of the externalizing spectrum of psychopathology in correctional, forensic, and community samples. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 125, 10271038.Google Scholar
Sellbom, M. (2017a). Mapping the MMPI-2-RF Specific Problems scales onto Extant Psychopathology Structures. Journal of Personality Assessment, 99, 341350.Google Scholar
Sellbom, M. (2017b). Using the MMPI-2-RF to Characterize Defendants Evaluated for Competency to Stand Trial and Criminal Responsibility. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 16, 304312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sellbom, M. (2019). The MMPI-2-Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF): Assessment of personality and psychopathology in the twenty-first century. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 15, 149177.Google Scholar
Sellbom, M., Anderson, J. L., & Bagby, R. M. (2013). Assessing DSM-5 Section III personality traits and disorders with the MMPI-2-RF. Assessment, 20, 709722.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sellbom, M., & Bagby, R. M. (2008). Validity of the MMPI-2-RF (Restructured Form) L-r and K-r scales in detecting underreporting in clinical and nonclinical samples. Psychological Assessment, 20, 370376.Google Scholar
Sellbom, M., Bagby, R. M., Kushner, S., Quilty, L. C., & Ayearst, L. E. (2012). Diagnostic construct validity of MMPI-2 Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF) scale scores. Assessment, 19(2), 176186.Google Scholar
Sellbom, M., & Ben-Porath, Y. S. (2005). Mapping the MMPI-2 Restructured Clinical Scales onto normal personality traits: Evidence of construct validity. Journal of Personality Assessment, 85, 179187.Google Scholar
Sellbom, M., Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Bagby, R. M. (2008a). On the hierarchical structure of mood and anxiety disorders: Confirmatory evidence and elaboration of a model of temperament markers. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 117, 576590.Google Scholar
Sellbom, M., Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Bagby, R. M. (2008b). Personality and psychopathology: Mapping the MMPI-2 Restructured Clinical (RC) Scales onto the Five Factor Model of personality. Journal of Personality Disorders, 22, 291312.Google Scholar
Sellbom, M., Ben-Porath, Y. S., Baum, L. J., Erez, E., & Gregory, C. (2008). Predictive validity of the MMPI-2 Restructured Clinical (RC) Scales in a batterers’ intervention program. Journal of Personality Assessment, 90, 129135.Google Scholar
Sellbom, M., Fischler, G. L., & Ben-Porath, Y. S. (2007). Identifying MMPI-2 predictors of police officer integrity and misconduct. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 9851004.Google Scholar
Sellbom, M., Lee, T. T. C., Ben-Porath, Y. S., Arbisi, P. A., & Gervais, R. O. (2012). Differentiating PTSD symptomatology with the MMPI-2-RF (Restructured Form) in a forensic disability sample. Psychiatry Research, 197, 172179.Google Scholar
Sellbom, M., Smid, W., De Saeger, H., Smit, N., & Kamphuis, J. H. (2014). Mapping the Personality Psychopathology Five domains onto DSM-IV personality disorders in Dutch clinical and forensic samples: Implications for the DSM-5. Journal of Personality Assessment, 96, 185191.Google Scholar
Sellbom, M., & Smith, A. (2017). Assessment of DSM-5 Section II personality disorders with the MMPI-2-RF in a nonclinical sample. Journal of Personality Assessment, 99, 384397.Google Scholar
Sharf, A. J., Rogers, R., Williams, M. M., & Henry, S. A. (2017). The effectiveness of the MMPI-2-RF in detecting feigned mental disorders and cognitive deficits: A meta-analysis. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 39, 441455.Google Scholar
Tarescavage, A. M., & Ben-Porath, Y. S. ( 2017 ). Examination of the feasibility and utility of Flexible and Conditional Administration (FCA) of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2-Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF). Psychological Assessment, 29, 13371348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarescavage, A. M., Brewster, J., Corey, D. M., & Ben-Porath, Y. S. (2015). Use of pre-hire MMPI-2-RF police candidate scores to predict supervisor ratings of post-hire performance. Assessment, 22, 411428.Google Scholar
Tarescavage, A. M., Cappo, B. M., & Ben-Porath, Y. S. (2018). Assessment of sex offenders with the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2-Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF). Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 30, 413437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarescavage, A. M, Corey, D. M., & Ben-Porath, Y. S. (2015). Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory Restructured form (MMPI-2-RF) predictors if police officer problem behavior. Assessment, 22, 116132.Google Scholar
Tarescavage, A. M., Corey, D. M., & Ben-Porath, Y. S. (2016). A prorating method for estimating MMPI-2-RF Scores from MMPI responses: Examination of score fidelity and illustration of empirical utility in the PERSEREC Police Integrity Study sample. Assessment, 23, 173190.Google Scholar
Tarescavage, A. M., Corey, D. M., Gupton, H. M., & Ben-Porath, Y. S. (2015). Criterion validity and clinical utility of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2-Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF) in assessments of police officer candidates. Journal of Personality Assessment, 97, 382394.Google Scholar
Tarescavage, A. M., Finn, J. A., Marek, R. J., Ben-Porath, Y. S., & van Dulmen, M. H. M (2015). Premature termination from psychotherapy and internalizing psychopathology: The role of demoralization. Journal of Affective Disorders, 174, 549555.Google Scholar
Tarescavage, A. M., Fischler, G. L., Cappo, B., Hill, D. O., Corey, D. M., & Ben-Porath, Y. S. (2015). Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2-Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF) predictors of police officer problem behavior and collateral self-report test scores. Psychological Assessment, 27, 125137.Google Scholar
Tarescavage, A. M., Glassmire, D. M., & Burchett, D. (2016). Introduction of a conceptual model for integrating the MMPI-2-RF into HCR-20V3 violence risk assessments and associations between the MMPI-2-RF and institutional violence. Law and Human Behavior, 40, 626637.Google Scholar
Tarescavage, A. M., Luna-Jones, L., & Ben-Porath, Y. S. (2014). Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2-Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF) predictors of violating probation after felonious crimes. Psychological Assessment, 26, 13751380.Google Scholar
Tarescavage, A. M., Scheman, J., & Ben-Porath, Y. S. (2015). Reliability and validity of the Minneapolis Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2-Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF) in evaluations of chronic low back pain patients. Psychological Assessment, 27, 433446.Google Scholar
Tarescavage, A. M., Scheman, J., & Ben-Porath, Y. S. (2018). Prospective comparison of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2) and MMPI-2 Restructured From (MMPI-2-RF) in predicting treatment outcomes among patients with chronic low back pain. Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings, 25, 6679.Google Scholar
Tellegen, A. (1985). Structures of mood and personality and their relevance to assessing anxiety, with an emphasis on self-report. In Tuna, A. H. & Maser, J. D. (Eds.), Anxiety and the anxiety disorders (pp. 681706). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Tellegen, A., & Ben-Porath, Y. S. (2008/2011). MMPI-2-RF (Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2-Restructured Form): Technical manual. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Tellegen, A., Ben-Porath, Y. S., McNulty, J. L., Arbisi, P. A., Graham, J. R., & Kaemmer, B. (2003). MMPI-2 Restructured Clinical (RC) Scales: Development, validation, and interpretation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Tellegen, A., Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Sellbom, M. (2009). Construct validity of the MMPI-2 Restructured Clinical (RC) Scales: Reply to Rouse, Greene, Butcher, Nichols, & Williams. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91, 211221.Google Scholar
Van der Heijden, P. T., Rossi, G. M., Van der Veld, M. M., Derksen, J. J. L., & Egger, J. I. M. (2013). Personality and psychopathology: Higher order relations between the Five Factor Model of personality and the MMPI-2 Restructured Form. Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 572579.Google Scholar
Watson, C., Quilty, L. C., & Bagby, R. M. (2011). Differentiating bipolar disorder from major depressive disorder using the MMPI-2-RF: A receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 33, 368374.Google Scholar
Whitman, M. R., Tarescavage, A. M., Glassmire, D. M., Burchett, D., & Sellbom, M. (2019). Examination of differential validity of MMPI-2-RF scores by gender and ethnicity in predicting future suicidal and violent behaviors on a forensic sample. Psychological Assessment, 31, 404409.Google Scholar
Wiggins, J. S. (1966). Substantive dimensions of self-report in the MMPI item pool. Psychological Monographs, 80.Google Scholar
Wolf, E. J., Miller, M. W., Orazem, R. J., Weierich, M. R., Castillo, D. T., Milford, J., et al. (2008). The MMPI-2 Restructured Clinical Scales in the assessment of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and comorbid disorders. Psychological Assessment, 20, 327340.Google Scholar
Zahn, N., Sellbom, M., Pymont, C., & Schenk, P. W. (2017). Associations between MMPI-2-RF scale scores and self-reported personality disorder criteria in a private practice sample. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 39, 723741.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×