Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T18:14:41.011Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Introduction

from Section V - How to Change Implicit Bias?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 December 2024

Jon A. Krosnick
Affiliation:
Stanford University, California
Tobias H. Stark
Affiliation:
Utrecht University, The Netherlands
Amanda L. Scott
Affiliation:
The Strategy Team, Columbus, Ohio
Get access

Summary

In April 2018, Starbucks closed all of its branches in the US and required some 175,000 employees to participate in a four-hour training session on implicit bias. Although this was undoubtedly well-meaning, the devoting of substantial resources to such an effort seems wisest if empirical evidence indicates that such training is effective. But in fact, the majority of evaluations of attempts to change implicit bias have shown no lasting effects (Forscher et al., 2019).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cone, J., & Ferguson, M. J. (2015). He did what? The role of diagnosticity in revising implicit evaluations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108(1), 3757. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000014CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Devine, P. G., Forscher, P. S., Austin, A. J., et al. (2012). Long-term reduction in implicit race bias: A prejudice habit-breaking intervention. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(6), 12671278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.06.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, M. J., Mann, T. C., Cone, J., et al. (2019). When and how implicit first impressions can be updated. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(4), 331336. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721419835206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forscher, P., Lai, C. K., Devine, P. G., et al. (2019). A meta-analysis of procedures to change implicit measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 117(3), 522559. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/DV8TUCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×