Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Psychology and Human Rights
- The Cambridge Handbook of Psychology and Human Rights
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Boxes
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- The Core International Human Rights Instruments and Their Monitoring Bodies
- Universal Human Rights Instruments
- Sustainable Development Goals
- Glossary of United Nations and Psychology Acronyms in the Handbook
- Introduction
- Part I History of Human Rights
- Part II The Intersection of Psychology and Human Rights
- Part III Contemporary Issues in Psychology and Human Rights
- Part IV Teaching, Research, and Training in Psychology and Human Rights
- 31 Decolonization and Liberation Psychology
- 32 Education of Psychologists for Human Rights Awareness, Accountability, and Action
- 33 Conducting Psychological Research across Borders
- 34 Diversity in Psychology Education and Training
- 35 Preparing Future Generations
- Part V Future Directions
- Index
- References
33 - Conducting Psychological Research across Borders
Maintaining Scientific Rigor and Safeguarding Human Rights
from Part IV - Teaching, Research, and Training in Psychology and Human Rights
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 October 2020
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Psychology and Human Rights
- The Cambridge Handbook of Psychology and Human Rights
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Boxes
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- The Core International Human Rights Instruments and Their Monitoring Bodies
- Universal Human Rights Instruments
- Sustainable Development Goals
- Glossary of United Nations and Psychology Acronyms in the Handbook
- Introduction
- Part I History of Human Rights
- Part II The Intersection of Psychology and Human Rights
- Part III Contemporary Issues in Psychology and Human Rights
- Part IV Teaching, Research, and Training in Psychology and Human Rights
- 31 Decolonization and Liberation Psychology
- 32 Education of Psychologists for Human Rights Awareness, Accountability, and Action
- 33 Conducting Psychological Research across Borders
- 34 Diversity in Psychology Education and Training
- 35 Preparing Future Generations
- Part V Future Directions
- Index
- References
Summary
Adopting a human rights approach to human subjects research entails shifting an ethic of “avoiding harm” to one of “actively promoting good,” especially in international contexts. The implications for research procedures are discussed as a series of steps in research planning and implementation, selection of participants, and community involvement. Special issues in research with vulnerable populations and in “big data” research are addressed.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Psychology and Human Rights , pp. 490 - 503Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
Allan, A. (2013). Are human rights redundant in the ethical codes of psychologists? Ethics and Behavior, 23(4), 251–265. doi:10.1080/10508422.2013.776480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (n.d.). Human rights in codes of ethics of scientific and professional societies. www.aaas.org/resources/humanrights-codes-ethics-scientific-and-professional-societies (accessed May 12, 2019).Google Scholar
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (2018). AAAS statement on scientific freedom and responsibility. Science, 358, 462. doi:10.1126/science.358.6362.462-bGoogle Scholar
American Psychological Association. (n.d.). Timeline of APA policies and actions related to detainee welfare and professional ethics in the context of interrogation and national security. www.apa.org/news/press/statements/interrogations.aspxGoogle Scholar
Amon, J. J., Baral, S. D., Beyrer, C., & Kass, N. (2012). Human rights research and ethics review: Protecting individuals or protecting the state? PLOS Med, e1001325. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aragón, A. O., & Glenzer, K. (2017). Untaming aid through action research: Seeking transformative reflective action. Action Research, May 17, 2017. doi:10.1177/1476750317700253Google Scholar
Arnett, J. J. (2008). The neglected 95%: Why American psychology needs to become less American. In American Psychologist. 63(7), 602–614.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ashaba, S., Kakuhikire, B., Vořechovská, D., Perkins, J. M., Cooper-Vince, C. E., Maling, S., & Tsai, A. C. (2017). Reliability, validity, and factor structure of the Hopkins symptom checklist-25: Population-based study of persons living with HIV in rural Uganda. AIDS and Behavior. doi:10.1007/s10461-017-1843-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Behnke, S., & Bullock, M. (2010). Ethics within, across, and beyond borders: A commentary. Ethics & Behavior, 20(3/4), 297–310. doi:10.1080/10508421003799115Google Scholar
Bernal, G., Morales-Cruz, J., & Gómez-Arroyo, K. (2019). In search of a global family psychology: Challenges and perspectives. In Fiese, B. H., Celano, M., Deater-Deckard, K., Jouriles, E. N., & Whisman, M. (Eds.), APA handbook of contemporary family psychology: Applications and broad impact of family psychology (vol. II, pp. 605–623). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/0000100-037Google Scholar
Beyrer, C., & Kass, N. E. (2002). Human rights, politics, and reviews of research ethics. Lancet, 360(9328), 246. www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(02)09465-5/fulltext accessed 6 March 2020).Google Scholar
Bhatia, S. (2019). Searching for justice in an unequal world: Reframing indigenous psychology as a cultural and political project. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 39(2), 107–114. doi:10.1037/teo0000109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boehnke, K. (2016). Is the German “civil clause” a model to present the involvement of psychologists in military atrocities? International Journal of Psychology, 51(S1), 8. doi:10.1002/ijop.12359Google Scholar
Bush, V. (1945). Science the endless frontier. Report to the National Science Foundation. www.nsf.gov/od/lpa/nsf50/vbush1945.htmCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, A., & Wyndham, J. (2013). A human right to science. Science, 340(6138), p. 1291.Google Scholar
Cheung, F. M., van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Leong, F. T. L. (2011). Toward a new approach to the study of personality in culture. American Psychologist, 66(7), 593–603. doi:10.1037/a0022389Google Scholar
Committee on Freedom and Responsibility in Science (CFRS). (2014). Freedom, responsibility and universality of science. Brochure, International Science Council. https://council.science/cms/2017/04/CFRS-brochure-2014.pdfGoogle Scholar
Creswell, J. W., & Sinley, R. C. (2018). Developing a culturally-specific mixed methods approach to global research. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 69(Suppl 2), 87–105. doi:10.1007/s11577-017-0453-2Google Scholar
Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. (1979). Belmont report. www.hhs.gov/ohrp/sites/default/files/the-belmont-report-508c_FINAL.pdfGoogle Scholar
Donders, Y. (2011). The right to enjoy the benefits of scientific progress: In search of state obligations in relation to health. Medicine, Health Care, and Philosophy, 14(4), 371–381. doi:10.1007/s11019-011-9327-yCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gauthier, J. (2009). Ethical principles and human rights: Building a better world globally. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 22(1), 25–32.Google Scholar
Gauthier, J., Pettifor, J., & Ferrero, A. (2010). The universal declaration of ethical principles for psychologists: A culture-sensitive model for creating and reviewing a code of ethics. Ethics & Behavior, 20(3/4), 179–196. doi:10.1080/10508421003798885Google Scholar
Gruskin, S., & Dickens, B. (2006). Human rights and ethics in public health. American Journal of Public Health, 96(11), 1903–1905. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2006.099606CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hagenaars, P. (2016). Towards a human rights based and oriented psychology. Psychology and Developing Societies, 28, 183–202. doi:10.1177/0971333616657170Google Scholar
Hagenaars, P., & Karayianni, E. (2016). News and announcements: “Psychology matters in human rights – Human rights matter in psychology.” Putting the focus on establishing human rights education for psychologists. European Psychologist, 21(3), 230. doi:10.1027/1016-9040/a000272Google Scholar
Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (2005). Participatory action research: Communicative action and the public sphere. In Denszin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 559–604). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Kleinman, A. (1987). Anthropology and psychiatry: The role of culture in cross-cultural research on illness. British Journal of Psychiatry, 151, 447–454.Google Scholar
Leach, M. M., & Oakland, T. (2010). Displaying ethical behaviors by psychologists when standards are unclear. Ethics & Behavior, 20(3/4), 197–206. doi:10.1080/10508421003798893Google Scholar
Leong, F. L., & Lyons, B. (2010). Ethical challenges for cross-cultural research conducted by psychologists from the United States. Ethics & Behavior, 20(3/4), 250–264. doi:10.1080/10508421003798984Google Scholar
McNamara, R. A., & Naepi, S. (2018). Decolonizing community psychology by supporting Indigenous knowledge, projects, and students: Lessons from Aotearoa New Zealand and Canada. American Journal of Community Psychology, 62, 340–349. doi:10.1002/ajcp.12296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, K. E., Omidian, P., Quraishy, A. S., Quraishy, N., Nasiry, M. N., Nasiry, S., Karyar, N. M., & Yaqubi, A. A. (2006). The Afghan symptom checklist: A culturally grounded approach to mental health assessment in a conflict zone. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 76(4), 423–233. doi:10.1037/0002-9432.76.4.423Google Scholar
Morgan-Consoli, M. L., Inman, A. G., Bullock, M., & Nolan, S. A. (2018). Framework for competencies for US psychologists engaging internationally. International Perspectives in Psychology: Research, Practice, Consultation, 7(3), 174–188. doi:10.1037/ipp0000090Google Scholar
Morris, N. (2015). Providing ethical guidance for collaborative research in developing countries. Research Ethics, 11(4), 211–235. doi:10.1177/1747016115586759Google Scholar
Mukherjee, S. R. (2012). Linking science and human rights: Facts and figures.www.scidev.net/global/humanrights/feature/linking-science-and-humanrights-facts-and-figures.htmlGoogle Scholar
Newman, E., Willard, T., Sinclair, R., & Kaloupek, D. (2001). The costs and benefits of research from the participants’ view: The path to empirically informed research practice. Accountability in Research, 8, 27–47.Google Scholar
Nicolas, G., Byer, K., & Ho, K. (2015). Guiding principles for implementing mental health programs internationally. International Journal of Culture and Mental Health. doi:10.1080/17542863.2014.996237Google Scholar
Pittaway, E., Bartolomei, L., & Hugman, R. (2010). “Stop stealing our stories”: The ethics of research with vulnerable groups. Journal of Human Rights Practice, 2, 229–251. https://ucdenver.instructure.com/files/3591209/download?download_frd=1&verifier=riCJQkxzn8kuplPMiXzIiMGVNmJNjaxSayUqAGoUGoogle Scholar
Ponterotto, J. G. (2013). Qualitative research in multicultural psychology: Philosophical underpinnings, popular approaches, and ethical considerations. Qualitative Psychology, 1, 19–32. doi:10.1037/2326-3598.1.S.19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rasmussen, A., Verkuilen, J., Ho, E., Yuyu, F., & Fan, Y. (2015). Posttraumatic stress disorder among refugees: Measurement invariance of Harvard Trauma Questionnaire scores across global regions and response patterns. Psychological Assessment, 27(4), 1160–1170. doi:10.1037/pas0000115Google Scholar
Rodriguez, M. A., & García, R. (2013). First, do no harm: The US sexually transmitted disease experiments in Guatemala. American Journal of Public Health, 103(12), 2122–2126.Google Scholar
Ruiz-Casares, M. (2014). Mental health: Tailor informed-consent processes. Nature, 513(7518), 304. doi:10.1038/513304aGoogle Scholar
Thompson, A. D. (2013). Fulfilling psychology’s promise: A model of undergraduate psychology education. Interamerican Journal of Psychology, 47(2), 277–285.Google Scholar
UN General Assembly. (1966, December). International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, 16 December 1966, United Nations, Treaty Series, 993, 3. www.refworld.org/docid/3ae6b36c0.htmlGoogle Scholar
UN General Assembly. (adopted 1989, November, entered into force September 1990). Convention on the Rights of the Child, 20 November 1989, United Nations, Treaty Series, 1577, 3. www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/crc.aspx (accessed March 6, 2020).Google Scholar
UN General Assembly. (2012, May). Report of the special rapporteur in the field of cultural rights, Farida Shaheed. www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/CulturalRights/Pages/benefitfromscientificprogress.aspx (accessed March 6, 2020)Google Scholar
UN General Assembly. (2015, October). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, October 21, 2015, A/RES/70/1. www.refworld.org/docid/57b6e3e44.htmlGoogle Scholar
UN Global Pulse. (2016, updated 2019). UN Global Pulse, ‘Risk, Harms and Benefits Assessment’, Level 1.www.unglobalpulse.org/policy/risk-assessment/ (accessed March 6, 2020).Google Scholar
United Nations Development Group. (2017). Data Privacy, Ethics and Protection: Guidance Note on Big Data for Achievement of the 2020 Agenda. unsdg.un.org/resources/data-privacy-ethics-and-protection-guidance-note-big-data-achievement-2030-agenda (accessed March 6, 2020).Google Scholar
Wessells, M. (2019). Do no harm: How reintegration programmes for former child soldiers can cause unintended harm. In Drumbl, M. A. & Barrett, J. C. (Eds.), Research handbook on child soldiers. New York, NY: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Wildt, H., Umanos, J., Khanzada, N. K., Saleh, M., Rahman, H., & Zakowski, S. G. (2017). War trauma, distress and coping among Afghan civilians presenting at a primary health center in Kabul. International Perspectives in Psychology: Research, Practice, Consultation, 6, 81–100.Google Scholar