Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-d8cs5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-14T10:18:33.949Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

31 - Internet Use in Schools

Promise and Problems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

By
Janet Ward Schofield
Edited by
R. Keith Sawyer
Janet Ward Schofield
Affiliation:
University of Pittsburgh
R. Keith Sawyer
Affiliation:
Washington University, St Louis
Get access

Summary

Schools in the United States are often characterized as bastions of stability, as institutions still strongly shaped by the early twentieth century, whose mission, rather ironically, is to prepare students to function effectively in the twenty-first century (Molenda, 1992). Yet, schools have changed quite dramatically in at least one way during the last twenty-five years. Specifically, in the 1980s school districts in the United States, as well as in many other developed countries, began to purchase large numbers of computers for instructional use, and in the mid-1990s they built on this trend by very rapidly connecting classrooms to the Internet. Furthermore, many school districts adopted computer technology with the specific goal of changing students' educational experiences in ways that would improve their education.

This chapter explores the introduction of the Internet into schools for instructional purposes, examining the Internet's potential to improve education and the factors that appear to impede full realization of this potential. This chapter focuses on Internet use, rather than on the use of computer technology more generally, because different kinds of computer use have somewhat different kinds of potential to change education (Levin & Bruce, 2003; Means, 1994; Salomon, 1993) and they do not face exactly the same set of impediments to the realization of their potential. For example, cognitive tutors are designed specifically to help students learn particular cognitive skills.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences , pp. 521 - 534
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, J. R., Corbett, A. T., Koedinger, K. R., & Pelletier, R. (1995). Cognitive tutors: Lessons learned. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(2), 167–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, R. E. (2003). Stellar cases of technology-supported pedagogical innovations. In Kozma, R. B. (Ed.), Technology, innovation, and educational change: A global perspective (pp. 195–215). Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE).Google Scholar
Ansell, S. E., & Park, J. (2003, May). Tracking tech trends: Student computer use grows, but teachers need training, Education Week, 22, 43–49.Google Scholar
Bacharach, S. B., Bauer, S. C., & Shedd, J. B. (1986). Education and reform. Teachers College Record, 88, 241–256.Google Scholar
Becker, H. J. (1998, April). The influence of computer and Internet use on teachers' pedagogical practices and perceptions. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Irvine, CA.Google Scholar
Becker, H. J. (1999). Internet use by teachers: Conditions of professional use and teacher-directed student use. (Report No. 1). University of California, Irvine and University of Minnesota [Online]. Retrieved March 26, 2003, from http://www.crito.uci.edu/TLC/findings/Internet-Use/startpage.htm
Becker, H. J. (2000, July). Findings from the teaching, learning, and computing survey: Is Larry Cuban right? Revision of a paper written for the School Technology Leadership Conference of the Council of Chief State School Officers, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Becker, H. J. (2001, April). How are teachers using computers in instruction? Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Irving, TX.Google Scholar
Berman, S., & Tinker, R. (2000). The world's the limit in the virtual high school. In Pea, R. D. (Intro.), Technology and learning (pp. 192–196). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Bushweller, K. (2002). Cyber schools, online teaching and testing, and other e-learning initiatives are changing how schools operate. Education Week, 21(35), 8–11.Google Scholar
Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cummins, J., & Sayers, D. (1995). Brave new schools: Challenging cultural illiteracy through global learning networks. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Environics Research Group (2001). Young Canadians in a wired world: The students' view: What are youth doing online, and what do their parents need to know? Retrieved April 7, 2003, from http://www.media-awareness.ca/eng/webaware/netsurvey/index.htm
Feldman, A., Konold, C., & Coulter, B. with Conroy, B., Hutchison, C., & Londo, N. (2000). Network science, a decade later: The Internet and classroom learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Garner, R., & Gillingham, M. G. (1996). Internet communication in six classrooms: Conversations across time, space, and culture. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Hunter, B (2002). Learning in the virtual community depends upon changes in local communities. In Renninger, K. A. and Shumar, W. (Eds.) Building virtual communities. New York: Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jonassen, D. H., & Howland, J. (2003). Learning to solve problems with technology: A constructivist perspective (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Karlan, J. W., Huberman, M., & Middlebrooks, S. H. (1997). Challenges of bringing the kids network to the classroom. In Raizen, S. & Britton, E. O. (Eds.), Bold ventures: Vol. 2. Case studies of U.S. innovations in science education (pp. 304–393). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koizumi, H., Dasai, T., Graf, K. D., Yokochi, K., & Moriya, S. (2000). Interactive distance learning between Japan and Germany. In Watson, D. M. & Downes, T. (Eds.), Communications and networking in education: Learning in a networked society (pp. 39–50). Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kozma, R. B. (2003). Summary and implications: For ICT-based educational change. In Technology, innovation, and educational change: A global perspective. A report of the second information technology in education study: Module 2. Eugene, OR: ISTE (International Society for Technology in Education).Google Scholar
Lankshear, C., Snyder, I., & Green, B. (2000). Teachers and technoliteracy: Managing literacy, technology and learning in schools. St. Leonards, NSW, Australia: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Levin, D., & Arafeh, S. (2002, August). The digital disconnect: The widening gap between internet-savvy students and their schools. Prepared for the Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved March 26, 2003, from http://www.pewinternet.org/reports/toc.asp?Report=67Google Scholar
Levin, J. A., & Bruce, B. C. (2003). Technology as media: A learner-centered perspective. In Zhao, Y. (Ed.), What should teachers know about technology: Perspectives and practices (pp. 45–51). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
Lieberman, A., & Miller, L. (1990). The social realities of teaching. In Lieberman, A. (Ed.), Schools as collaborative cultures: Creating the future now (pp. 165–193). Bristol, PA: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
Little, J. W. (1990). The persistence of privacy: Autonomy and initiative in teachers' professional relations. Teachers College Record, 91, 509–536.Google Scholar
Love, R., & McVey, M. (2000). Teachers' use of the Internet. Retrieved July 18, 2000Google Scholar
Malarney, M. (2000). Learning communities and on-line technologies: The classroom at sea experience. Ph. D. Dissertation, College of Education, University of Washington, Seattle.Google Scholar
Mambretti, C. (1999). Internet technology for schools. Jefferson, NC: McFarland.Google Scholar
Means, B. (1994). Introduction: Using technology to advance educational goals. In Means, B. (Ed.), Technology and education reform (pp. 1–21). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Molenda, M. (1992). Technology and school restructuring: Some clarifying propositions. In Ely, D. & Minor, B. (Eds.), Educational media and technology yearbook (pp. 77–90). Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.Google Scholar
National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) (2004). Internet access in U.S. public schools and classrooms: 1994–2002. Retrieved November 15, 2004, from http://nces.ed.gov/surveys/frss/publications/2004011/.
National School Boards Foundation (2002). Are we there yet?: Research and guidelines on schools' use of the Internet. Retrieved April 18, 2003, from http://www.nsbf.org/thereyet/fulltext.htm.
Neilsen, L. (1998). Coding the light: Rethinking generational authority in a rural high school telecommunications project. In Reinking, D., McKenna, M. C., Labbo, L. D., & Kieffer, R. D. (Eds.), Handbook of literacy and technology: Transformations in a post-typographic world (pp. 129–143). Mawah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
OECD (2003). Table D3.1. Introduction of basic computer applications in upper secondary education (1980–2000). Retrieved November 15, 2004, from oecd.org/dataoecd/2/14/14558779.
Orange, G., & Hobbs, D. (2000). International perspectives on tele-education and virtual learning environments. Berlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Pelgrum, W. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2001). ICT and the emerging paradigm for life-long learning: An IEA educational assessment of infrastructure, goals, and practices in twenty-six countries. Amsterdan: IEA.Google Scholar
Power to Teach (2003). The growing technology gap between schools and students: Findings from the BellSouth Foundation power to teach program. Retrieved April 9, 2003, from http://www.bellsouthfoundation.org/pdfs/pttreport03.pdf.
Roschelle, J. M., Pea, R. D., Hoadley, C. M., Gordin, D. N., & Means, B. M. (2000). Changing how and what children learn in school with computer-based technologies. The Future of Children, 10(2), 76–101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salomon, G. (1993). On the nature of pedagogic computer tools: The case of the writing partner. In Lajoie, S. P. & Derry, S. J. (Eds.), Computers as cognitive tools (pp. 179–196). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Savin-Baden, M. (2000). Problem-based learning in higher education: Untold stories. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Schofield, J. W. (in press). Realizing the Internet's educational potential. To appear in Weiss, J., Nolan, J., Hunsinger, J., & Trifonas, P. (Eds.), The international handbook of virtual learning environments. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schofield, J. W., & Davidson, A. L. (2002). Bringing the Internet to school: Lessons from an urban district. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Schofield, J. W., & Davidson, A. L. (2004). Achieving equality of student Internet access within schools. In Eagly, A. H., Baron, R. M., & Hamilton, V. L. (Eds.), The social psychology of group identity and social conflict: Theory, application, and practice (pp. 97–109). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaffer, D. W., & Resnick, M. (1999). “Thick” authenticity: New media and authentic learning. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 10(2), 195–215.Google Scholar
Songer, N. B. (1996). Exploring learning opportunities in coordinated network-enhanced classrooms: A case of kids as global scientists. The Journal of Learning Sciences, 5, 297–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Songer, N. B. (1998). Can technology bring students closer to science? In Fraser, B. J. & Tobin, K. G. (Eds.), International handbook of science education (Vol. 1, pp. 333–347). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Starkey, B. A. (1998). Using computers to connect across cultural divides. In Bromley, H. & Apple, M. W. (Eds.), Education/technology/power (pp. 175–185). Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Süss, D. (2001). Computers and the Internet in school: Closing the knowledge gap? In Livingstone, S. & Bovill, M. (Eds.), Children and their changing media environment: A European comparative study (pp. 221–241). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Thornburgh, D., & Lin, H. S. (2002). Youth, pornography, and the Internet. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Trotter, A. (2002). E-learning goes to school. Education Week, 21(35), 13–18.Google Scholar
Virtual Schools Forum Report, Virtual Schools Forum held October 21–22, 2002 in Denver, Colorado. Retrieved March 26, 2003, from http://www.centerdigitaled.com/highlightstory.phtml?docid=40235.
Zehr, M. A. (1997). Partnering with the public. Education Week, 17(11), 36–39.Google Scholar
Zhao, Y. (2003). What teachers need to know about technology? Framing the question. In Zhao, Y. (Ed.), What should teachers know about technology: Perspectives and practices (pp. 1–14). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
Zhao, Y., & Frank, K. (2003). Technology uses in schools: An ecological perspective. American Educational Research Journal, 40(4), 808–840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, Y., Pugh, K., Sheldon, S., & Byers, J. L. (2002). Conditions for classroom technology innovations. Teachers College Record, 104(3), 482–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zucker, A, Kozma, R, with Yarnall, L, Marder, C. & Associates (2003). The virtual high school: Teaching generation V. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×