from Part III - Prejudice Reduction and Analysis in Applied Contexts
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 November 2016
Operationalizing Prejudice, Stigma, Bias, and Discrimination in Health Research
Prejudice, stigma, bias, and discrimination are all expressions of oppression, “a concept that describes a relationship between groups or categories of people in which a dominant group benefits from the systematic abuse, exploitation, and injustice directed toward a subordinate group” (Johnson, 2000, p. 293). While a myriad of typologies exist concerning definitions and manifestations of prejudice, stigma, bias, and discrimination, in the public health literature, oppression is frequently conceptualized across three distinct, but interrelated, levels (Jones, 2000; Paradies, 2006):
• internalized (or intrapersonal) prejudiced attitudes or beliefs, frequently based on notions of supposedly innate superiority/inferiority, which may be subscribed to either by members of dominant social groups or by subordinate ones;
• interpersonal discriminatory interactions between people, with varying degrees of frequency and intensity, including manifestations from racially motivated assault to verbal abuse, ostracism, and exclusion; and
• systemic or structural, which includes bias in societal institutions, laws, policies, and social practices. Of note, this level may be thought of as the one that sets the context and increases or decreases the likelihood of the first two types of oppression outlined here.
In the mid-twentieth century, the psychological concept of prejudice (Allport, 1954) and the sociological phenomenon of stigma (Goffman, 1963) gave rise to two lines of inquiry, which have only recently begun to converge in relation to their use within health research (Phelan, Link, & Dovidio, 2008), with ongoing calls to better understand the relationship between these concepts (Hatzenbuehler & Link, 2014; Hatzenbuehler, Phelan, & Link, 2013; Stuber, Meyer, & Link, 2008). For example, a stigma framework has often been referenced when studying specific illnesses or morbidities, such as mental illness and HIV/AIDS, while prejudice and discrimination have been foregrounded in studies of racism and health. In addition, the concept of bias is commonly utilized within health care contexts as a way of describing unconscious forms of discrimination, often labeled implicit bias (Paradies, Truong, & Priest, 2014; Shavers et al., 2012; Van Ryn et al., 2011). Within public health, researchers have tended to define and measure discrimination as the behavioral manifestations of prejudice, stigma, and bias, thus considering discrimination a real-world manifestation of oppression with potential adverse health consequences.
To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.