Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Twin Peaks Financial Regulation
- The Cambridge Handbook of Twin Peaks Financial Regulation
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Introduction
- Part I Surveying the Terrain
- Part II The Trek towards Twin Peaks
- Part III Different Topographies
- 10 Can the Twin Peaks Model of Financial Regulation Serve as a Model for Israel?
- 11 Towards a Twin Peak Regulatory Architecture for Hong Kong?
- 12 Regulatory Structure and the Revolving Door Phenomenon in South Korea
- 13 China
- 14 Financial Regulatory Structure in China
- 15 US Financial Regulatory Structure
- 16 A ‘Twin Peaks’ Vision for Europe
- 17 A Complex European Financial Architecture
- Part IV Seismic Activity and Fault Lines
13 - China
Considering Elements of Twin Peaks to Upgrade Its Financial Regulation
from Part III - Different Topographies
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 June 2021
- The Cambridge Handbook of Twin Peaks Financial Regulation
- The Cambridge Handbook of Twin Peaks Financial Regulation
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Introduction
- Part I Surveying the Terrain
- Part II The Trek towards Twin Peaks
- Part III Different Topographies
- 10 Can the Twin Peaks Model of Financial Regulation Serve as a Model for Israel?
- 11 Towards a Twin Peak Regulatory Architecture for Hong Kong?
- 12 Regulatory Structure and the Revolving Door Phenomenon in South Korea
- 13 China
- 14 Financial Regulatory Structure in China
- 15 US Financial Regulatory Structure
- 16 A ‘Twin Peaks’ Vision for Europe
- 17 A Complex European Financial Architecture
- Part IV Seismic Activity and Fault Lines
Summary
As China’s financial system becomes more complex and integrated, interest in and discussion of potential structural reform has intensified. In particular, many commentators advocate for a move towards the Twin Peaks model, along the lines of Australia’s experience. This chapter begins with an overview of China’s financial sector and sources of risk to lay the foundation for a country-specific study. There follows a brief discussion of China’s current financial regulatory architecture and an examination of how the authorities have responded to the sources of risk laid down at the start of the chapter. The shortcomings of the regulatory responses to date have sparked a call for reform of the regulatory structure and these reform proposals are subject to scrutiny. It is concluded that Twin Peaks might serve as a model for China, which, as revealed, is not the latest reform trend announced by the Chinese government and what can be done next to address the unresolved problems after the implementation of the latest reforms.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Twin Peaks Financial Regulation , pp. 236 - 252Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021