Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:31:38.956Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

17 - The Life Sciences

from Part II - Disciplines

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

Roy Porter
Affiliation:
Wellcome Institute for the History of Medicine, University College London
Get access

Summary

For much of the eighteenth century, the biological world was seen as a very ordered place. Plants and animals yielded to Linnean classification. Physiological functioning was envisioned in mechanistic terms. And the generation of new animals and plants proceeded from preformed germs that had existed since the creation. All this order arose from God, who had created and organized the world for humans to understand and thereby to appreciate His handiwork and lead moral lives. Even the seemingly disordered, such as monsters and wonders of Nature, were generally brought under the paradigm of order.

All this was to be challenged by mid-century. Mechanistic physiology, based on the analogy of living organisms with machines, was to be considerably broadened by the introduction of Newtonian forces into physiology. The clear borders between the animal and plant kingdoms, and even between the plant and mineral worlds, were to be called into question by new experimental evidence. And the comfortable synthesis of mechanism with reproduction from preexisting germs was to encounter serious opposition from new theories of gradual development that raised the specter of materialism.

Some scholars have characterized eighteenth-century life sciences as a move from mechanism to vitalism, from a view that living phenomena could be explained by matter and motion alone to one that argued that living organisms possess some special force or principle that makes them distinct from dead matter. Yet, as Thomas Hankins has pointed out, creating such absolute dichotomies can be misleading because it ignores the “middle ground.”

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bonnet, Charles, Contemplation de la nature, in Oeuvres d’histoire naturelle et de philosophie (Neuchâtel: Samuel Fauche, 1779–83), 8.Google Scholar
Bonnet, Charles, Considérations sur les corps organisés, où l’on traite de leur origine, de leur développement, de leur réproduction, etc., 2 vols. (Amsterdam: M. M. Rey, 1762), 1.Google Scholar
Bowler, Peter J., “Bonnet and Buffon: Theories of Generation and the Problem of Species,” Journal ofthe History of Biology, 6 (1973).Google ScholarPubMed
Brown, Theodore M., “From Mechanism to Vitalism in Eighteenth-Century English Physiology,” Journal of the History of Biology, 7 (1974)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, , The Mechanical Philosophy and the “Animal Oeconomy” (New York: Arno Press, 1981).Google Scholar
Bynum, William F., “The Great Chain of Being after Forty Years: An Appraisal,” History of Science, 13 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawson, Virginia P., Nature’s Enigma: the Problem of the Polyp in the Letters of Bonnet, Trembley and Réaumur (Philadelphia, PA: American Philosophical Society, 1987)Google Scholar
[d’Holbach, Paul-Henri Thiry], Système de la nature, ou des loix du monde physique et du monde moral, par M. Mirabaud (London [Amsterdam], 1770) n. 5..Google Scholar
Diderot, Denis and d’Alembert, Jean Rond (eds.), Encyclopédie, ou dictionnaire raisonné des sciences, des arts et des métiers, 17 vols. (Paris: Birasson, David, Le Breton, Durand and Neufschâtel: S. Fauche, 1751–67).Google Scholar
Diderot, Denis, Correspondance, ed. Roth, Georges (Paris: Editions de Minuit, 1955–70), 2;Google Scholar
Diderot, Denis, Oeuvres philosophiques, ed. Vernière, Paul (Paris: Editions Garnier Frères, 1964).Google Scholar
Dobbs, Betty Jo Teeter, The Janus Faces of Genius: The Role of Alchemy in Newton’s Thought (Cambridge University Press, 1991)Google Scholar
Dobbs, Betty Jo Teeter and Jacob, Margaret C., Newton and the Culture of Newtonianism (Atlantic Heights, NJ: Humanities Press, 1995)Google Scholar
Duchesneau, François, La physiologie des lumières: empirisme, modèles et théories (The Hague: M. Nijhoff, 1982).Google Scholar
Duchesneau, François, “Vitalism in Late Eighteenth-Century Physiology: The Cases of Barthez, Blumenbach and John Hunter,” in Bynum, W. F. and Porter, Roy (eds.), William Hunter and the Eighteenth-Century Medical World (Cambridge University Press, 1985);Google Scholar
Fontenelle, Bernard, Lettres galantes, in Oeuvres, (Paris: Libraires Associés, 1766), 1.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel, The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences (New York: Random House, 1973).Google Scholar
French, R. K., Robert Whytt, the Soul, and Medicine (London: Wellcome Institute of the History of Medicine, 1969);Google Scholar
Furbank, John, Diderot: A Critical Biography (New York: Knopf, 1992).Google Scholar
Guerrini, Anita, “James Keill, George Cheyne, and Newtonian Physiology, 1690–1740,” Journal of the History of Biology, 18 (1985)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guerrini, , “Archibald Pitcairne and Newtonian Medicine,” Medical History, 31 (1987).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guerrini, , “The Tory Newtonians: Gregory, Pitcairne, and Their Circle,” Journal of British Studies, 25 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haigh, Elizabeth, “Vitalism, the Soul, and Sensibility: The Physiology of Théopile de Bordeu,” Journal of the History of Medicine, 31 (1976).Google Scholar
Haller, Albrecht, “De partibus corporis humani sensilibus et irritabilibus,” Commentarii Societatis Regiae Scientiarum Gottingensis, 2 (1752).Google Scholar
Haller, Albrecht, Réflexions sur le systême de la génération, de M. de Buffon (Geneva: Barrillot, 1751).Google Scholar
Hankins, Thomas L., Science and the Enlightenment (Cambridge University Press, 1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffheimer, Michael H., “Maupertuis and the Eighteenth-Century Critique of Preexistence,” Journal of the History of Biology, 15 (1982)Google ScholarPubMed
Jacob, François, The Logic of Life: A History of Heredity, trans. Spillmann, Betty E. (New York: Pantheon Books, 1973).Google Scholar
King, Lester S., “Stahl and Hoffmann: A Study in Eighteenth-Century Animism,” Journal of the History of Medicine, 19 (1964)Google ScholarPubMed
King, Lester S., The Philosophy of Medicine: The Early Eigh teenth Century (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, , “Medicine in 1695: Friedrich Hoffmann’s Fundamenta Medicinae,” Bulletin of the History of Medicine, 43 (1969).Google Scholar
Kors, Alan Charles, D’Holbach’s Coterie: An Enlightenment in Paris (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1976).Google Scholar
Lamarck, Jean-Baptiste L., Recherches sur l’organisation des corps vivans (Paris: Maillard, 1802).Google Scholar
Leclerc, Georges Louis, comte de Buffon, Histoire naturelle, générate et particulière, avec la description du cabinet du roy (Paris: L’Imprimerie Royale, 1749–89), 2.Google Scholar
Lovejoy, Arthur O., The Great Chain of Being (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1936).Google Scholar
Malebranche, Nicholas, Oeuvres complètes, ed. Robinet, André, 20 vols. (Paris, Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin, 1958–), 12.Google Scholar
Maupertuis, Pierre-Louis Moreau, The Earthly Venus, trans. Boas, Simone Brangier (The Sources of Science, no. 29) (New York: Johnson Reprint Corporation, 1966).Google Scholar
Mazzolini, Renato G. and Roe, Shirley A.(eds.), Science Against the Unbelievers: The Correspondence of Bonnet and Needham, 1760–1780 (Studies on Voltaire and the Eighteenth Century, 243) (Oxford: The Voltaire Foundation, 1986).Google Scholar
Mettrie, Julian Offray, Machine Man and Other Writings, trans. and ed. Thomson, Ann (Cambridge University Press, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Needham, John Turberville, “A Summary of some late Observations upon the Generation, Composition, and Decomposition of Animal and Vegetable Substances; Communicated in a Letter to Martin Folkes Esq.; President of the Royal Society,” Philosophical Transactions, 45 (1748)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinto-Correia, Clara, The Ovary of Eve: Egg and Sperm and Preformation (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roe, Shirley A., “Anatomia animata: The Newtonian Physiology of Albrecht von Haller,” in Mendelsohn, Everett (ed.), Transformation and Tradition in the Sciences (Cambridge University Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Roe, Shirley A., Matter, Life, and Generation: Eighteenth-Century Embryology and the Haller-Wolff Debate (Cambridge University Press, 1981).Google Scholar
Roe, Shirley A., “John Turberville Needham and the Generation of Living Organisms,” Isis, 74 (1983)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roe, Shirley A., “Metaphysics and Materialism: Needham’s Response to d’Holbach,” Studies on Voltaire and the Eighteenth Century, 284 (1991).Google Scholar
Roger, Jacques, “The Living World,” in Rousseau, G. S. and Porter, Roy (eds.), The Ferment of Knowledge: Studies in the Historiography of Eighteenth-Century Science (Cambridge University Press, 1980).Google Scholar
Roger, Jacques, Les sciences de la vie dans la pensée française du XVIIIe siècle: la génération des animaux de Descartes à l’Encyclopédie (Paris: Armand Colin, 1963).Google Scholar
Roger, Jacques, Buffon, trans. Bonnefoi, Sarah Lucille (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Ruestow, Edward G., The Microscope in the Dutch Republic: The Shaping of a Discovery (Cambridge University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Terrall, Mary, “Salon, Academy, and Boudoir: Generation and Desire in Maupertuis’s Science of Life,” Isis, 87 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vartanian, Aram, “Trembley’s Polyp, La Mettrie, and Eighteenth-Century French Materialism,” Journal of the History of Ideas, 11 (1950).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wellman, Kathleen, La Mettrie: Medicine, Philosophy, and Enlightenment (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Williams, Elizabeth A., The Physical and the Moral: Anthropology Physiology, and Philosophical Medicine in France, 1750–1850 (Cambridge University Press, 1994).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • The Life Sciences
  • Edited by Roy Porter, Wellcome Institute for the History of Medicine, University College London
  • Book: The Cambridge History of Science
  • Online publication: 28 March 2008
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521572439.018
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • The Life Sciences
  • Edited by Roy Porter, Wellcome Institute for the History of Medicine, University College London
  • Book: The Cambridge History of Science
  • Online publication: 28 March 2008
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521572439.018
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • The Life Sciences
  • Edited by Roy Porter, Wellcome Institute for the History of Medicine, University College London
  • Book: The Cambridge History of Science
  • Online publication: 28 March 2008
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521572439.018
Available formats
×