Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-f46jp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-15T11:00:29.919Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

F

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 January 2025

Edited by
Karolina Hübner  and
Justin Steinberg
Karolina Hübner
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Justin Steinberg
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Spinoza Lexicon , pp. 167 - 198
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Recommended Reading

Garber, D. (2008). Should Spinoza have published his philosophy? In Huenemann, C. (ed.), Interpreting Spinoza: Critical Essays (pp. 166–87). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
James, S. (2012). Spinoza on Philosophy, Religion, and Politics: The Theological-Political Treatise. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matheron, A. (1971). Le Christ et le salut des ignorants chez Spinoza. Aubier-Montaigne.Google Scholar
Nadler, S. (2011). A Book Forged in Hell: Spinoza’s Scandalous Treatise and the Birth of the Secular Age. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Steinberg, J. (2018). Spinoza’s Political Psychology: The Taming of Fortune and Fear. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Recommended Reading

Bennett, J. (1986). Spinoza on error. Philosophical Papers, 15(1), 59–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Della Rocca, M. (1996). Representation and the Mind-Body Problem in Spinoza (pp. 107–17). Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, D. (2018). Representation, misrepresentation, and error in Spinoza’s philosophy of mind. In Della Rocca, M. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Spinoza (pp. 190–203). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gueroult, M. (1974). Spinoza, vol. ii: L’Ame (Éthique, 2). Aubier-Montaigne. Especially chap. 10, 301–23.Google Scholar
LeBuffe, M. (2009). Imagination and error. In LeBuffe, , From Bondage to Freedom: Spinoza on Human Excellence (pp. 77–98). Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, D. (2007). Spinoza on having a false idea. Metaphysica, 8(1), 17–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parkinson, G. H. R. (1964). Truth and falsity in Spinoza. In Parkinson, , Spinoza’s Theory of Knowledge (pp. 112–37). Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Radner, D. (1971). Spinoza’s theory of ideas. Philosophical Review, 80(3), 338–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinberg, J. (2018). Two puzzles concerning Spinoza’s conception of belief. European Journal of Philosophy, 26(1), 261–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Recommended Reading

Barbone, S. (2017). Not just ‘an unmitigated and seemingly unmotivated disaster’: What could Spinoza mean by ‘sentimus experimurque, nos æternos esse’? International Philosophical Quarterly, 57(3), 305–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, L. (2021). Spinoza on ideas of affections. In Melamed, Y. (ed.), A Companion to Spinoza (pp. 286–95). Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Matson, W. (1990). Body essence and mind eternity in Spinoza. In Curley, E. and Moreau, P.-F. (eds.), Spinoza: Issues and Directions (pp. 82–95). Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mignini, F. (1996). Sensus/sentatio in Spinoza. In Bianchi, M. L. (ed.), Sensus, Sensatio: VIII Colloquio Internazionale (pp. 267–96). Olschki.Google Scholar
Shapiro, L. (2012). How we experience the world: Passionate perception in Descartes and Spinoza. In Pickavé, M. and Shapiro, L. (eds.), Emotion and Cognitive Life in Medieval and Early Modern Philosophy (pp. 193–216). Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Recommended Reading

Gatens, M. (2009). Spinoza’s disturbing thesis: Power, norms and fiction in the Tractatus Theologico-Politicus. History of Political Thought, 30(3), 454–68.Google Scholar
Hughes, J. (2020). The greatest deception: Fiction, falsity, and manifestation in Spinoza’s metaphysical thoughts. Intellectual History Review, 30(3), 363–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, S. (2019). Responding emotionally to fiction: A Spinozist approach. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement, 85, 195–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenthal, M. A. (2019). Spinoza on beings of reason [entia rationis] and the analogical imagination. In Stetter, J. & Ramond, C. (eds.), Spinoza in Twenty-First-Century American and French Philosophy: Metaphysics, Philosophy of Mind, Moral and Political Philosophy (pp. 231–50). Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Steinberg, J. (2018). Two puzzles concerning Spinoza’s conception of belief. European Journal of Philosophy, 26(1), 261–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Recommended Reading

Bennett, J. (1984). A Study of Spinoza’s Ethics. Hackett.Google Scholar
Carriero, J. (1991). Spinoza’s views on necessity in historical perspective. Philosophical Topics, 19(1), 47–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, D. (1991). Spinoza’s necessitarianism. In Yovel, Y. (ed.), God and Nature: Spinoza’s Metaphysics (pp. 191–218). Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renz, U. (2018). The Explainability of Experience: Realism and Subjectivity in Spinoza’s Theory of the Human Mind. Oxford University Press. Chapter 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schnepf, R. (2011). The one substance and finite things (1p16–28). In Hampe, M., Renz, U., and Schnepf, R., Spinoza’s Ethics: A Collective Commentary (pp. 37–56). Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, M. (1999). Infinite understanding, scientia intuitiva, and Ethics 1.16. In Wilson, , Ideas and Mechanism: Essays on Early Modern Philosophy (pp. 166–77). Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Recommended Reading

Garrett, D. (1994). Spinoza’s theory of metaphysical individuation. In Barber, K. & Gracia, J. (eds.), Individuation and Identity in Early Modern Philosophy (pp. 73–101). State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Manning, R. (2006). Spinoza’s physical theory. In E. N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/spinoza-physicsGoogle Scholar

Recommended Reading

James, S. (2020). Spinoza on Learning to Live Together. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kisner, M. (2011). Spinoza on Human Freedom. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadler, S. (2020). Think Least of Death: Spinoza on How to Live and How to Die. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sharp, H. (2019). Generosity as freedom in Spinoza’s Ethics. In Ramond, C. and Stetter, J. (eds.), Spinoza in Twenty-First-Century American and French Philosophy: Metaphysics, Philosophy of Mind, Moral and Political Philosophy (pp. 277–88). Bloomsbury.Google Scholar

Recommended Reading

Del Lucchese, F. (2009). Conflict, Power and Multitude in Machiavelli and Spinoza: Tumult and Indignation, trans. Z. Hanafi. Continuum.Google Scholar
Moreau, P.‐F. (1994). Spinoza: L’expérience et l’éternité. Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Morfino, V. (2018). The Spinoza–Machiavelli Encounter: Time and Occasion, trans. Mesing, D.. Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pitkin, H. (1984). Fortune is a Woman: Gender and Politics in the Thought of Niccolò Machiavelli. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Reichert, K. (1985). Fortuna oder die Beständigkeit des Wechsels. Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Steinberg, J. (2018). Spinoza’s Political Psychology: The Taming of Fortune and Fear. Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Recommended Reading

Carriero, J. (2005). Spinoza on final causality. Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy, 2, 105–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Della Rocca, M. (2019). Steps toward Eleaticism in Spinoza’s philosophy of action. In Naaman-Zauderer, N. (ed.), Freedom, Action, and Motivation in Spinoza’s “Ethics” (pp. 13–30). Routledge.Google Scholar
Koistinen, O. (2009). Spinoza on action. In Koistinen, O. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza’s Ethics (pp. 122–38). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadler, S. (2014). On Spinoza’s “free man.” Journal of the American Philosophical Association, 1, 103–20.Google Scholar
Soyarslan, S. (2019). Two ethical ideals in Spinoza’s ethics: The free man and the wise man. Journal of the American Philosophical Association, 5, 357–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Recommended Reading

Armstrong, A., Green, K., and Sangiacomo, A. (eds.). (2019). Spinoza and Relational Autonomy: Being with Others. Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, S. (2020). Freedom, slavery, and the passions. In James, , Spinoza on Learning to Live Together. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kisner, M. J. (2012). Spinoza’s liberalism. Philosophy Compass, 7(11), 782–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lærke, M. (2021). Spinoza and the Freedom of Philosophizing. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prokhovnik, R. (2004). Spinoza and Republicanism. Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenthal, M. A. (2021). Spinoza’s ‘republican idea of freedom.’ In Melamed, Y. (ed.), A Companion to Spinoza (pp. 402–09). Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Steinberg, J. (2009). Spinoza on civil liberation. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 47(1), 35–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Recommended Reading

James, S. (2021). Spinoza on Learning to Live Together. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kisner, M. J. (2011). Spinoza on Human Freedom: Reason, Autonomy and the Good Life. Cambridge University Press. Especially Chapter 7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LeBuffe, M. (2010). From Bondage to Freedom: Spinoza on Human Excellence. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lucash, F. (2012). Spinoza on friendship. Philosophia, 40, 305–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadler, S. (2014). The lives of others: Spinoza on benevolence as a rational virtue. In Kisner, M. J. and Youpa, A. (eds.), Essays on Spinoza’s Ethical Theory (pp. 41–56). Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadler, S. (2021). Spinoza on friendship. Historia philosophica, 19, 87–97.Google Scholar
Steinberg, D. (1984). Spinoza’s ethical doctrine and the unity of human nature. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 22, 303–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Youpa, A. (2020). The Ethics of Joy: Spinoza on the Empowered Life. Oxford University Press. Especially Chapter 10.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • F
  • Edited by Karolina Hübner, Cornell University, New York, Justin Steinberg, Cornell University, New York
  • Book: The Cambridge Spinoza Lexicon
  • Online publication: 09 January 2025
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • F
  • Edited by Karolina Hübner, Cornell University, New York, Justin Steinberg, Cornell University, New York
  • Book: The Cambridge Spinoza Lexicon
  • Online publication: 09 January 2025
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • F
  • Edited by Karolina Hübner, Cornell University, New York, Justin Steinberg, Cornell University, New York
  • Book: The Cambridge Spinoza Lexicon
  • Online publication: 09 January 2025
Available formats
×