Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-mzp66 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-15T10:59:15.517Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

124. - Mind–Body Identity

from M

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 January 2025

Karolina Hübner
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Justin Steinberg
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Get access

Summary

According to Spinoza, the mind and the body are “one and the same thing but expressed in two ways” (E2p7s). A natural interpretation of this doctrine is that the mind and body are numerically identical: there is a single mode of God that is expressed both under the attribute of Thought as mind and under the attribute of Extension as body. This is an important doctrine for Spinoza.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Recommended Reading

Curley, E. (1988). Behind the Geometrical Method: A Reading of Spinoza’s Ethics. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Della Rocca, M. (1996). Representation and the Mind-Body Problem in Spinoza. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, D. (2017). The indiscernibility of identicals and the transitivity of identity in Spinoza’s logic of the attributes. In Melamed, Y. (ed.), Spinoza’s Ethics: A Critical Guide (pp. 1242). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gueroult, M. (1974). Spinoza. 2 vols. Aubier-Montaigne.Google Scholar
Hübner, K. (2022). Representation and mind-body identity in Spinoza’s philosophy. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 60(1), 4777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koistinen, O. (1996). Causality, intensionality and identity: Mind body interaction in Spinoza. Ratio, 9(1), 2338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, M. (2019). Being and Reason: An Essay on Spinoza’s Metaphysics. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loeb, L. E. (1981). From Descartes to Hume: Continental Metaphysics and the Development of Modern Philosophy. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Marshall, C. R. (2009). The mind and the body as ‘one and the same thing’ in Spinoza. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 17(5), 897919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrison, J. (2017). Two puzzles about thought and identity in Spinoza. In Melamed, Y. (ed.), Spinoza’s Ethics: A Critical Guide. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×