Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-d8cs5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-15T11:04:22.444Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

S

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 January 2025

Edited by
Karolina Hübner  and
Justin Steinberg
Karolina Hübner
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Justin Steinberg
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Spinoza Lexicon , pp. 473 - 520
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Recommended Reading

Domínguez, A. (1980). La morale de Spinoza et le salut par la foi. Revue philosophique de Louvain, 78, 345–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, E. E. (1973). Salvation from Despair: A Reappraisal of Spinoza’s Philosophy. Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacroix, J. (1970). Spinoza et le problème du salut. PUF.Google Scholar
Matheron, A. (1971). Le Christ et le salut des ignorants. Aubier-Montaigne.Google Scholar

Recommended Reading

Coppens, G. (ed.). (2003). Spinoza en de scholastiek. Acco.Google Scholar
Costa, E. (2021). Spinoza and Scholastic philosophy. In Melamed, Y. (ed.), A Companion to Spinoza (pp. 47–55). Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freudenthal, J. (1887). Spinoza und die Scholastik. In Zeller, E. (ed.), Philosophische Aufsätze: Eduard Zeller zum 50 jährigen Doctor-Jubiläum gewidmet (pp. 86–138). Fues.Google Scholar
Manzini, F. (ed.). (2011). Spinoza et ses scolastiques: Retour aux sources et nouveaux enjeux. Presses de l’Université Paris-Sorbonne.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadler, S. (ed.). (2014). Spinoza and Medieval Jewish Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renz, U., and Schnepf, R. (eds.). (2008). Studia Spinozana, 16: Spinoza and Late Scholasticism.Google Scholar
Sangiacomo, A. (2016). Aristotle, Heereboord and the polemical target of Spinoza’s critique of final causes. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 54(3), 395–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Recommended Reading

Barua, A. (ed.). (2017). Schopenhauer on Self, World and Morality: Vedantic and Non-Vedantic Perspectives. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berman, D. (1982). Spinoza’s spiders, Schopenhauer’s dogs. Philosophical Studies, 29, 202–09.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brann, H. W. (1972). Schopenhauer and Spinoza. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 10, 181–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segev, M. (2021). Schopenhauer’s critique of Spinoza’s pantheism, optimism, and egoism. In Melamed, Y. (ed.), A Companion to Spinoza (pp. 557–67). Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Viljanen, V. (2009). Schopenhauer’s twofold dynamism. In Pietarinen, J. and Viljanen, V. (eds.), The World as Active Power: Studies in the History of European Reason (pp. 305–30). Brill.Google Scholar

Recommended Reading

Steenbakkers, P. (1994). Spinoza’s Ethica, from Manuscript to Print. Van Gorcum.Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. W. (1926–). Sämtlichte Schriften und Briefe. Akademie Verlag. Series iii, vol. 2.Google Scholar

Recommended Reading

Toto, F. (2022). Superbia, existimatio, and despectus: An aspect of Spinoza’s theory of esteem. Intellectual History Review, 32(1), 113–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Recommended Reading

Curley, E. M. (1977). Notes on the immortality of the soul in Spinoza’s Short Treatise. Giornale critico della filosofia italiana, 56, 327–36.Google Scholar
Melamed, Y. (ed). (2015). The Young Spinoza: A Metaphysician in the Making. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mignini, F. (1986a). Introduzione. In Spinoza, Korte Verhandeling, van God, de Mensch, en deszelvs Welstand / Breve Trattato su Dio, l’Uomo, e il suo Bene (pp. 11–118). Japadre.Google Scholar
Mignini, F. (1986b). Spinoza’s theory on the active and passive nature of the intellect, trans. Barbara Rae. Studia Spinozana, 2, 27–58.Google Scholar
Scribano, E. (2012). La connaissance du bien et du mal: Du court traité à l’Éthique. In Jaquet, C. and Moreau, P.-F. (eds.), Spinoza transalpin: Les interprétations actuelles en Italie (pp. 59–78). Publications de la Sorbonne.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Recommended Reading

Homan, M. (2021). Spinoza’s Epistemology through a Geometrical Lens. Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, J. (2002). “By eternity I understand”: Eternity according to Spinoza. Iyyun: The Jerusalem Philosophical Quarterly, 51, 295–324.Google Scholar
Wilson, M. (1996). Spinoza’s theory of knowledge. In Garrett, D. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza (pp. 89–141). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Recommended Reading

Steenbakkers, P. (2011). Sive. In van Bunge, W., et al. (eds), The Continuum Companion to Spinoza (pp. 312–13). Bloomsbury.Google Scholar

Recommended Reading

Bolton, M. (1985). Spinoza on Cartesian doubt. Noûs, 19, 379–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Della Rocca, M. (2007). Spinoza and the metaphysics of scepticism. Mind, 116, 851–74.Google Scholar
Della Rocca, M. (2019). The elusiveness of the one and the many in Spinoza: Substance, attribute, and mode. In Stetter, J. and Ramond, C. (eds.), Spinoza in Twenty-first-Century American and French Philosophy (pp. 59–86). Bloomsbury.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perler, D. (2018). Spinoza on skepticism. In Della Rocca, M. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Spinoza (pp. 220–39). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Popkin, R. (2003). The History of Scepticism from Savonarola to Bayle. Oxford University Press. Chapter 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Primus, K. (2021). Reflective knowledge. In Melamed, Y. (ed.), A Companion to Spinoza (pp. 265–75). Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Renz, U. (2022). Spinoza’s epistemology. In Garrett, D. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza, 2nd edn (pp. 141–86). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Recommended Reading

Balibar, E. (1998). Spinoza and Politics. Verso.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (2004). “Society Must Be Defended”: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1975–1976. Penguin.Google Scholar
Goldenbaum, U. (2011). Sovereignty and obedience 1550–1750. In Clarke, D. M. and Wilson, C. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy in Early Modern Europe (pp. 500–21). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
James, S. (2012). Spinoza on Philosophy, Religion, and Politics: The Theologico-Political Treatise. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McShea, R. (1968). The Political Philosophy of Spinoza. Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Negri, A. (1991). The Savage Anomaly: The Power of Spinoza’s Metaphysics and Politics, trans. M. Hardt. University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Prokhovnik, R. (2004). Spinoza and Republicanism. Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Recommended Reading

Barbone, S. (2002). What counts as an individual for Spinoza? In Koistinen, O. and Biro, J. (eds.), Spinoza: Metaphysical Themes (pp. 89–112). Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Den Uyl, D. J. (1983). Power, State and Freedom: An interpretation of Spinoza’s Political Philosophy. Van Gorcum.Google Scholar
Matheron, A. (1969). Individu et communauté chez Spinoza. Éditions de Minuit.Google Scholar
Matheron, A. (2020). Politics, Ontology and Knowledge in Spinoza, ed. Del Lucchese, F., Maruzzella, D., and Morejon, G., trans. Maruzzella, D. and Morejon, G.. Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renz, U. (2018). The Explainability of Experience: Realism and Subjectivity in Spinoza’s Theory of the Human Mind. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinberg, J. (2018). Spinoza’s Political Psychology: The Taming of Fortune and Fear. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Recommended Reading

Balibar, E. (2008). Spinoza and Politics, trans. Snowdon, P.. Verso.Google Scholar
Curley, E. (1991). The state of nature and its law in Hobbes and Spinoza. Philosophical Topics, 19(1), 97–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, S. (2012). Spinoza on Philosophy, Religion, and Politics: The Theological-Political Treatise. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinberg, J. (2018). Spinoza’s Political Psychology: The Taming of Fortune and Fear. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verbeek, T. (2007). Spinoza on natural rights. Intellectual History Review, 17(3), 257–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Recommended Reading

Andrault, R. (2019). Spinoza’s missing physiology. Perspectives on Science, 27(2), 214–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cristofolini, P. (2008). La lettera di Stensen: Un falso d’autore. Historia philosophica, 6, 141–44.Google Scholar
Jorink, E. (2018). Modus politicus vivendi: Nicolaus Steno and the Dutch (Swammerdam, Spinoza and Other Friends), 1660–1664. In Andrault, R. and Lærke, M. (eds.), Steno and the Philosophers (pp. 13–44). Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spruit, L., and Totaro, P. (eds). (2011). The Vatican Manuscript of Spinoza’s Ethica. Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Totaro, P. (2018). Steno in Italy: From Florence to Rome. In Andrault, R. and Lærke, M. (eds.), Steno and the Philosophers (pp. 270–87). Brill.Google Scholar

Recommended Reading

Dilthey, W. (1977). Gesammelte Schriften, 10th edn. Teubner.Google Scholar
James, S. (1993). Spinoza the Stoic. In Sorrell, T. (ed.), The Rise of Modern Philosophy (pp. 121–41). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kenny, A. (2006). A New History of Western Philosophy, vol. iii. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (2003). Stoicism in the philosophical tradition: Spinoza, Lipsius, Butler. In Miller, J. and Inwood, B. (eds.), Hellenistic and Early Modern Philosophy (pp. 230–54). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, J. (2015). Spinoza and the Stoics. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutherford, D. (1999). Salvation as a state of mind: The place of acquiescentia in Spinoza’s Ethics. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 7(2), 221–44.Google Scholar

Recommended Reading

Carriero, J. (2005). Spinoza on final causality. Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy, 2, 105–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Della Rocca, M. (2022). Spinoza’s metaphysical psychology. In Garrett, D. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza, 2nd edn (pp. 234–81). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Garrett, D. (2002). Spinoza’s conatus argument. In Koistinen, O. and Biro, J. (eds.), Spinoza: Metaphysical Themes (pp. 127–58). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hübner, K. (2018). Spinoza’s unorthodox metaphysics of the will. In Della Rocca, M., The Oxford Handbook of Spinoza (pp. 343–68). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Viljanen, V. (2011). Spinoza’s Geometry of Power. Cambridge University Press. Chapters 4–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viljanen, V. (2015). Spinoza’s essentialism in the Short Treatise. In Melamed, Y. (ed.), The Young Spinoza: A Metaphysician in the Making (pp. 183–95). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Recommended Reading

Carriero, J. (1994). On the theological roots of Spinoza’s argument for monism. Faith and Philosophy, 11, 626–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carriero, J. (1995). On the relationship between mode and substance in Spinoza’s metaphysics. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 33, 245–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carriero, J. (2002). Monism in Spinoza. In Koistinen, O. and Biro, J. (eds.), Spinoza: Metaphysical Themes (pp. 38–59). Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curley, E. (1969). Spinoza’s Metaphysics: An Essay in Interpretation. Harvard University Press. Chapter 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donagan, A. (1980). Spinoza’s dualism. In Kennington, R. (ed.), The Philosophy of Baruch Spinoza (pp. 89–102). Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar

Recommended Reading

Barbone, S., and Rice, L. C. (1994). Spinoza and the problem of suicide. International Philosophical Quarterly, 34(2), 229–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buyse, F. (2016). Spinoza on conatus, inertia, and the impossibility of self-destruction. Society and Politics, 10(2), 115–34. https://philarchive.org/archive/BUYSOCGoogle Scholar
Delassus, E. (2012). Le suicide de Spinoza: Un problème éthique et philosophique. Interrogations?, 15. www.revue-interrogations.org/Le-suicide-de-Spinoza-un-problemeGoogle Scholar
Grey, J. (2017). Reply to Nadler: Spinoza and the metaphysics of suicide. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 25(2), 380–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ivic, S. (2007). Spinoza and Kant on suicide. Res Cogitans, 1(4), 132–44.Google Scholar
Matson, W. (1977). Death and destruction in Spinoza’s Ethics. Inquiry, 20, 403–17.Google Scholar
Nadler, S. (2016). Spinoza on lying and suicide. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 24(2), 257–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Recommended Reading

Cameron, E. (2010). Enchanted Europe: Superstition, Reason and Religion, 1250–1750. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di Poppa, F. (2017). Diagnosing superstition: Superstition and piety in Spinoza’s political philosophy. In Adams, M. P. et al. (eds.), Eppur si muove: Doing History and Philosophy of Science with Peter Machamer (pp. 69–82). Springer.Google Scholar
Garber, D. (2019). Anthropomorphism, teleology, and superstition: The politics of obedience in Spinoza’s Tractatus Theologico-Politicus. In Ramond, C. and Stetter, J. (eds.), Spinoza in Twenty-First-Century American and French Philosophy (pp. 297–310). Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
James, S. (2012). Spinoza on Philosophy, Religion, and Politics: The Theologico-Political Treatise. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matheron, A. (1988). Individu et communauté chez Spinoza (pp. 135–43). New edn. Éditions de Minuit.Google Scholar
Strauss, L. (1982). Spinoza’s Critique of Religion. Schocken. Chapter 9, §E.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • S
  • Edited by Karolina Hübner, Cornell University, New York, Justin Steinberg, Cornell University, New York
  • Book: The Cambridge Spinoza Lexicon
  • Online publication: 09 January 2025
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • S
  • Edited by Karolina Hübner, Cornell University, New York, Justin Steinberg, Cornell University, New York
  • Book: The Cambridge Spinoza Lexicon
  • Online publication: 09 January 2025
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • S
  • Edited by Karolina Hübner, Cornell University, New York, Justin Steinberg, Cornell University, New York
  • Book: The Cambridge Spinoza Lexicon
  • Online publication: 09 January 2025
Available formats
×