Book contents
- China and International Dispute Resolution in the Context of the ‘Belt and Road Initiative’
- China and International Dispute Resolution in the Context of the ‘Belt and Road Initiative’
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Part I China, BRI and International Dispute Resolution
- Part II China, BRI and International Trade Dispute Resolution
- 3 Trade and Investment Adjudication Involving ‘Silk Road Projects’
- 4 Why Don’t We Have a WITO? G20, TPP and WTO
- Part III China, BRI and Investment Dispute Resolution
- Part IV China, BRI and Resolution of Maritime Disputes
- Index
3 - Trade and Investment Adjudication Involving ‘Silk Road Projects’
Legal Methodology Challenges
from Part II - China, BRI and International Trade Dispute Resolution
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 March 2021
- China and International Dispute Resolution in the Context of the ‘Belt and Road Initiative’
- China and International Dispute Resolution in the Context of the ‘Belt and Road Initiative’
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Part I China, BRI and International Dispute Resolution
- Part II China, BRI and International Trade Dispute Resolution
- 3 Trade and Investment Adjudication Involving ‘Silk Road Projects’
- 4 Why Don’t We Have a WITO? G20, TPP and WTO
- Part III China, BRI and Investment Dispute Resolution
- Part IV China, BRI and Resolution of Maritime Disputes
- Index
Summary
It discusses legal methodology problems of multilevel trade and investment regulation and explores related problems of adjudication involving investment projects in the context of BRI involving more than sixty-five countries. The very limited number of investor–state arbitration proceedings initiated so far by foreign companies against China – or by Chinese companies against foreign host states – suggests that alternative dispute resolution may become one of the important ‘legal innovations’ of BRI. Yet also involvement of third parties as ‘mediators’ or ‘conciliators’ in dispute settlement proceedings raises questions of ‘justice’ and of legal methodology that are easier to resolve by embedding BRI regulations into multilateral trade, investment and UN law.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- China and International Dispute Resolution in the Context of the ‘Belt and Road Initiative’ , pp. 51 - 77Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021