Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T11:47:08.763Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Scaling Ethnography Up

from Part II - Regional Comparisons

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 May 2020

Michael Schnegg
Affiliation:
Universität Hamburg
Edward D. Lowe
Affiliation:
Soka University of America
Get access

Summary

While ethnography produces highly contextualized understandings of fields of practice, it is hard to assess whether the phenomena revealed through ethnographic study are typical on a regional level. To overcome this shortcoming, I introduce a research design, ethnographic upscaling, that combines in-depth ethnography with larger-N regional comparisons. While the in-depth ethnography provides valid hypotheses, comparison allows the testing of whether an observed phenomenon can be generalized. To illustrate ethnographic upscaling, I present research on the social engineering of water governance in Namibia. In the course of political “decentralization,” and inspired by community-based natural resource management policies, pastoralists have developed new rules stipulating how to share water and distribute the costs of providing it. While all communities were exposed to similar blueprints, local social practices concerning water governance differ. I show that these variations can be explained if we combine an ethnographic understanding of the dynamics within communities with an understanding of both networks that impinge on the individual cases and influences of external authorities.

Type
Chapter
Information
Comparing Cultures
Innovations in Comparative Ethnography
, pp. 133 - 152
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abu-Lughod, Lila. 1991. “Writing against Culture.” In Recapturing Anthropology, edited by Fox, Richard G., 137–62. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press.Google Scholar
Abu-Lughod, Lila. 1993. Writing Women’s Worlds. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Boas, Franz. 1887. “The Occurrence of Similar Inventions in Areas Widely Apart.” Science 9 (224): 485–86.Google Scholar
Bollig, Michael. 2000. “Production and Exchange among the Himba of Northwestern Namibia.” In People, Cattle and Land-Transformations of a Pastoral Society in Southwestern Africa, edited by Bollig, Michael and Gewald, Jan-Bart, 271–98. Köln: Rüdiger Köppe Verlag.Google Scholar
Buettner-Janusch, John. 1957. “Boas and Mason: Particularism versus Generalization.” American Anthropologist 59 (2): 318–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cleaver, Frances. 2002. “Reinventing Institutions: Bricolage and the Social Embeddedness of Natural Resource Management.” The European Journal of Development Research 14 (2): 11–30.Google Scholar
Cleaver, Frances. 2012. Development through Bricolage? Institutions and Natural Resource Management. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
Cleaver, Frances, and de Koning, Jessica. 2015. “Furthering Critical Institutionalism.” International Journal of the Commons 9 (1): 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dall, Wiliam H., and Boas, Franz. 1887. “Museums of Ethnology and Their Classification.” Science 9 (228): 587–89.Google Scholar
Dow, Malcolm M., Burton, Michael L., White, Douglas R., and Reitz, Karl P.. 1984. “Galton’s Problem as Network Autocorrelation.” American Ethnologist 11 (4): 754–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jahn, Detlef. 2006. “Globalization as ‘Galton’s Problem’: The Missing Link in the Analysis of Diffusion Patterns in Welfare State Development.” International Organization 60 (2): 401–31.Google Scholar
Linke, Theresa. 2017. Kooperation unter Unsicherheit: Institutionelle Reformen und kommunale Wassernutzung im Nordwesten Namibias. Bielefeld: transcript Verlag.Google Scholar
Mason, Otis T. 1886. “Resemblances in Arts Widely Separated.” The American Naturalist 20 (3): 246–51.Google Scholar
Mason, Otis T. 1887. “The Occurrence of Similar Inventions in Areas Widely Apart.” Science 9 (226): 534–35.Google Scholar
Menestrey Schwieger, Diego A. 2015. “An Ethnographic Analysis of the Role of Power in Institutional Arrangements: Borehole Cost Recovery within a Pastoral Community in North-Western Namibia.” Environmental Policy and Governance 25 (4): 258–69.Google Scholar
Menestrey Schwieger, Diego A. 2017. The Pump Keeps on Running. Münster: LIT Verlag.Google Scholar
Moore, Sally Falk. 2000. Law as Process: An Anthropological Approach. Oxford: James Currey.Google Scholar
Naroll, Raoul. 1961. “Two Solutions to Galton’s Problem.” Philosophy of Science 28 (1): 15–39.Google Scholar
Powell, John W., and Boas, Franz. 1887. “Museums of Ethnology and Their Classification.” Science 9 (229): 612–14.Google Scholar
Rogers, Everett M. 2003. Diffusion of Innovations. London: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Schnegg, Michael. 2014. “Anthropology and Comparison: Methodological Challenges and Tentative Solutions.” Zeitschrift für Ethnologie 139 (1): 55–72.Google Scholar
Schnegg, Michael. 2015. “Reciprocity on Demand: Sharing and Exchanging Food in Northwestern Namibia.” Human Nature 26 (3): 313–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schnegg, Michael. 2016. “Lost in Translation: State Policies and Micro-politics of Water Governance in Namibia.” Human Ecology 44 (2): 245–55.Google Scholar
Schnegg, Michael. 2018. “Institutional Multiplexity: Social Networks and Community-Based Natural Resource Management.” Sustainability Science 13 (4): 1017–30.Google Scholar
Schnegg, Michael. 2019. “The Life of Winds: Knowing the Namibian Weather from Someplace and from No Place.” American Anthropologist. doi: 10.1111/aman.13274.Google Scholar
Schnegg, Michael, and Bollig, Michael. 2016. “Institutions Put to the Test: Community-Based Water Management in Namibia during a Drought.” Journal of Arid Environments 124: 62–71.Google Scholar
Schnegg, Michael, Bollig, Michael, and Linke, Theresa. 2016. “Moral Equality and Success of Common-Pool Water Governance in Namibia.” Ambio 45 (5): 581–90.Google Scholar
Schnegg, Michael, and Linke, Theresa. 2015. “Living Institutions: Sharing and Sanctioning Water among Pastoralists in Namibia.” World Development 68: 205–14.Google Scholar
Tylor, Edward B. 1889. “On a Method of Investigating the Development of Institutions; Applied to Laws of Marriage and Descent.” The Journal of the Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland 18: 245–72.Google Scholar
Valente, Thomas. 2005. “Network Models and Methods for Studying the Diffusion of Innovation.” In Models and Methods in Social Network Analysis, edited by Carrington, Peter J., Scott, John, and Wasserman, Stanley, 98–116. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×