Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-cphqk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-13T05:19:18.221Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - Political Communication Effects: The Impact of Mass Media and Personal Conversations on Voting

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 November 2009

By
Rüdiger Schmitt-Beck
Edited by
Frank Esser  and
Barbara Pfetsch
Rüdiger Schmitt-Beck
Affiliation:
Professor of Politics and Political Communication, University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany
Frank Esser
Affiliation:
University of Missouri, Columbia
Barbara Pfetsch
Affiliation:
Freie Universität Berlin
Get access

Summary

In recent years there has been a revived interest in the question of whether the media can not only inform, but also persuade their audiences. Opinions, attitudes, and even behavior are no longer believed to be totally immune from media influences (Page et al. 1987; Ansolabehere et al. 1993; Bartels 1993; Kepplinger et al. 1994; Joslyn and Ceccoli 1996; Zaller 1996; Dalton et al. 1998; Kinder 1998; Schmitt-Beck 2000; Denemark 2002; Farrell and Schmitt-Beck 2002). This chapter will discuss this theme in comparative perspective, with a particular focus on voting decisions. Two different angles of comparison will be applied. One concerns differences and similarities between various countries and societies. As Blumler and Gurevitch note, inspecting political communication in more than one systemic context can serve as an “essential antidote” against ethnocentrism and premature generalizations (Gurevitch and Blumler 1990, 308–9). The empirical basis for analytical statements is extended, and above all it becomes clear to what extent observed relationships are tied to specific settings and contexts (Dogan and Pelassy 1984, 5–19; Kohn 1989, 21–2).

Another dimension of comparison concerns different modes of political communication. Voters not only participate in processes of mass communication, thus opening up avenues for media influence; to varying degrees, they also talk to other people and discuss political matters. The messages they receive during such conversations may also influence their attitudes and behavioral intentions (Huckfeldt and Sprague 1995).

Type
Chapter
Information
Comparing Political Communication
Theories, Cases, and Challenges
 , pp. 293 - 322
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Altheide, David L., and Robert P. Snow. 1988. Toward a Theory of Mediation. In James E. Anderson, ed. Communication Yearbook 11. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, pp. 194–223
Andreß, Hans-Jürgen, Jacques A. Hagenaars, and Steffen Kühnel. 1997. Analyse von Tabellen und kategorialen Daten. Log-lineare Modelle, latente Klassenanalyse, logistische Regression und GSK-Ansatz. Berlin: Springer
Ansolabehere, Stephen, Roy Behr, and Shanto Iyengar. 1993. The Media Game. American Politics in the Television Age. New York: Macmillan
Bartels, Larry M. 1993. Messages Received: The Political Impact of Media Exposure. American Political Science Review 87: 267–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burt, Ronald S. 1984. Network Items and the General Social Survey. Social Networks 6: 293–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaffee, Steven H. 1972. The Interpersonal Context of Mass Communication. In Gerald F. Kline and Phillip J. Tichenor, eds. Current Perspectives in Mass Communication Research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, pp. 95–120
Chaffee, Steven H., and Diana C. Mutz. 1988. Comparing Mediated and Interpersonal Communication Data. In Robert P. Hawkins, John M. Wiemann, and Suzanne Pingree, eds. Advancing Communication Science: Merging Mass and Interpersonal Processes. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, pp. 19–43
Conover, Pamela Johnston. 1984. The Influence of Group Identifications on Political Perceptions and Evaluation. Journal of Politics 46: 760–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Converse, Philip E. 1966. Information Flow and the Stability of Partisan Attitudes. In Angus Campbell, Philip E. Converse, Warren E. Miller, and Donald E. Stokes, eds. Elections and the Political Order. New York: Wiley, pp. 136–57
Curtice, John. 1997. Is the Sun Shining on Tony Blair? The Electoral Influence of British Newspapers. Press/Politics 2: 9–26Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1957. The Concept of Power. Behavioral Science 2: 201–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalton, Russell J., Paul, Allen Beck, and Robert, Huckfeldt. 1998. Partisan Cues and the Media: Information Flows in the 1992 Presidential Election. American Political Science Review 92: 111–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalton, Russell J., and Martin P. Wattenberg, eds. 2000. Parties Without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Denemark, David. 2002. Television Effects and Voter Decision Making in Australia: A Re-Examination of the Converse Model. British Journal of Political Science 32: 663–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dogan, Mattei, and Dominique Pelassy. 1984. How to Compare Nations. Strategies in Comparative Politics. Chatham, UK: Chatham House
Erikson, Robert S., Thomas, D. Lancaster, and David, W. Romero. 1989. Group Components of the Presidential Vote, 1952–1984. Journal of Politics 51: 337–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrell, David M., and Rüdiger Schmitt-Beck, eds. 2002. Do Political Campaigns Matter? Campaign Effects in Elections and Referendums. London: Routledge
Gunther, Richard, and Anthony Mughan, eds. 2000. Democracy and the Media: A Comparative Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press
Gurevitch, Michael, and Jay G. Blumler. 1990. Comparative Research: The Extending Frontier. In David L. Swanson and Dan Nimmo, eds. New Directions in Political Communication. A Resource Book. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, pp. 305–25
Hofstetter, C. Richard. 1976. Bias in the News. Network Television Coverage of the 1972 Election Campaign. Columbus: Ohio State University Press
Huckfeldt, Robert, and John Sprague. 1995. Citizens, Politics, and Social Communication. Information and Influence in an Election Campaign. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Inglehart, Ronald. 1990. Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society. Princeton: Princeton University Press
Joslyn, Mark R., and Steve, Ceccoli. 1996. Attentiveness to Television News and Opinion Change in the Fall 1992 Presidential Campaign. Political Behavior 18: 141–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, Elihu, and Paul F. Lazarsfeld. 1955. Personal Influence. The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communication. Glencoe, IL: Free Press
Kepplinger, Hans M., Hans B. Brosius, and Stefan Dahlem. 1994. Wie das Fernsehen Wahlen beeinflußt. Theoretische Modelle und empirische Analysen. Munich: R. Fischer
Kinder, Donald R. 1998. Communication and Opinion. Annual Review of Political Science 1: 167–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klapper, Joseph T. 1960. The Effects of Mass Communication. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press
Kleinnijenhuis, Jan. 1991. Newspaper Complexity and the Knowledge Gap. European Journal of Communication 6: 499–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knoke, David. 1990. Political Networks. The Structural Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Kohn, Melvin L. 1989. Introduction. In Melvin L. Kohn, ed. Cross-National Research in Sociology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, pp. 17–31
Lazarsfeld, Paul F., Bernard Berelson, and Hazel Gaudet. 1944. The People's Choice. How the Voter Makes Up his Mind in a Presidential Campaign. 3rd ed. New York: Columbia University Press
Lenart, Silvo. 1994. Shaping Political Attitudes. The Impact of Interpersonal Communication and Mass Media. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Levine, Jeffrey, Edward, G. Carmines, and Robert, Huckfeldt. 1997. The Rise of Ideology in the Post-New Deal Party System, 1972–1992. American Politics Quarterly 25: 19–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin, and Stein Rokkan. 1967. Cleavage Structures, Party Systems, and Voter Alignments: An Introduction. In Seymour Martin Lipset and Stein Rokkan, eds. Party Systems and Voters Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives. New York: Free Press, pp. 1–64
Listhaug, Ola, MacDonald, Stuart Elaine, and George, Rabinowitz. 1994. Ideology and Party Support in Comparative Perspective. European Journal of Political Research 25: 111–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClosky, Herbert, and Harold, E. Dahlgren. 1959. Primary Group Influence on Party Loyalty. American Political Science Review 53: 757–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Warren E., and J. Merrill Shanks. 1996. The New American Voter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Noelle-Neumann, Elisabeth. 1979. Öffentlichkeit als Bedrohung. Beiträge zur empirischen Kommunikationsforschung. 2nd ed. Munich: Alber
Norris, Pippa. 2000. A Virtuous Circle: Political Communications in Post-Industrial Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Østergaard, Bernt Stubbe, ed. 1997. The Media in Western Europe: The Euromedia Handbook. London: Sage
Page, Benjamin I., Robert, Y. Shapiro, and Glenn, R. Dempsey. 1987. What Moves Public Opinion?American Political Science Review 81: 23–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasquino, Gianfranco. 2001. The New Campaign Politics in Southern Europe. In Nikiforos Diamandouros and Richard Gunther, eds. Parties, Politics, and Democracy in the New Southern Europe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 183–223
Pedersen, Mogens N. 1990. Electoral Volatility in Western Europe, 1948–1977. In Peter Mair, ed. The West European Party System. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 195–207
Pfetsch, Barbara. 1996. Convergence Through Privatization? Changing Media Environments and Televised Politics in Germany. European Journal of Communication 11: 427–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Przeworski, Adam, and Henry Teune. 1970. The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry. New York: Wiley
Reardon, Kathleen K., and Everett, M. Rogers. 1988. Interpersonal Versus Mass Media Communication. A False Dichotomy. Human Communication Research 15: 284–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, Bradley M. 1991. European Party Loyalties Revisited. American Political Science Review 85: 751–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, John P. 1976. Interpersonal Influence in Election Campaigns: Two-Step-Flow Hypotheses. Public Opinion Quarterly 40: 304–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, Everett M. 1973. Mass Media and Interpersonal Communication. In Ithiel de Sola Pool, Frederick W. Frey, Wilbur Schramm, Nathan Maccoby, and Edwin P. Parker, eds. Handbook of Communication. Chicago: Rand McNally, pp. 290–310
Rogers, Everett M., and Dilip, K. Bhowmik. 1970. Homophily-Heterophily: Relational Concepts for Communiation Research. Public Opinion Quarterly 34: 523–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sartori, Giovanni. 1970. Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics. American Political Science Review 64: 1033–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schenk, Michael. 1989. Massenkommunikation und Interpersonale Kommunikation. In Max Kaase and Winfried Schulz, eds. Massenkommunikation. Theorien, Methoden, Befunde. Opladen, Germany: Westdeutscher Verlag, pp. 406–17
Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger. 1998. Of Readers, Viewers, and Cat-Dogs. In Jan W. van Deth, ed. Comparative Politics: The Problem of Equivalence. London: Routledge, pp. 222–46
Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger. 2000. Politische Kommunikation und Wählerverhalten. Ein internationaler Vergleich. Wiesbaden, Germany: Westdeutscher Verlag
Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger. 2003. Mass Communication, Personal Communication and Vote Choice: The Filter Hypothesis of Media Influence in Comparative Perspective. British Journal of Political Science 33: 233–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger and David M. Farrell. 2002. Do Political Campaigns Matter? Yes, But It Depends. In David M. Farrell and Rüdiger Schmitt-Beck, eds. Do Political Campaigns Matter? Campaign Effects in Elections and Referendums. London: Routledge, pp. 183–93
Semetko, Holli A. 1996. The Media. In Lawrence LeDuc, Richard G. Niemi, and Pippa Norris. eds. Comparing Democracies. Elections and Voting in Global Perspective. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 254–79
Seymour-Ure, Colin. 1974. The Political Impact of Mass Media. London: Constable
Simon, Klaus. 1976. Einfluß von Gruppenzugehörigkeiten auf politisches Verhalten. In Paul Kevenhörster and Horst Kanitz, eds. Kommunales Wahlverhalten. Bonn: Eichholz, pp. 59–113
Deth, Jan W. 1995. Comparative Politics and the Decline of the Nation-State in Western Europe. European Journal of Political Research 27: 443–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weir, Blair T. 1975. The Distortion of Voter Recall. American Journal of Political Science 19: 53–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaller, John R. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Zaller, John R. 1996. The Myth of Massive Media Impact Revived: New Support for a Discredited Idea. In Diana C. Mutz, Paul M. Sniderman, Richard A. Brody, eds. Political Persuasion and Attitude Change. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, pp. 17–78
Zukin, Cliff. 1977. A Reconsideration of the Effects of Information on Partisan Stability. Public Opinion Quarterly 41: 244–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×