Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-s22k5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-13T05:56:34.157Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Strategic Political Communication: Mobilizing Public Opinion in “Audience Democracies”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 November 2009

By
Hanspeter Kriesi
Edited by
Frank Esser  and
Barbara Pfetsch
Hanspeter Kriesi
Affiliation:
Professor of Comparative Politics in the Department of Political Science, The University of Zurich, Switzerland
Frank Esser
Affiliation:
University of Missouri, Columbia
Barbara Pfetsch
Affiliation:
Freie Universität Berlin
Get access

Summary

The democratic systems of government are changing profoundly because the form of representation is fundamentally changing. This is the position defended by Bernard Manin (1995, 247–303) in his influential book on the principles of representative government, the term he uses for the form of government of Western liberal democracies. After the classical parliamentarianism of the nineteenth century and the party democracy that was established at the beginning of the twentieth century, according to Manin, representative government currently takes the form of an “audience democracy.” The characteristics of this new form of government include personalization of elections and the rise of experts in political communication, increasing importance of political offers formulated so vaguely that the governing elites possess a large maneuvering space, the omnipresence of public opinion, and the transfer of the political debate from the backrooms of parliamentary committees and the central offices of parties and associations to the public sphere.

Manin has formulated concisely what party and media experts have observed for quite a while. Party researchers point to the decline of the ideologically oriented and structurally rooted mass party and the rise of the “electoral professional party” (Panebianco 1988) or the “cartel party” (Mair 1997). This transformation has led, on the one hand, to the declining importance of the traditional party apparatus and of party militants, and, on the other hand, it has reinforced the importance of the party leaders and of the much more independent electoral audience.

Type
Chapter
Information
Comparing Political Communication
Theories, Cases, and Challenges
 , pp. 184 - 212
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baumgartner, Frank R., and Bryan D. Jones. 1993. Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Beyme, Klaus von. 1994. Die Massenmedien und die politische Agenda des parlamentarischen Systems. In Friedhelm Neidhardt, ed. Öffentlichkeit, öffentliche Meinung, soziale Bewegungen. Opladen, Germany: Westdeutscher Verlag, pp. 320–36
Blumler, Jay G., and Dennis, Kavanagh. 1999. The Third Age of Political Communication: Influences and Features. Political Communication 16: 209–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burstein, Paul. 1998. Discrimination, Jobs, and Politics. The Struggle for Equal Employment Opportunity in the United States since the New Deal. With a New Introduction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Cobb, Roger W., and Charles D. Elder. 1983. Participation in American Politics. The Dynamics of Agenda-Building. 2nd ed. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University
Colomer, Josep M. 1996. Introduction. In Joseph M. Colomer, ed. Political Institutions in Europe. London: Routledge, pp. 1–17
Converse, Philip E. 1987. Changing Conceptions of Public Opinion in the Political Process. Public Opinion Quarterly 51: 12–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalton, Russell J., PaulA. Beck, and Robert Huckfeldt A. Beck, and Robert Huckfeldt. 1998. Partisan Cues and the Media: Information Flows in the 1992 Presidential Election. American Political Science Review 92 (1): 111–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Bens, Els, and Helge Ostbye. 1997. The European Newspaper Market. In Denis McQuail and Karen Siune, eds. Media Policy. Convergence, Concentration and Commerce. London: Sage, pp. 7–22
Esser, Frank. 2000. Spin Doctoring. Rüstungsspirale Zwischen Politischer PR und Politischem Journalismus. Forschungsjournal Neue Soziale Bewegungen 13 (3): 17–24Google Scholar
Ferree, Myra Marx, William A. Gamson, Jürgen Gerhards, and Dieter Rucht. 2002. Shaping Abortion Discourse. Democracy and the Public Sphere in Germany and the United States. New York: Cambridge University Press
Fuchs, Dieter. 2000. Typen und Indizes demokratischer Regime. Eine Analyse des Präsidentialismus- und des Veto-Spieler Ansatzes. In Hans-Joachim Lauth, Gert Pickel, and Christian Welzel, eds. Demokratiemessung. Konzepte und Befunde im internationalen Vergleich. Opladen, Germany: Westdeutscher Verlag, pp. 27–48
Gabriel, Oskar, and Frank Brettschneider, eds. 1994. Die EU-Staaten im Vergleich. Strukturen, Prozesse, Politikinhalte. Opladen, Germany: Westdeutscher Verlag
Gais, Thomas L., and Jack L. Walker. 1991. Pathways to Influence in American Politics. In Jack L. Walker, ed. Mobilizing Interest Groups in America. Patrons, Professions, and Social Movements. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, pp. 103–22
Gamson, William A. 1988. Political Discourse and Collective Action. In Bert Klandermans, Hanspeter Kriesi, and Sidney Tarrow, eds. From Structure to Action: Comparing Social Movement Research across Cultures. Greenwich, CT: JAI-Press, pp. 219–44
Gamson, William A., and André, Modigliani. 1989. Media Discourse and Public Opinion on Nuclear Power: A Constructionist Approach. American Journal of Sociology 95 (1): 1–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gamson, William A., and David S. Meyer. 1996. Framing Political Opportunity. In Doug McAdam, John D. McCarthy, and Mayer N. Zald, eds. Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements. Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 275–90
Gamson, William A., David Croteau, William Hoynes, and Theodore Sasson. 1992. Media Images and the Social Construction of Reality. In Judith Blake and John Hagan, eds. Annual Review of Sociology 18. Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews Inc., pp. 373–93
Gerhards, Jürgen, Friedhelm Neidhardt, and Dieter Rucht. 1998. Zwischen Palaver und Diskurs. Strukturen öffentlicher Meinungsbildung am Beispiel der deutschen Diskussion zur Abtreibung. Opladen, Germany: Westdeutscher Verlag
Grande, Edgar. 2000. Charisma und Komplexität: Verhandlungsdemokratie, Mediendemokratie und der Funktionswandel politischer Eliten. Leviathan 28 (1): 122–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1992. Theorie kommunikativen Handelns. Frankfurt, Germany: Suhrkamp
Hajer, Maarten A. 1995. The Politics of Environmental Discourse. Ecological Modernization and the Political Process. Oxford: Clarendon Press
Hamdan, Fouad. 2000. Aufdecken und Konfrontieren. NGO-Kommunikation am Beispiel Greenpeace. Forschungsjournal Neue Soziale Bewegungen 13 (3): 69–74Google Scholar
Hilgartner, Stephen, and Charles, L. Bosk. 1988. The Rise and Fall of Social Problems: A Public Arenas Model. American Journal of Sociology 94 (1): 53–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn, Kim, and Patrick J. Kenney. 1999. The Spectacle of U.S. Senate Campaigns. Princeton: Princeton University Press
Keck, Margaret E., and Kathryn Sikkink. 1998. Transnational Advocacy Networks in the Movement Society. In David S. Meyer and Sidney Tarrow, eds. The Social Movement Society. Contentious Politics for a New Century. Boulder, CO: Rowman and Littlefield, pp. 217–38
Kernell, Samuel. 1988. Going Public. New Strategies of Presidential Leadership. Washington, DC: CQ Press
Kingdon, John W. 1984. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Boston: Little Brown
Kitschelt, Herbert. 1986. Political Opportunity Structures and Political Protest: Anti-Nuclear Movements in Four Democracies. British Journal of Political Science 16: 57–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert 2000. Citizens, Politicians, and Party Cartellization: Political Representation and State Failure in Post-Industrial Democracies. European Journal of Political Research 37 (2): 149–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klandermans, Bert. 1984. Mobilization and Participation: Social-Psychological Expansions of Resource Mobilization Theory. American Sociologica Review 49: 583–600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kliment, Tibor. 1998. Durch Dramatisierung zum Protest? Theoretische Grundlegung und empirischer Ertrag des Framing-Konzepts. In Kai-Uwe Hellmann and Ruud Koopmans, eds. Paradigmen der Bewegungsforschung. Entstehung und Entwicklung von Neuen sozialen Bewegungen und Rechtsextremismus. Wiesbaden, Germany: Westdeutscher Verlag, pp. 69–89
Kollman, Ken. 1998. Outside Lobbying. Public Opinion and Interest Group Strategies. Princeton: Princeton University Press
Koopmans, Ruud. 1995. Democracy from Below. New Social Movements and the Political System in West Germany. Boulder, CO: Westview Press
Koopmans, Ruud. 1996. Asyl: Die Karriere eines politischen Konflikts. In Wolfgang van den Daele and Friedhelm Neidhardt, eds. Kommunikation und Entscheidung, WZB-Jahrbuch. Berlin: Edition Sigma, pp. 167–92
Koopmans, Ruud, and Paul, Statham. 1999. Political Claims Analysis: Integrating Protest Event and Political Discourse Approaches. Mobilization 4 (2): 203–22Google Scholar
Koopmans, Ruud, and Paul Statham 2000. Challenging the Liberal Nation-State? Postnationalism, Multiculturalism, and the Collective Claims-making of Migrants and Ethnic Minorities in Britain and Germany. In Ruud Koopmans and Paul Statham, eds. Challenging Immigration and Ethnic Relations Politics. Comparative European Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 89–232
Kriesi, Hanspeter. 1980. Entscheidungsstrukturen und Entscheidungsprozesse in der Schweizer Politik. Frankfurt, Germany: Campus
Kriesi, Hanspeter, and Maya, Jegen. 2001. The Swiss Energy Policy Elite. European Journal of Political Science 39: 251–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kriesi, Hanspeter, Ruud Koopmans, Jan Willem Duyvendak, and Marco Giugni. 1995. New Social Movements in Western Europe. A Comparative Analysis. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press
Lane, Jan-Erik, David McKay, and Kenneth Newton. 1997. Political Data Handbook. OECD Countries. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Lang, Gladys Engel, and Kurt Lang. 1983. The Battle for Public Opinion. The President, the Press and the Polls During Watergate. New York: Columbia University Press
Laumann, Edward O., and David Knoke. 1987. The Organizational State. Social Choice in National Policy Domains. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press
Laumann, Edward O., and Franz U. Pappi. 1976. Networks of Collective Action: A Perspective on Community Influence Systems. New York: Academic Press
Leca, Jean. 1996. Ce que l'analyse des politiques publiques pourrait apprendre sur le gouvernement démocratique. Revue française de science politique 46 (1): 122–33Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1999. Patterns of Democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press
Linsky, Martin. 1986. Impact. How the Press Affects Federal Policymaking. New York: W. W. Norton
Livingston, Steven. 1997. Clarifying the CNN Effect. An Examination of Media Effects According to Type of Military Intervention. Research paper R-18 of the Joan Shorenstein Center of Press, Politics, and Public Policy at the John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard
Lowi, Theodore J. 1964. American Business, Public Policy, Case-Studies and Political Theory. World Politics 16: 667–715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maarek, Philippe J. 1997. New Trends in French Political Communication: The 1995 Presidential Elections. Media, Culture and Society 19: 357–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mair, Peter. 1997. Party System Change. Approaches and Interpretations. Oxford: Clarendon Press
Mair, Peter, and Ingrid, Biezen. 2001. Party Membership in Twenty European Democracies, 1980–2000. Party Politics 7 (1): 5–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mancini, Paolo. 2000. How to Combine Media Commercialization and Party Affiliation: The Italian Experience. Political Communication 17: 319–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manin, Bernard. 1995. Principes du gouvernement représentatif. Paris: Flammarion
McAdam, Doug. 1982. Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930–1970. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
McAdam, Doug, John D. McCarthy, and Mayer N. Zald. 1996. Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements. Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
McCarthy, John D., Clark, McPhail, and Jackie, Smith. 1996. Images of Protest: Dimensions of Selection Bias in Media Coverage of Washington Demonstrations, 1982 and 1991. American Sociological Review 61 (3): 478–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, John D., Jackie Smith, and Mayer N. Zald. 1996. Accessing Public, Media, Electoral, and Governmental Agendas. In Doug McAdam, John D. McCarthy, and Mayer N. Zald, eds. Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements. Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 291–311
McCombs, Maxwell E. and Donald, L. Shaw. 1972. The Agenda-Setting Function of the Mass Media. Public Opinion Quarterly 36: 176–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mény, Yves, and Yves Surel. 2000. Par le peuple, pour le peuple. Le populisme et les démocraties. Paris: Fayard
Meyer, David S., and Sidney Tarrow. 1998. A Movement Society: Contentious Politics for a New Century. In David S. Meyer and Sidney Tarrow, eds. The Social Movement Society. Contentious Politics for a New Century. Boulder, CO: Rowman and Littlefield, pp. 1–28
Morris, Dick. 1999. The New Prince. Machiavelli Updated for the Twenty-first Century. Los Angeles: Renaissance Books
Neidhardt, Friedhelm. 1994. Öffentlichkeit, öffentliche Meinung, soziale Bewegungen. In Friedhelm Neidhardt, ed. Öffentlichkeit, öffentliche Meinung, soziale Bewegungen. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie Sonderheft 34. Opladen, Germany: Westdeutscher Verlag, pp. 7–41
Neidhardt, Friedhelm, Christiane Eilders, and Barbara Pfetsch. 1998. Die Stimme der Medien im politischen Prozess: Themen und Meinungen in Pressekommentaren. Discussion Paper FS III 98–106. Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung
Neveu, Erik. 1998. Media and Politics in French Political Science. European Journal of Political Research 33: 439–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newton, Ken. 2000. Versagt politisches Marketing? In Oskar Niedermayer and Bettina Westle, eds. Demokratie und Partizipation. Festschrift für Max Kaase. Opladen, Germany: Westdeutscher Verlag, pp. 177–91
Page, Benjamin I., Robert, Y. Shapiro, and Glenn, R. Dempsey. 1987. What Moves Public Opinion?American Political Science Review 81 (1): 23–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panebianco, Angelo. 1988. Political Parties: Organization and Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Pfetsch, Barbara. 1986. Volkszählung ′83. Ein Beispiel für die Thematisierung eines politischen Issues in den Massenmedien. In Hans-Dieter Klingemann and Max Kaase, eds. Wahlen und Politischer Prozess. Opladen, Germany: Westdeutscher Verlag, pp. 201–31
Pfetsch, Barbara 1993. Strategien und Gegenstrategien – Politische Kommunikation bei Sachfragen. Eine Fallstudie aus Baden-Württemberg. In Wolfgang Donsbach, ed. Beziehungsspiele – Medien und Politik in der öffentlichen Diskussion. Fallstudien und Analysen. Gütersloh, Germany: Bertelsmann Stiftung, pp. 45–110
Pfetsch, Barbara 1998. Regieren unter den Bedingungen medialer Allgegenwart. In Ulrich Sarcinelli, ed. Politikvermittlung und Demokratie in der Mediengesellschaft. Wiesbaden, Germany: Westdeutscher Verlag, pp. 233–52
Plasser, Fritz, and Peter A. Ulram. 2000. Rechtspopulistische Resonanzen: Die Wählerschaft der FPÖ. In Fritz Plasser, ed. Das Österreichische Wahlverhalten. Wien, Austria: Signum-Verlag, pp. 225–41
Pujas, Véronique, and Martin, Rhodes. 1999. Party Finance and Political Scandal in Italy, Spain and France. West European Politics 22 (3): 41–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricolfi, Luca. 1997. Politics and the Mass Media in Italy. West European Politics 20 (1): 135–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rochon, Thomas R. 1990. The West European Peace Movement and the Theory of New Social Movements. In Russell J. Dalton and Manfred Kuechler, eds. Challenging the Political Order. Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 105–21
Sabatier, Paul A. 1993. Advocacy-Koalitionen, Policy-Wandel und Policy-Lernen: Eine Alternative zur Phasenheuristik. In Adrienne Héritier, ed. Policy-Analyse. Kritik und Neuorientierung. PVS-Sonderheft 24: 116–48
Sabatier, Paul A. 1998. The Advocacy Coalition Framework: Revisions and Relevance for Europe. Journal of European Public Policy 5 (1): 98–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarcinelli, Ulrich. 1989. Symbolische Politik und politische Kultur. Das Kommunikationsritual als politische Wirklichkeit. Politische Vierteljahresschrift 30 (2): 292–309Google Scholar
Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger. 1990. Über die Bedeutung der Massenmedien für soziale Bewegungen. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 42 (4): 642–62Google Scholar
Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger, and Barbara Pfetsch. 1994. Politische Akteure und die Medien der Massenkommunikation. Zur Generierung von Öffentlichkeit in Wahlkämpfen. In Friedhelm Neidhardt, ed. Öffentlichkeit, Öffentliche Meinung, Soziale Bewegungen. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie Sonderheft 34. Opladen, Germany: Westdeutscher Verlag, pp. 106–38
Schnapp, Kai-Uwe. 2000. Ministerial Bureaucracies as Stand-In Agenda-Setters? A Comparative Description. Discussion Paper FS III 00–204. Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung
Seisselberg, Jörg. 1996. Conditions of Success and Political Problems of a ‘Media-mediated Personality Party.’ The Case of Forza Italia. West European Politics 19 (4): 715–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snow, David A., and Robert D. Benford. 1988. Ideology, Frame Resonance, and Participant Mobilization. In Bert Klandermans, Hanspeter Kriesi, and Sidney Tarrow, eds. Structure to Action: Comparing Social Movement Research Across Cultures. Greenwich, CT: JAI-Press, pp. 97–218
Snow, David, Burke, E. Rochford Jr., Steven, K. Worden, and Robert, D. Benford. 1986. Frame Alignment Processes, Micromobilization, and Movement Participation. American Sociological Review 51 (4): 464–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stimson, James A., Michael, B. MacKuen, and Robert, S. Erikson. 1995. Dynamic Representation. American Political Science Review 89 (3): 543–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swanson, David L., and Paolo Mancini. 1996. Patterns of Modern Electoral Campaigning and Their Consequences. In David L. Swanson and Paolo Mancini, eds. Politics, Media, and Modern Democracy. An International Study of Innovations in Electoral Campaigning and Their Consequences. London: Praeger, pp. 247–76
Tarrow, Sidney. 1994. Power in Movement. Social Movements, Collective Action and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Tarrow, Sidney 1998. Social Protest and Policy Reform: May 1968 and the Loi d'Orientation in France. In Marco Giugni, Doug McAdam, and Charles Tilly, eds. From Contention to Democracy. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, pp. 31–56
Voltmer, Katrin. 2000. Structures of Diversity of Press and Broadcasting Systems. The Institutional Context of Public Communication in Western Democracies. Discussion Paper FS III 00–201. Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung
Walgrave, Stefan, and Jan, Manssens. 2000. The Making of the White March: The Mass Media as a Mobilizing Alternative to Movement Organizations. Mobilization 5 (2): 217–39Google Scholar
Wolfsfeld, Gadi. 1997. Media and Political Conflict. News from the Middle East. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×