Book contents
- Compassion-Justice Conflicts and Christian Ethics
- New Studies in Christian Ethics
- Compassion-Justice Conflicts and Christian Ethics
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Tables
- General Editor’s Preface
- Preface
- Part I Nature of the Conflict
- Chapter 1 Rank Ordering of Claims
- Chapter 2 Deference to Justice
- Chapter 3 Agape in the Marketplace
- Part II How and Why Agape-Justice Conflicts Arise
- References
- Index
- Titles Published in the Series ()
Chapter 1 - Rank Ordering of Claims
from Part I - Nature of the Conflict
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 October 2023
- Compassion-Justice Conflicts and Christian Ethics
- New Studies in Christian Ethics
- Compassion-Justice Conflicts and Christian Ethics
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Tables
- General Editor’s Preface
- Preface
- Part I Nature of the Conflict
- Chapter 1 Rank Ordering of Claims
- Chapter 2 Deference to Justice
- Chapter 3 Agape in the Marketplace
- Part II How and Why Agape-Justice Conflicts Arise
- References
- Index
- Titles Published in the Series ()
Summary
Perfect duties are deemed to have priority over imperfect duties. We can rank order competing moral duties in a continuum of obligatoriness. Listing them in descending order of obligatoriness and stringency, we have strict legal dues, relational moral obligations, general moral obligations, and supererogation. Most agape-justice conflicts lie along one of three fault lines in this continuum, namely (1) legal debt versus moral debt; (2) particular moral duties versus general moral duties; and (3) legal and moral debt versus supererogatory, self-sacrificial beneficence. Justice requires; it demands. In contrast, agape does not require or demand, but elicits and entices.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Compassion-Justice Conflicts and Christian Ethics , pp. 3 - 37Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023