Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T23:27:25.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Accountability and Governance in European Higher Education

from Part II - Systems, Processes, and Dynamics of Governance in Higher Education

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 November 2020

By
Michael Dobbins  and
Jens Jungblut
Edited by
Giliberto Capano  and
Darryl S. L. Jarvis
Giliberto Capano
Affiliation:
Università degli Studi, Bologna, Italy
Darryl S. L. Jarvis
Affiliation:
The University of Hong Kong
Get access

Summary

Although accountability is touched on in nearly every account of current higher education developments (HE), only a few HE scholars have attempted to further theorize accountability, its forms, implications, and practical significance. In this chapter, we attempt to advance the debate by focusing on European HE in the age of Bologna, international rankings, massification, and underfunding. We begin our analysis by addressing the manifold socio-economic forces which have put accountability centre stage in contemporary HE discourse and reforms. We then outline numerous state-of-the-art conceptualizations of accountability in general, and in HE specifically. Following the lead of Huisman and Currie (2004), we wish to move beyond normative statements and generalized descriptions by analysing the emergence of ‘accountability regimes’ in four large European countries — Germany (North-Rhine Westphalia), France, Poland, and Romania — with distinctly different paths of development in HE. The analysis allows us to identify cross-national cases of convergence and divergence in the emergence of accountability regimes.

Keywords

higher educationaccountabilitygovernancepolicy instrumentsGermanyFrancePolandRomaniaBologna Processgovernance convergence
Type
Chapter
Information
Convergence and Diversity in the Governance of Higher Education
Comparative Perspectives
 , pp. 208 - 245
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aghion, P., and Cohen, É. (2004) Education et croissance. Paris: La documentation française.Google Scholar
ARACIS (2006) Methodology for External Evaluation, Standards, Standards of Reference, and List of Performance Indicators of the Romanian Agency for Quality Assurance in Higher Education.Google Scholar
Berdahl, R. (1990) Academic freedom, autonomy and accountability in British universities. Studies in Higher Education, 15(2), 169–180. doi:10.1080/03075079012331377491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Boer, H., Jongbloed, B., Benneworth, P., et al. (2015) Performance-based funding and performance agreements in fourteen higher education systems. Enschede: University of Twente, Center for Higher Education Policy Studies. www.utwente.nl/bms/cheps/publications/Publications%202011/C11HV018%20Final%20Report%20Quality-related%20funding,%20performance%20agreements%20and%20profiling%20in%20HE.pdfGoogle Scholar
Bovens, M. (2007) Analysing and assessing accountability: A conceptual framework. European Law Journal, 13(4), 447–468. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00378.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bovens, M. (2010) Two concepts of accountability: Accountability as a virtue and as a mechanism. West European Politics, 33(5), 946–967. doi:10.1080/01402382.2010.486119Google Scholar
Bovens, M., Schillemans, T., and ’t Hart, P. (2008) Does public accountability work? An assessment tool. Public Administration, 86(1), 225–242. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2008.00716.xGoogle Scholar
Burke, J. C. (Ed.) (2004) Achieving accountability in higher education: Balancing public, academic, and market demands. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Chevaillier, T. (2007) The changing role of the state in French higher education. In Westerheijden, D and Schwarz, S (Eds), Accreditation and evaluation in the European Higher Education Area, pp. 159–174. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Christensen, T. (2011) University governance reforms: Potential problems of more autonomy? Higher Education, 62(4), 503–517. doi:10.1007/s10734-010-9401-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, T., and Lægreid, P. (2015) Performance and accountability: A theoretical discussion and an empirical assessment. Public Organization Review, 15(2), 207–225. doi:10.1007/s11115-013-0267-2Google Scholar
Clark, B. R. (1983) The higher education system: Academic organization in cross-national perspective. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Clark, B. R. (1998) Creating entrepreneurial universities: Organizational pathways of transformation. New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Comité de Suivi/LRU (2011) ‘De nouvelles relations avec l’État’. http://media.enseignementsup-recherche.gouv.fr/file/Autonomie_universites/30/6/LRU_part3_168306.pdfGoogle Scholar
Consiliul Naţional pentru Finanţarea Învăţământului Superior (2005) ‘Optiuni pentru viitor. 10 ani de activitate’. Ministerul Educaţiei şi Cercetării.Google Scholar
Curaj, A., Deca, L., Egron-Polak, E., and Salmi, J. (Eds) (2015) Higher education reforms in Romania: Between the Bologna Process and national challenges. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Dakowska, D. (2015) Between competition imperative and Europeanisation: The case of higher education reform in Poland. Higher Education, 69(1), 129–141.Google Scholar
Dalsheimer, N., and Despréaux, D. (2008) Les classements internationaux des établissements d’enseignement supérieur. Éducation et Formation, 78, 151–173.Google Scholar
Dill, D. D., and Beerkens, M. (Eds) (2010) Public policy for academic quality: Analyses of innovative policy instruments. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Dobbins, M. (2011) Explaining different pathways in higher education policy in Central and Eastern Europe: The cases of Romania and the Czech Republic. Comparative Education, 47(2), 223–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobbins, M. (2014) Exploring the governance of Polish public higher education: Balancing restored historical legacies with Europeanization and market pressures. European Journal of Higher Education, 5(1), 18–33.Google Scholar
Dobbins, M. (2017) Convergent or divergent Europeanization? An analysis of higher education governance reforms in France and Italy. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 83(1), 177–199.Google Scholar
Dobbins, M., and Knill, C. (2014) Higher education governance and policy change in Western Europe: International challenges to historical institutions. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Dobbins, M., Knill, C., and Vögtle, E. M (2011) An analytical model for the cross-country comparison of higher education governance. Higher Education, 62(5), 665–683.Google Scholar
Duczmal, W. (2006) The rise of private higher education in Poland: Policies, markets and strategies. PhD Thesis. Enschede: University of Twente, Center for Higher Education Policy Studies.Google Scholar
Enders, J., de Boer, H., and Weyer, E. (2013) Regulatory autonomy and performance: The reform of higher education re-visited. Higher Education, 65(1), 5–23. doi:10.1007/s10734-012-9578-4Google Scholar
Estermann, T., Nokkala, T., and Steinel, M. (2011) University autonomy in Europe II: The scorecard. Brussels. European University Association.Google Scholar
Gieysztor, A. (1992) Management and resources. In de Ridder-Symoens, H (Ed.), A history of the university in Europe, Volume 1: Universities in the Middle Ages, pp. 108–143. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gingrich, J. R. (2011) Making markets in the welfare state: The politics of varying market reforms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gornitzka, Å. (2007) The Lisbon Process: A supranational policy perspective. In Maassen, P and Olsen, P. J. (Eds), University dynamics and European integration, pp. 155–178. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.Google Scholar
Gornitzka, Å., and Maassen, P. (2014) Dynamics of convergence and divergence. Exploring accounts of higher education policy change. In Mattei, P (Ed.), University adaptation in difficult economic times, pp. 13–29. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gornitzka, Å., Maassen, P., Olsen, J. P., and Stensaker, B. (2007) Europe of knowledge: Search for a new pact. In Maassen, P and Olsen, J. P. (Eds), University dynamics and European integration, pp. 181–214. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.Google Scholar
Gornitzka, Å., and Stensaker, B. (2014) The dynamics of European regulatory regimes in higher education: Challenged prerogatives and evolutionary change. Policy and Society, 33(3), 177–188. doi:10.1016/j.polsoc.2014.08.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huisman, J., and Currie, J. (2004) Accountability in higher education: Bridge over troubled water? Higher Education, 48(4), 529–551. doi:10.1023/B:HIGH.0000046725.16936.4cGoogle Scholar
Hüther, O. (2010) Von der Kollegialität zur Hierarchie? Eine Analyse des New Managerialism in den Landeshochschulgesetzen. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
Inglehart, R. (1997) Modernization and postmodernization: Cultural, economic, and political change in 43 societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
INRP (2005) L’Enseignement supérieur sous le regard des chercheurs. Les dossiers de la vielle. Lyon: Institut Nationale de la Recherche Pégagogique, Cellule de Veille Scientifique et Technologique. https://ife.ens-lyon.fr/vst/DS-Veille/Dossier_enseignement_superieur.pdfGoogle Scholar
Jongbloed, B. (2003) Institutional funding and institutional change. In File, J and Goedegebuure, L (Eds), Real-time systems: Reflections on higher education in the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, and Slovenia, pp. 115–146. Enschede: University of Twente, Center for Higher Education Policy Studies.Google Scholar
Jongbloed, B., Enders, J., and Salerno, C. (2008) Higher education and its communities: Interconnections, interdependencies and a research agenda. Higher Education, 56(3), 303–324. doi:10.1007/s10734-008-9128-2Google Scholar
Jongbloed, B., and Vossensteyn, H. (2001) Keeping up performances: An international survey of performance-based funding in higher education. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 23(2), 127–145. doi:10.1080/13600800120088625Google Scholar
Jungblut, J. (2016) Re-distribution and public governance: The politics of higher education in Western Europe. European Politics and Society, 17(3), 331–352. doi:10.1080/23745118.2016.1140395Google Scholar
Kaiser, Frans (2007) Higher education in France: Country report. International higher education monitor. Twente: CHEPS.Google Scholar
Keller, A., and Dobbins, M. (2015) Das Ringen um autonome und wettbewerbsfähige Hochschulen: Der Einfluss von Parteipolitik, fiskalpolitischem Problemdruck und historischen Vermächtnissen auf die Hochschulpolitik der Bundesländer. Beiträge zur Hochschulforschung, 37(2), 28–55.Google Scholar
Kwiek, M. (2014) Structural changes in the Polish higher education system (1990–2010): A synthetic view. European Journal of Higher Education, 4(3), 266–280.Google Scholar
Le Monde (2008) La loi sur l’autonomie des universités mise en œuvre progressivement, 25 July.Google Scholar
Leveille, D. (2006) Accountability in higher education: A public agenda for trust and cultural change. Berkeley: Center for Studies in Higher Education.Google Scholar
Marga, A. (2002) Reform of education in Romania in the 1990s: A retrospective. Higher Education in Europe, XXVII(1–2), 123–135.Google Scholar
Marginson, S., and Rhoades, G. (2002) Beyond national states, markets, and systems of higher education: A glonacal agency heuristic. Higher Education, 43(3), 281–309. doi:10.1023/a:1014699605875Google Scholar
Martens, K., and Jakobi, A. P. (Eds) (2010) Mechanisms of OECD governance: International incentives for national policy-making? Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Martens, K., Rusconi, A., and Leuze, K. (Eds) (2007) New arenas of education governance: The impact of international organisations and markets on educational policy making. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Martens, K., Nagel, A.-K., Windzio, M., and Weymann, A. (Eds) (2010) Transformation of education policy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Mayntz, R. (2002) University councils: An institutional innovation in German universities. European Journal of Education, 37(1), 21–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ministerul Educaţiei Naţionale (2002) Reforma învăţământului In Anul 2000 (Acţiuni Majore). Bucharest: Ministerul Educaţiei NaţionaleGoogle Scholar
Mulgan, R. (2000) Accountability: An ever-expanding concept? Public Administration, 78(3), 555–573. doi:10.1111/1467-9299.00218Google Scholar
Musselin, C. (2001) La longue marche des universités françaises. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
Musselin, C. (2009) The side effects of the Bologna Process on national institutional settings: The case of France. In Amaral, A, Neave, G, and Musselin, C (Eds), European integration and the governance of higher education and research, pp. 181–205. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Musselin, C., and Paradeise, C. (2009) France: From incremental transitions to institutional change. In Paradeise, C, Reale, E, Bleiklie, I, and Ferlie, E (Eds), University governance: Western European comparative perspectives, pp. 21–49. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Neave, G. (2001) The European dimension of higher education. In Huisman, J, Maassen, P, and Neave, G (Eds). Higher education and the nation state: The international dimension of higher education, pp. 13–73. Amsterdam: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Neave, G. (2009) The evaluative state as policy in transition: A historical and anatomical study. In Cowen, R and Kazamias, A (Eds), International handbook of comparative education, pp. 551–568. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neave, G. (2012) The evaluative state, institutional autonomy and re-engineering higher education in Western Europe: The prince and his pleasure. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Nicolescu, L., Sapatoru, D., and Paun, L. (2000) Public and private initiatives in higher education: The case of Romania. Polonie Hongrie Aide à la Réconstruction ÉconomiqueAction for Cooperation in Economics (PHARE-ACE) Report.Google Scholar
OECD (2000) Reviews of national policies for education: Romania. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
OECD (2006) OECD thematic review of tertiary education: Country background report for Poland. OECD: Warsaw.Google Scholar
Olsen, J. P. (1988) Administrative reform and theories of organization. In Campbell, C and Peters, B. G. (Eds), Organizing governance, governing organizations, pp. 233–254. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Olsen, J. P. (2007) The institutional dynamics of the European university. In Maassen, P and Olsen, J. P. (Eds), University dynamics and European integration, pp. 25–54. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.Google Scholar
Pierson, P. (1998) Irresistible forces, immovable objects: Post-industrial welfare states confront permanent austerity. Journal of European Public Policy, 5(4), 539–560. doi:10.1080/13501769880000011Google Scholar
Pollitt, C., and Bouckaert, G. (2011) Public management reform: A comparative analysis (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pressman, J., and Wildavsky, A. (1984) Implementation: How great expectations in Washington are dashed in Oakland; Or, why it’s amazing that federal programs work at all. Oakland: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Quinio, P. (1998) ‘Pour financer le plan Université du troisième millénaire. Allègre compte sur les régions. Libération, 3 December: www.liberation.fr/societe/0101264216-pour-financer-le-plan-universite-du-troisieme-millenaire-allegre-compte-sur-les-regions.Google Scholar
Reisz, R. (2004) Hochschulautonomie in Rumänien zwischen 1990 und 2000. Die Hochschule, 1/2004, 185–202.Google Scholar
Romzek, B. S. (2000) Dynamics of public sector accountability in an era of reform. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 66(1), 21–44. doi:10.1177/0020852300661004Google Scholar
Rose, N. (2000) Government and control. British Journal of Criminology, 40(2), 321–329.Google Scholar
Schimank, U., and Lange, S. (2009) Germany: A latecomer to new public management. In Paradeise, C, Reale, E, Bleiklie, I, and Ferlie, E (Eds), University governance: Western European comparative perspectives, pp. 51–75. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Shaw, M. (2014) Switchmen of reform: Competing conceptions of public higher education governance in Poland. Doctoral Dissertation. University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
Trow, M. (1996) Trust, markets and accountability in higher education: A comparative perspective. Higher Education Policy, 9(4), 309–324. doi:10.1057/palgrave.hep.8380051Google Scholar
van Vught, F. (1997) The effects of alternative governance structures: A comparative analysis of higher education policy in five EU member states. In Steunenberg, B and van Vught, F (Eds), Political institutions and public policy: Perspectives on European decision making, pp. 115–137. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Vîiu, G. A., Vlăsceanu, M., and Miroiu, A. (2012) Ranking political science departments: The case of Romania. Quality Assurance Review for Higher Education, 4(2), 79–97.Google Scholar
Vögtle, E. M., Knill, C., and Dobbins, M. (2011) To what extent does transnational communication drive cross-national policy convergence? The impact of the Bologna Process on domestic higher education policies. Higher Education, 61(1), 77–94. doi:10.1007/s10734-010-9326-6Google Scholar
Vukasovic, M., Jungblut, J., and Elken, M. (2017) Still the main show in town? Assessing political saliency of the Bologna Process across time and space. Studies in Higher Education, 42(8), 1421–1436. doi:10.1080/03075079.2015.1101755Google Scholar
World Bank (2004) Tertiary education in Poland. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×