Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-f46jp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-13T05:08:10.538Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Judicialization in Argentina: Legal Culture or Opportunities and Support Structures?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2010

By
Catalina Smulovitz
Edited by
Javier Couso ,
Alexandra Huneeus  and
Rachel Sieder
Javier Couso
Affiliation:
Diego Portales University, Santiago, Chile
Alexandra Huneeus
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin, School of Law
Get access

Summary

Since 1983, Argentina has experienced a process of judicialization of conflicts and of juridification of social interactions. Why and when did people turn to the law? Are these processes associated with changes in legal culture? Are they related to modifications of the opportunity structure for rights claiming? Alternatively, are they explained by the existence of support structures for legal mobilization? This chapter will argue that judicialization in Argentina is not related to ex ante changes in legal culture, but rather to the combined effects of changes in opportunity structures for claim making and the earlier emergence of a support structure for legal mobilization consisting of labor lawyers and a new rights advocacy network of nongovernmental organizations (NGO). These two developments resulted in an increase in the judicialization of claims insofar as they transformed legal demands into a strategic political tool.

INTRODUCTION

In many parts of the world, courts and the law are playing an increasingly important political role. Courts are redefining public policies decided by representative authorities, and citizens are using the law and rights-framed discourses as political tools to address private and social demands, as well as to govern everyday social interactions previously regulated by cooperation, trust, or kinship. This increased use of legal procedures and rights-framed discourses is taking place in various forms and places and has given birth to a growing literature on the judicialization of politics. Argentina is not exempt from this process.

Type
Chapter
Information
Cultures of Legality
Judicialization and Political Activism in Latin America
 , pp. 234 - 253
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acuña, Carlos and Smulovitz, Catalina. 1997. “Guarding the Guardians in Argentina: Some Lessons about the Risks and Benefits of Empowering the Courts.” In Transitional Justice and the Rule of Law in New Democracies. McAdams, James (ed.). Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, pp. 93–122.Google Scholar
,Argentine Constitution. 1995. Accessed at http://www1.hcdn.gov.ar/dependencias/dip/congreso/Constitucion%20sola.pdf.
Bercholc, Jorge. 2004. La independencia de la Corte suprema a través del control de Constitucionalidad. Respecto de los otros poderes políticos del Estado (1935–1998). Buenos Aires, Ediar.Google Scholar
Carnovale, Vera. 2009. Memoria Abierta, Colección Abogados, Derecho y Política. Buenos Aires: MIMEO: unpublished working paper.Google Scholar
Chama, Mauricio. 2003. “Movilización y politización: los abogados de Buenos Aires, 1968–1973.” Accessed at http://historiapolitica.com/datos/biblioteca/Chama.pdf.
Chavez, Rebecca Bill. 2004a. The Rule of Law in Nascent Democracies. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Chavez, Rebecca Bill. 2004b. “The Evolution of Judicial Autonomy in Argentina: Establishing the Rule of Law in an Ultrapresidential System.” Journal of Latin American Studies 36: 451–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epp, Charles. 1998. The Rights Revolution. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Frühling, Hugo. 2000. “From Dictatorship to Democracy: Law and Social Change in the Andean Region and the Southern Cone of South America.” In Many Roads to Justice: The Law-Related Work of Ford Foundation Grantees Around the World. McClymont, Mary and Golub, Stephen (eds.). New York: Ford Foundation, pp. 55–88.Google Scholar
Galanter, Marc. 1974. “Why the ‘Haves’ Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change.” 9 Law & Soc'y Rev. 95: 108–11.Google Scholar
Garapon, Antoine. 1997. Juez y Democracia. Madrid: Flor del Viento Ediciones.Google Scholar
Gelli, María Angélica. 2005. Constitución de la Nación Argentina Comentada y Concordada. Buenos Aires: Editorial La Ley.Google Scholar
Guarneri, Carlo and Pederzoli, Patrizia. 1999. Los Jueces y la Política. Poder Judicial y Democracia, Madrid: Taurus.Google Scholar
Hammergren, Lynn. 2002. “Uses Of Empirical Research in Refocusing Judicial Reforms: Lessons from Five Countries.” Washington DC: World Bank. Available at http://www.argenjus.org.ar/argenjus/articulos/leen.pdf.
Helmke, Gretchen. 2005. Courts Under Constraints: Judges, Generals, and Presidents in Argentina. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kapiszewski, Diana. 2006. “La Corte Suprema y la Política Constitucional en la Argentina Post-Menem.” Revista Jurídica de la Universidad de Palermo, Año 7, Número 1 Julio: 5–46.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert. January 1986. “Political Opportunity Structures and Political Protest: Anti-Nuclear Movements in Four Democracies.” British Journal of Political Science, 16 (1): 57–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leiva, Alberto. 2005. Historia del Foro de Buenos Aires. La Tarea de Pedir Justicia durante los Siglos XVIII a XX. Buenos Aires: Ad-Hoc.Google Scholar
McCann, Michael. 1994. Rights at Work: Pay Equity Reform and the Politics of Legal Mobilization. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Meili, Stephen . 1998. “Cause Lawyers and Social Movements: A Comparative Perspective on Democratic Change in Argentina and Brazil.” In Cause Lawyering: Political Commitments and Professional Responsabilities, Austin, Sarat and Scheingold, Sturart eds. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 487–522.Google Scholar
Molinelli, Guillermo. 1999. “La Corte Suprema de Justicia de la Nación frente a los poderes políticos a través del control de Constitucionalidad, 1983–98.” MIMEO: unpublished working paper.
Negretto, Gabriel. 1999. “Constitution-Making and Institutional Design: The Transformations of Presidentialism in Argentina.” Archives Européennes de Sociologie, Vol. XL, No 2, Fall 1999, pp. 193–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saba, Roberto and Bohmer, Martín. 2000. “Participación Ciudadana en Argentina: Estrategias para el efectivo ejercicio de los derechos,” accessed at http://www.abogadosvoluntarios.net/contenido.asp?idcontenido/225.
Sabsay, Daniel. 1996. “El amparo como garantía para la defensa de los derechos fundamentales,” Revista Jurídica del Centro de Estudiantes de la Facultad de Derecho y Ciencias Sociales de la Universidad de Buenos Aires. 6: 28–34.Google Scholar
Sabsay, Daniel. 2000. La Constitución de los Argentinos. Buenos Aires: ERREPAR.Google Scholar
Saldivia, Laura. 2002. “Derechos Humanos y Derecho de Interés Público en Argentina: ¿Quiebre o Continuidad?” Buenos Aires: Documento de Trabajo. Programa de Derecho de Interés Público. Law Faculty, Universidad de Palermo.
Schjolden, Line. 2005. Suing for Justice: Labor and the Courts in Argentina, 1900–1943. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Scioscioli, Sebastián. 2005. “Acceso a la Justicia para Todos.” Encrucijadas, 39: 64–6. Buenos Aires: Universidad de Buenos Aires.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Martin and Sweet, Alec Stone. 2002. On Law, Politics, and Judicialization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sikkink, Kathryn. 1996. “The Emergence, Evolution, and Effectiveness of the Latin American Human Rights Network.” In Constructing Democracy: Human Rights, Citizenship, and Society in Latin America. Jelin, E. and Hershberg, Eric (ed.). Boulder, CO: Westview Press, pp. 59–84.Google Scholar
Sikkink, Kathryn and Keck, Margaret. 1998. Activist Beyond Borders. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Smulovitz, Catalina. 1995. “Constitución y Poder Judicial en la Nueva Democracia Argentina. La Experiencia de las Instituciones.” In La Nueva Matriz Política Argentina, Acuña, Carlos (comp.). Buenos Aires: Nueva Visión, p. 71–114.Google Scholar
Smulovitz, Catalina. 1997. “Ciudadanos, Derechos y Política.” In Las Acciones de Interés Público. Argentina, Chile, Colombia y Perú. Felipe, Gonzalez Morales (ed.), Santiago de Chile: Escuela de Derecho. Universidad Diego Portales. Serie Publicaciones Especiales No. 7: 407–38.Google Scholar
Smulovitz, Catalina. 2005. “Petitioning and Creating Rights: Judicialization in Argentina.” In The Judicialization of Politics in Latin America, Sieder, Rachel, Angell, Alan, and Schjolden, Line (eds.). New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 161–81.Google Scholar
Smulovitz, Catalina. 2006. “Judicialization of Protest in Argentina. The case of ‘corralito’” In Enforcing the Rule of Law: Citizens and the Media in Latin America. Peruzzotti, Enrique and Smulovitz, Catalina (eds.). Pittsburgh: Pittsburgh University Press, pp. 55–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smulovitz, Catalina and Daniela, Urribarri. 2006. “Organizaciones Sociales e Incidencia en Políticas Públicas: Actores y Contexto en el Caso Argentino.” Accessed at http://new.lasociedadcivil.org/docs/ciberteca/incidencia_argentina.pdf.
Southworth, Anne. 2000. “The Rights Revolution and Support Structures for Rights Advocacy.” Law and Society Review, 34(4): 1203–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarrow, Sydney. 1994. Power in Movement: Collective Action, Social Movements, and Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tate, Neal and Vallinder, Torbjorn (eds.). 1995. The Global Expansion of Judicial Power. New York: New York University Press.
Toharia, Jose Juan. 2003. “Assessing a Judiciary's Performance Through Public Opinion.” In Beyond Common Knowledge: Empirical Approaches to the Rule of Law, Jensen, Erik and Heller, Thomas, eds. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Verchioli, Virginia. 2006. “A Luta Pelo Direito,” Engajamento Miliante E Profissionalizacao Dos Advogados Na Causa Pelos Direitos Humanos Na Argentina. Doctoral Thesis. Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×