Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T05:49:50.672Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - Day Fines in Slovenia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2021

By
Mitja Kovac
Edited by
Elena Kantorowicz-Reznichenko  and
Michael Faure
Elena Kantorowicz-Reznichenko
Affiliation:
Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam
Michael Faure
Affiliation:
Universiteit Maastricht, Netherlands
Get access

Summary

The imposition of day fines and related questions on the optimal punitive policy have been for the last few decades one of the most extensively debated issues in the Slovenian criminal law scholarship. This chapter offers an overview of the historical development of day fines in Slovenia, provides a thorough discussion on its current regulatory structure, investigates its main sources of inefficiencies and problems of daily implementation, explores the issues of public perception of day fines and identifies the main obstacles, roadblocks and special challenges that lay ahead on the path towards the optimal implementation of day fines in Slovenia. Analysis suggests that the legislative infrastructure is in place for an optimal implementation of day fines. Yet, its de facto imposition, although on an increasing trajectory, is still far behind the percentage in some of the developed western legal systems. Ironically, the public discourse and some of the public prosecutors (and judges) perceive day fines as inefficient, unjust, ineffective and non-retributory.

Keywords

Day finesSloveniapunitive policyimplementationroadblocksinefficiency
Type
Chapter
Information
Day Fines in Europe
Assessing Income-Based Sanctions in Criminal Justice Systems
 , pp. 216 - 237
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bačić, F. 1980. ‘Krivično pravo: opći dio’, Informator 91–104.Google Scholar
Bavcon, L. 1958. Kriminalna Politika in njene Tendence v Socialistični Družbi. Univerza v Ljubljani, Pedagoška fakulteta.Google Scholar
Bavcon, L., et al. 1994. ‘Kazenski Zakonik Republike Slovenije z Uvodnimi Pojasnili’, ČZ Uradni list, Ljubljana, 42–3, 131–2.Google Scholar
Bavcon, L. et al. 2003. ‘Kazensko Pravo Splošni Del’, Uradni list Republike Slovenije, 78–81.Google Scholar
Bavcon, L. and Kobe, P. 1970. ‘Kazenski zakonik s pojasnili in sodno prakso’, Uradni list SR Slovenije, 37–44.Google Scholar
Bošnjak, M. 2004. ‘Rezultati analize kazenskih postopkov’, Pravna praksa 36: 15–17.Google Scholar
Christián, L. and Sotlar, A. 2018. ‘Private Security Regulation in Hungary and Slovenia – A Comparative Study Based on Legislation and Societal Foundations’, Journal of Criminal Justice and Security 2: 143–62.Google Scholar
Criminal Code, Article 87, KZ-1E, Off. Gaz. No. 255/08, 50/12, 6/16, 54/15, 38/16 and 7/2017, from 2.6.2017.Google Scholar
Delovni osnutek Kazenskega Zakonika Republike Slovenije in njegove usmeritve, 1993. Vlada Republike Slovenije.Google Scholar
European Commission, 2018. Your Social Security Rights in Slovenia, Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion.Google Scholar
Felc, M. 2011. ‘Nedelo: Denarna kazen dolgoročno ni učinkovita’, Delo 4(4).Google Scholar
Florjančič, D. 2006. ‘Izbira, odmera in izrek kazenskih sankcij’, Pravna Praksa 19–1: 18–22.Google Scholar
Frank, S. 1951. Teorija Kaznenog Prava Po, Krivinom zakoniku od godine. Sveuciliste Zagreb.Google Scholar
Hacin, R. 2015. ‘Pregled slovenskega penološkega raziskovanja od sredine petdesetih let dvajsetega stoletja’, Revija za kriminalistiko in kriminologijo 66: 235–52.Google Scholar
Jager, M. 2002. Ekonomska analiza kazenskega prava in kriminalitetne politike, p. 1635.Google Scholar
Jovanović, L. and Jović, M. 2004. Krivično pravo: opšti deo. Viša škola unutrašnjih poslova. Sveuciliste Zagreb Viša škola unutrašnjih poslova.Google Scholar
‘Kazenski Zakonik SFRJ’, Uradni list SFRJ, No. 44/1976.Google Scholar
‘Kazenski zakonik’, Uradni list RS, št. 50/12 – uradno prečiščeno besedilo, 6/16 – popr., 54/15, 38/16 in 27/17.Google Scholar
‘Kazenski zakonik (uradno prečiščeno besedilo)’ KZ-UPB1, Uradni list RS, No. 95/2004, z dne 27.8.2004.Google Scholar
‘Kazenski zakonik Republike Slovenije’ KZ, Uradni list RS, št. 63/94 z dne 13.10.1994.Google Scholar
Lobnikar, B., Prislan, K. and Modic, M. 2016. ‘Merjenje uspešnosti implementacije policijskega dela v skupnosti v Sloveniji’, Revija za kriminalistiko in kriminologijo 67: 89–110.Google Scholar
Lovšin, P. 2013. ‘Za več denarnih in manj pogojnih kazni’, Dnevnik.Google Scholar
Marinko, J. 2002, ‘Kakšne sankcije izrekajo sodišča v kazenskem postopku?’ (What Are The Penal Sections Pronounced In Criminal Cases?), Pravna praksa 33–34: 28–30.Google Scholar
Markelj, L. 2008. ‘Ekonomska analiza kazenskih sankcij’ in Zaic, K. (ed.), Ekonomska analiza prava v Sloveniji. Uradni List.Google Scholar
Ministrstvo za notranje zadeve – Policija: Statistični podatki s področja kriminalitete za leto 2007.Google Scholar
Petrovčič, P. 2011. ‘Pogojno veselje Po liniji najmanjšega odpora v pravosodju trije od štirih obsojencev s sodišča odidejo svobodni’, Mladina (29 July).Google Scholar
Petrovec, D. 1999. ‘Alternativno kaznovanje v slovenski zakonodaji in praksi’, Revija za kriminalistiko in kriminologijo/Ljubljana 50: 345–50.Google Scholar
Petrovec, D. 2015. ‘Alternativne zaporne kazni’, IUS Software, GV Založba, 50–9.Google Scholar
Plesničar, M. M. 2013. ‘The Individualization of Punishment: Sentencing in Slovenia’, European Journal of Criminology 10: 462–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Resolucija o Nacionalnem programu preprečevanja in zatiranja kriminalitete za obdobje 2007-2011’, Uradni list RS, št. 40/2007.Google Scholar
Repovž, E. 2010. ‘Bodo visoke kazni za delo na črno učinkovite?’, Delo (16 November).Google Scholar
Šelih, A. 1993. ‘Problemi kazenskih sankcij’, Podjetje in delo 5–6: 474–79.Google Scholar
Šelih, A. 2009. ‘Načelo sorazmernosti in kazenske sankcije’, Podjetje in delo 6: 1357–68.Google Scholar
Statistical Office of the Republic of Slovenia, 2019.Google Scholar
Vlada Republike Slovenije, Predlog Kazenskega Zakonika, Ljubljana, 17.01.2008.Google Scholar
Vrhovno državno tožilstvo RS: Skupno poročilo o delu državnih tožilstev, 2007.Google Scholar
‘Zakon o spremembah in dopolnitvah Kazenskega zakonika’ KZ-B, Uradni list RS, št. 40/04 z dne 20.4.2004.Google Scholar
‘Zakon o socialno varstvenih prejemkih’, Uradni list RS, št. 61/10, 40/11, 14/13, 99/13, 90/15, 88/16, 31/18 in 73/18.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×