Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T14:34:07.993Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 62 - Research in Obstetrics and Gynaecology

from Section 12 - Miscellaneous

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 November 2021

Tahir Mahmood
Affiliation:
Victoria Hospital, Kirkcaldy
Charles Savona-Ventura
Affiliation:
University of Malta, Malta
Ioannis Messinis
Affiliation:
University of Thessaly, Greece
Sambit Mukhopadhyay
Affiliation:
Norfolk & Norwich University Hospital, UK
Get access

Summary

Scientific research leads to the generation of new knowledge and is either basic or applied. A question is formulated first, followed by the creation of a hypothesis that needs to be tested. Research in obstetrics and gynaecology can explain the physiology of the reproductive system, the physiology of pregnancy and various clinical abnormalities. Clinical research is carried out through clinical trials. Randomized controlled trials are the gold standard and are performed in four phases with the involvement of patients. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses form the basis of evidence-based medicine. Performance of high-quality research should be controlled by the rules and regulations of national research governance policy to ensure patient safety and ethical issues are adhered to. Research misconduct is a serious failure that leads to incorrect results. Researchers must be aware of the moral rules governing research as well as the consequences for themselves and science.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

De Muth, JE. Overview of biostatistics used in clinical research. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2009;66:7081.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sacha, V, Panagiotakos, DB. Insights in hypothesis testing and making. Open Cardiovasc Med J 2016;10:196200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hon, CY, Danyluk, Q, Bryce, E et al. Comparison of qualitative and quantitative fit-testing results for three commonly used respirators in the healthcare sector. J Occup Environ Hyg 2016;14:175179.Google Scholar
Li, Z, Heng, J, Yan, J, et al. Integrated analysis of gene expression and methylation profiles of 48 candidate genes in breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2016;160:371383.Google Scholar
Messinis, IE, Templeton, AA. Effects of supraphysiological concentrations of progesterone on the characteristics of the oestradiol-induced gonadotrophin surge in women. J Reprod Fertil 1990;88:513519.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, AM, Stavri, PZ, Hersh, WR. A categorization and analysis of the criticisms of evidence-based medicine. Int J Med Inform 2004;73:3543.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spilker, B. Guide to Clinical Studies and Developing Protocols. New York: Raven Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Humaidan, P, Chin, W, Rogoff, D, et al. Efficacy and safety of follitropin alfa/lutropin alfa in ART: a randomized controlled trial in poor ovarian responders. Hum Reprod 2017;32:544555.Google Scholar
Lancaster, GA, Dodd, S, Williamson, PR. Design and analysis of pilot studies: recommendations for good practice. J Eval Clin Pract 2004;10:307312.Google Scholar
Baker, SG, Kramer, BS. The transitive fallacy for randomized trials: if A bests B and B bests C in separate trials, is A better than C? BMC Med Res Methodol 2002;13:213.Google Scholar
Olsson, H, Bladström, A, Ingvar, C, Möller, TR. A population-based cohort study of HRT use and breast cancer in southern Sweden. Br J Cancer 2001;85:674677.Google Scholar
Whiting, P, Westwood, M, Burke, M, Sterne, J, Glanville, J. Systematic reviews of test accuracy should search a range of databases to identify primary studies. J Clin Epidemiol 2008;61:357364.Google Scholar
Hartling, L, Featherstone, R, Nuspl, M, et al. The contribution of databases to the results of systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study. BMC Med Res Methodol 2016;16:127.Google Scholar
Royle, P, Milne, R. Literature searching for randomized controlled trials used in Cochrane reviews: rapid versus exhaustive searches. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2003;19:591603.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mochtar, MH, Danhof, NA, Ayeleke, RO, Van der Veen, F, van Wely, M. Recombinant luteinizing hormone (rLH) and recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (rFSH) for ovarian stimulation in IVF/ICSI cycles. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017;5:CD005070.Google Scholar
Resnik, DB. What is ethics in research & why is it important? 2015. Available at: www.niehs.nih.gov/research/resources/bioethics/whatis/index.cfm.Google Scholar
Resnik, DB, Zubin Master, Z. Policies and initiatives aimed at addressing research misconduct in high-income countries. PLoS Med 2013;10:e1001406.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×