Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T23:07:16.531Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 66 - Prumnopitys

Podocarpales: Prumnopityaceae

from Part III - Living Arborescent Gymnosperm Genetic Presentations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 November 2024

Christopher N. Page
Christopher N. Page
Affiliation:
University of Exeter
Get access

Summary

Dioecious evergreen trees of yew-like foliar habit. The leaves are more freely spaced, more perpendicularly inserted and more irregularly spreading than in Pectinopitys, often inserted near-perpendicularly and with many spreading more irregularly above or all around most major shoots, and hence only weakly and irregularly ranked. The leaves remain small, and much smaller than in Sundacarpus. The female ‘fruits’ when mature are pendulous on long stalks, and large and heavy.

Type
Chapter
Information
Evolution of the Arborescent Gymnosperms
Pattern, Process and Diversity
 , pp. 504 - 515
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adam, P. 1992. Australian Rainforests. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, I.A.E. & Greenwood, R.M. 1989. Relationships between moas and plants. New Zealand Journal of Ecology 12(suppl.): 67–96.Google Scholar
Buchholz, J.T. 1936. Embryogeny of species of Podocarpus of the subgenus Stachycarpus. Botanical Gazette 98: 135–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchholz, J.T. 1941. Embryogeny of the Podocarpaceae. Botanical Gazette 103: 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chowdhury, C.R. 1962. The embryology of conifers: a review. Phytomorphology 12: 313–338.Google Scholar
Christophel, D.C. & Greenwood, D.R. 1988. A comparison of Australian tropical rainforest and Tertiary fossil leaf beds. Proceedings of the Ecological Society of Australia 15: 139–148.Google Scholar
Conran, J.G., Wood, G.A., Martin, P.G., et al. 2000. Generic relationships within and between the gymnosperm families Podocarpaceae and Phyllocladaceae based on an analysis of the chloroplast gene rbcL. Australian Journal of Botany 48: 715–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, B.J., O’Brien, I.E.W. & Murray, B.G. 1997. Karyotypes, chromosome bands and genome size variation in New Zealand endemic gymnosperms. Plant Systematics and Evolution 208: 169–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farjon, A. 2010. A Handbook of the World’s Conifers. Leiden: Konninklijke Brill NV.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flory, W.S. 1936. Chromosome numbers and phylogeny in the gymnosperms. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 17: 83–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, M.F. 2019. Threatened Conifers of the World: https://threatenedconifers.rbge.org.uk/conifers/prumnopitys-andinaGoogle Scholar
Gardner, M.F. & Lara, A. 2003. The conifers of Chile: an overview of their distribution and ecology. Pp 165–170 in Mill, R.R. (ed.), Conifers for the Future? Proceedings of the Fourth International Conifer Conference. Wye: Acta Horticulturae.Google Scholar
Gaussen, H. 1974. Les Gymnospermes actuelles et fossiles. Fascicule XIII. Les Podocarpines sauf les Podocarpus. Travaux du laboratoire forestier de Toulouse 2(3).Google Scholar
Greenwood, R.M. & Atkinson, I.A.E. 1977. Evolution of divaricating plants in New Zealand in relation to moa browsing. Proceedings of the New Zealand Ecological Society 24: 21–33.Google Scholar
Hechenleitner, P., Gardner, M.F., Thomas, P., et al. 2005. Plantas Amenazadadas del Centro-Sur de Chile. Distribución, Conservatión y Propagación. Santiago: Universidad Austral de Chile y Real Jardin Botánico de Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Jokisch, B.D. & Lair, B.M. 2002. One last stand? Forests and change in Ecuador’s eastern Cordillera. Geographical Review 92: 235–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelch, D.G. 1997. The phylogeny of the Podocarpaceae based on morphological evidence. Systematic Botany 22: 113–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelch, D.G. 1998. Phylogeny of Podocarpaceae: a comparison of evidence from morphology and 18S rDNA. American Journal of Botany 85: 986–996.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knopf, P., Schulz, C., Little, D.P., Stützel, Th. & Stevenson, D.W. 2012. Relationships within Podocarpaceae based on DNA sequence anatomical, morphological, and biogeographical data. Cladistics 1: 1–29.Google Scholar
Little, D.P., Knopf, P. & Schulz, C. 2013. DNA barcode identification of Podocarpaceae: the second largest conifer family. PLoS One 8: e81008.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lowry, J.B. 1980. Evolution of divaricating plants in New Zealand in relation to moa browsing. New Zealand Journal of Ecology 3: 165.Google Scholar
Mehra, P.N. & Khoshoo, T.N. 1956. Cytology of conifers I, II. Journal of Genetics 54: 165–180, 181–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliver, W.R.B. 1949. The Moas of New Zealand and Australia. Wellington: Dominion Museum.Google Scholar
Page, C.N. 2019. New and maintained genera in the taxonomic alliance of Prumnopitys s.l. (Podocarpaceae), and circumscription of a new genus: Pectinopitys. New Zealand Journal of Botany 57(3): 137–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pole, M. 1992. Eocene vegetation from Hasties, north-east Tasmania. Australian Systematic Botany 5: 431–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pole, M. 1997. Paleocene plant microfossils from Kakahu, South Canterbury, New Zealand. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand 27: 371–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pole, M. 2007. Early Eocene dispersed cuticles and mangrove to rainforest vegetation at Strahan-Regatte Point, Tasmania. Palaeontologica Electronica 10(3).Google Scholar
Preest, D.S. 1963. A note on the dispersal characteristics of the seed of New Zealand podocarps and beeches and their biogeographical significance. Pp 415–424 in Gressitt, J.L. (ed.), Pacific Basin Biogeography. Honolulu, HI: Bishop Museum Press.Google Scholar
Quiroga, M.P., Mathiasen, P., Iglesias, A., Mill, R.R. & Premoli, A.C. 2016. Molecular and fossil evidence disentangle the biogeographical history of Podocarpus, a key genus in plant geography. Journal of Biogeography 43(2): 372–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, W.T., Mill, R.R., Gardner, M.F., et al. 2002. Evolutionary relationships of the New Caledonian heterotrophic conifer, Parasitaxus usta (Podocarpaceae), inferred from chloroplast trn LF intron/spacer and nuclear rDNA ITS2 sequences. Plant Systematics and Evolution 233: 79–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Truswell, E.M. 1990. Cretaceous and Tertiary vegetation of Antarctica: a palynological perspective. Pp 71–88 in Taylor, T.N. & Taylor, E.L. (eds.), Antarctic Palaeobiology. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Worthy, T.H. 1987. Sexual dimorphism and temporal variation in the North Island moa species Euryapteryx curtisi (Owen) and Pachyornis mappini (Archey). National Museum of New Zealand Records 3: 59–70.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Prumnopitys
  • Christopher N. Page, University of Exeter
  • Book: Evolution of the Arborescent Gymnosperms
  • Online publication: 11 November 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009263108.030
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Prumnopitys
  • Christopher N. Page, University of Exeter
  • Book: Evolution of the Arborescent Gymnosperms
  • Online publication: 11 November 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009263108.030
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Prumnopitys
  • Christopher N. Page, University of Exeter
  • Book: Evolution of the Arborescent Gymnosperms
  • Online publication: 11 November 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009263108.030
Available formats
×