Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T14:09:58.775Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 17.1 - Fetal tumors

Pathophysiology

from Section 2 - Fetal disease

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2013

Mark D. Kilby
Affiliation:
Department of Fetal Medicine, University of Birmingham
Anthony Johnson
Affiliation:
Baylor College of Medicine, Texas
Dick Oepkes
Affiliation:
Department of Obstetrics, Leiden University Medical Center
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Fetal tumors are rare, with an incidence of around 1 in 12 000 to 1 in 30 000 births [1]. Whilst almost all childhood tumors have also been reported to occasionally occur in the perinatal period, most tumors diagnosed in utero are biologically distinct from, and behave differently to, tumors more common in older children. Congenital solid fetal tumors are, as in older children, generally of mesenchymal rather than epithelial origin, and often recapitulate aspects of normal embryonic development; it is postulated that they arise from oncogenic mutations in immature cells or fetal stem cells, and are generally referred to as blastomas or embryonal sarcomas. In view of the unique fetal circulation, peculiar metastatic patterns are observed in this age group which are not seen in older children, and the size and site of the tumor are often more important in determining outcome than the specific histological type. Furthermore, from a histological perspective, features such as a high mitotic index, tumor necrosis, and even vascular invasion do not necessarily indicate malignant behavior in this setting [1]. Complications specific to this age group include development of fetal hydrops, polyhydramnios, and obstructed labor, and some tumors may be associated with specific malformation syndromes [1].

As in older children, fetal tumors can be broadly categorized as either benign or malignant, although this distinction is not always clear. Benign tumors are relatively common and include entities such as hemangiomas which may not necessarily be adequately reported in the literature [1], although many “hemangiomas” are now considered to be vascular malformations rather than true neoplasms [2]. Indeed, many fetal and neonatal tumors are hamartomas rather than true neoplasms, although the distinction between neoplasms and hamartomas is again not always obvious. Moreover, many of the tumors that are regarded as malignant in older children may behave in a more benign fashion in the fetus and neonate, including neuroblastoma, congenital myeloproliferative disorder in Trisomy 21, congenital fibrosarcoma, and hereditary retinoblastoma [1].

Type
Chapter
Information
Fetal Therapy
Scientific Basis and Critical Appraisal of Clinical Benefits
, pp. 320 - 328
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Charles, AK. Congenital tumours. In: Keeling, JW, Yee Khong, T, eds. Fetal and Neonatal Pathology, 4th edn. London, Springer Verlag. 2007; 327–78.
North, PE, Waner, M, Buckmiller, L, James, CA, Mihm, MC Jr. Vascular tumors of infancy and childhood: beyond capillary hemangioma. Cardiovasc Pathol 2006;15:303–17.Google Scholar
Isaacs, H. Tumors of the fetus and newborn. In: Major Problems in Pathology, Vol. 35. Philadelphia, WB Saunders Company. 1997; 69–72.
Moore, SW, Satgé, D, Sasco, AJ, Zimmermann, A, Plaschkes, J. The epidemiology of neonatal tumours. Report of an international working group. Pediatr Surg Int 2003;19:509–19.Google Scholar
Houston, SK, Murray, TG, Wolfe, SQ, Fernandes, CE. Current update on retinoblastoma. Int Ophthalmol Clin 2011;51:77–91.Google Scholar
Tonni, G, De Felice, C, Centini, G, Ginanneschi, C. Cervical and oral teratoma in the fetus: a systematic review of etiology, pathology, diagnosis, treatment and prognosis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2010;282:355–61.Google Scholar
Sebire, NJ, Malone, M, Ashworth, M, Jacques, TS. Diagnostic Pediatric Surgical Pathology. China, Churchill Livingstone Elsevier, 2010.
Heerema-McKenney, A, Harrison, MR, Bratton, B, Farrell, J, Zaloudek, C. Congenital teratoma: a clinicopathologic study of 22 fetal and neonatal tumors. Am J Surg Pathol 2005;29:29–38.Google Scholar
Pourang, H, Sarmadi, S, Mireskandari, SM, et al. Twin fetus in fetu with immature teratoma: a case report and review of the literature. Arch Iran Med 2009;12:507–10.Google Scholar
Sebire, NJ, Jauniaux, E. Fetal and placental malignancies: prenatal diagnosis and management. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009;33:235–44.Google Scholar
Chatten, J. Neuroblastoma. In: Reed, GB, Clairaux, AE, Cockburn, F, eds. Diseases of the Fetus and Newborn. London, Chapman & Hall. 1995; 855–63.
Acharya, S, Jayabose, S, Kogan, S, et al. Prenatally diagnosed neuroblastoma. Cancer 1997;80:304–10.Google Scholar
Allen, AT, Dress, AF, Moore, WF. Mirror syndrome resulting from metastatic congenital neuroblastoma. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2007;26:310–12.Google Scholar
Robertson, M, De Jong, G, Mansvelt, E. Prenatal diagnosis of congenital leukemia in a fetus at 25 weeks’ gestation with Down syndrome: case report and review of the literature. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003;21:486–9.Google Scholar
Isaacs, H. Fetal and neonatal leukemia. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2003;25:348–61.Google Scholar
Trotz, M, Weber, MA, Jacques, TS, Malone, M, Sebire, NJ. Disseminated langerhans cell histiocytosis-related sudden unexpected death in infancy. Fetal Pediatr Pathol 2009;28:39–44.Google Scholar
Isaacs, H. Fetal brain tumors: a review of 154 cases. Am J Perinatol 2009;26:453–66.Google Scholar
Powis, M. Neonatal renal tumours. Early Hum Dev 2010;86:607–12.Google Scholar
Dumont, C, Monforte, M, Flandrin, A, et al. Prenatal management of congenital infantile fibrosarcoma: unexpected outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011;37:733–5.Google Scholar
Bourgeois, JM, Knezevich, SR, Mathers, JA, Sorensen, PH. Molecular detection of the ETV6-NTRK3 gene fusion differentiates congenital fibrosarcoma from other childhood spindle cell tumors. Am J Surg Pathol 2000;24:937–46.Google Scholar
Durin, L, Jeanne-Pasquier, C, Bailleul, P, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of a fibrosarcoma of the thigh: a case report. Fetal Diagn Ther 2006;21:481–4.Google Scholar
Yan, AC, Chamlin, SL, Liang, MG, et al. Congenital infantile fibrosarcoma: a masquerader of ulcerated hemangioma. Pediatr Dermatol 2006;23:330–4.Google Scholar
Nonaka, D, Sun, CC. Congenital fibrosarcoma with metastasis in a fetus. Pediatr Dev Pathol 2004;7:187–91.Google Scholar
McCahon, E, Sorensen, PH, Davis, JH, Rogers, PC, Schultz, KR. Non-resectable congenital tumors with the ETV6-NTRK3 gene fusion are highly responsive to chemotherapy. Med Pediatr Oncol 2003;40:288–92.Google Scholar
Onderoglu, LS, Yucel, A, Yuce, K. Prenatal sonographic features of embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1999;13:210–12.Google Scholar
Yoshino, K, Takeuchi, M, Nakayama, M, Suehara, N. Congenital cervical rhabdomyosarcoma arising in one fetus of a twin pregnancy. Fetal Diagn Ther 2005;20:291–5.Google Scholar
Liu, J, Guzman, MA, Pezanowski, D, et al. FOXO1-FGFR1 fusion and amplification in a solid variant of alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma. Mod Pathol 2011:34;1327–35.Google Scholar
Sueters, M, Peek, AM, Ball, LM, et al. Prenatal detection of orbital rhabdomyosarcoma. Arch Ophthalmol 2005;123:276–9.Google Scholar
Matsunaga, GS, Shanberg, AM, Rajpoot, D. Prenatal ultrasonographic detection of bladder rhabdomyosarcoma. J Urol 2003;169:1495–6.Google Scholar
Isaacs, H. Fetal and neonatal rhabdoid tumor. J Pediatr Surg 2010;45:619–26.Google Scholar
Uno, K, Takita, J, Yokomori, K, et al. Aberrations of the hSNF5/INI1 gene are restricted to malignant rhabdoid tumors or atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors in pediatric solid tumors. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2002;34:33–41.Google Scholar
Leader, J, Carlan, SJ, Blum, J. Congenital malignant extrarenal rhabdoid tumor: prenatal ultrasound findings. Obstet Gynecol 2002;99:949–51.Google Scholar
De Tar, M, Sanford Biggerstaff, J. Congenital renal rhabdoid tumor with placental metastases: immunohistochemistry, cytogenetic, and ultrastructural findings. Pediatr Dev Pathol 2006;9:161–7.Google Scholar
Zand, DJ, Huff, D, Everman, D, et al. Autosomal dominant inheritance of infantile myofibromatosis. Am J Med Genet A 2004;126A:261–6.Google Scholar
Meizner, I, Shalev, J, Mashiach, R, Vardimon, D, Ben-Raphael, Z. Prenatal ultrasound diagnosis of infantile myofibromatosis – a case report. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000;16:84–6.Google Scholar
Hachisuga, M, Tsukimori, K, Hojo, S, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of a retroperitoneal lymphangioma: a case and review. Fetal Diagn Ther 2008;24:177–81.Google Scholar
Miniati, DN, Chintagumpala, M, Langston, C, et al. Prenatal presentation and outcome of children with pleuropulmonary blastoma. J Pediatr Surg 2006;41:66–71.Google Scholar
Pai, S, Eng, HL, Lee, SY, et al. Correction: Pleuropulmonary blastoma, not rhabdomyosarcoma in a congenital lung cyst. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2007;48:370–1.Google Scholar
Libretti, L, Ciriaco, P, Casiraghi, M, Arrigoni, G, Zannini, P. Pleuropulmonary blastoma in the area of a diagnosed congenital lung cyst. Ann Thorac Surg 2008;85:658–60.Google Scholar
Langston, C. New concepts in the pathology of congenital lung malformations. Semin Pediatr Surg 2003;12:17–37.Google Scholar
Correia-Pinto, J, Gonzaga, S, Huang, Y, Rottier, R. Congenital lung lesions – underlying molecular mechanisms. Semin Pediatr Surg 2010;19:171–9.Google Scholar
Langston, C, Dishop, MK. Diffuse lung disease in infancy: a proposed classification applied to 259 diagnostic biopsies. Pediatr Dev Pathol 2009;12:421–37.Google Scholar
Chen, WS, Yeh, GP, Tsai, HD, Hsieh, CT. Prenatal diagnosis of congenital cystic adenomatoid malformations: evolution and outcome. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 2009;48:278–81.Google Scholar
Nagata, K, Masumoto, K, Tesiba, R, et al. Outcome and treatment in an antenatally diagnosed congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation of the lung. Pediatr Surg Int 2009;25:753–7.Google Scholar
Isaacs, H. Fetal and neonatal hepatic tumors. J Pediatr Surg 2007;42:1797–803.Google Scholar
Aviram, R, Cohen, IJ, Kornreich, L, Braslavski, D, Meizner, I. Prenatal imaging of fetal hepatoblastoma. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2005;17:157–9.Google Scholar
Isaacs, H. Fetal and neonatal cardiac tumors. Pediatr Cardiol 2004;25:252–73.Google Scholar
Pierro, L, Brancato, R, Capoferri, C. Prenatal detection and early diagnosis of hereditary retinoblastoma in a family. Ophthalmologica 1993;207:106–11.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×