Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b95js Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-12T19:05:14.528Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

18 - Framing the question of fine-tuning for intermediary metabolism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2009

By
Eric Smith  and
Harold J. Morowitz
Edited by
John D. Barrow ,
Simon Conway Morris ,
Stephen J. Freeland  and
Charles L. Harper, Jr
Eric Smith
Affiliation:
Santa Fe Institute, 1399 Hyde Park Road, Santa Fe
Harold J. Morowitz
Affiliation:
Krasnow Institute for Advanced Study, East Building 207
John D. Barrow
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Simon Conway Morris
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Stephen J. Freeland
Affiliation:
University of Maryland, Baltimore
Charles L. Harper, Jr
Affiliation:
John Templeton Foundation
Get access

Summary

Learning from our own existence

Hoyle's [1] successful prediction of the 7.6 MeV resonance of the carbon-12 nucleus, based on observation of his own carbon-based existence, established the scientific usefulness of anthropic principles. These principles have become common, if not yet standard, tools in cosmology, where theories of initial conditions may not yet exist – or, if they do exist, may admit a range of values [2, 3, 4, 5, 6]. At the same time, anthropic principles have retained a traditional role in religion and philosophy, where sensitive dependence of human existence on laws of nature that could imaginably have been otherwise is interpreted as evidence for human significance in the creation of the universe.

The tendency of life forms to make universal use of, and seemingly to depend on, specific details of natural law or historical circumstance does not end with nuclear abundances. Following decades of studying the ways in which mammalian blood achieves homeostasis by exploiting favorable regions in carbonic-acid chemistry and similar adaptations, Henderson compiled a list of such dependences in physiology [7]. Inverting Darwin's description of selective fine-tuning of organisms for “fit” to their environments, Henderson characterized his physiological sensitivities anthropically as evidence of “the fitness of the environment” for life.

The rapid growth in understanding of biology, from structures to systems, seems likely to expose many more sensitivities of life to details of chemistry, physics, and history.

Type
Chapter
Information
Fitness of the Cosmos for Life
Biochemistry and Fine-Tuning
 , pp. 384 - 420
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Hoyle, F.On nuclear reactions occurring in very hot stars. I. The synthesis of elements from carbon to nickel. Astrophysical Journal Supplement, 1 (1954), 121–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, S. (1988). Why there is nothing rather than something: a theory of the cosmological constant. Nuclear Physics, B310 (1988), 643–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawking, S. W.The cosmological constant is probably zero. Physics Letters, 134B (1984), 403–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrow, J. D. and Tipler, F. J.The Anthropic Cosmological Principle. New York, NY: Oxford University Press (1986).Google Scholar
Davies, P.God and the New Physics. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster (1984).Google Scholar
Davies, P.Are We Alone? Philosophical Implications of the Discovery of Extraterrestrial Life. New York, NY: Basic Books (1995).Google Scholar
Henderson, L. J. (1913). The Fitness of the Environment: An Inquiry into the Biological Significance of the Properties of Matter. New York, NY: Macmillan. Repr. (1958) Boston, MA: Beacon Press; (1970) Gloucester, MA: Peter Smith.Google Scholar
Shannon, C. E. and Weaver, W.The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press (1971).Google Scholar
Gell-Mann, M. and Lloyd, S.Information measures, effective complexity, and total information. Complexity, 2 (1996), 44–52.3.0.CO;2-X>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kasting, J. F.Habitable zones around low-mass stars and the search for extraterrestrial life. Origins of Life and Evolution of Biospheres, 27 (1997), 291–307.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morowitz, H. J.The Emergence of Everything: How the World Became Complex. New York, NY: Oxford University Press (2002).Google Scholar
Savage, L. J.The Foundations of Statistics, 2nd rev. edn. New York, NY: Dover Publications (1972).Google Scholar
Holland, J. H.Emergence: From Chaos to Order. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley (1998).Google Scholar
Popper, K. Reduction and the incompleteness of science. In Studies in the Philosophy of Biology, ed. Ayala, F. and Dobzhansky, T.. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fry, I.The Emergence of Life on Earth: A Historical and Scientific Overview. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press (2000).Google Scholar
Hartl, D. L. and Clark, A. G.Principles of Population Genetics, 2nd edn. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates (1988).Google Scholar
Grant, V.The Evolutionary Process. New York, NY: Columbia University Press (1985).Google Scholar
Wilson, K. G. and Kogut, J.The renormalization group and the ε expansion. Physics Reports. Physics Letters, 12C (1974), 75–200.Google Scholar
Huang, K.Statistical Mechanics. New York, NY: Wiley (1987).Google Scholar
Alligood, K. T., Sauer, T. and Yorke, J. A.Chaos: An Introduction to Dynamical Systems. New York, NY: Springer (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, S. J.The Structure of Evolutionary Theory. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, (2002).Google Scholar
Conway-Morris, S.Life's Solution: Inevitable Humans in a Lonely Universe. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karp-Boss, L. and Jumars, P. A.Motion of diatom chains in steady shear flow. Limnology and Oceanography, 43 (1988), 1767–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karp-Boss, L., Boss, E. and Jumars, P. A.Motion of dinoflagellates in a simple shear flow. Limnology and Oceanography, 45 (2000), 1594–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morowitz, H. J.Beginnings of Cellular Life. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press (1992).Google Scholar
Fenchel, T. and Finlay, B. J.Ecology and Evolution in Anoxic Worlds. New York, NY: Oxford University Press (1995).Google Scholar
Fenchel, T.Origin and Early Evolution of Life. New York, NY: Oxford University Press (2002).Google Scholar
Blankenship, R. E.Molecular Mechanisms of Photosynthesis. Malden, MA: Blackwell Science (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woese, C. R.Interpreting the universal phylogenetic tree. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 97 (2000), 8392–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woese, C. R.On the evolution of cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 99 (2002), 8742–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margulis, L. and Schwartz, K. V.Five Kingdoms: An Illustrated Guide to the Phyla of Life on Earth. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman (1998).Google Scholar
Doolittle, W. F.Evolution, uprooting the tree of life. Scientific American, 282 (2000), 90–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jain, R., Rivera, M. C., Moore, J. E.et al.Horizontal gene transfer in microbial genome evolution. Theoretical Population Biology, 61 (2002), 489–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raymond, J., Zhaxybayeva, O., Gogarten, J. P.et al.Whole-genome analysis of photosynthetic prokaryotes. Science, 298 (2002), 1616–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stryer, L.Biochemistry, 4th edn. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman (1995).Google Scholar
Hillis, D. M., Moritz, C. and Mable, B. K., eds. Molecular Systematics, 2nd edn. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates (1996).Google Scholar
Fontana, W. and Buss, L. W.The arrival of the fittest: toward a theory of biological organization. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, 56 (1994), 1–64.Google Scholar
Miller, S. L. and Orgel, L. E.The Origins of Life on the Earth. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall (1974).Google Scholar
Crick, F.Life Itself. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster (1984).Google Scholar
Monod, J.Chance and Necessity. Glasgow: Collins (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewontin, R.The Triple Helix: Gene, Organism, and Environment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (2000).Google Scholar
Lewontin, R. C., Rose, S. and Kamin, L. J.Not in Our Genes: Biology, Ideology and Human Nature. New York, NY: Pantheon Books (1984).Google Scholar
Gould, S. J.Wonderful Life: The Burgess Shale and the Nature of History. New York, NY: W. W. Norton (2000).Google Scholar
Morowitz, H. J., Srinivasan, V. S., Copley, S.et al.The simplest enzyme revisited. Complexity, 10 (2005), 12–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morowitz, H. J.Phenetics, a born-again science. Complexity, 8 (2003), 12–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eschenmoser, A.Chemistry of potentially prebiological natural products. Origins of Life and Evolution of Biospheres, 24 (1994), 389–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, A. L.Chemical constraints governing the origin of metabolism: the thermodynamic landscape of carbon group transformations under mild aqueous conditions. Origins of Life and Evolution of Biospheres, 32 (2002), 333–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weber, A. L.Kinetics of organic transformations under mild aqueous conditions: implications for the origin of life and its metabolism. Origins of Life and Evolution of Biospheres, 34 (2004), 473–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Adami, C., Ofria, C. and Collier, T. C.Evolution of biological complexity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 97 (2000), 4463–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, R. J. P. and Fraústo da Silva, J. J. R.Evolution was chemically constrained. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 220 (2003), 323–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shpak, M., Stadler, P. F., Wagner, G. P.et al.Aggregation of variables and system decomposition: applications to fitness landscape analysis. Theory in Bioscience, 123 (2004), 33–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shpak, M., Stadler, P. F., Wagner, G. P.et al.Simon Ando decomposability and fitness landscapes. Theory in Bioscience, 123 (2004), 139–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jaynes, E. T. Papers on Probability, Statistics, and Statistical Physics, ed. Rosenkrantz, R. D., Boston, MA: Kluwer, (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schrödinger, E. F.What Is Life?: The Physical Aspect of the Living Cell. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoelzer, G., Pepper, J. and Smith, E.On the logical relationship between natural selection and self-organization. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 19 (2006), 1785–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lengeler, J. W., Drews, G. and Schlegel, H. G.Biology of the Prokaryotes. Stuttgart: Thieme (1999).Google Scholar
Schlegel, H. G. and Bowien, B.Autotrophic Bacteria. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag (1989).Google Scholar
Westheimer, F. H.Why nature chose phosphates. Science, 235 (1987), 1173–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peters, O., Hertlein, C. and Christensen, K.A complexity view of rainfall. Physical Review Letters, 88 (2002), 1–4.Google ScholarPubMed
Peters, O., Hertlein, C. and Christensen, K.Rain: relaxations in the sky. Physical Review, E66 (2002), 36120–9.Google Scholar
Peixoto, J. P. and Oort, A. H.Physics of Climate. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag, (1992).Google Scholar
Glansdorff, P. and Prigogine, I.Thermodynamic Theory of Structure. New York, NY: Wiley (1971).Google Scholar
Smith, E.Carnot's theorem as Noether's theorem for thermoacoustic engines. Physical Review, E58 (1998), 2818–32.Google Scholar
Smith, E.Statistical mechanics of self-driven Carnot cycles. Physical Review, E60 (1999), 3633–45.Google ScholarPubMed
Morowitz, H. J., Kostelnik, J. D., Yang, H.et al.The origin of intermediary metabolism. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 97 (2000), 7704–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, S. L. and Smith-Magowan, D.The thermodynamics of the Krebs cycle and related compounds. Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data, 19 (1990), 1049–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plyasunov, A. V. and Shock, E. L.Thermodynamic functions of hydration of hydrocarbons at 298.15 K and 0.1 MPa. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 64 (2000), 439–68 (data available at http://webdocs.asu.edu).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alberty, R. A.Standard Gibbs free energy, enthalpy, and entropy changes as a function of pH and pMg for several reactions involving adenosine phosphates. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 244 (1969), 3290–302.Google ScholarPubMed
Andreev, A. V., Emelyanov, V. I. and Ilinskii, Y. A.Cooperative Effects in Optics: Superradiance and Phase Transitions. Philadelphia, PA: Institute of Physics Publications (1993).Google Scholar
Kauffman, S. A.Autocatalytic sets of proteins. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 119 (1986), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kauffman, S. A. The Origins of Order: Self-Organization and Selection in Evolution. New York, NY: Oxford University Press (1993).
Fontana, W. Algorithmic chemistry. In Artificial Life II, ed. by , C. G.et al.New York, NY: Addison-Wesley (1991), pp. 159–209.Google Scholar
Fox, S. W.Life from an orderly cosmos. Naturwissenschaften, 67 (1980), 576–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wächtershäuser, G.Evolution of the first metabolic cycles. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 87 (1990), 200–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wächtershäuser, G.Groundworks for an evolutionary biochemistry: the iron-sulphur world. Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology, 58 (1992), 85–201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woodruff, W. H. (personal communication). For a coarse-grained comparison of the resulting albedo of land and water, see [61], Sections 6.3 and 6.7.
See [35], p. 677, where the author estimates c. 30% conversion effciency from 8 absorbed photons per CO2 reduced to hexose. In [28], p. 35, the author refines this slightly, correcting for quantum efficiencies. In all cases, this is an upper bound under idealized conditions. See Spanner, D. C.Introduction to Thermodynamics. New York, NY: Academic Press (1964) for some discussion of the complexity of this calculation, as well as Clayton, R. K.Light and Living Matter, vol. 1: The Physical Part. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill (1970), pp. 91–6, 98–103.Google Scholar
Wald, G.Fitness in the universe: choices and necessities. Origins of Life and Evolution of Biospheres, 5 (1974), 7–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jackson, J. D.Classical Electrodynamics, 2nd edn. New York, NY: Wiley (1975).Google Scholar
Darwin, F.The Life and Letters of Charles Darwin, vol. 3. New York, NY: Johnson Reprint Corp. (1969), p. 18.Google Scholar
Baltascheffsky M. and Nyren, P. The synthesis and utilization of inorganic pyrophosphate. In Bioenergetics, ed. Ernster, L.. Amsterdam: Elsevier (1984), pp. 187–206.Google Scholar
Morowitz, H. J.Proton semiconductors and energy transduction in biological systems. American Journal of Physiology, 235 (1978), R99–114.Google ScholarPubMed
Smith, E. and Morowitz, H. J.Universality in intermediary metabolism. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 101 (2004), 13168–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hanczyk, M. M., Fujikawa, S. M. and Szostak, J. W.Experimental models of primitive cellular compartments: encapsulation, growth, and division. Science, 302 (2003), 618–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Božič, B. and Svetina, S. A relationship between membrane properties forms the basis of a selectivity mechanism for vesicle self-reproduction. Europe an Biophysics Journal>, 33 (2004), 565–71.CrossRef
Koch, A. L.How did bacteria come to be?Advances in Microbial Physiology, 40 (1998), 353–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fraser, C. M., Gocayne, J. D., White, O.et al.The minimal gene complement of Mycoplasma genitalium. Science, 270 (1995), 397–403.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
King, J. L. and Jukes, T. H.Non-Darwinian evolution. Science, 164 (1969), 788–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gacs, P.Reliable cellular automata with self-organization. Journal of Statistical Physics, 103 (2001), 45–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, L.Introduction to Gacs's positive-rates paper. Journal of Statistical Physics, 103 (2001), 1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burbidge, E. M., Burbidge, G. R., Fowler, W. A.et al.Synthesis of the elements in stars. Reviews of Modern Physics, 29 (1957), 547–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartle, J. B. and Hawking, S. W.Wave function of the universe. Physical Review, D28 (1983), 2960–75.Google Scholar
Hoyle, F. and Wickramasinghe, C.Evolution from Space. London: J. M. Dent and Sons (1981).Google Scholar
Jordan, M. I.Learning in Graphical Models. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press (1999).Google Scholar
Livio, M., Hollowell, D., Weiss, A.et al.The anthropic significance of the existence of an excited state of 12C. Nature, 340 (1989), 281–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, I. Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals, ed. Wood, A. W.. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press (2002).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×