Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:06:47.088Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - The Affects of Manumission

Racial Melancholy and Roman Freed Persons*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 May 2024

By
Dan-el Padilla Peralta
Edited by
Sinclair W. Bell ,
Dorian Borbonus  and
Rose MacLean
Sinclair W. Bell
Affiliation:
Northern Illinois University
Dorian Borbonus
Affiliation:
University of Dayton, Ohio
Rose MacLean
Affiliation:
University of California, Santa Barbara
Get access

Summary

This contribution brings racial affect theory to bear on the literary representation of Roman manumission, in the process developing new critical tools for the history of Roman slavery as a mechanism for racialization. Through a close reading of the freed man Hermeros’ diatribe in the Cena Trimalchionis, I argue for the centrality of racial melancholy to the discursive and social forms by which manumission came to be experienced and figured. The operation of this racial melancholy in Petronius’ text is decomposable into two distinct, but complementary, sentimental performances: paranoia on the one hand, and compulsion into (evasive) autobiographical confession on the other. The interlinking of these performances within Hermeros’ speech generates a melancholic affect, which I conceptualize as a disposition for managing and negotiating the grief of enslavement and manumission. In formulating and grounding this claim, I hope to clear a space for mutually enriching exchange among historians of Roman slavery, historians of premodern race, and those literary critics and cultural theorists who have been influential in setting the terms for the “affective turn.”

Keywords

racial melancholyaffect theorypsychoanalysispremodern race and racializationanimacySatyricaCena Trimalchionismanumission
Type
Chapter
Information
Freed Persons in the Roman World
Status, Diversity, and Representation
 , pp. 242 - 277
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, J. N. 2016. An Anthology of Informal Latin, 200 BC–AD 900: Fifty Texts with Translations and Linguistic Commentary. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahmed, S. 2010. The Promise of Happiness. Durham, NC and London.Google Scholar
Alcoff, L. M. 2006. Visible Identities: Race, Gender, and the Self. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ando, C. 2020. “The Future’s Past: Fiction, Biography, and Status in Roman Law.” Acta Classica 63: 43–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andreau, J. 2009. “Freedmen in the Satyrica.” Trans. P. Dilley. In Petronius: A Handbook, ed. Prag, J. and Repath, I., 114–24. Chichester and Malden, MA.Google Scholar
Anderson, G. 1999. “The Novella in Petronius.” In Latin Fiction: Latin Novel in Context, ed. Hofmann, H., 44–53. London.Google Scholar
Beavis, M. A. 2019. “The Parable of the Slave, Son, and Vineyard: An Early Christian Freedman’s Narrative (Hermas Similitudes 5.2–11).” Catholic Biblical Quarterly 89.4: 655–69.Google Scholar
Beavis, M. A. 2020. “Six Years a Slave: The Confessio of St. Patrick as Early Christian Slave Narrative.” Irish Theological Quarterly 85.4: 339–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Billig, M. 1999. Freudian Repression: Conversation Creating the Unconscious. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodel, J. 1984. Freedmen in the Satyricon of Petronius. Unpublished Ph.D. diss., University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Bodel, J. 1999. “The Cena Trimalchionis.” In Latin Fiction: Latin Novel in Context, ed. Hofmann, H., 32–43. London.Google Scholar
Bodel, J. 2016. “Death and Social Death in Ancient Rome.” In On Human Bondage: After Slavery and Social Death, ed. Bodel, J. and Scheidel, W., 81–108. Malden, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodel, J. 2019. “Liber esto: Free Speech at the Banquet of Trimalchio.” In Slaves and Masters in the Ancient Novel, ed. Panayotakis, S. and Paschalis, M., 161–80. Groningen.Google Scholar
Bonar, C. E. 2022. “Hermas the (Formerly?) Enslaved: Rethinking Manumission and Hermas’s Biography in the Shepherd of Hermas.” Early Christianity 13: 205–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonilla-Silva, E. 2019. “Feeling Race: Theorizing the Racial Economy of Emotions.” American Sociological Review 84.1: 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, K. R. 1987. Slaves and Masters in the Roman Empire: A Study of Social Control. New York.Google Scholar
Bradley, K. R. 2000. “Animalizing the Slave: The Truth of Fiction.” JRS 90: 110–25.Google Scholar
Bradley, K. R. 2001. “Imagining Slavery: The Limits of the Invisible.” JRA 14: 473–77.Google Scholar
Cayton, H. R. 1948. “A Psychological Approach to Race Relations.” Présence Africaine 3: 418–13.Google Scholar
Champlin, E. 2005. “Phaedrus the Fabulous.” JRS 95: 97–123.Google Scholar
Charles-Laforge, M.-O. 2019. “Les cultes privés chez les Romains (IIIe s. avant – IIIe s. après J.-C.)” Pallas 111: 171–97.Google Scholar
Chen, M. Y. 2012. Animacies: Biopolitics, Racial Mattering, and Queer Affect. Durham, NC.Google Scholar
Cheng, A. A. 2001. The Melancholy of Race: Psychoanalysis, Assimilation and Hidden Grief. Oxford.Google Scholar
Cheung-Judge, L. M.-Y. 1988. “The Social-psychological Analysis of Manumission.” In Slavery and Other Forms of Unfree Labour, ed. Archer, L., 239–50. London.Google Scholar
Chinn, S. E. 2020. “Enslavement and the Temporality of Childhood.” American Literature 92.1: 33–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chow, R. 2002. The Protestant Ethnic and the Spirit of Capitalism. New York.Google Scholar
Connolly, B. 2022. “Introduction: Psychoanalysis and History.” History of the Present 12.1: 1–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conte, G. B. 1996. The Hidden Author: An Interpretation of Petronius’ Satyricon. Berkeley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dal Lago, E. and Katsari, C.. 2008. “Manumissio e rebellio nell’Impero romano e nel Sud degli Stati Uniti prima della Guerra Civile.” In Gonzales, A., ed., La fin du statut servile? (Affranchisement, libération, abolition …), II.541–50. Besançon.Google Scholar
Duncan-Jones, R. 2016. Power and Privilege in Roman Society. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Easton, J. 2019. “The Elusive libertina nobilitas: A Case-Study of Roman Municipal Freedmen in the Augustales.” Phoenix 73.3–4: 333–57.Google Scholar
Easton, J. 2021. “Mostly Work and Some Play: Assessing the Associative Behaviors of the Roman Municipal familia publica.” Historia 70.2: 242–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edmonson, J. 2011. “Slavery and the Roman Family.” In The Cambridge World History of Slavery, Vol. 1: The Ancient Mediterranean World, ed. Bradley, K. and Cartledge, P., 338–61. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Eng, D. L., and Han, S.. 2018. Racial Melancholia, Racial Dissociation: On the Social and Psychic Lives of Asian Americans. Durham, NC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fanon, F. 2019. Alienation and Freedom, trans. Corcoran, S. and ed. Khalfa, J. and Young, R. J. C.. London.Google Scholar
Fassin, D., and Rechtman, R.. 2009. The Empire of Trauma: An Inquiry into the Condition of Victimhood, trans. Gomme, R.. Princeton.Google Scholar
Ferreira da Silva, D. 2007. Toward a Global Idea of Race. Minneapolis.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, W. 2000. Slavery and the Roman Literary Imagination. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flohr, M. 2013. The World of the Fullo: Work, Economy, and Society in Roman Italy. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flower, H. I. 2022. “The Most Expensive Slave in Rome: Quintus Lutatius Daphnis.” CP 117.1: 99–119.Google Scholar
Fontaine, M. 2013. “On Being Sane in an Insane Place: The Rosenhan Experiment in the Laboratory of Plautus’ Epidamnus.” Current Psychology 32.4: 348–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freudenburg, K. 2020. “Feeling with the Romans: The Cultural Psychology of Ancient Contempt.” Studi italiani di filologia classica 18.2: 149–72.Google Scholar
Giannella, N. 2019. “The Freedom to Give: The Legal Basis of Seneca’s Treatment of Slaves in De Beneficiis.” CP 114: 79–99.Google Scholar
Giannella, N. 2020. “Free in Fact? Legal Status and State in the Suits for Freedom.” In The Discovery of the Fact, ed. Ando, C. and Sullivan, W. P., 91–111. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Ginzburg, C. 2019. “The Bond of Shame.” New Left Review 120: 35–44.Google Scholar
Gloyn, L. 2012. “She’s Only a Bird in a Gilded Cage: Freedwomen at Trimalchio’s Dinner Party.” CQ 62.1: 260–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gowers, E. 1993. The Loaded Table: Representations of Food in Latin Literature. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutarra Cordero, D. 2021. She is Weeping: An Intellectual History of Racialized Slavery and Emotions in the Atlantic World. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habash, M. 2018. “The Introduction of Characters in Petronius.” In At the Crossroads of Greco-Roman History, Culture, and Religion: Papers in Memory of Carin M.C. Green, ed. Bell, S. W. and Holland, L. L., 133–54. Oxford.Google Scholar
Hagelin, L. 2020. “Homo inter homines sum. The Importance of Age for Freedmen’s Construction of Masculinity in Late Republican and Early Imperial Rome.” EuGeStA 10: 117–43.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. 2018. “Cowherds and Saints: Paulinus of Nola Carmen 18.” In Complex Inferiorities: The Poetics of the Weaker Voice in Latin Literature, ed. Matzner, S. and Harrison, S., 245–62. Oxford.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. 2010. “The Satyrica and the Greek Novel: Revisions and Some Open Questions.” IJCT 17.4: 483–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heng, G. 2022. “Before Race, and After Race: A Response to the Forum on The Invention of Race in the European Middle Ages.” Cambridge Journal of Postcolonial Literary Inquiry 9.1: 159–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hersh, K. E. K. 2022. “Worth Her Weight: Worthy Women, Coupling, and Eating in Petronius’ Satyrica.” In Married Life in Greco-Roman Antiquity, ed. Centlivres Challet, C.-E., 107–28. London.Google Scholar
Hershbell, J. P. 1995. “Epictetus: A Freedman on Slavery.” AncSoc 26: 185–204.Google Scholar
Hirt, M. 2018. “In Search of Junian Latins.” Historia 67.3: 288–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hong, C. P. 2020. Minor Feelings: An Asian American Reckoning. New York.Google Scholar
Hopkins, K. 1993. “Novel Evidence for Roman Slavery.” P&P 138: 3–27.Google Scholar
Howley, J. 2020. “Despotics: The Subjection of Workers in the Ancient Agronomists.” Lecture, “Work/Life: Institutions, Subjectivities, and Human Resources in the Roman World,” The Ranieri Colloquium on Ancient Studies, New York University, October 19.Google Scholar
Huemoeller, K. P. D. 2016. “Sex and Slavery in the Roman World.” Unpublished Ph.D. diss., Princeton University.Google Scholar
Huemoeller, K. P. D. 2020. “Freedom in Marriage? Manumission for Marriage in the Roman World.” JRS 110: 123–39.Google Scholar
Husby, T. 2017. “Recognizing Freedom: Manumission in the Roman Republic.” Unpublished Ph.D. diss., The City University of New York.Google Scholar
Jeong, D. H. 2020. “Simon the Tanner, Empires, and Assemblages: A New Materialist Asian American Reading of Acts 9:43.” The Bible and Critical Theory 16.1: 41–63.Google Scholar
Joshel, S. R. 1992. Work, Identity, and Legal Status at Rome: A Study of the Occupational Inscriptions. Norman, OK.Google Scholar
Karanika, A., and Panoussi, V., eds. 2020. Emotional Trauma in Greece and Rome: Representations and Reactions. London.Google Scholar
Kaster, R. 2005. Emotion, Restraint, and Community in Ancient Rome. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, R. F. 2015. “Airs, Waters, Metals, Earth.” In The Routledge Handbook of Identity and the Environment in the Classical and Medieval Worlds, ed. Kennedy, R. F. and Jones-Lewis, M., 9–28. London.Google Scholar
Koops, E. 2013. “Masters and Freedmen: Junian Latins and the Struggle for Citizenship.” In Integration in Rome and the Roman World: Proceedings of the Tenth Workshop of the International Network Impact of Empire (Lille, June 23–25, 2011), ed. Kleijn, G. and Benoist, S., 105–26. Leiden.Google Scholar
Koops, E. 2020. “The Practice of Manumission through Negotiated Conditions in Imperial Rome.” In Roman Law and Economics, vol. 2: Exchange, Ownership, and Disputes, ed. Dari-Mattiacci, G. and Kehoe, D. P., 35–77. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kotrosits, M. 2020. The Lives of Objects: Material Culture, Experience, and the Real in the History of Early Christianity. Chicago.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kudlien, F. 1991. Sklaven-Mentalität im Spiegel antiker Wahrsagerei. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Laes, C. 2008. “Child Slaves at Work in Roman Antiquity.” AncSoc 38: 235–83.Google Scholar
Lavan, M. 2013a. Slaves to Rome: Paradigms of Empire in Roman Culture. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lavan, M. 2013b. “Florus and Dio on the Enslavement of the Provinces.” CCJ 59: 125–51.Google Scholar
Leonard, M. 2019. “Tragedy and the Posthuman.” In Antiquities beyond Humanism, ed. Bianchi, E., Brill, S., and Holmes, B., 77–93. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lev Kenaan, V. 2019. The Ancient Unconscious: Psychoanalysis and the Ancient Text. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd-Jones, H. 1985. “Psychoanalysis and the Study of the Ancient World.” In Freud and the Humanities, ed. Horden, P., 152–80. London.Google Scholar
Loomba, A. 1998. Colonialism/Postcolonialism. London.Google Scholar
López Barja de Quiroga, P. 2020. “Patronage and Slavery in the Roman World: The Circle of Power.” In The Oxford Handbook of Greek and Roman Slaveries, ed. Hodkinson, S., Kleijwegt, M., and Vlassopoulos, K., doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199575251.013.31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luciani, F. 2022. Slaves of the People: A Political and Social History of Roman Public Slavery. Stuttgart.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luciano, D. 2003. “Passing Shadows: Melancholic Nationality and Black Critical Publicity in Pauline E. Hopkins’s Of One Blood.” In Loss: The Politics of Mourning, ed. Eng, D. L. and Kazanjian, D., 148–87. Berkeley.Google Scholar
MacLean, R. 2018. Freed Slaves and Roman Imperial Culture: Social Integration and the Transformation of Values. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacMullen, R. 2014. Why Do We Do What We Do? Motivation in History and the Social Sciences. Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manne, K. 2018. “Melancholy Whiteness (or, Shame-faced in Shadows).” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 96.1: 233–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marzougui, M. C. 2019. “Le genius dans la Byzacène occidentale à travers l’épigraphie latine.” Latomus 78: 123–40.Google Scholar
Matzner, S., and Harrison, S., eds. 2019. Complex Inferiorities: The Poetics of the Weaker Voice in Latin Literature. Oxford.Google Scholar
McClintock, A. 1995. Imperial Leather: Race, Gender and Sexuality in the Colonial Contest. London.Google Scholar
McCoskey, D. 2012. Race: Antiquity and Its Legacy. London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McInerney, J. 2019. “Interpreting Funerary Inscriptions from the City of Rome.” Journal of Ancient History 7.1: 156–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKeown, N. 2007. “The Sound of John Henderson Laughing: Pliny 3.14 and Roman Slaveowners’ Fear of Their Slaves.” In Fear of Slaves – Fear of Enslavement in the Ancient Mediterranean (Discourse, Representations, Practices). Rethymnon 4–7 November 2004, ed. Serghidou, A., 265–79. Besançon.Google Scholar
Meghji, A. 2022. The Racialized Social System. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Millar, F. 1981. “The World of the Golden Ass.” JRS 71: 63–75.Google Scholar
Morgan, T. 2007. Popular Morality in the Early Roman Empire. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mouritsen, H. 2011. The Freedman in the Roman World. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mouritsen, H. 2016. “Manumission.” In The Oxford Handbook of Roman Law and Society, ed. du Plessis, P. J., Ando, C., and Tuori, K., 402–15. Oxford.Google Scholar
Mouritsen, H. 2019. “Slavery and Manumission in Imperial Italy: The Album from Herculaneum Revisited.” In Popolazione, risorse e urbanizzazione nella Campania antica. Dall’età preromana alla tarda antichità, ed. Maiuro, M. and Balbo, M., 211–31. Bari.Google Scholar
Muñoz, J. E. 2000. “Feeling Brown: Ethnicity and Affect in Ricardo Bracho’s The Sweetest Hangover (and Other STDs).” Theatre Journal 52.1: 67–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muñoz, J. E. 2006. “Feeling Brown, Feeling Down: Latina Affect, the Performativity of Race, and the Depressive Position.” Signs 31.3: 675–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muñoz, J. E. 2020. The Sense of Brown, ed. Chambers-Letson, J. and Nyong’o, T.. Durham, NC.Google Scholar
Ngai, S. 2005. Ugly Feelings. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Oliensis, E. 2010. “Psychoanalysis and the Roman Imaginary.” In The Oxford Handbook of Roman Studies, ed. Barchiesi, A. and Scheidel, W., 295–308. Oxford.Google Scholar
Owens, W. M. 2019. “Callirhoe: A Therapeutic Slave Narrative.” In Slaves and Masters in the Ancient Novel, ed. Panayotakis, S. and Paschalis, M., 37–53. Groningen.Google Scholar
Owens, W. M. 2020. The Representation of Slavery in the Greek Novel: Resistance and Appropriation. London.Google Scholar
Owens, W. M. 2021. “Reading Apuleius’s Cupid and Psyche from the Slave’s Perspective: The Tale of Psyche ancilla.” In Slavery and Sexuality in Classical Antiquity, ed. Kamen, D. and Marshall, C.W., 239–53. Madison.Google Scholar
Padilla Peralta, D. 2017. “Slave Religiosity in the Roman Middle Republic.” ClAnt 36.2: 317–69.Google Scholar
Padilla Peralta, D. 2019. “Citizenship’s Insular Cases, from Greece and Rome to Puerto Rico.” In Displacement and the Humanities: Manifestos from the Ancient to the Present, ed. Jewell, E. and Isayev, E., Humanities 8.3.134: doi.org/10.3390/h8030134.Google Scholar
Padilla Peralta, D. 2020. Divine Institutions: Religions and Community in the Middle Roman Republic. Princeton.Google Scholar
Padilla Peralta, D. 2022. “Anti-race: Anti-racism, Whiteness, and the Classical Imagination.” In A Cultural History of Race in Antiquity, ed. McCoskey, D., 157–71. London.Google Scholar
Panayotakis, C. 1995. Theatrum Arbitri: Theatrical Elements in the Satyrica of Petronius. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panegyres, K. 2021. “Capillos liberos habere (Petron. 38).” Hermes 149: 122–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, L. 2020. “Afropessimism and Futures of …: A Conversation with Frank Wilderson.” The Black Scholar 50.3: 29–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, O. 1982. Slavery and Social Death: A Comparative Study. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Perry, M. J. 2014. Gender, Manumission, and the Roman Freedwoman. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Pironti, G., and Perfigli, M.. 2018. “Polytheism.” In The World through Roman Eyes: Anthropological Approaches to Ancient Culture, ed. Bettini, M. and Short, W. M., 71–111. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prag, J. and Repath, I., eds. 2009. Petronius: A Handbook. Malden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puar, J. K. 2022. “In Solidarity.” Representations 158: 87–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramsby, T. 2012. “‘Reading’ the Freed Slave in the Cena Trimalchionis.” In Free at Last! The Impact of Freed Slaves on the Roman Empire, ed. Bell, S. and Ramsby, T., 74–93. London.Google Scholar
Richlin, A. 2009. “Sex in the Satyrica: Outlaws in Literatureland.” In Petronius: A Handbook, ed. Prag, J. and Repath, I., 82–100. Malden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richlin, A. 2014. “Talking to Slaves in the Plautine Audience.” ClAnt 33.1: 174–226.Google Scholar
Richlin, A. 2017. “The Traffic in Shtick.” In Rome, Empire of Plunder: The Dynamics of Cultural Appropriation, ed. Loar, M. P, MacDonald, C., and Padilla Peralta, D., 169–93. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Richlin, A. 2017. Slave Theater in the Roman Republic: Plautus and Popular Comedy. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rimell, V. 2002. Petronius and the Anatomy of Fiction. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roediger, D. 1991. The Wages of Whiteness: Race and the Making of the American Working Class. London.Google Scholar
Roth, U. 2010. “Peculium, Freedom, Citizenship: Golden Triangle or Vicious Circle? An Act in Two Parts.” In By the Sweat of Your Brow: Roman Slavery in Its Socio-economic Setting, ed. Roth, U., 91–120. London.Google Scholar
Roth, U. 2016. “Liberating the Cena.” CQ 66.2: 614–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roth, U. 2021. “Speaking Out? Child Sexual Abuse and the Enslaved Voice in the Cena Trimalchionis.” In Slavery and Sexuality in Classical Antiquity, ed. Kamen, D. and Marshall, C.W., 211–38. Madison.Google Scholar
Scheid, J. 2019. Rites et religion à Rome. Paris.Google Scholar
Scheidel, W. 1990. “Free-born and Manumitted Bailiffs in the Graeco-Roman World.” CQ 40.2: 591–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheidel, W. 1993. “Slavery and the Shackled Mind: On Fortune-telling and Slave Mentality in the Graeco-Roman World.” AHB 7.3: 107–14.Google Scholar
Scheidel, W. 1997. “Quantifying the Sources of Slaves in the Early Roman Empire.” JRS 87: 156–69.Google Scholar
Schmeling, G., ed. 2011. A Commentary on the Satyrica of Petronius. Oxford.Google Scholar
Shaw, B. D. 2020. “Social Status and Economic Behavior: A Hidden History of the equites?” AncSoc 50: 153–202.Google Scholar
Spillers, H. J. 1996. “‘All the Things You Could Be by Now, if Sigmund Freud’s Wife Was Your Mother’: Psychoanalysis and Race.” Critical Inquiry 22: 710–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, D. 2019. “Ethnic Identity, Social Identity, and The Aesthetics of Sameness in the Funerary Monuments of Roman Freedmen.” In The Ancient Art of Transformation: Case Studies from Mediterranean Contexts, ed. Gondek, R. M. and Sulosky Weaver, C. L., 135–52. Oxford.Google Scholar
Sullivan, J. P. 1961. “The Satiricon of Petronius: Some Psycho-analytical Considerations.” American Imago 18.4: 353–69.Google Scholar
Sullivan, J. P. 1968. The Satyricon of Petronius: A Literary Study. Bloomington.Google Scholar
Tadiar, N. X. M. 2022. Remaindered Life. Durham, NC and London.Google Scholar
Tompkins, K. W. 2019. “Sweetness, Capacity, Energy.” AQ 71.3: 849–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toner, J. 2009. Popular Culture in Ancient Rome. Malden, MA and Cambridge.Google Scholar
Vernant, J.-P. 1965. Mythe et pensée chez les Grecs : Études de psychologie historique. Paris.Google Scholar
Veyne, P. 1961. “Vie de Trimalcion.” AnnÉconSocCiv 16.2: 213–47.Google Scholar
Vuolanto, V. 2003. “Selling a Freeborn Child: Rhetoric and Social Realities in the Late Roman World.” AncSoc 33: 169–207.Google Scholar
Walsh, R. F. 2019. “IVDAEA DEVICTA: The Gospels as Imperial ‘Captive Literature’.” In Class Struggle in the New Testament, ed. Myles, R. J., 89–114. Lanham and Boulder.Google Scholar
Walsh, R. F. 2020. “The Satyrica and the Gospels in the Second Century.” CQ 70.1: 356–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walsh, R. F. 2021. The Origins of Early Christian Literature: Contextualizing the New Testament within Greco-Roman Literary Culture. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wehus, G. Ø. 2019. “Freedom, Slavery, and Self in Epictetus.” Teologisk tidsskrift 8.4: 227–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, A. 2009. “Hermas’ ‘Biography’: Social Upward and Downward Mobility of an Independent Freedman.” AncSoc 39: 185–202.Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, T. 2013. “An I for an I: Reading Fictional Autobiography.” In The Author’s Voice in Classical and Late Antiquity, ed. Marmodoro, A. and Hill, J., 233–47. Oxford.Google Scholar
Wiedemann, T. 1985. “The Regularity of Manumission at Rome.” CQ 35.1: 162–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yao, X. 2021. Disaffected: The Cultural Politics of Unfeeling in Nineteenth-century America. Durham, NC.Google Scholar
Ypsilanti, M. 2010. “Trimalchio and Fortunata as Zeus and Hera: Quarrel in the Cena and Iliad 1.” HSCP 105: 221–37.Google Scholar
Zelnick-Abramovitz, R. 2019. “Half-slave, Half-free: Partial Manumission in the Ancient Near East and Beyond.” HSCP 110: 1–58.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×