Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Tables
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Introduction
- 2 The Formative Years (July 1910 to December 1941)
- 3 The BIA and the Resistance (January 1942 to August 1945)
- 4 Showing the British Out (September 1945 to December 1947)
- 5 Independence and Civil War (January 1948 to September 1950)
- 6 Relaxing and Rebuilding (October 1950 to March 1958)
- 7 Rehearsing and Reviewing (April 1958 to February 1962)
- 8 Coup d'Etat and Revolution (March 1962 to February 1964)
- 9 Cold War General (March 1964 to February 1967)
- 10 Preparation for Transition (March 1967 to February 1972)
- 11 Transition and Small Change (March 1972 to February 1978)
- 12 Purifying the Sangha, Unifying the Nation, and Maintaining Genuine Neutrality (March 1978 to February 1988)
- 13 Failure and Farewell (March 1988 to December 2002)
- Epilogue: What to Make of Ne Win?
- Appendix: Radio Address by Colonel Naywin (7–5–45), to the People of Burma
- Bibliography
- Index
- About the Author
5 - Independence and Civil War (January 1948 to September 1950)
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 January 2018
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Tables
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Introduction
- 2 The Formative Years (July 1910 to December 1941)
- 3 The BIA and the Resistance (January 1942 to August 1945)
- 4 Showing the British Out (September 1945 to December 1947)
- 5 Independence and Civil War (January 1948 to September 1950)
- 6 Relaxing and Rebuilding (October 1950 to March 1958)
- 7 Rehearsing and Reviewing (April 1958 to February 1962)
- 8 Coup d'Etat and Revolution (March 1962 to February 1964)
- 9 Cold War General (March 1964 to February 1967)
- 10 Preparation for Transition (March 1967 to February 1972)
- 11 Transition and Small Change (March 1972 to February 1978)
- 12 Purifying the Sangha, Unifying the Nation, and Maintaining Genuine Neutrality (March 1978 to February 1988)
- 13 Failure and Farewell (March 1988 to December 2002)
- Epilogue: What to Make of Ne Win?
- Appendix: Radio Address by Colonel Naywin (7–5–45), to the People of Burma
- Bibliography
- Index
- About the Author
Summary
He should be appointed Commander-in-Chief who is experienced in the subjugation of others, who knows how to choose a victory-giving battlefield, who does not abandon his forces in misfortune, who remains the same in adversity or prosperity, who is strong, of irreproachable character, well versed in military treatises, who can bear fatigues riding and is replete with diligence and bravery.
Myanma Min Okchokpon SadanWhen Myanmar received its independence from Great Britain at 4:20 in the morning of 4 January 1948, Ne Win, as commander of the Northern region, was responsible for defending the country's borders with India, China, French Indochina, and Thailand. India was convulsed with the consequences of the partition from Pakistan and China was in the final throes of the civil war between Mao Tse-tung's Red Army and Chiang Kai-shek's Kuomintang (KMT). Laos, as a French colony was relatively peaceful and Thailand was just two months back under the military rule of Marshall Pibul Songram. None of these at that time appeared to pose a threat to the territorial integrity or the sovereignty of Myanmar but with Chinese Communist victory apparently imminent, and Thailand having only recently given up administrative control of the cis-Salween (Thanlwin) Shan State of Kengtung which had been given by Japan, the future appeared ominous.
Moreover, both putative Chinese governments maintained claims to territory bequeathed by Britain to Burma to a line deep into Ne Win's command, roughly from Myitkyina west to the Indian border. In January 1948, it was fortunate that no neighbouring government either wished, or was in a position, to challenge Burma's borders. The northern command had neither the troops nor the equipment to move up to the borders and defend them. During the sixty-two years that Britain had controlled this vast territory, little had been done to develop the roads and railways of the region. Being a rough mountainous country with few obvious economic assets, most of the border areas remained largely undisturbed except for the many Western and Karen missionaries who were converting the peoples of the area who were non-Buddhists, particularly the Kachin, to one or another variety of Christianity. Like the Bamar, however, the Shan remained overwhelming followers of Theravada Buddhism.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- General Ne WinA Political Biography, pp. 107 - 158Publisher: ISEAS–Yusof Ishak InstitutePrint publication year: 2015