Book contents
- Great Judgments of the European Court of Justice
- Great Judgments of the European Court of Justice
- Copyright page
- Epigraph
- Contents
- Tables
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- European Court of Justice Cases
- Preamble and Selected Provisions of the Treaty of Rome
- Equivalence Table of Treaty Articles
- Introduction
- 1 Pork Products, 1961
- 2 Van Gend en Loos, 1963
- 3 Costa v. ENEL, 1964
- 4 Dairy Products, 1964
- 5 International Fruit, 1972
- 6 Van Duyn, 1974
- 7 Simmenthal, 1978
- 8 Sheep Meat, 1979
- 9 Internationale Handelsgesellschaft, 1970
- 10 States and Individuals in the Great Judgments of the European Court of Justice, 1961–1979
- Bibliography
- Index
7 - Simmenthal, 1978
Obligations of “Lower” National Courts
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 November 2020
- Great Judgments of the European Court of Justice
- Great Judgments of the European Court of Justice
- Copyright page
- Epigraph
- Contents
- Tables
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- European Court of Justice Cases
- Preamble and Selected Provisions of the Treaty of Rome
- Equivalence Table of Treaty Articles
- Introduction
- 1 Pork Products, 1961
- 2 Van Gend en Loos, 1963
- 3 Costa v. ENEL, 1964
- 4 Dairy Products, 1964
- 5 International Fruit, 1972
- 6 Van Duyn, 1974
- 7 Simmenthal, 1978
- 8 Sheep Meat, 1979
- 9 Internationale Handelsgesellschaft, 1970
- 10 States and Individuals in the Great Judgments of the European Court of Justice, 1961–1979
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
This chapter discusses the Court’s 1978 judgment, Simmenthal, where the Court declared that all national courts – including ‘lower’ national courts – were under an obligation to apply European law in place of contrary national legal obligations, even if national constitutional rules restricted such powers to the national constitutional court. This judgment is often understood as an important one in the ‘politics of judges’ within the European legal order, reflecting the Court of Justice’s efforts to develop more active cooperation with ‘lower’ national courts than with national constitutional courts. This chapter demonstrates that the logic of Simmenthal is also derived from the use of national courts to enforce treaty obligations as a substitute for inter-state retaliation, as demonstrated by similar aspects of the enforcement provisions of the Side Agreements of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA).
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Great Judgments of the European Court of JusticeRethinking the Landmark Decisions of the Foundational Period, pp. 171 - 184Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019