Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents
- Introduction: The Unintentional Role of Coincidence in History
- 1 Secret U.S. Plans to Absorb Hawaii and Guam (1897)
- 2 Alfred Thayer Mahan Invents Island-Hopping (1911)
- 3 Yuan Shikai Preapproves Japan’s “21 Demands” (1915)
- 4 Gallipoli’s Unexpected Connection to the Armenian Genocide (1915)
- 5 The Historical Importance of 7 December 1902/1917/1941
- 6 The Halifax Explosion and Unification of the U.S. and British Navies (1917)
- 7 Woodrow Wilson’s Clerical Error and the May Fourth Movement in China (1919)
- 8 Soviet Gold Mining and the Sudden End to the Mongolian Gold Rush (1924)
- 9 The Soviet Great Purges and Gulags as a Reaction to Japan’s Proposed Immigration Policies in Manchukuo (1937)
- 10 Secret Western Manipulations behind Japan’s Pearl Harbor Attack (1941)
- 11 The True Origin of the Kamikazes (1944)
- 12 Why the Kurile Islands Were Disputed after World War II
- 13 How Secret Yalta Talks Resulted in Post-War Soviet Colonization (1945)
- 14 Secret Negotiations of the Sino-Soviet Border (1945)
- 15 The CIA Argument for Why China Should Be Allowed to Become Communist (1948)
- 16 Both North Vietnamese Tonkin Gulf Attacks Were PerhapsReal (1964)
- 17 The U.S. Anti-Soviet Blockade during the Vietnam War (1965)
- 18 The Secret U.S. Anti-SAM Strategy in the Vietnam War (1966)
- 19 The 3 March 1969 Creation of the Top Gun School (1969)
- 20 The Real “Signaling” History of the 4 May 1970 Kent StateMassacre (1970)
- 21 The Secret Agreement that May Have Really Ended theVietnam War (1975)
- Conclusions: The Profound Influence of Coincidental History on Twentieth-Century History
- Bibliography
- About the Author
- Index
14 - Secret Negotiations of the Sino-Soviet Border (1945)
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 March 2024
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents
- Introduction: The Unintentional Role of Coincidence in History
- 1 Secret U.S. Plans to Absorb Hawaii and Guam (1897)
- 2 Alfred Thayer Mahan Invents Island-Hopping (1911)
- 3 Yuan Shikai Preapproves Japan’s “21 Demands” (1915)
- 4 Gallipoli’s Unexpected Connection to the Armenian Genocide (1915)
- 5 The Historical Importance of 7 December 1902/1917/1941
- 6 The Halifax Explosion and Unification of the U.S. and British Navies (1917)
- 7 Woodrow Wilson’s Clerical Error and the May Fourth Movement in China (1919)
- 8 Soviet Gold Mining and the Sudden End to the Mongolian Gold Rush (1924)
- 9 The Soviet Great Purges and Gulags as a Reaction to Japan’s Proposed Immigration Policies in Manchukuo (1937)
- 10 Secret Western Manipulations behind Japan’s Pearl Harbor Attack (1941)
- 11 The True Origin of the Kamikazes (1944)
- 12 Why the Kurile Islands Were Disputed after World War II
- 13 How Secret Yalta Talks Resulted in Post-War Soviet Colonization (1945)
- 14 Secret Negotiations of the Sino-Soviet Border (1945)
- 15 The CIA Argument for Why China Should Be Allowed to Become Communist (1948)
- 16 Both North Vietnamese Tonkin Gulf Attacks Were PerhapsReal (1964)
- 17 The U.S. Anti-Soviet Blockade during the Vietnam War (1965)
- 18 The Secret U.S. Anti-SAM Strategy in the Vietnam War (1966)
- 19 The 3 March 1969 Creation of the Top Gun School (1969)
- 20 The Real “Signaling” History of the 4 May 1970 Kent StateMassacre (1970)
- 21 The Secret Agreement that May Have Really Ended theVietnam War (1975)
- Conclusions: The Profound Influence of Coincidental History on Twentieth-Century History
- Bibliography
- About the Author
- Index
Summary
By early August 1945, only one major Sino-Soviet issue was left unresolved, a detailed agreement as to where exactly the Sino-Soviet boundary ran. With Japan's surrender imminent, it was important to Chiang Kai-shek that the agreement on Outer Mongolia be announced soon, so that the Chinese people could be convinced that Outer Mongolia's loss was a necessity of war. On 11 July 1945, Soong expressed his concern that the joint Sino-Soviet declaration on Outer Mongolia not mention the border, since there were still many disagreements about the disposition of the boundary line. Stalin agreed, suggesting that they retain the “status quo,” but Soong retorted: “These is dispute about status quo.”1 Negotiations were broken off after 12 July, so that Stalin and Molotov could attend the conference at Potsdam, but talks resumed once again on 7 August. Coincidentally, during this almost four-week break, the Chinese envoy T. V. Soong had the opportunity to travel back to Chungking to consult personally with his brother-in-law Chiang Kai-shek. Based on Chiang's decisions, the final points of the upcoming Sino-Soviet declaration were determined between 7 and 14 August 1945.
The issue of Outer Mongolia's borders with China was of great importance to Soong. After returning from Chungking, he presented two maps to Stalin, one Russian and one Chinese, which outlined the Sino-Mongolian border. The following exchange then took place:
Soong: We would like to come to agreement on Outer Mongolia before we recognize independence: frontiers.
Stalin: We decided within existing boundaries.
Soong: We did not agree on anything concrete as I had no map.
Stalin: We did not mention boundaries.
Soong: We must recognize something and settle boundary so as to avoid friction.
Stalin: O.K.
But, on 10 August, Stalin disputed the maps which Soong had presented: “Re frontiers Chinese map is not well founded. Existing frontiers should be recognized.”2
Stalin stuck to this proposal because the existing borders actually included extensive Manchurian territories which Tokyo had secretly ceded to Moscow during Outer Mongolia-Manchukuo border negotiations in the 1930s. Stalin clearly hoped to retain the largest amount of Chinese territory possible. The Chinese delegation, on the other hand, pleaded with Stalin to define the border between Outer Mongolia and China, even suggesting that the two countries use a Chinese college atlas as their guide.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Impact of Coincidence in Modern American, British, and Asian HistoryTwenty-One Unusual Historical Events, pp. 57 - 60Publisher: Anthem PressPrint publication year: 2023