Book contents
- International Perspectives on End-of-Life Law Reform
- Cambridge Bioethics and Law
- International Perspectives on End-of-Life Law Reform
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Preface
- About the Editors
- List of Contributors
- Table of Cases
- Table of Statutes, Bills and Regulations
- 1 End-of-Life Law Reform
- 2 The Path from Rodriguez to Bill C-14 and Beyond
- 3 The Extension of the Belgian Euthanasia Law to Minors in 2014
- 4 The Role of Scientific Evaluations of the Dutch Termination of Life on Request and Assisted Suicide (Review Procedure) Act
- 5 The Challenging Path to Voluntary Assisted Dying Law Reform in Australia
- 6 Should Assisted Dying Require the Consent of a High Court Judge?
- 7 Aid in Dying in the United States
- 8 The Medical Regulator as Law Reformer
- 9 Extrajudicial Resolution of Medical Futility Disputes
- 10 Challenging Mandatory Court Hearings for People in Vegetative and Minimally Conscious States
- 11 Withholding and Withdrawing Life-Prolonging Treatment and the Relevance of Patients’ Wishes
- 12 International Perspectives on Reforming End-of-Life Law
- Index
3 - The Extension of the Belgian Euthanasia Law to Minors in 2014
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 December 2021
- International Perspectives on End-of-Life Law Reform
- Cambridge Bioethics and Law
- International Perspectives on End-of-Life Law Reform
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Preface
- About the Editors
- List of Contributors
- Table of Cases
- Table of Statutes, Bills and Regulations
- 1 End-of-Life Law Reform
- 2 The Path from Rodriguez to Bill C-14 and Beyond
- 3 The Extension of the Belgian Euthanasia Law to Minors in 2014
- 4 The Role of Scientific Evaluations of the Dutch Termination of Life on Request and Assisted Suicide (Review Procedure) Act
- 5 The Challenging Path to Voluntary Assisted Dying Law Reform in Australia
- 6 Should Assisted Dying Require the Consent of a High Court Judge?
- 7 Aid in Dying in the United States
- 8 The Medical Regulator as Law Reformer
- 9 Extrajudicial Resolution of Medical Futility Disputes
- 10 Challenging Mandatory Court Hearings for People in Vegetative and Minimally Conscious States
- 11 Withholding and Withdrawing Life-Prolonging Treatment and the Relevance of Patients’ Wishes
- 12 International Perspectives on Reforming End-of-Life Law
- Index
Summary
On May 16 2002, the Belgian parliament approved the original law permitting euthanasia. The law was voted in after three years of debate in parliament and within the Federal Advisory Committee on Bioethics. The focus of this chapter is an issue which has been of particular interest in recent public debates internationally: the extension of the law in 2014 to permit minors with ‘capacity of discernment’ to have access to euthanasia. Although the law now theoretically applies to Belgians of all ages, in reality, euthanasia for minors will be limited to older adolescents. This chapter considers how the issue of children’s access to euthanasia came to be considered and the process of reform including the positions and arguments of different entities. Also considered is parliament’s rationale for this change in the law. Of particular significance in the reform process was the view that the age barrier for euthanasia was perceived as arbitrary. The prime qualifier for a valid, well-considered and competent request should not be chronological age but mental age and maturity.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- International Perspectives on End-of-Life Law ReformPolitics, Persuasion and Persistence, pp. 40 - 62Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
- 1
- Cited by