Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Table of Contents
- Foreword
- Who Will Be Indonesian President in 2014?
- The Seventh Plenum of the Communist Party of Vietnam:The Gains of the Central Committee
- The Struggle to Amend Thailand's Constitution
- Whither China's Myanmar Stranglehold?
- Malaysia's BN Stays in Power, But Deep Changes Have Nevertheless Occurred
- The Significance of China-Malaysia Industrial Parks
- Steadily Amplified Votes Decide Malaysian Elections
- The Rise of Chinese Power and the Impact on Southeast Asia
- The China-Myanmar Energy Pipelines: Risks and Benefits
- Moving ASEAN+1 FTAs towards an Effective RCEP
- Ethnic Insurgencies and Peacemaking in Myanmar
- Japan's Growing Angst over the South China Sea
- Taking the Income Gap in Southeast Asia Seriously
- Indonesian Parties Struggle for Electability
- Rohingya Boat Arrivals in Thailand: From the Frying Pan into the Fire?
- APEC's Model of Green Growth is a Move Forward
- China's FDI in Southeast Asia
- Hidden Counter-Revolution: A History of the Centralisation of Power in Malaysia
- The Dominance of Chinese Engineering Contractors in Vietnam
- RCEP and TPP: Comparisons and Concerns
- Implications of Demographic Trends in Singapore
- Big Power Contest in Southeast Asia
- The Resurgence of Social Activism in Malaysia
- Pivoting Asia, Engaging China—American Strategy in East Asia
- Towards a Code of Conduct for the South China Sea
- List of ISEAS Perspective Issues
RCEP and TPP: Comparisons and Concerns
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 October 2015
- Frontmatter
- Table of Contents
- Foreword
- Who Will Be Indonesian President in 2014?
- The Seventh Plenum of the Communist Party of Vietnam:The Gains of the Central Committee
- The Struggle to Amend Thailand's Constitution
- Whither China's Myanmar Stranglehold?
- Malaysia's BN Stays in Power, But Deep Changes Have Nevertheless Occurred
- The Significance of China-Malaysia Industrial Parks
- Steadily Amplified Votes Decide Malaysian Elections
- The Rise of Chinese Power and the Impact on Southeast Asia
- The China-Myanmar Energy Pipelines: Risks and Benefits
- Moving ASEAN+1 FTAs towards an Effective RCEP
- Ethnic Insurgencies and Peacemaking in Myanmar
- Japan's Growing Angst over the South China Sea
- Taking the Income Gap in Southeast Asia Seriously
- Indonesian Parties Struggle for Electability
- Rohingya Boat Arrivals in Thailand: From the Frying Pan into the Fire?
- APEC's Model of Green Growth is a Move Forward
- China's FDI in Southeast Asia
- Hidden Counter-Revolution: A History of the Centralisation of Power in Malaysia
- The Dominance of Chinese Engineering Contractors in Vietnam
- RCEP and TPP: Comparisons and Concerns
- Implications of Demographic Trends in Singapore
- Big Power Contest in Southeast Asia
- The Resurgence of Social Activism in Malaysia
- Pivoting Asia, Engaging China—American Strategy in East Asia
- Towards a Code of Conduct for the South China Sea
- List of ISEAS Perspective Issues
Summary
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
• Asia is witnessing two different approaches to trade liberalisation — the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) and the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP). While TPP and RCEP have quite similar objectives of trade liberalisation and economic integration, there are differences too.
• RCEP, driven by ASEAN, is a FTA between ASEAN and ASEAN's FTA partners - Australia-New Zealand, China, South Korea, Japan and India. It is envisaged to be a high-quality and mutually-beneficial economic partnership agreement that will broaden and deepen the current FTA engagements. TPP, on the other hand, is a USled process pushed forward as a “WTO-plus approach”. Around eleven countries (New Zealand, Singapore, Brunei, Chile, the US, Canada, Australia, Peru, Malaysia, Vietnam, Mexico) are negotiating TPP. China or India are not included.
• RCEP is likely to be more accommodative to the development differences of the member countries. On the other hand, TPP is said to have more demanding set of commitments — intellectual property rights, labour standards, competition policy, investment rules, the environment and the role of state-owned enterprises. As TPP comprises of members at different levels of economic development, reaching a consensus on the optimal standards will be difficult.
• Both have perceived benefits for the Asia and the Pacific region, and are expected to support the international production network. They are likely to address “behind the border” issues or trade facilitation measures, with more specific assistance to SMEs. RCEP and TPP are expected to promote domestic reforms in line with regional goals. It is possible that agreement between a small group of countries like RCEP and TPP may to take care of some of the concerns of the “noodle bowl” effect of overlapping smaller FTAs and an over-arching set of free trade principles may be achievable.
• There may be some concern over competition between TPP and RCEP as the regional pacts have similar objectives over trade liberalisation and economic integration. TPP and RCEP may also come into conflict due to the rivalry between the US and China. Besides, any competition between these two agreements may lead to division among ASEAN members, which may undermine ASEAN's centrality in the region.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- ISEAS PerspectiveSelections 2012-2013, pp. 202 - 213Publisher: ISEAS–Yusof Ishak InstitutePrint publication year: 2014