Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T12:19:49.491Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Conclusion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2015

Get access

Summary

The history of thought is an elusive area to write about. It has many holes where writers are trapped into making generalizations or simplifications. However, generalizations and simplifications are sometimes necessary in giving an intelligible picture of the complex phenomenon of human thought. There is, however, a danger that it tends to give a distorted version of human history. Various books on Islamic thought fall into this trap through generalizing or simplifying its complexity into various ideological categories such as “modernist”, “traditionalist”, “revivalist”, “neo-modernist”, and so on. There is a certain element of truth in these categories, but the history of thought is not a mere history of ideology. As Karl Mannheim argues, political thought will not adequately be understood without an appreciation of the role of utopia. It is disappointing that many studies on Islamic thought in Indonesia heavily emphasize political ideologies without due consideration of Muslim utopia.

This study is an attempt to fill this gap by addressing Islamic political thought in terms of the role of utopia. Utopia has played a great role in determining political discourse in the country. Since the very beginning of the era of national resurgence (era kebangkitan nasional or nahdah in the Arab context), Indonesian Muslims have been daunted by the ideal model of polity. The model of polity, as Macpherson argues, is the most practical idea of utopia. This study has examined Muslim models of polity in Indonesia since independence. It has found three dominant models that reflect Muslims’ political understanding and attitudes towards various religious-political issues. These three models have played a crucial role in developing Islamic political thinking in contemporary Indonesia. Various arguments and explanations about major ideas such as democracy, pluralism, liberalism, freedom, and gender equality, cannot be properly understood without an exploration of Muslim conceptualization of a model of polity; a utopia.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×