Book contents
- Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason
- Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- General Note on Citations and Translations
- General Introduction
- Part I Pre-Kantian Moral Philosophy
- Part II Between the Critiques
- 3 Johann Friedrich Flatt
- Review of the Groundwork (1786)
- 4 Gottlob August Tittel
- On Herr Kant’s Reform of Moral Science (1786)
- 5 Hermann Andreas Pistorius
- Review of Schultz’s Elucidations of Professor Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason (1786)
- 6 Hermann Andreas Pistorius
- Review of the Groundwork (1786)
- 7 Thomas Wizenmann
- ‘To Herr Professor Kant’ (1787)
- Part III The Reception of the Critique of Practical Reason
- Bibliography
- Index
3 - Johann Friedrich Flatt
Introduction
from Part II - Between the Critiques
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 31 January 2025
- Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason
- Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- General Note on Citations and Translations
- General Introduction
- Part I Pre-Kantian Moral Philosophy
- Part II Between the Critiques
- 3 Johann Friedrich Flatt
- Review of the Groundwork (1786)
- 4 Gottlob August Tittel
- On Herr Kant’s Reform of Moral Science (1786)
- 5 Hermann Andreas Pistorius
- Review of Schultz’s Elucidations of Professor Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason (1786)
- 6 Hermann Andreas Pistorius
- Review of the Groundwork (1786)
- 7 Thomas Wizenmann
- ‘To Herr Professor Kant’ (1787)
- Part III The Reception of the Critique of Practical Reason
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
Johann Friedrich Flatt (1759–1821) was a lecturer in theoretical philosophy in Tübingen from 1785–1791. As the resident Kant expert, during this time Flatt was responsible for reviewing both pro- and anti-Kantian works in the local academic journal, the Tübingische gelehrte Anzeigen. Flatt also reviewed Kant’s works themselves, including the Groundwork, translated into English in this chapter for the first time. The main theme of the review is Kant’s inconsistency, but Flatt also makes a claim that is repeated by other early critics, such as Tittel and Pistorius, namely that Kant’s own examples reveal that the categorical imperative cannot determine concrete duties without referring to experience, despite what Kant might say to the contrary. We have good reason to believe that Kant read Flatt’s review of the Groundwork, and Kant likely has Flatt in mind at 5:4.28–37n and 5:5.24–6.11 when discussing various alleged inconsistencies in his writings.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Kant's Critique of Practical ReasonBackground Source Materials, pp. 85 - 87Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2024