Book contents
- Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason
- Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- General Note on Citations and Translations
- General Introduction
- Part I Pre-Kantian Moral Philosophy
- Part II Between the Critiques
- Part III The Reception of the Critique of Practical Reason
- 8 Johann Georg Heinrich Feder
- Review of the Critique of Practical Reason (1788)
- 9 August Wilhelm Rehberg
- Review of the Critique of Practical Reason (1788)
- 10 Christian Garve
- ‘On Patience’ (1792)
- 11 Hermann Andreas Pistorius
- Review of the Critique of Practical Reason (1794)
- Bibliography
- Index
8 - Johann Georg Heinrich Feder
Introduction
from Part III - The Reception of the Critique of Practical Reason
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 31 January 2025
- Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason
- Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- General Note on Citations and Translations
- General Introduction
- Part I Pre-Kantian Moral Philosophy
- Part II Between the Critiques
- Part III The Reception of the Critique of Practical Reason
- 8 Johann Georg Heinrich Feder
- Review of the Critique of Practical Reason (1788)
- 9 August Wilhelm Rehberg
- Review of the Critique of Practical Reason (1788)
- 10 Christian Garve
- ‘On Patience’ (1792)
- 11 Hermann Andreas Pistorius
- Review of the Critique of Practical Reason (1794)
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
Johann Georg Heinrich Feder (1740–1821) was a well-respected and well-known professor of philosophy at the University of Göttingen, especially during the 1770s and early 1780s. A turning point took place in Feder’s life and career, however, when he edited the infamous Göttingen review of the first Critique, which was originally written by Christian Garve and to which Kant responds in the Prolegomena. This chapter contains a complete translation of Feder’s review of the second Critique, which therefore captures the opinion of one of Kant’s most well-known and infamous critics. Feder discusses a number of topics in the review, including: whether pure reason can be practical without the assistance of feeling and inclination, the nature of good and evil and their relationship to pleasure and displeasure, and the idea that respect for the moral law is respect for ourselves as legislators.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Kant's Critique of Practical ReasonBackground Source Materials, pp. 199 - 202Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2024