Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T06:45:33.619Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - De-magnetizing the Market: European Integration, Employer Sanctions, and the Crackdown on Undeclared Work

from Part II - Participation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 November 2021

Tesseltje de Lange
Affiliation:
Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen
Willem Maas
Affiliation:
York University, Toronto
Annette Schrauwen
Affiliation:
Universiteit van Amsterdam
Get access

Summary

Economic incentives shape migratory decisions and therefore play an important role in immigration enforcement. Facing limits on the utility of formal border controls or forced removals as ways of combating irregular migration, governments in Europe have sought to ‘de-magnetize’ their economies – rendering life in their countries infeasible or unattractive by making it difficult for irregular migrants to find paid work. Although governments initially focused on penalizing employers who hire migrants lacking legal authorization to work, in recent decades they adopted a wider set of initiatives targeting undeclared work of all kinds. This chapter explores these initiatives, tracing their emergence in a number of Northern European countries and subsequent diffusion across Europe. One theme of the chapter concerns the effect of these measures on the relationship of states to economies. Another theme concerns the impact of these initiatives on irregular migrants who, if they remain within these countries, can be pushed into the shadowy depths of advanced industrialized economies.

Type
Chapter
Information
Money Matters in Migration
Policy, Participation, and Citizenship
, pp. 169 - 187
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bernsten, Lisa and de Lange, Tesseltje. 2018. ‘Employer Sanctions: Instrument of Labour Market Regulation, Migration Control, and Worker Protection’. In Rijken, Conny and de Lange, Tesseltje, eds., Towards a Decent Labor Market for Low Waged Migrant Workers? Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, pp. 207–30.Google Scholar
Bigo, Didier. 2005. ‘Frontier Controls in the European Union: Who is in Control?’ In Bigo, Didier and Guild, Elspeth, eds., Controlling Frontiers: Free Movement Into and Within Europe. Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 4999.Google Scholar
Broeders, Dennis. 2009. Breaking Down Anonymity: Digital Surveillance of Irregular Migrants in Germany and the Netherlands. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Calavita, Kitty. 1994. ‘Italy and the New Immigration’. In Cornelius, Wayne, Martin, Philip, and Hollifield, James, eds., Controlling Illegal Immigration: A Global Perspective. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press, pp. 303–26.Google Scholar
Carbonnier, Clément and Morel, Nathalie, eds. 2015. The Political Economy of Household Services in Europe. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Ciccarone, Giuseppe and Raitano, Michele. 2007. Article on Undeclared Work from SYSDEM Correspondent. Brussels: European Employment Observatory.Google Scholar
Coste, Fréréric. 2008. ‘Report from France’. In Doomernik, Jeroen and Jandl, Michael, eds., Modes of Migration Regulation and Control in Europe. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, pp. 6380.Google Scholar
Cornelius, Wayne. 1994. ‘Spain: The Uneasy Transition from Labour Exporter to Labour Importer’. In Cornelius, Wayne, Martin, Philip, and Hollifield, James, eds., Controlling Illegal Immigration: A Global Perspective. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press, pp. 387429.Google Scholar
De Lange, Tesseltje. 2011. ‘The Privatization of Control over Labour Migration in the Netherlands: In Whose Interest?European Journal of Migration and Law 13, no. 2: 185200.Google Scholar
Diepenhorst, Denis. 2012. Practical Measures to Reduce Irregular Immigration: Netherlands. Rijswijk, The Netherlands: Ministry of the Interior and Kingdom Relations Immigration and Naturalisation Service.Google Scholar
Direction Générale du Travail. 2019. Analyse de la verbalization du travail illégal en 2017. https://travail-emploi.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/rapport_2017_verbalisation_du_travail_illegal.pdf.Google Scholar
Doomernik, Jeroen. 2008. ‘Report from the Netherlands’. In Doomernik, Jeroen and Jandl, Michael, eds., Modes of Migration Regulation and Control in Europe. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, pp. 129–45.Google Scholar
Emmenegger, Patrick, Häusermann, Silja, Palier, Bruno, and Seeleib-Kaiser, Martin, eds. 2012. The Age of Dualization: The Changing Face of Inequality in Deindustrializing Societies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engbersen, Godfried and Broeders, Dennis. 2009. ‘The State versus the Alien: Immigration Control and Strategies of Irregular Immigrants’. West European Politics 32, no. 5: 867–85.Google Scholar
European Commission. 2014. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the Application of Directive 2009/52/EC Providing for Minimum Standards on Sanctions and Measures against Employers of Illegally Staying Third Country Nationals. COM(2014) 286 final.Google Scholar
European Commission. 2017. European Platform Tackling Undeclared Work: Member State Factsheets and Synthesis Report.Google Scholar
European Migration Network. 2017. Illegal Employment of Third-Country Nationals in the European Union. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
Fasani, Mario. 2011. Labour Inspection in Italy. Geneva: ILO.Google Scholar
Groenendijk, Kees. 2011. ‘Introduction: Migration and Law in Europe’. In Guild, Elspeth and Minderhoud, Paul, eds., Immigration and Asylum Law and Policy in Europe: The First Decade of EU Migration and Asylum Law. Leiden, NL: Brill Nijhoff, pp. 122.Google Scholar
Guiraudon, Virginie and Lahav, Gallya. 2000. ‘A Reappraisal of the State Sovereignty Debate: The Case of Migration Control’. Comparative Political Studies 33, no. 2 (March): 164–95.Google Scholar
Hooghe, Liesbet and Marks, Gary. 2001. Multi-Level Governance and European Integration. Boulder, CO: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Inciyan, Erich. 1994. ‘Pour appliquer la nouvelle législation sur l’entrée et le séjour des étrangers M. Pasqua met en place une police de l’immigration’. Le Monde, 18 January.Google Scholar
ILO. 2008. Addressing the Irregular Employment of Immigrants in the European Union: Between Sanctions and Rights.Google Scholar
ILO 2009. Regularization and Employer Sanctions as Means towards the Effective Governance of Labour Migration Russian Federation and International Experience.Google Scholar
ILO 2013. Labour Inspection and Undeclared Work in the EU. Working Document no. 29.Google Scholar
Junkert, Christoph and Kreienbrink, Axel. 2008. ‘Irregular Employment of Migrant Workers in Germany: Legal Situation and Approaches to Tackling the Phenomenon’. In Kupiszewski, Marek and Mattila, Heikki, eds., Addressing the Irregular Employment of Immigrants in the European Union: Between Sanctions and Rights. Washington, DC: International Organization for Migration, pp. 1388.Google Scholar
Junkert, Christoph and Kreienbrink, Axel. 2010. ‘Illegal Employment of Immigrants in Germany: Combating the Phenomenon versus Social Rights?’ In Shechory, Mally, David, Sarah Ben, and Soen, Dan, eds., Who Pays the Price? Foreign Workers, Society, Crime and the Law. Hauppage, NY: Nova Science, pp. 151–67.Google Scholar
Leerkes, Arjan. 2016. ‘Back to the Poorhouse: Social Protection and Social Control of Unauthorized Immigrants in the Shadow of the Welfare State’. Journal of European Social Policy 26, no. 2: 140–54.Google Scholar
Maas, Willem. 2005. ‘Freedom of Movement Inside “Fortress Europe”’. In Zureik, Elia and Salter, Mark, eds., Global Surveillance and Policing: Borders, Security, Identity. Portland: Willan, pp. 233–45.Google Scholar
Marie, Claude-Valentin. 1994. ‘From the Campaign against Illegal Migration to the Campaign against Illegal Work’. Annals AAPSS 534 (July): 118–32.Google Scholar
Martin, Philip. 2003. Bordering on Control: Combating Irregular Migration in North America and Europe. Washington, DC: International Organization for Migration Research Series, no. 13.Google Scholar
Martin, Philip and Miller, Mark. 2000. Employer Sanctions: French, German and US Experiences. International Migration Papers 36. Geneva: International Labour Office.Google Scholar
Mason, Rowena. 2015. ‘Immigration: UK’s Rogue Employers to be “Hit from All Angles”’. The Guardian, 10 August.Google Scholar
Miller, Mark. 1987. Employer Sanctions in Western Europe. Occasional Paper No. 7. New York: Centre for Migration Studies.Google Scholar
OECD. 2003. Trends in International Migration. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Orrenius, Pia M. and Zavodny, Madeline. 2016. ‘Irregular Immigration in the European Union’. Working Paper 1603. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas Research Department. www.dallasfed.org/-/media/documents/research/papers/2016/wp1603.pdfGoogle Scholar
Picum. 2015. Employers’ Sanctions: Impacts on Undocumented Migrant Workers’ Rights in Four EU Countries. Brussels: Picum.Google Scholar
Renooy, Piet. 2013. Labor Inspection Strategies for Combating Undeclared Work in Europe: The Netherlands (Regioplan).Google Scholar
Reyneri, Emilio. 2002. Migrants Involvement in Irregular Employment in the Mediterranean Countries of the European Union. Geneva: ILO International Migration Paper.Google Scholar
Ruhs, Marin. 2006. ‘The Potential of Temporary Migration Programmes in Future International Migration Policy’. International Labor Review 145, no. 1–2: 736.Google Scholar
Ryan, Bernard. 2014. ‘Employer Checks of Immigration Status and Employment Law’. In Costello, Cathryn and Freedland, Mark, eds., Migrants at Work: Immigration and Vulnerability in Labour Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 239–56.Google Scholar
Samers, Michael E. 2004. ‘The “Underground Economy,” Immigration and Economic Development in the European Union: An Agnostic-Skeptic Perspective’. International Journal of Economic Development 6, no. 3: 199272.Google Scholar
Sassen, Saskia. 1998. ‘The de facto Transnationalizing of Immigration Policy’. In Joppke, Christian, ed., Challenge to the Nation-State. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 4985.Google Scholar
Sinn, Annette, Kreienbrink, Axel, and von Loeffelholz, Hans Dietrich. 2005. Illegal Resident Third-Country Nationals in Germany: Policy Approaches, Profile and Social Situation. Berlin: Federal Office for Migration and Refugees.Google Scholar
Tangermann, Julian and Grote, Janne. 2017. Illegal Employment of Third-Country Nationals in Germany. Working Paper no. 74. Berlin: Federal Office for Migration and Refugees.Google Scholar
Triandafyllidou, Anna. 2010. ‘Irregular Migration in Europe in the Early 21st Century’. In Triandafyllidou, Anna, ed., Irregular Migration in Europe: Myths and Realities. Surrey, England: Ashgate, pp. 121.Google Scholar
Triandafyllidou, Anna and Ambrosini, Maurizio. 2011. ‘Irregular Immigration Control in Italy and Greece: Strong Fencing and Weak Gate-Keeping Serving the Labour Market’. European Journal of Migration and Law 13: 251–73.Google Scholar
Torpey, John. 1998. ‘Coming and Going: On the State Monopolization of the Legitimate “Means of Movement”’. Sociological Theory 16, no. 3 (November): 239–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van der Leun, Joanne. 2006. ‘Excluding Illegal Migrants in the Netherlands: Between National Policies and Local Implementation’. West European Politics 29, no. 2: 310–26.Google Scholar
Van Meeteren, Masja. 2014. Irregular Migrants in Belgium and the Netherlands: Aspirations and Incorporation. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Vogel, Dita. 2000. ‘Migration Control in Germany and the United States’. International Migration Review 34, no. 2: 390422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogler-Ludwig, Kurt. 2007. Germany: Undeclared Work. Brussels: European Employment Observatory.Google Scholar
Wagner, Ines and Berntsen, Lisa. 2016. ‘Restricted Rights: Obstacles in Enforcing the Labor Rights of Mobile EU Workers in the German and Dutch Construction Sector’. Transfer 22, no. 2: 193206.Google Scholar
Williams, Colin C. 2008. ‘Evaluating Public Sector Management Approaches towards Undeclared Work in the European Union’. International Journal of Public Sector Management 21, no. 3: 285–94.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×