Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T23:39:25.443Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 November 2020

Jennifer Andrus
Jennifer Andrus
Affiliation:
University of Utah
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Narratives of Domestic Violence
Policing, Identity, and Indexicality
 , pp. 213 - 219
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahearn, L. M. (2001). Language and agency. Annual Review of Anthropology, 30(1), 109–137.Google Scholar
Anderson, K. L. (1997). Gender, status, and domestic violence: An integration of feminist and family violence approaches. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 59(3), 655–669.Google Scholar
Andersen, M., & Collins, P. H. (2001). Introduction. In Andersen, M. & Collins, P. H. (Eds.), Race, class and gender: An anthology (4th ed., pp. 1–9). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Andrus, J. (2015). Entextualizing domestic violence: Language ideology and violence against women in the Anglo-American hearsay principle. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bamberg, M. (2006). Stories: Big or small: Why do we care? Narrative Inquiry, 16(1), 139–147.Google Scholar
Bamberg, M., & Georgakopoulou, A. (2008). Small stories as a new perspective in narrative and identity analysis. Text & Talk, 28(3), 377–396.Google Scholar
Bathurst, E. H. B., & Buller, F. (1768). An introduction to the law relative to trials at Nisi Prius. Retrieved from heinonline.org.Google Scholar
Benson, M., Woolridge, A., Thistlethwaite, B., & Fox, G. (2004). The correlation between race and domestic violence is confounded with community context. Social Problems, 51(3), 326–342.Google Scholar
Bent-Goodley, T. B. (2001). Eradicating domestic violence in the African American community: A literature review and action agenda. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 2(4), 316–330.Google Scholar
Bent-Goodley, T. B. (2004). Perceptions of domestic violence: A dialogue with African American women. Health & Social Work, 29(4), 307–316.Google Scholar
Benwell, B., & Stokoe, E. (2006). Discourse and identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berk, S. F., & Loseke, D. R. (1980). “Handling” family violence: Situational determinants of police arrest in domestic disturbances. Law & Society Review, 15(2), 317–346.Google Scholar
Berry, D. B. (2000). The domestic violence sourcebook. Los Angeles, CA: Lowell House.Google Scholar
Black, M. C., Basile, K. C., Breiding, M. J., Smith, S. G., Walters, M. L., Merrick, M. T., … Stevens, M. R. (2011). The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services. Retrieved from www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/nisvs_report2010-a.pdf.Google Scholar
Blommaert, J. (2005). Discourse: A critical introduction. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Blommaert, J. (2007). Sociolinguistics and discourse analysis: Orders of indexicality and polycentricity. Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 2(2), 115–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley v.State, 1 Miss. 156, 1 Miss.(1 Walker) 156, 1 Mississippi 156 (1824).Google Scholar
Brooks, P. (1996). The law as narrative and rhetoric. In Brooks, P. & Gerwirtz, P. (Eds.), Law's stories: Narrative and rhetoric in the law (pp. 14–22). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Brooks, P., & Gewirtz, P. (Eds.). (1996). Law's stories: Narrative and rhetoric in the law. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Bucholtz, M., & Hall, K. (2005). Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies, 7(4–5), 585–614.Google Scholar
Bucholtz, M., & Hall, K. (2008). Finding identity: Theory and data. Journal of Cross-Cultural & Interlanguage Communication, 27(1–2), 151–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, J. (1997). Excitable speech: A politics of the performative. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Buzawa, E. S., & Austin, T. (1993). Determining police response to domestic violence victims: The role of victim preference. American Behavioral Scientist, 36(5), 610–623.Google Scholar
Cameron, D. (1998). Gender, language, and discourse: A review essay. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 23(4), 945–973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coker, D. (2001). Crime control and feminist law reform in domestic violence law: A critical review. Buffalo Criminal Law Review, 4(2), 801–860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coker, D. (2004). Race, poverty, and the crime-centered response to domestic violence: A comment on Linda Mills's insult to injury: Rethinking our responses to intimate abuse. Violence against Women, 10(11), 1331–1353.Google Scholar
Coulter, M. L., Kuehnle, K., Byers, R., & Alfonso, M. (1999). Police-reporting behavior and victim-police interactions as described by women in a domestic violence shelter. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14(12), 1290–1298.Google Scholar
Dando, C., Geiselman, E., MacLeod, N., & Griffiths, A. (2015). Interviewing adult witnesses, including vulnerable witnesses. In Oxburgh, G., Myklebust, T., Grant, T., & Milne, B. (Eds.), Communication in forensic contexts: Integrated approaches from psychology, linguistics and law enforcement (pp. 79–106). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
De Fina, A., & Georgakopoulou, A. (2008). Analysing narratives as practices. Qualitative Research, 8(3), 379–387.Google Scholar
De Fina, A., & King, K. A. (2011). Language problem or language conflict? Narratives of immigrant women's experiences in the US. Discourse Studies, 13(2), 163–188.Google Scholar
De Fina, A., & Perrino, S. (2011). Introduction: Interviews vs. ‘natural’ contexts: A false dilemma. Language in Society, 40(1), 1–11.Google Scholar
Dettmer, C. (2004). Increased sentencing for repeat offenders of domestic violence in Ohio: Will this end the suffering. University of Cincinnati Law Review, 73, 705.Google Scholar
Dobash, R. E., & Dobash, R. P. (1992). Women, violence and social change. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Eckert, P. (2008). Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 12(4), 453–476.Google Scholar
Ehrlich, S. (2003). Representing rape: Language and sexual consent. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ehrlich, S. (2015). “Inferring” consent in the context of rape and sexual assault. In Sloan, L. M., Ainsworth, J., & Shuy, R. W. (Eds.), Speaking of language and law: Conversations on the work of Peter Tiersma (pp. 141–144). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ellison, C. G., Trinitapoli, J. A., Anderson, K. L., & Johnson, B. R. (2007). Race/ethnicity, religious involvement, and domestic violence. Violence against Women, 13(11), 1094–1112.Google Scholar
English reports: Ecclesiastical, admiralty, and probate and divorce, Volume 161: 616. Retrieved from heinonline.orgGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Language in social life (1st ed.). New York, NY: Pearson Education Limited.Google Scholar
Fairclough, N. (2001). Language and power (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Felson, R. B., Messner, S. F., Hoskin, A. W., & Deane, G. (2002). Reasons for reporting and not reporting domestic violence to the police. Criminology, 40(3), 617–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferraro, K. J. (1995). Cops, courts, and woman battering. In Price, B. R. & Sokoloff, N. J. (Eds.), The criminal justice system and women: Offenders, victims, and workers (pp. 262–271). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge, with discourse on language (Smith, A. M. Sheridan, Trans.). New York, NY: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1975). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (Sheridan, A., Trans.). Paris, France: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Gagné, I. (2008). Urban princesses: Performance and “women's language” in Japan's Gothic/Lolita subculture. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 18(1), 130–150.Google Scholar
Georgakopoulou, A. (2006). Thinking big with small stories in narrative and identity analysis. Narrative Inquiry, 16(1), 122–130.Google Scholar
Goodwin, M. H. (1997). Toward families of stories in context. Journal of Narrative & Life History, 7(1–4), 107–112.Google Scholar
Grossman, S. F., & Lundy, M. (2007). Domestic violence across race and ethnicity: Implications for social work practice and policy. Violence against Women, 13(10), 1029–1052.Google Scholar
Gubrium, J. F., & Holstein, J. A. (Eds.). (2003). Postmodern interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Haworth, K. (2009). An analysis of police interview discourse and its role(s) in the judicial process. Nottingham: University of Nottingham. Retrieved from http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/12253/.Google Scholar
Heydon, G. (2005). The language of police interviewing. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Heydon, G. (2013). From legislation to the courts: Providing safe passage for legal texts through the challenges of a police interview. In Heffer, C., Rock, F., & Conley, J. (Eds.), Legal-lay communication: Textual travels in the law (pp. 55–77). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Holden v. Holden, 1 Hag. Con. 453 (1810).Google Scholar
Hoyle, C., & Sanders, A. (2000). Police response to domestic violence. British Journal of Criminology, 40(1), 14–36.Google Scholar
Hymes, D. (1967). Models of the interaction of language and social setting. Journal of Social Issues, 23(2), 8–28.Google Scholar
Irvine, J. T., & Gal, S. (2000). Language ideology and linguistic differentiation. In Duranti, A. (Ed.), Linguistic anthropology: A reader (pp. 402–434). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Irvine, J. T., & Gal, S. (2009). Language ideology and linguistic differentiation. In Duranti, A. (Ed.), Linguistic anthropology: A reader (pp. 402–434). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Johnson, A. J. (2008a). Changing stories – achieving a change of state in suspect and witness knowledge through evaluation in police interviews with suspects and witnesses. Functions of Language, 15(1), 84–114.Google Scholar
Johnson, A. J. (2008b). ‘From where we're sat…’ negotiating narrative transformation through interaction in the police interview. Text and Talk, 28(3), pp. 327–349.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. P. (1995). Patriarchal terrorism and common couple violence: Two forms of violence against women. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 283–294.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. P., & Ferraro, K. J. (2000). Research on domestic violence in the 1990s: Making distinctions. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62(4), 948–963.Google Scholar
Johnstone, B. (1995). Sociolinguistic resources, individual identities, and public speech styles of Texas women. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 5(2), 183–202.Google Scholar
Johnstone, B. (2008). Discourse analysis (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Johnstone, B. (2010). Locating language in identity. In Llamas, C. & Watts, D. (Eds.), Language & identities (pp. 29–36). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Johnstone, B. (2013). Speaking Pittsburghese: The sory of a dialect. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Johnstone, B., Andrus, J., & Danielson, A. E. (2006). Mobility, indexicality, and the enregisterment of “Pittsburghese”. Journal of English Linguistics, 34(2), 77–104.Google Scholar
Johnstone, B., & Kiesling, S. F. (2008). Indexicality and experience: Exploring the meanings of/aw/-monophthongization in Pittsburgh. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 12(1), 5–33.Google Scholar
Kimmel, M. S. (2002). “Gender symmetry” in domestic violence: A substantive and methodological research review. Violence against Women, 8(11), 1332–1363.Google Scholar
Kitzinger, C., & Frith, H. (1999). Just say no? The use of conversation analysis in developing a feminist perspective on sexual refusal. Discourse & Society, 10(3), 293–316.Google Scholar
Kupenda, A. M. (1998). Law, life, and literature: A critical reflection of life and literature to illuminate how laws of domestic violence, race and class bind black women based on Alice Walker's book The Third Life of Grange Copeland. Howard Law Journal, 42, 1–26.Google Scholar
Labov, W., & Waletzky, J. (1967). Narrative analysis. Essays on the verbal and visual arts. In Spencer, R. F. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1966 Spring Meeting of the American Ethnological Society. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Lamb, S. (1999). Constructing the victim: Popular images and lasting labels. In Lamb, S. (Ed.), New versions of victims: Feminists struggle with the concept (pp. 108–138). New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (2000). When things strike back: A possible contribution of ‘science studies’ to the social sciences. The British Journal of Sociology, 51(1), 107–123.Google Scholar
Linell, P. (1998). Approaching dialogue: Talk, interaction and contexts in dialogical perspectives (Vol. III). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
MacLeod, N. (2016). “I thought I'd be safe there”: Pre-empting blame in the talk of women reporting rape. Journal of Pragmatics, 96, 96–109.Google Scholar
Mann, S. A., & Grimes, M. D. (2001). Common and contested gound: Marxism and race, gender & class analysis. Race, Gender & Class, 8(2), 3–22.Google Scholar
Matoesian, G. M. (1993). Reproducing rape: Domination through talk in the courtroom. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Matoesian, G. M. (2001). Law and the language of identity: Discourse in the William Kennedy Smith rape trial. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McElhinny, B. S. (1995). Challenging hegemonic masculinities: Female and male police officers handling domestic violence. In Hall, K. & Bucholtz, M. (Eds.), Gender articulated: Language and the socially constructed self (pp. 217–244). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
McNeely, R. L., Cook, P. W., & Torres, J. B. (2001). Is domestic violence a gender issue, or a human issue? Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 4(4), 227–251.Google Scholar
Milani, T. M. (2010). What's in a name? Language ideology and social differentiation in a Swedish print-mediated debate. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 14(1), 116–142.Google Scholar
Milroy, J. (2012). Sociolinguistics and ideologies in language history. In Hernández-Campoy, J. M. & Conde-Silvestre, J. C. (Eds.), The handbook of historical sociolinguistics (pp. 569–584). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Mulla, S. (2011). Facing victims: Forensics, visual technologies, and sexual assault examination. Medical Anthropology: Cross-Cultural Studies in Health & Illness, 30(3), 271–294.Google Scholar
Murphy, J. (1993). Lawyering for social change: The power of the narrative in domestic violence law reform. Hofstra Law Review, 21(4), 1243–1293.Google Scholar
Murray, C. E., & Mobley, A. K. (2009). Empirical research about same-sex intimate partner violence: A methodological review. Journal of Homosexuality, 56, 361–386.Google Scholar
Murray, C. E., Mobley, A. K., Buford, A. P., & Seaman-DeJohn, M. M. (2007). Same-sex intimate partner violence: Dynamics, social context, and counseling implications. The Journal of LGBT Issues in Counseling, 1, 7–30.Google Scholar
National Coalition against Domestic Violence. (2018). Who is doing what to whom? Retrieved from https://ncadv.org/statistics.Google Scholar
Newbury, P., & Johnson, A. (2007). Suspects’ resistance to constraining and coercive questioning strategies in the police interview. International Journal of Speech Language & the Law, 13(2), 213–240.Google Scholar
State v. Black, 60 N.C. 262 (1864).Google Scholar
Ochs, E. (1979). Transcription as theory. Developmental Pragmatics, 10(1), 43–72.Google Scholar
Ochs, E. (1993). Constructing social identity: A language socialization perspective. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 26(3), 287–306.Google Scholar
Ochs, E., & Capps, L. (1996). Narrating the self. Annual Review of Anthropology, 25(1), 19–43.Google Scholar
Ochs, E., & Capps, L. (2001). Living narrative: Creating lives in everyday storytelling. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Peirce, C.S., 1940. Logic as Semiotic: The Theory of Signs. In Buchler, Justus (Ed.), Philosophical Writings of Peirce, (pp. 98–119).Google Scholar
Pence, E., & Paymar, M. (1993). Education groups for men who batter: The Duluth model. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Raphael, J., & Tolman, R. M. (1997). Trapped by poverty, trapped by abuse: New evidence documenting the relationship between domestic violence and welfare. Chicago, IL: Taylor Institute.Google Scholar
Renzetti, C. M. (1992). Violent betrayal: Partner abuse in Lesbian relationships. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Rock, F. (2013). Every link in the chain. In Heffer, C., Rock, F., & Conley, J. (Eds.), Legal-lay communication: Textual travels in the law (pp. 78–104). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Roulston, K., & Shelton, S. A. (2015). Reconceptualizing bias in teaching qualitative research methods. Qualitative Inquiry, 21(4), 332–342.Google Scholar
Schelong, K. M. (1994). Domestic violence and the state: Response to and rationales for spousal battering, marital rape and stalking. Marquette Law Review, 78, 79.Google Scholar
Schiffrin, D. (1996). Narrative as self-portrait: Sociolinguistic constructions of identity. Language in Society, 25(2), 167–203.Google Scholar
Schiffrin, D., De Fina, A., & Nylund, A. (Eds.). (2010). Telling stories: Language, narrative, and social life. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Schneider, E. M. (2000). Battered women and feminist lawmaking. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Sherman, L. (1992). Policing domestic violence: Experiments and dilemmas. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
Shuy, R. W. (1998). The language of confession, interrogation, and deception (1st ed., Vol. II). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Silverstein, M. (1995). Shifters, linguistic categories, and cultural description. In Blount, B. G. (Ed.), Language, culture, and society: A book of readings (pp. 187–221). Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland.Google Scholar
Silverstein, M. (2003). Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language & Communication, 23(3–4), 193–229.Google Scholar
Smart, C. (1989). Feminism and the power of law. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sokoloff, N. J., & Dupont, I. (2005). Domestic violence at the intersections of race, class, and gender: Challenges and contributions to understanding violence against marginalized women in diverse communities. Violence against Women, 11(1), 38–64.Google Scholar
Stanko, E. A. (1989). Missing the mark? Policing battering. In Hanmer, J., Radford, J., & Stanko, E. A. (Eds.), Women, policing, and male violence: International perspectives (pp. 46–69). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stark, E. (2007). Coercive control: How men entrap women in personal life. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stark, E. (2013). Coercive control. In Lombard, N. & McMillian, L. (Eds.), Violence against women: Current theory and practice in domestic abuse, sexual violence and exploitation (pp. 17–33). London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.Google Scholar
Stiles-Shields, C., & Carroll, R. A. (2015). Same-sex domestic violence: Prevalence, unique aspects, and clinical implications. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 41(6), 636–648.Google Scholar
Stokoe, E., & Edwards, D. (2007). Story formulations in talk-in-interaction. In Bamberg, M. (Ed.), Narrative – State of the art (pp. 69–79). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Thornborrow, J. (2002). Power talk: Language and interaction in institutional discourse. New York, NY: Pearson Education Limited.Google Scholar
Tjaden, P. G., & Thoennes, N. (2000). Full report of the prevalence, incidence, and consequences of violence against women: Findings from the National Violence against Women Survey (pp. 1–71). Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice.Google Scholar
Tolman, R. M., & Raphael, J. (2000). A review of research on welfare and domestic violence. Journal of Social Issues, 56(4), 655–682.Google Scholar
Trinch, S. (2003). Latinas’ narratives of domestic abuse: Discrepant versions of violence (Vol. XVII). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Trinch, S. (2010). Disappearing discourse: Performative texts and identity in legal contexts. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 7(2–3), 207–229.Google Scholar
Violence Against Women Act. Title IV, Sec. 40001-40703 of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act, H.R. 3355.Google Scholar
Williams, S. L., & Mickelson, K. D. (2004). The nexus of domestic violence and poverty: Resilience in women's anxiety. Violence against Women, 10(3), 283–293.Google Scholar
Woolley, M. L. (2007). Marital rape: A unique blend of domestic violence and non-marital rape issues. Hastings Women's Law Journal, 18, 269.Google Scholar
Worden, R. E., & Pollitz, A. A. (1984). Police arrests in domestic disturbances: A further look. Law & Society Review, 18, 105.Google Scholar
Young, K. G. (1987). Taleworlds and storyrealms. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×