References
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 December 2021
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Network InfrastructuresTechnology meets Institutions, pp. 240 - 255Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
Acemoglu, D., and Robinson, J. (2012). Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity and Poverty. New York, NY: Crown PublishersGoogle Scholar
Albrechtslund, A. (2007). Ethics and technology design. Ethics and Information Technology, 9: 63–72Google Scholar
Alchian, A. A. (1965). Some economics of property rights. Il Politico, 30 (4): 816–819. Reprinted in Economic Forces at Work (1977). Indianapolis, IN: Liberty PressGoogle Scholar
Alchian, A. A., and Demsetz, H. (1972). Production, information costs and economic organization. American Economic Review, 62 (5): 777–795Google Scholar
Alchian, A. A., and Demsetz, H. American Heritage Dictionary (2011). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin CompanyGoogle Scholar
Aoki, M. (2001). Production, information costs and economic organization. American Economic Review, 62 (5): 777–795Google Scholar
Arbib, J., and Seba, T. (2017). Rethinking Transportation 2020–2030, pp. 143–144. Report from RethinkX. Available at www.rethinkx.comGoogle Scholar
Arentsen, M. J., and Künneke, R. W. (eds.) (2003). National Reforms in European Gas. Amsterdam, Netherlands: ElsevierGoogle Scholar
Baker, G., Gibbons, R., and Murphy, K. J. (2002). Relational contracts and the theory of the firm. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117 (1): 39–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, G., Gibbons, R., and Murphy, K. J. (2008). Strategic alliances: bridges between islands of conscious power. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 22 (2): 146–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barabasi, A. L. (2003). Linked: How Everything Is Connected to Everything Else and What It Means. New York, NY: PlumeGoogle Scholar
Barnard, C. (1938). The Functions of the Executive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Barzel, Y. (2002). A Theory of the State: Economic Rights, Legal Rights, and the Scope of the State. Cambridge, NY and UK: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Bauer, J. M., and Herder, P. (2009). Designing Socio-technical Systems. Handbook of the Philosophy of Science, Volume 8: Philosophy of Technology and Engineering Sciences. Amsterdam, Netherlands: North HollandGoogle Scholar
Baumol, W., Willig, R., and Panzar, J. (1982). Contestable Markets and the Theory of Industrial Structure. Boston, MA: Harcourt Brace JovanovichGoogle Scholar
Bauwens, T., Gotchev, B., and Holstenkamp, L. (2016). What drives the development of community energy in Europe? The case of wind power cooperatives. Energy Research & Social Science, 13: 136–147Google Scholar
Beermann, J., and Tews, K. (2016). Decentralised laboratories in the German energy transition. Why local renewable energy initiatives must reinvent themselves. Journal of Cleaner Production, 169: 125–134Google Scholar
Berle, A. E., and Means, G. C. (1932). The Modern Corporation and Private Property. New York, NY: Commerce Clearing House; New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers (1991)Google Scholar
Bijker, W., Hughes, T. P., and Pinch, T. J. (1987). The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology. Boston, MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
Birk, M., Chayes-Avila, J. P., Gomez, T., and Tabors, R. (2017). TSO/ DSO Coordination in a Context of Distributed Energy Resource Penetration. Boston, MA: MIT Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research, Working Paper Series, 2017-017. Boston: MITGoogle Scholar
Bose, T., Reina, A., and Marshall, J. (2017). Collective decision making. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 16: 30–34Google Scholar
Brandstätt, C., Brunekreeft, G., Buchmann, M., and Friedrichsen, N. (2014). Information Governance in Smart Grids: A Common Information Platform (CIP). Bremen, Germany: Jacobs University Bremen, Energy Working Papers no. 18.Google Scholar
Braun, M., Krebs, S., Flohr, F., and Gravila, D. (2019). EuroCity persons: a novel benchmark for person detection in traffic scenes. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 41 (8): 1844–1861. Available at https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2019.2897684Google Scholar
Brunekreeft, G., Buchmann, M., and Meyer, R. (2016). The rise of third parties and the fall of incumbents driven by large-scale integration of renewable energies: the case of Germany. Energy Journal, 37 (special issue)Google Scholar
Bush, P. D. (2009). The neoinstitutionalist theory of value. Journal of Economic Issues, 43 (2): 293–307Google Scholar
Bush, P. D., and Tool, M. R. (2003). Foundational concepts for institutionalist policy making. In Bush, P. D. and Tool, M. R. (eds.), Institutional Analysis and Economic Policy. New York, NY: SpringerGoogle Scholar
Cabral, L. M. B. (2000). Introduction to Industrial Organization. Cambridge, MA and London, UK: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
Canguilhem, G. (2019). Gaston Bachelard et les philosophes. Sciences, 24 (mars–avril): 7–10. Reprinted in C. Limoges (ed.), Georges Canguilhelm, Œuvres Complètes, tome 3: Écrits d’histoire des sciences et d’épistémologie. Paris, France: Éditions VrinGoogle Scholar
CBS Statistics Netherlands (2017). Aardgasbaten op laagste niveau in ruim 40 jaar. Available at www.cbs.nl/nl-nl/nieuws/2017/17/aardgasbaten-op-laagste-niveau-in-ruim-40-jaarGoogle Scholar
Chor Boon, G., and Gopinathan, S. (2008). The development of education in Singapore since 1965. In Lee, S.-K., Chor Boon, G., Fredriksen, B., and Tan, J. P. (eds.), Toward a Better Future: Education and Training for Economic Development in Singapore since 1965, pp. 12–38. Washington, DC: World Bank GroupGoogle Scholar
Coase, R. H. (1938). Review: British Experiments in Public Ownership and Control by Terence H. O’Brien. Economica, 5 (20): 485–487Google Scholar
Coase, R. H. (1947). The origin of the monopoly of broadcasting in Great Britain. Economica, (n. s.) 14: 189–210Google Scholar
Coase, R. H. (1959 ). The Federal Communications Commission. Journal of Law and Economics, 2 (October): 1–40Google Scholar
Coase, R. H. (1960). The problem of social cost. Journal of Law and Economics, 3 (October): 1–44Google Scholar
Coase, R. H. (1972). Industrial organization: a proposal for research. In Fuchs, V. R. (ed.), Economic Research: Retrospect and Prospect, Volume 3, Policy Issues and Research Opportunities in Industrial Organization, pp. 59–73. Cambridge, MA: NBERGoogle Scholar
Coase, R. H. (1998). New institutional economics. American Economic Review, 88 (2): 72–74Google Scholar
Connolly, D., Lund, H., and Mathiesen, B. V. (2016). Smart energy Europe: the technical and economic impact of one potential 100% renewable energy scenario for the European Union. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Review, 60: 1634–1653Google Scholar
Correljé, A. F. (2013). Markets for Natural Gas: Reference Module in Earth Systems and Environmental Sciences. Amsterdam, Netherlands: ElsevierCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Correljé, A. F., and Groenewegen, J. (2009). Public values in utility sectors: economic perspectives. International Journal of Public Policy, 4(5): 395–413Google Scholar
Correljé, A., Groenewegen, J., Künneke, R., and Scholten, D. (2014). Design for values in economics. In van den Hoven, J., Vermaas, P. E., and van de Poel, I. (eds.), Handbook of Ethics, Values, and Technological Design. Dordrecht, Netherlands: SpringerGoogle Scholar
Correljé, A. F., Van der Linden, C., and Westerwoudt, T. (2003). Natural Gas in the Netherlands: From Cooperation to Competition. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Orange Nassau Group BVGoogle Scholar
Davis, L. E., and North, D. C. (1971). Institutional Change and American Economic Growth. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
De Bruijne, M., Steenhuisen, B., Correljé, A. F., Ten Heuvelhof, E., E., and de Vries, L. (2011). How to design a new gas bid price ladder? Exploring market design issues in the new Dutch gas balancing regime. Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, 12 (1): 83–97Google Scholar
De Carne, G., Zou, Z., Butuicchi, G., Liserre, M., and Vournas, C. (2017). Overload control in smart transformer-fed grid. Applied Sciences, 7(2): 208Google Scholar
Denzau, A., and North, D. C. (1994). Shared mental models: ideologies and institutions. Kyklos, 47(1): 3–31Google Scholar
Depuru, S. S. S. R., Wang, L., and Devabhaktuni, V. (2011). Smart meters for power grid: challenges, issues, advantages and status. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Review, 15(6): 2736–2742Google Scholar
De Vries, P., and Yehoue, E. B. (2013). The Routledge Companion to Public–Private Partnerships. London, UK: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Domanski, A., and Ménard, C. (2011). Liberalization in the water sector: three leading models. In Künneke, R. and Finger, M. (eds.), International Handbook of Network Industries: The Liberalization of Infrastructures, chapter 18, pp. 310–327. Cheltenham and Northampton, UK: Edward Elgar PublishingGoogle Scholar
Dosi, G. (1982). Technological paradigms and technological trajectories. A suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Research Policy, 11(3): 147–162Google Scholar
Dutch Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment (2017). On our Way Towards Connected and Automated Driving in Europe. Outcome of the first High Level Meeting held in Amsterdam, February 15. The Hague, Netherlands: MIE. Available at www.government.nl/documents/leaflets/2017/05/18/on-our-way-towards-connected-and=automated-driving-in-EuropeGoogle Scholar
Dutton, K., Thompson, S., and Barraclough, B. (1997). The Art of Control Engineering. Harlow, UK: Addison Wesley LongmanGoogle Scholar
Economides, N. (1996). The economics of networks. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 14 (6): 673–699Google Scholar
ENTSO-E (2015). Towards Smarter Grids: ENTSO-E Position Paper on Developing TSO and DSO Roles for the Benefit of Consumers. Brussels, Belgium: ENTSO-E, ENTSOE-E Position PaperGoogle Scholar
ENTSOG (2019 ). Transparency Platform, European Gas Transport Network. Available at https://transparency.entsog.euGoogle Scholar
European Commission (2008). Modern rail modern Europe. Towards an integrated European railway area. Luxembourg: European CommissionGoogle Scholar
European Union/European Commission (2019). 2020 Targets, EU Policy, Strategy and Legislation for 2020 Environmental, Energy and Climate Targets. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission. Available at https://ec.europa.eu/info/energy-climate-change-environment/overall-targets/2020-targets_enGoogle Scholar
Faulconbridge, I. R., and Ryan, M. J. (2014). Systems Engineering Practice. Canberra, Australia: Argos PressGoogle Scholar
Finger, M., Groenewegen, J., and Künneke, R. W. (2005). The quest for coherence between technology and institutions in infrastructures. Journal of Network Industries, 6(4): 227–259Google Scholar
Finger, M., and Finon, D. (2011). From “service public” to universal service: the case of the European Union. In Finger, M. and Künneke, R. (eds.), International Handbook of Network Industries: The Liberalization of Infrastructure, pp. 54–69. Cheltenham and Northampton, UK: Edward Elgar PublishingGoogle Scholar
Finger, M., and Messulam, P. (eds.) (2015). Rail Economics, Policy and Regulation in Europe. Cheltenham and Northampton, UK: Edward Elgar PublishingGoogle Scholar
Funcke, S., and Bauknecht, D. (2016). Typology of centralised and decentralised visions for electricity infrastructure. Utilities Policy, 40: 67–74Google Scholar
Gabert, J. (ed.) (2018). Memento de l’assainissement: Mettre en œuvre un service d’assainissement complet, durable et adapté, 844 pp. Paris, France: Éditions du Gret et QuæGoogle Scholar
Gasunie Transport Services (2019). The Transmission Network. Available at www.gasunietransportservices.nl/en/network-operations/the-transmission-networkGoogle Scholar
Geels, F. W. (2004). From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems. Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory. Research Policy, 33: 897–920Google Scholar
Gerard, H., Rivero Puente, E. I., and Six, D. (2018). Coordination between transmission and distribution system operators in the electricity sector: a conceptual framework. Utilities Policy, 50: 40–48Google Scholar
Gerxhani, K., and Van Breemen, J. (2019 ). Social values and institutional change: an experimental study. Journal of Institutional Economics, 15 (2): 259–280Google Scholar
Gibbons, R., and Henderson, R. (2012). Relational contracts and organizational capabilities. Organization Science, 23 (5): 1350–1364Google Scholar
Gilsing, V., and Nooteboom, B. (2006). Exploration and exploitation in innovation systems: the case of pharmaceutical biotechnology. Research Policy, 35 (1): 1–23Google Scholar
Glachant, J.-M. (2012). Regulating networks in the new economy. Review of Economics and Institutions, 3 (1): 1–27. Available at https://DOI.10.5202/rei.v3il.49Google Scholar
Glachant, J.-M., and Hallack, M. (2010). The Gas Transportation Network as a “Lego” Game: How to Play with It? Florence, Italy: European University Institute, EUI Working Paper RSCAS 2010/42Google Scholar
Goodman, B., and Flaxman, S. (2016). European Union regulations on algorithmic decision-making and a “right to explanantion.” ArXiv e-prints (June)Google Scholar
Greif, A. (1993). Contract enforceability and economic institutions in early trade: the Maghribi traders. American Economic Review, 83 (3): 525–547Google Scholar
Greif, A., Milgrom, P., and Weingast, B. (1994). Coordination, commitment and enforcement. The case of Merchant Guild. Journal of Political Economy, 102: 45–76Google Scholar
Greif, A. (2005). Commitment, coercion, and markets: the nature and dynamics of institutions supporting exchange. In Menard, C. and Shirley, M. (eds.), Handbook of New Institutional Economics, chapter 28, pp. 725–786. Berlin-Dordrecht-New York: SpringerGoogle Scholar
Greif, A. (2006). Institutions and the Path to the Modern Economy: Lessons from Medieval Trade. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Groenewegen, J. P. M. (2011). The Bloomington School and American institutionalism. The Good Society, 20 (1): 15–36Google Scholar
Groenewegen, J. P. M., and Künneke, R. W. (2005). Process and outcomes of the infrastructure reform: an evolutionary perspective. In Künneke, R. W., Correljé, A. F., and Groenewegen, J. P. M. (eds.), Institutional Reform, Regulation, and Privatization, chapter 1, pp. 1–35. Cheltenham and Northampton, UK: Edward Elgar PublishingGoogle Scholar
Groenewegen, J. P. M., and van der Steen, M. (2007). The evolutionary policy maker. Journal of Economic Issues, 41 (2): 351–358Google Scholar
Groenewegen, J. P. M., van Spithoven, A., and van der Berg, A. (2010). Institutional Economics: An Introduction. New York, NY: Palgrave MacmillanGoogle Scholar
Hadjipaschalis, I., Poullikkas, A., and Efthimiou, V. (2009). Overview of current and future energy storage technologies for electric power applications. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Review, 13 (6–7): 1513–1522Google Scholar
Helm, D. (2009a). Utility Regulation, the RAB and the Cost of capital. Working Paper. Available at www.dieterhelm.co.ukGoogle Scholar
Helm, D. (2009b). Infrastructure investment, the cost of capital, and regulation: an assessment. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 25(3): 307–326Google Scholar
Hewitson, L., Brown, M., and Balakrishnan, R. (2004). Practical Power System Protection. Amsterdam, Netherlands: ElsevierGoogle Scholar
Hines, P., and Blumsack, S. (2008). A centrality measure for electrical networks. Proceedings of the 41st Annual International Conference on System Sciences. Hawaii: IEEEGoogle Scholar
Ho, P. (2013). In defense of endogenous, spontaneously ordered development: institutional functionalism and Chinese property rights. Journal of Peasant Studies, 40 (6): 1087–1118Google Scholar
Hodgson, G. (1988). Economics and Institutions: A Manifesto for a Modern Institutional Economics. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania PressGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, G. (2015a). On defining institutions: rules versus equilibria. Journal of Institutional Economics, 11 (3): 497–505Google Scholar
Hodgson, G. M. (2015b). Conceptualizing Capitalism. Institutions, Evolution, Future. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
Holstein, T., Dodig-Crnkovic, G., and Pelliccione, P. (2018). Ethical and social aspects of self-driving cars. ArXiv 18, Gothenburg, SwedenGoogle Scholar
Hurwicz, L. (1996). Institutions as families of game forms. Japanese Economic Review, 47: 113–133Google Scholar
Hurwicz, L., and Reiter, S. (2008). Designing Economic Mechanisms. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
International Energy Agency (IEA) (2011). Harnessing Renewables: A Guide to the Balancing Challenge. Paris, France: OECD/IEAGoogle Scholar
International Energy Agency (IEA) (2014). Technology Road Map: Energy Storage. Paris, France: O. I. E. AgencyGoogle Scholar
International Energy Agency (IEA) (2017). World Energy Outlook. Paris, France: OECD/IEAGoogle Scholar
International Energy Agency (IEA) (2018). System Integration of Renewables. An Update on Best Practice. Paris, France: OECD/IEAGoogle Scholar
International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA) (2018). Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2017. Abu Dhabi, UAE: IRENAGoogle Scholar
International Union of Railways (UIC) (2015). High Speed Rail: Fast Track to Sustainable Mobility. Paris, France: UICGoogle Scholar
Jaag, C., and Trinkner, U. (2011). A general framework for regulation and liberalization in network industries. In Finger, M. and Künneke, R. (eds.), International Handbook of Network Industries. The Liberalization of Infrastructure. Cheltenham and Northampton, UK: Edward Elgar PublishingGoogle Scholar
Jensen, O. (2017). Public–private partnership for water in Asia: a review of two decades of experience. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 33 (1): 4–30Google Scholar
Jensen, O., and Wu, H. (2018). Urban water security indicators: development and pilot. Environmental Science & Policy, 83: 33–45Google Scholar
Joskow, P. L. (1985). Vertical integration and long-term contracts: the case of coal-burning electric generating plants. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 1 (1): 33–80Google Scholar
Joskow, P. L. (1996). Introducing competition into regulated network industries: from hierarchies to markets in electricity. Industrial and Corporate Change, 5(2): 341–382Google Scholar
Joskow, P. L. (2008 [2005]). Vertical integration. In Ménard, C. and Shirley, M. (eds.), Handbook of New Institutional Economics, chapter 13. Berlin-Dordrecht-New York: SpringerGoogle Scholar
Joskow, P. L., Polinsky, A. M., and Shavell, S. (2007). Regulation of natural monopoly. In Polinsky, A. M. and Shavell, S. (eds.), Handbook of Law and Economics, pp. 1227–1348. Amsterdam, Netherlands: ElsevierGoogle Scholar
Kessides, I. (2004). Reforming Infrastructure: Privatization, Regulation and Competition. Oxford, UK: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Klein, P. (2008 [2005]). The make-or-buy decision: lessons from empirical studies. In Ménard, C. and Shirley, M. (eds.), Handbook of New Institutional Economics, chapter 17, pp. 435–464. Berlin-Dordrecht-New York: SpringerGoogle Scholar
Kooij, H.-J., Oteman, M., Veenman, S., Sperling, K., Magnusson, D., Palm, J., and Hvelplund, F. (2018). Between grassroots and treetops: community power and institutional dependence in the renewable energy sector in Denmark, Sweden and the Netherlands. Energy Research & Social Science, 37(supplement C): 52–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroes, P., Franssen, M., van de Poel, I., and Ottens, M. (2006). Treating socio-technological systems as engineering systems: some conceptual problems. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 23: 803–814Google Scholar
Künneke, R. W. (2008). Institutional reform and technological practice: the case of electricity. Industrial and Corporate Change, 17(2): 233–265Google Scholar
Künneke, R. W., Groenewegen, J., and Auger, J. F. (2009). The Governance of Network Industries. Institutions, Technology and Policy in Reregulated infrastructures. Cheltenham and Northampton, UK: Edward Elgar PublishingGoogle Scholar
Künneke, R. W., Groenewegen, J., and Ménard, C. (2010). Aligning modes of organization with technology: critical transactions in the reform of infrastructures. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 75: 494–505Google Scholar
Künneke, R. W. (2018). Interrelated technical and institutional coordination: the case of network infrastructures. In Ménard, C. and Shirley, M. (eds.), Research Agenda of New Institutional Economics, chapter 8, pp. 72–79. Cheltenham and Northampton, UK: Edward Elgar PublishingGoogle Scholar
Laffont, J.-J., and Tirole, J. (1993). A Theory of Incentives in Procurement and Regulation. Boston, MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
Laffont, J.-J. (2005). Regulation and Development. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Lafontaine, F., and Slade, M. (2007). Vertical integration and firm boundaries: the evidence. Journal of Economic Literature, 45: 629–685Google Scholar
Lemstra, W., Hayes, V., and Groenewegen, J. (2011). The Innovation Journey of Wi-Fi – The Road to Global Success. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Levinson, M. (2006). The Box, How the Shipping Container Made the World Smaller and the World Economy Bigger. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
Levy, B., and Spiller, P. (1994). The institutional foundations of regulatory commitment. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 9 (fall): 201–246Google Scholar
Levy, B., and Spiller, P. (1996). Regulations, Institutions and Commitments. A Comparative Analysis of Telecommunications Regulation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Liebowitz, S. J., and Margolis, S. E. (2003). Network effects. In Cave, M. E., Majumda, S. K., and Vogelsang, I. (eds.), Handbook of Telecommunications Economics, pp. 75–96. Amsterdam, Netherlands: North-Holland/ElsevierGoogle Scholar
Long, C. (2018). The China experience: an institutional approach. In Ménard, C. and Shirley, M. (eds.), Research Agenda of New Institutional Economics, chapter 15, pp. 135–143. Cheltenham and Northampton, UK: Edward Elgar PublishingGoogle Scholar
Lund, H., Ostergaard, P. A., Connolly, D., and Mathiesen, B. V. (2017). Smart energy and smart energy systems. Energy, 137: 556–565Google Scholar
Macaulay, S. (1963). Non-contractual relations in business: a preliminary study. American Sociological Review, 28 (1): 55–67Google Scholar
Maier, M. W., and Rechtin, E. (2000). The Art of System Architecting. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. Available at https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420058529Google Scholar
Mantzavinos, C. (2001). Individual, Institutions and Markets. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Marshall, A. (1919). Industry and Trade: A Study of Industrial Technique and Business Organization, and of Their Influences on the Conditions of Various Classes and Nations, 2 vols. London, UK: MacmillanGoogle Scholar
Marshall, W., and Weingast, B. R. (1988). The industrial organization of congress. Journal of Political Economy, 96 (February): 132–163.Google Scholar
McCloskey, D. (2016). Bourgeois Equality: How Ideas, Not Capital Or Institutions, Enriched the World. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
McNeill, W. H. (1982). The Pursuit of Power. Technology, Armed Force, and Society since A.D. 1000. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
Ménard, C. (2004). The economics of hybrid organizations. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 160 (3): 345–376Google Scholar
Ménard, C. (2008 [2005]). A new institutional approach to organization. In Ménard, C. and Shirley, M. (eds.), Handbook of New Institutional Economics, chapter 12, pp. 281–318. Boston-New York-Berlin-Dordrecht: SpringerGoogle Scholar
Ménard, C., and Domanski-Peeroo, A. (2011). Liberalization in the water sector: three leading models. In Künneke, R. and Finger, M. (eds.), International Handbook of Network Industries: The Liberalization of Infrastructures, chapter 18, pp. 310–327. Cheltenham and Northampton, UK: Edward Elgar PublishingGoogle Scholar
Ménard, C., and Ghertman, M. (eds.) (2009). Regulation, Deregulation, Reregulation: An Institutional Approach. Cheltenham and Northampton, UK: Edward Elgar PublishingGoogle Scholar
Ménard, C., (2012). Risk in urban water reform: a challenge to public–private partnership. In Gunawansa, A. and Bhular, L. (eds.), Water Governance: An Evaluation of Alternative Architectures, chapter 12, pp. 290–320. Cheltenham and Northampton, UK: Edward Elgar PublishingGoogle Scholar
Ménard, C. (2013). Hybrid modes of organization. Alliances, joint ventures, networks, and other “strange” animals. In Gibbons, R. and Roberts, J. (eds.), The Handbook of Organizational Economics, chapter 26, pp. 1066–1108. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
Ménard, C. (2017). Meso-institutions: the variety of regulatory arrangements in the water sector. Utilities Policy, 49: 6–19Google Scholar
Ménard, C., Jimenez, A., and Tropp, H. (2018). Addressing the policy-implementation gaps in water services: the key role of meso-institutions. Water International, 43 (1): 13–33Google Scholar
Ménard, C. (2019). Dimensionalizing Institutions. In Gagliardi, F. and Gindis, D. (eds.), Institutions and Evolution of Capitalism: Essays in Honour of Geoffrey M. Hodgson, chapter 8, pp. 110–126. Cheltenham and Northampton, UK: Edward Elgar PublishingGoogle Scholar
Milakis, J. D., van Arem, B., and van Wee, B. (2017). Policy and society related implications of automated driving: a review of literature and directions for future research. Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems, 21 (4): 324–348Google Scholar
Milchram, C., Van de Ka, G., Doorn, N., and Künneke, R. W. (2018). Moral values as factors for social acceptance of smart grids. Sustainability, 10 (8): 1–23. Available at https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082703Google Scholar
Milgrom, P., North, D. C., and Weingast, B. (1989). The role of institutions in the revival of trade: the law merchant, private judges, and the champagne fairs. Economics and Politics, 2: 1–23Google Scholar
Mockyr, J. (2014). Culture, institutions, and modern growth. In Sened, I. and Galiani, S. (eds.), Economic Institutions, Rights, Growth, and Sustainability: The Legacy of Douglass North, pp. 151–191. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Mockyr, J. (2016). A Culture of Growth: Origins of the Modern Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
Murmann, J. P. (2003). Knowledge and Competitive Advantage: The Coevolution of Firms, Technology and National Institutions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA)/Department of Transportation (DOT) (2018). Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM). October 3, Washington, DC, under authority delegated in 49 CFR part 1.95. Available at www.federalregister.govGoogle Scholar
National Research Council (2006). Drinking Water Distribution Systems: Assessing and Reducing Risks. Washington, DC: National Academies PressGoogle Scholar
National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) (2018). Preliminary Report Released for Crash Involving Pedestrian, Uber Technologies, Inc. Test Vehicle. May 24Google Scholar
National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) (2019a). Inadequate Safety Culture Contributed to Uber Automated test Vehicle Crash – NTSB Calls for Federal Review Process for Automated Vehicle Testing on Public Roads. NTSB Office of Public Affairs News Release, November 19Google Scholar
National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) (2019b). Testimony of the Honorable Robert L. Sumwalt, III Chairman National Transportation Safety Board, before the Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation. United States Senate on Highly Automated Vehicles: Federal Perspectives on the Deployment of Safety Technology. November 20, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
Nightingale, P., Brady, T., Davies, A., and Hall, J. (2003). Capacity utilization revisited: software, control and the growth of large technical systems. Industrial and Corporate Change, 12 (3): 477–517Google Scholar
North, D. C. (1968). Sources of productivity change in ocean shipping, 1600–1850. Journal of Political Economy, 76 (5): 953–970Google Scholar
North, D. C. (1981). Structure and Change in Economic History. New York, NY: Norton & Co.Google Scholar
North, D. C. (1990a). Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
North, D. C. (1990b). A transaction cost theory of politics. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 2 (4): 355–367Google Scholar
North, D. C. (2005). Understanding the Process of Economic Change. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
North, D. C., Wallis, J. J., and Weingast, B. R. (2009). Violence and Social Orders. A Conceptual Framework for Interpreting Recorded Human History. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
OECD (2011). Water Governance in OECD Countries: A Multi-level Approach. Paris, France: OECDGoogle Scholar
OECD (2015a). Principles on Water Governance (coordinated by Akhmouch, A.). Paris, France: OECDGoogle Scholar
OECD (2015b). The Governance of Water Regulators (coordinated by Kauffmann, C.). Paris, France: OECDGoogle Scholar
OECD (2015c). Inventory: Water Governance Indicators and Measurement Frameworks (collected by Akhmouch, A. and Romano, O.). Paris, France: OECDGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, E. (1998). A behavioral approach to the rational choice theory of collective action: presidential address. American Political Science Review, 92 (1): 1–22Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. (2005). Understanding Institutional Diversity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, E. (2009). A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science, 325: 419–422Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. (2014a). Institutions and sustainability of ecological systems. In Sened, I. and Galiani, S. (eds.), Economic Institutions, Rights, Growth, and Sustainability: The Legacy of Douglass North, pp. 151–191. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, E. (2014b). Do institutions for collective action evolve? Journal of Bioeconomics, 16 (1): 3–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perennes, P. (2014). Use of combinatorial auctions in the railway industry: can the “invisible hand” draw the railway timetable? Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 67: 175–187Google Scholar
Pezon, C., Fonseca, C., and Butterworth, J. (2011). Pumps, pipes, and promises. Costs, finances and accountability for sustainable WASH services. IRC Symposium, November 18–20, 2010, The Hague, Netherlands.Google Scholar
Public Utilities Board (PUB) (2019). PUB Annual Report 2018–2019. Available at www.pub.gov.sg/annualreports/annualreport2019.pdfGoogle Scholar
Public Utilities Board (PUB) (2020). Singapore’s National Water Agency: Singaport Water Story. Available at www.pub.gov.sg/watersupply/singaporewaterstoryGoogle Scholar
Ray, K., and Skorup, B. (2019). Smart Cities, Dumb Infrastructure: Policy-Induced Competition in Vehicle-to-Infrastructure Systems. Arlington, VA: Mercatus Center at George Mason University, Mercatus Working PaperGoogle Scholar
Rodrik, D. (2008). One Economics, Many Recipes: Globalization, Institutions, and Economic Growth. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
Royal Academy of Engineering (2012). Smart Infrastructure: The Future. London, UK: Royal Academy of EngineeringGoogle Scholar
Rubinfeld, D. L. (1998). Antitrust enforcement in dynamic network infrastructures. Antitrust Bulletin, 48: 859–882Google Scholar
Sandel, M. (2012). What Money Can’t Buy: The Moral Limits of Markets. London, UK: PenguinGoogle Scholar
Savedoff, W. D., and Spiller, P. (1999). Spilled Water: Institutional Commitment in the Provision of Water Services. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development BankGoogle Scholar
Saviotti, P. P. (2005). The coevolution of technologies and institutions. In Weber, M. and Hemmelskamp, J. (eds.), Towards Environmental Innovation Systems, chapter 2, pp. 9–31. Berlin-Heidelberg, Germany: SpringerGoogle Scholar
Schotter, A. (1981). The Economic Theory of Social Institutions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Selznick, P. (1948). Foundations of the theory of organization. American Sociological Review, 13 (1): 25–35Google Scholar
Shapiro, C., and Varian, H. R. (1999). Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School PressGoogle Scholar
Shelanski, H. A., and Klein, P. (1995). Empirical research in transaction costs economics. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 11 (2): 335–361Google Scholar
Shelanski, H. A. (2007). Adjusting regulation to competition: toward a new model for U.S. telecommunications policy. Yale Journal on Regulation, 24: 55–62. Available at https://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/yjreg/vol24/iss1/3Google Scholar
Shirley, M. S. (ed.) (2002). Thirsting for Efficiency. The Economics and Politics of Urban Water Reform. London, UK: Pergamon and the World Bank GroupGoogle Scholar
Shirley, M. S. (2008). Institutions of Development. Cheltenham and Northampton, UK: Edward Elgar PublishingGoogle Scholar
Shleifer, A., Glaeser, E. L., La Porta, R., Lopez de Silanes, F., and Djankov, S. (2003). The new comparative economics. Journal of Comparative Economics, 31 (4): 595–619Google Scholar
Siemens (2016). Planning of Electric Power Distribution. Technical Principles. Erlangen, Germany: Siemens AGGoogle Scholar
SiemensSingapore Post (n. d.). Anti-bribery and corruption policy. Available at www.singpost.com/sites/default/files/SingPost ABC Policy.pdfGoogle Scholar
Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) (2014). Levels of Driving Automation are Defined in New SAE International Standard J3016. Available at www.sae.org/misc/pdfs/automated_driving.pdfGoogle Scholar
Spiller, P. T. (2009). An institutional theory of public contracts. In Ménard, C. and Ghertman, M. (eds.), Regulation, Deregulation, Reregulation: An Institutional Approach. Cheltenham and Northampton, UK: Edward Elgar PublishingGoogle Scholar
Spiller, P. T. (2013). Transaction cost regulation. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 89: 232–242Google Scholar
Stigler, G. J. (1971). The theory of economic regulation. Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 2 (1): 3–21Google Scholar
Tadelis, S., and Williamson, O. E. (2013). Transaction costs economics. In Gibbons, R. and Roberts, J. (eds.), The Handbook of Organizational Economics, chapter 4, pp. 159–189. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
Tropp, H. (2007). Water governance: trends and needs for new capacity development. Water Policy, 9 (S2): 19–30Google Scholar
UNICEF (2015). WASH and Accountability: Explaining the Concept. Stockholm and New York: Accountability for Sustainability Partnership, UNDP Water Governance Facility at SIWI and UNICEF. Available at http://www.watergovernance.orgGoogle Scholar
United Nations (2019). 17 Sustainable Development Goals. Available at https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/?menu=1300Google Scholar
US Government Accountability Office (GAO) (2016a). Vehicle Cybersecurity. Report to Congressional Requesters, GAO-16-350. Available at www.gao.gov/products/GAO-16-350Google Scholar
US Government Accountability Office (GAO) (2016b). Vehicle Cybersecurity: DOT and Industry have Efforts under Way, but DOT Needs to Define its Role in Responding to a Real-world Attack. Available at https://bit.ly/1ruZi09Google Scholar
US Secretary of Energy (2004). Final Report on the August 14 Blackout in the United States and Canada: Causes and Recommendations. Washington, DC. Available at www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/oeprod/DocumentsandMedia/BlackoutFinal-Web.pdfGoogle Scholar
Van der Wal, W. (2003). The technological infrastructure of the gas chain. In Arentsen, M. and Künneke, R. W. (eds.), National Reforms in European Gas, chapter 2, pp. 13–29. Amsterdam, Netherlands: ElsevierGoogle Scholar
Vazquez, M., Hallack, M., and Perez, Y. (2018). The dynamics of institutional and organizational change in emergent industries: the case of electric vehicles. International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management, 18 (3): 187–208Google Scholar
Verzijlberg, R. A., De Vries, L. J., Dijkema, G. P. J., and Herder, P. M. (2017). Institutional challenges caused by the integration of renewable energy sources in the European electricity sector. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 75: 660–667Google Scholar
Villar, J., Bessa, R., and Matos, M. (2018). Flexibility products and markets: literature review. Electric Power Systems Research, 154: 329–340Google Scholar
Wahaab, R. Abdel (2018). Water and Sanitation in Egypt. Overview Report (based on a partially updated and complemented report to the African Development Bank (AFDB), Côte d’Ivoire, 2015)Google Scholar
Water International (2018). The OECD principles on water governance: from policy standards to practice. 43 (1): 1–132Google Scholar
Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. New York, NY: Free PressGoogle Scholar
Williamson, O. E. (1979). Transaction-cost economics: the governance of contractual relations. Journal of Law and Economics, 22(2): 233–261Google Scholar
Williamson, O. E. (1985). The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. New York, NY: Free Press-MacmillanGoogle Scholar
Williamson, O. E. (1996). The Mechanisms of Governance. Oxford, UK: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Williamson, O. E. (1998). Transaction cost economics: how it works, where it is headed. De Economist, 146 (January): 23–58Google Scholar
Williamson, O. E. (1999). Public and private bureaucracies: a transaction cost economics perspective. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 15 (1): 306–342Google Scholar
Williamson, O. E. (2000). The new institutional economics: taking stock, looking ahead. Journal of Economic Literature, 37 (3): 595–613Google Scholar
Wolsink, M. (2018). Co-production in distributed generation: renewable energy and creating space for fitting infrastructure within landscapes. Landscape Research, 43(4): 542–561Google Scholar
World Bank (2017). Governance and the Law. World Bank Annual Report. Washington, DC: International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/World Bank GroupGoogle Scholar
World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED) (1987). Special working session. Our Common Future, no. 17, pp. 1–91. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Wu, X., and Malaluan, N. A. (2008). A tale of two concessionaires: a natural experiment of water privatization in Metro Manilla. Urban Studies, 45(1): 207–229.Google Scholar
Xenias, D., Axon, C. J., Whitmarsh, L., Connor, P. M., Balta-Ozkan, N., and Spence, A. (2015). UK smart grid development: an expert assessment of the benefits, pitfalls and functions. Renewable Energy, 81: 89–102Google Scholar
Yildiz, Ö., Rommel, J., Debor, S., Holstenkamp, S. L., Mey, F., Müller, J. R., Radtke, J., and Rognli, J. (2015). Renewable energy cooperatives as gatekeepers or facilitators? Recent developments in Germany and a multidisciplinary research agenda. Energy Research & Social Science, 6: 59–73Google Scholar
Zhang, F. (2018). The Institutional Evolution of China. Government vs Market. Cheltenham and Northampton, UK: Edward Elgar PublishingGoogle Scholar