Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T22:54:45.889Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - What Is Biological Knowledge?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 September 2020

By
Kevin McCain
Edited by
Kostas Kampourakis  and
Tobias Uller
Kostas Kampourakis
Affiliation:
Université de Genève
Tobias Uller
Affiliation:
Lunds Universitet, Sweden
Get access

Summary

As biologists can certainly appreciate, it can be helpful to think of biological knowledge as a species belonging to the genus knowledge. A good starting point for understanding the features of biological knowledge is therefore to ask what features all instances of knowledge have in common.

Type
Chapter
Information
Philosophy of Science for Biologists , pp. 36 - 54
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, M. P. (2009). Empirical Evidence and the Knowledge-That/Knowledge-How Distinction. Synthese 170(1): 97–114.Google Scholar
Beebe, J. (2009). The Abductivist Reply to Skepticism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 79(3): 605–636.Google Scholar
Bernhardt, H. S. (2012). The RNA World Hypothesis: The Worst Theory of the Early Evolution of Life (Except for All the Others). Biology Direct 7: 23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carter, J. A. & Poston, T. (2018). A Critical Introduction to Knowledge-How. New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. (1962 [1859]). The Origin of Species. New York: Collier.Google Scholar
Dellsén, F. (2017). Abductively Robust Inference. Analysis 77(1): 20–29.Google Scholar
De Ridder, J. (2019). How Many Scientists Does It Take to Have Knowledge? In McCain, K. & Kampourakis, K. (eds.), What Is Scientific Knowledge? An Introduction to the Epistemology of Science. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Devitt, M. (2011). Methodology and the Nature of Know How. Journal of Philosophy 108(4): 205–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douven, I. (2017). Abduction. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. In Zalta, E. N., ed., The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Summer 2017 Edition. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2017/entries/abduction/Google Scholar
Douven, I. & Mirabile, P. (2018). Best, Second-Best, and Good-Enough Explanations: How They Matter to Reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 44(11): 1792–1813.Google ScholarPubMed
Douven, I. & Schupbach, J. N. (2015). Probabilistic Alternatives to Bayesianism: The Case of Explanationism. Frontiers of Psychology 6: 459. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00459CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Douven, I. & Wenmackers, S. (2017). Inference to the Best Explanation versus Bayes’s Rule in a Social Setting. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 68(2): 535–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enoch, D. & Schechter, J. (2008). How Are Basic Belief-Forming Methods Justified? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 76(3): 547–579.Google Scholar
Fantl, J. & McGrath, M. (2009). Knowledge in an Uncertain World. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fricker, E. (1994). Against Gullibility. In Matilal, B. K. & Chakrabarti, A. (eds.), Knowing from Words, pp. 125–161. Netherlands: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Hobbs, J. R. (2004). Abduction in Natural Language Understanding. In Horn, L. & Ward, G. (eds.), The Handbook of Pragmatics, pp. 724–741. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kampourakis, K. (2014). Understanding Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kampourakis, K. (2015). That Gregor Mendel Was a Lonely Pioneer of Genetics, Being Ahead of His Time. In Numbers, R. L. & Kampourakis, K. (eds.), Newton’s Apple and Other Myths about Science, pp. 129–138. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kampourakis, K. (2017). Making Sense of Genes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kampourakis, K. & McCain, K. (2020). Uncertainty: How It Makes Science Advance. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kampourakis, K. & Niebert, K. (2018). Explanation in Biology Education. In Kampourakis, K. & Reiss, M. (eds.), Teaching Biology in Schools: Global Research, Issues and Trends, pp. 236–248. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kornblith, H. (2012). On Reflection. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, D. (1990). What Experience Teaches. In Lycan, W. (ed.), Mind and Cognition, pp. 29–57. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Lipton, P. (1998). The Epistemology of Testimony. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 29(1): 1–31.Google Scholar
Lipton, P. 2004. Inference to the Best Explanation. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lycan, W. (2002). Explanation and Epistemology. In Moser, P. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Epistemology, pp. 408–433. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCain, K. (2014). Evidentialism and Epistemic Justification. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
McCain, K. (2016). The Nature of Scientific Knowledge: An Explanatory Approach. Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
McCain, K. (2018). Explanatory Virtues Are Indicative of Truth. Logos & Episteme 9(1): 63–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCain, K. (2019). How Do Explanations Lead to Scientific Knowledge? In McCain, K. & Kampourakis, K. (eds.), What Is Scientific Knowledge? An Introduction to the Epistemology of Science. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCain, K. & Poston, T. (2014). Why Explanatoriness Is Evidentially Relevant. Thought 3(2): 145–153.Google Scholar
McCain, K. & Poston, T. (2017). The Evidential Impact of Explanatory Considerations. In McCain, K. & Poston, T. (eds.), Best Explanations: New Essays on Inference to the Best Explanation, pp. 121–129. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McCain, K. & Poston, T. (2019). Dispelling the Disjunction Objection to Explanatory Inference. Philosophers’ Imprint 19(36): 1–8.Google Scholar
McCain, K. & Poston, T. (Forthcoming). Explanation and Evidence. In Littlejohn, C. & Lasonen-Aarnio, M. (eds.), Routledge Handbook of Evidence. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
McCain, K. & Weslake, B. (2013). Evolutionary Theory and the Epistemology of Science. In Kampourakis, K. (ed.), The Philosophy of Biology: A Companion for Educators, pp. 101–119. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
McMullin, E. (2008). The Virtues of a Good Theory. In The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Science, pp. 526–536. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Musgrave, A. 1988. The Ultimate Argument for Scientific Realism. In Nola, R. (ed.), Relativism and Realism in Science, pp. 229–252. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Newton, I. (1999 [1687]). The Principia: Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy. Cohen, I. B. & Whitman, A., trans. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Novick, A. & Scholl, R. (Forthcoming). Presume It Not: True Causes in the Search for the Basis of Heredity. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.Google Scholar
Olesko, K. M. (2015). That Science Has Been Largely a Solitary Enterprise. In Numbers, R. L. & Kampourakis, K. (eds.), Newton's Apple and Other Myths about Science, pp. 202–209. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Poston, T. (2009). Know-How to Be Gettiered? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 79(3): 743–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rinard, S. (2017). External World Skepticism and Inference to the Best Explanation. In McCain, K. & Poston, T. (eds.), Best Explanations: New Essays on Inference to the Best Explanation, pp. 203–216. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Roche, W. (2018). The Perils of Parsimony. Journal of Philosophy 115(9): 485–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roche, W. & Sober, E. (2013). Explanatoriness Is Evidentially Irrelevant, or Inference to the Best Explanation Meets Bayesian Confirmation Theory. Analysis 73(4): 659–668.Google Scholar
Roche, W. & Sober, E. (2014). Explanatoriness and Evidence: A Reply to McCain and Poston. Thought 3(3): 193–199.Google Scholar
Ryle, G. (1949). The Concept of Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Schacter, D. L., Wagner, A. D., & Buckner, R. L. (2000). Memory Systems of 1999. In Tulving, E. & Craik, F. I. M. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Memory, pp. 627–643. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sober, E. (2015). Ockham’s Razors: A User’s Manual. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sosa, E. (2011). Knowing Full Well. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sosa, E. (2017). Epistemology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Squire, L. R. (1987). Memory and Brain. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stanley, J. (2011). Know How. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stanley, J. & Williamson, T. (2001). Knowing How. Journal of Philosophy 98(8): 411–444.Google Scholar
Swinburne, R. (1997). Simplicity as Evidence of Truth. Milwaukee, WI: Marquette University Press.Google Scholar
Trout, J. D. (2016). Wondrous Truths: The Improbable Triumph of Modern Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tulodziecki, Dana. (2011). A Case Study in Explanatory Power: John Snow’s Conclusions about the Pathology and Transmission of Cholera. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 42(3): 306–316.Google Scholar
van Fraassen, B. (1989). Laws and Symmetry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
White, R. (2005). Why Favour Simplicity? Analysis 65(287): 205–210.Google Scholar
Williamson, T. (2000). Knowledge and Its Limits. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zagzebski, L. (1996). Virtues of the Mind: An Inquiry into the Nature of Virtue and the Ethical Foundations of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×