Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T05:40:27.633Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 1 - Theories of Place Across Time and Space

Urban Form in Ancient Rome and Han China

from Part I - Crafting Space and Place

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2024

Hans Beck
Affiliation:
Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Germany
Griet Vankeerberghen
Affiliation:
McGill University, Montréal
Get access

Summary

Russell opens the book with a plea for a new approach to the comparative study of ancient cities. Past scholars – with Rykwert as the foremost example – have pointed to claims in ancient Chinese and Roman literary materials that link cities with the cosmos. They have, furthermore, used these claims to argue that, in both ancient Rome and China, the idea of the city as a microcosmos is what led to what we might call ‘placemaking’, the process by which abstract space is made meaningful to humans. Rather than disproving these claims, Russell shows the limited reach of the literary materials. First, whatever the texts claim, real cities are never scaled-down models of the cosmos: whereas the texts may seek to imbue features of the human landscape with symbolic meaning, these are most often later ascriptions, explaining features of the city that have arisen for much more concrete, mundane reasons. Second, starting from the observation that both ancient China and ancient Rome are civilisations that take great pride in their past traditions, Russell shows how the theories that associate cities with cosmological ideas are, in fact, classicising constructions of a fairly late date (last two centuries BCE), part of a growing body of technical literature, that itself was spurred into being by the cultural and intellectual changes that attended Chinese unification and Roman imperial expansion. Thus, the similarities between Roman and Chinese cities turn out to hinge on highly abstract and relatively marginal concepts of space. By showing this, Russell frees up the field for a historical investigation of cities, not as spaces but as concrete, complex places with multiple and constantly evolving social meanings. This mode of investigation gets fully underway in subsequent chapters of the book.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allison, P. M. 2006. The Insula of the Menander at Pompeii. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Barbieri-Low, A. J. 2007. Artisans in Early Imperial China. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Beard, M., North, J., and Price, S.. 1998. Religions of Rome. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bispham, E. 2000. ‘Coloniam deducere: how Roman was Roman colonization during the middle Republic?’. In Fentress, E., ed., Romanization and the City: Creations, Transformations and Failures: Proceedings of a Conference Held at the American Academy in Rome to Celebrate the 50th Anniversary of the Excavations at Cosa, 14–16 May, 1998, 73160. Portsmouth, RI: Journal of Roman Archaeology.Google Scholar
Brennan, T. C., and Hsing, I-tien. 2010. ‘The Eternal City and the City of Eternal Peace’. In Nylan, M. and Loewe, M., eds., China’s Early Empires: A Re-appraisal, 186212. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, F. E. 1951. Cosa I: History and Topography. Rome: American Academy in Rome.Google Scholar
Brown, F. E. 1980. Cosa: The Making of a Roman Town. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Brown, F. E., Richardson, E. H., and Richardson, L.. 1960. Cosa II: The Temples of the Arx. Rome: American Academy in Rome.Google Scholar
Brown, M. 2015. ‘Looking Backward: The Rise of Medical Tradition in the Han Period’. In Nylan, M. and Vankeerberghen, G., eds., Chang’an 26 BCE: An Augustan Age in China, 441–60. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, B. 2000. The Writings of the Roman Land Surveyors. London: Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies.Google Scholar
Cancik, H. 1985–6. ‘Rome as Sacred Landscape: Varro and the End of Republican Religion’. Visible Religion: Annual for Religious Iconography 4–5: 250–65.Google Scholar
Carl, P., Kemp, B., and Laurence, R.. 2000. ‘Were Cities Built as Images?’. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 10(2): 327–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casey, E. S. 1997. The Fate of Place: A Philosophical History. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Catalano, P. 1978. ‘Aspetti spaziali del sistema giuridico-religioso romano: mundus, templum, urbs, ager, Latium, Italia’. In Haase, W. and Temporini, H., eds., Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt (ANRW) [The Rise and Fall of the Roman World] II.16.1, 440553. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Chang, Wenzhai 畅文斋. 1963. ‘Shanxi Xiangfen Zhaokang fujin gudai chengzhi diaocha’ 山西襄汾赵康附近古城址調查 [‘A Survey of Ancient City Sites in Zhaokang in Xiangfen [county], Shanxi [province]’]. Kaogu, 10: 544–6.Google Scholar
Cheng, Xiong. 2020. ‘Continuity and Innovation in Imperial Inscriptions’. New Classicists 3: 115.Google Scholar
Coarelli, F. 2001. ‘Mundus, pomerium, ager: la concezione dello spazio a Roma [Mundus, pomerium, ager: The Concept of Space in Rome]’. In Camassa, G., De Guio, A., and Veronese, F., eds., Paesaggi di potere: problemi e prospettive: atti del seminario Udine 16–17 maggio 1996 [Landscapes of Power: Problems and Prospects: Proceedings of the Conference at Udine 16–17 May 1996], 285–92. Rome: Quasar.Google Scholar
Elman, B. A. 2009. ‘The Story of a Chapter: Changing Views of the “Artificer’s Record” (“Kaogong ji” 考工記) and the Zhouli’. In Elman, B. A. and Kern, M., eds., Statecraft and Classical Learning: The Rituals of Zhou in East Asian History, 330–55. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Elman, B. A., and Kern, M.. 2009. ‘Introduction’. In Elman, B. A. and Kern, M., eds., Statecraft and Classical Learning: The Rituals of Zhou in East Asian History, 129. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Fentress, E. 2000. ‘Introduction: Cosa and the Idea of the City’. In Fentress, E., ed., Romanization and the City: Creations, Transformations and Failures: Proceedings of a Conference Held at the American Academy in Rome to Celebrate the 50th Anniversary of the Excavations at Cosa, 14–16 May, 1998, 924. Portsmouth, RI: Journal of Roman Archaeology.Google Scholar
Flower, H. I. 2009. Roman Republics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flower, H. I. 2014. The Cambridge Companion to the Roman Republic, 2nd ed. Cambridge Companions to the Ancient World. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, M. 1986. ‘Of Other Spaces’. Diacritics 16: 22–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gargola, D. J. 2017. The Shape of the Roman Order: The Republic and Its Spaces. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guan, Zengjian and Hermann, K. (trans.). 2020. Kao Gong Ji: The World’s Oldest Encyclopedia of Technologies. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habberstad, L. 2015. ‘Recasting the Imperial Court in Late Western Han: Rank, Duty, and Alliances During Institutional Change’. In Nylan, M. and Vankeerberghen, G., eds., Chang’an 26 BCE: An Augustan Age in China, 239–62. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Habinek, T., and Schiesaro, A., eds. 1997. The Roman Cultural Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Heng, Chye Kiang. 1999. Cities of Aristocrats and Bureaucrats: The Development of Medieval Chinese Cities. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.Google Scholar
Hillier, B., and Hanson, J.. 1984. The Social Logic of Space. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humm, M. 2004. ‘Le mundus et le Comitium: representations symboliques de l’espace de la cité [The mundus and the Comitium: Symbolic Representations of the Space of the City]’. Histoire urbaine [Urban History] 10: 4361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkyns, R. 2013. God, Space, and City in the Roman Imagination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jing, Xie. 2012. ‘Human Dimensions of the Street: The Origin and Formation of the Traditional Chinese Street in the Tang-Song Period’. Journal of Urban Design 17(3): 389412.Google Scholar
Kay, P. 2014. Rome’s Economic Revolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knechtges, D. R. 1983. Wen xuan, or Selections of Refined Literature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, D. 2008. ‘Reflections on the Concept of Antiquity in Chinese Civilization’. In Kuhn, D. and Stahl, H., eds., Perceptions of Antiquity in Chinese Civilization, 1768. Heidelberg: Edition Forum.Google Scholar
Le Gall, J. 1975. ‘Les romains et l’orientation solaire [The Romans and Solar Orientation]’. Mélanges de l’Ecole Française de Rome – Antiquité (MEFRA) 87: 287320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leung, V. S. 2019. The Politics of the Past in Early China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, M. E. 1999. Writing and Authority in Early China. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, M. E. 2006. The Construction of Space in Early China. Albany: State University of New York Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, M. E. 2015. ‘Public Spaces in Cities in the Roman and Han Empires’. In Scheidel, W., ed., State Power in Ancient China and Rome, 204–29. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Linderski, J. 1986. ‘The Augural Law’. In Haase, W. and Temporini, H., eds., Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt (ANRW) [The Rise and Fall of the Roman World] II.16.3: 2146–312. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ling, R. 1990. ‘A Stranger in Town: Finding the Way in the Ancient City’. Greece & Rome 37: 204–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Qingzhu. 2007. ‘Archaeological Discovery and Research into the Layout of the Palaces and Ancestral Shrines of Han Dynasty Chang’an: A Comparative Essay on the Capital Cities of Ancient Chinese Kingdoms and Empires’. Early China 31: 113–43.Google Scholar
Lomas, K. 2014. ‘Italy During the Roman Republic, 338–31 B.C.’. In Flower, H. I., ed., The Cambridge Companion to the Roman Republic, 233–59. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Malmberg, S. 2009. ‘Finding Your Way in the Subura’. Theoretical Roman Archaeology Journal 2008: 3951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moatti, C. 1997. La raison de Rome. Naissance de l’esprit critique à la fin de la République (IIe-Ier siècle avant Jésus-Christ) [The Birth of Critical Thinking in Republican Rome. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press]. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.Google Scholar
Noreña, C. F. 2015. ‘Chang’an and Rome: Structural Parallels and the Logic of Urban Form’. In Nylan, M. and Vankeerberghen, G., eds., Chang’an 26 BCE: An Augustan Age in China, 7597. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Nylan, M. 2000. ‘Textual Authority in Pre-Han and Han’. Early China 25: 205–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nylan, M. 2001. The Five ‘Confucian’ Classics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Nylan, M. 2008. ‘Empire in the Classical Era in China (323 BC–AD 316)’. In Mutschler, F.-H. and Mittag, A., eds., Conceiving the Empire: China and Rome Compared, 3464. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nylan, M. 2011. Yang Xiong and the Pleasures of Reading and Classical Learning in Han China. New Haven, CT: American Oriental Society.Google Scholar
Nylan, M. 2015. ‘Introduction’. In Nylan, M. and Vankeerberghen, G., eds., Chang’an 26 BCE: An Augustan Age in China, 352. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Nylan, M. and Vankeerberghen, G., eds. 2015. Chang’an 26 BCE: An Augustan Age in China. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Osgood, J. 2018. Rome and the Making of a World State, 150 BCE–20 CE. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pankenier, D. W. 2013. Astrology and Cosmology in Early China: Conforming Earth to Heaven. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pirazzoli-t’Serstevens, M. 2010. ‘Urbanism’. In Nylan, M. and Loewe, M., eds., China’s Early Empires: A Re-appraisal, 169–85. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Plaks, A. H. 2009. ‘Zheng Xuan’s Commentary on the Zhouli’. In Elman, B. A. and Kern, M., eds., Statecraft and Classical Learning: The Rituals of Zhou in East Asian History, 155–78. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Poo, Mu-Chou. 2008. ‘The Formation of the Concept of Antiquity in Early China’. In Kuhn, D. and Stahl, H., eds., Perceptions of Antiquity in Chinese Civilization, 85101. Heidelberg: Edition Forum.Google Scholar
Poo, Mu-Chou 2018. Daily Life in Ancient China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puett, M. 2009. ‘Centering the Realm: Wang Mang, the Zhouli, and Early Chinese Statecraft’. In Elman, B. A. and Kern, M., eds., Statecraft and Classical Learning: The Rituals of Zhou in East Asian History, 129–54. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Rapoport, A. 1990. The Meaning of the Built Environment: A Nonverbal Communication Approach. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Rawson, E. 1985. Intellectual Life in the Late Roman Republic. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Rich, J. W. 2011. ‘The fetiales and Roman International Relations’. In Richardson, J. H. and Santangelo, F., eds., Priests and State in the Roman World, 187242. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner [= Potsdamer Altertumswissenschaftliche Beiträge 33].Google Scholar
Robinson, R. 2021. ‘Employing Knowledge: A Case Study in Calendar Reforms in the Early Han and Roman Empires’. In Beck, H. and Vankeerberghen, G., eds., Rulers and Ruled in Ancient Greece, Rome, and China, 369–96. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rykwert, J. 1976. The Idea of a Town: The Anthropology of Urban Form in Rome, Italy and the Ancient World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rykwert, J. 2014. ‘Afterword: The Four and the Five’. In Cody, J. W., Steinhardt, N. S. and Atkin, T., eds., Chinese Architecture and the Beaux-Arts, 361–8. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.Google Scholar
Schaberg, D. 2009. ‘The Zhouli as Constitutional Text’. In Elman, B. A. and Kern, M., eds., Statecraft and Classical Learning: The Rituals of Zhou in East Asian History, 3163. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Sivin, N. 1995. ‘State, Cosmos, and Body in the Last Three Centuries BC’. Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 55(1): 537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, M. E. 2007. ‘Form and Meaning in the Earliest Cities: A New Approach to Urban Planning’. Journal of Planning History 6(1): 347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinhardt, N. S. 1986. ‘Why Were Chang’an and Beijing So Different?’. Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians 45(4): 339–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinhardt, N. S. 1990. Chinese Imperial City Planning. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, S. 2009. ‘The Emperor and the Plough: (Re)founding the City and Extending the Empire’. BABESCH 94: 147–60.Google Scholar
Syme, R. 1939. The Roman Revolution. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Tang, Xiaofeng. 2015. ‘The Evolution of Imperial Urban Form in Western Han Chang’an’. In Nylan, M. and Vankeerberghen, G., eds., Chang’an 26 BCE: An Augustan Age in China, 5574. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Tian, Tian. 2015. ‘The Suburban Sacrifice Reforms and the Evolution of the Imperial Sacrifices’. In Nylan, M. and Vankeerberghen, G., eds., Chang’an 26 BCE: An Augustan Age in China, 263–92. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Tseng, L. Lan-ying. 2011. Picturing Heaven in Early China. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tuan, Yi-fu. 1977. Space and Place: The Perspective of Experience. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Vankeerberghen, G. 2021. ‘Writing Memories: The Sanfu huangtu on Western Han Chang’an’. Monumenta Serica: Journal of Oriental Studies 69(2): 353–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, A. 1997. ‘Mutatio morum: The Idea of a Cultural Revolution’. In Habinek, T. and Schiesaro, A., eds., The Roman Cultural Revolution, 322. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, A. 2008. Rome’s Cultural Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wang, Zhongshu (trans. Kwang-chih Chang). 1982. Han Civilization. Early Chinese Civilization Series. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Wheatley, P. 1971. The Pivot of the Four Quarters: A Preliminary Enquiry into the Origins and Character of the Ancient Chinese City. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Wiesheu, W. M. 1997. ‘China’s First Cities: The Walled Site of Wangchenggang in the Central Plain Region of North China’. In Manzanilla, L., ed., Emergence and Change in Early Urban Societies, 87105. New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiesheu, W. M. 1999. ‘Urban Genesis in China: A Brief Reevaluation of Wheatley’s City-As-Temple Thesis’. Wall and Market: Chinese Urban History News 4(2): 1719.Google Scholar
Wright, A. F. 1977. ‘The Cosmology of the Chinese City’. In Skinner, G. W., ed., The City in Late Imperial China, 3373. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Wu, Hung. 1995. Monumentality in Early Chinese Art and Architecture. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Xiong, V. C. 2000. Sui-Tang Chang’an. A Study in the Urban History of Medieval China. Ann Arbor, MI: Center for Chinese Studies.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xiong, V. C. 2017. Capital Cities and Urban Form in Pre-modern China: Luoyang, 1038 BCE to 938 CE. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Xu, Yinong. 2000. The Chinese City in Space and Time: The Development of Urban Form in Suzhou. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yegül, F. K., and Favro, D. G.. 2019. Roman Architecture and Urbanism: From the Origins to Late Antiquity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Jihai. 2015. ‘The Residential Wards of Western Han Chang’an’. In Nylan, M. and Vankeerberghen, G., eds., Chang’an 26 BCE: An Augustan Age in China, 174200. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×