Book contents
- Power in Close Relationships
- Advances in Personal Relationships
- Power in Close Relationships
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction: Power in Close Relationships
- Part I Power in Close Relationships: Theoretical Perspectives
- Part II Power in Close Relationships: Interpersonal Contexts
- Index
- References
Part II - Power in Close Relationships: Interpersonal Contexts
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 February 2019
Book contents
- Power in Close Relationships
- Advances in Personal Relationships
- Power in Close Relationships
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction: Power in Close Relationships
- Part I Power in Close Relationships: Theoretical Perspectives
- Part II Power in Close Relationships: Interpersonal Contexts
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Power in Close Relationships , pp. 141 - 278Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
References
Acitelli, L. K. (2001). Maintaining and enhancing a relationship by attending to it. In Harvey, J. & Wenzel, A. (Eds.), Close romantic relationships: Maintenance and enhancement (pp. 153–167). Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Adler-Baeder, F., Higginbotham, B., & Lamke, L. (2004). Putting empirical knowledge to work: Linking research and programming on marital quality. Family Relations, 53, 537–546.Google Scholar
Afifi, T. D. (2003). ‘Feeling caught’ in stepfamilies: Managing boundary turbulence through appropriate communication privacy rules. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 20, 729–755.Google Scholar
Amato, P. R., & Cheadle, J. E. (2008). Parental divorce, marital conflict and children's behavior problems: A comparison of adopted and biological children. Social Forces, 86, 1139–1161.Google Scholar
Anderson, H. (2016). Postmodern/poststructural/social construction therapies: Collaborative, narrative, and solution-focused. In Sexton, T. L. & Lebow, J. (Eds.), Handbook of family therapy (pp. 182–204). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Arditti, J. A. (1995). Noncustodial parents: Emergent issues of diversity and process. Marriage & Family Review, 20, 283–304.Google Scholar
Babcock, J. C., Waltz, J., Jacobson, N. S., & Gottman, J. M. (1993). Power and violence: The relation between communication patterns, power discrepancies, and domestic violence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61, 40–50.Google Scholar
Baumrind, D. (1971). Current patterns of parental authority. Developmental Psychology, 4, 1–103.Google Scholar
Baumrind, D. (1991). Parenting styles and adolescent development. In Brooks-Gunn, J., Lerner, R., & Petersen, A. C. (Eds.), The encyclopedia of adolescence (pp. 746–758). New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Baumrind, D. (2013). Is a pejorative view of power assertion in the socialization process justified? Review of General Psychology, 17, 420–427.Google Scholar
Bean, R. A., Barber, B. K., & Crane, D. R. (2006). Parental support, behavioral control, and psychological control among African American youth: The relationships to academic grades, delinquency, and depression. Journal of Family Issues, 27, 1335–1355.Google Scholar
Bean, R. A., Bush, K. R., McKenry, P. C., & Wilson, S. M. (2003). The impact of parental support, behavioral control, and psychological control on the academic achievement and self-esteem of African American and European American adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Research, 18, 523–541.Google Scholar
Berkel, L. A., Vandiver, B. J., & Bahner, A. D. (2004). Gender role attitudes, religion, and spirituality as predictors of domestic violence attitudes in white college students. Journal of College Student Development, 45, 119–133.Google Scholar
Berscheid, E. (1983). Emotion. In Kelley, H. H., Berscheid, E., Christensen, A., Harvey, J., Huston, T. L., Levinger, G., McClintock, E., Peplau, L. A., & Peterson, D. R. (Eds.), Close relationships (pp. 110–168). San Francisco: Freeman.Google Scholar
Bianchi, S. M. (1994). The changing demographic and socioeconomic characteristics of single parent families. Marriage & Family Review, 20, 71–97.Google Scholar
Biblarz, T. J., & Savci, E. (2010). Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender families. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 480–497.Google Scholar
Bornstein, M. H. (2015). Children's parents. In Lerner, R. M. (Editor-in-Chief) & Bornstein, M. H. & Leventhal, T. (Volume Eds.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science: vol. 4. Ecological settings and processes in developmental systems (7th ed., pp. 55–132). Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
Botvin, G. J., & Kantor, L. W. (2000). Preventing alcohol and tobacco use through life skills training. Alcohol Research and Health, 24, 250–257.Google Scholar
Bowers, L., Smith, P. K., & Binney, V. (1992). Cohesion and power in the families of children involved in bully/victim problems at school. Journal of Family Therapy, 14, 371–387.Google Scholar
Bowers, L., Smith, P. K., & Binney, V. (1994). Perceived family relationships of bullies, victims and bully/victims in middle childhood. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 11, 215–232.Google Scholar
Broesch, T., Rochat, P., Olah, K., Broesch, J., & Henrich, J. (2016). Similarities and differences in maternal responsiveness in three societies: Evidence from Fiji, Kenya, and the United States. Child Development, 8, 700–711.Google Scholar
Brown, S. L. (2010). Marriage and child well‐being: Research and policy perspectives. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(5), 1059–1077. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00750.x.Google Scholar
Bumpass, L. L., Castro Martin, T., & Sweet, J. A. (1991). The impact of family background and early marital factors on marital disruption. Journal of Family Issues, 12, 22–42.Google Scholar
Butterfield, J., & Padavic, I. (2014). The impact of legal inequality on relational power in planned lesbian families. Gender & Society, 28, 752–774.Google Scholar
Cabrera, N. J., Tamis-LeMonda, C. S., Bradley, R. H., Hofferth, S., & Lamb, M. E. (2000). Fatherhood in the twenty-first century. Child Development, 71, 127–136.Google Scholar
Campbell, J. C., Webster, D., Koziol-McLain, J., Block, C., Campbell, D., & Curry, M. A. (2003). Risk factors for femicide in abusive relationships: Results from a multisite case control study. American Journal of Public Health, 93, 1089–1097.Google Scholar
Carr, A. (2016). The evolution of systems theory. In Sexton, T. L. & Lebow, J. (Eds.), Handbook of family therapy (pp. 13–29). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Carroll, J. S., & Doherty, W. J. (2003). Evaluating the effectiveness of premarital prevention programs: A meta-analytic review of outcome research. Family Relations, 52, 105–118.Google Scholar
Cherlin, A. J. (2004). The deinstitutionalization of American marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 848–861.Google Scholar
Cherlin, A. (2010). Demographic trends in the United States: A review of research in the 2000. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 403–409.Google Scholar
Christensen, A., & Heavey, C. L. (1990). Gender and social structure in the demand/withdraw pattern of marital conflict. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 73–81.Google Scholar
Coleman, D. H., & Straus, M. A. (1986). Marital power, conflict, and violence in a nationally representative sample of American couples. Violence and Victims, 1, 141–157.Google Scholar
Collins, W. A., Laursen, B., Mortensen, N., Luebker, C., & Ferreira, M. (1997). Conflict processes and transitions in parent and peer relationships: Implications for autonomy and regulation. Journal of Adolescent Research, 12, 178–198.Google Scholar
Cooke, L. P. (2006). “Doing” gender in context: Household bargaining and risk of divorce in Germany and the United States. American Journal of Sociology, 112, 442–472.Google Scholar
Cox, M. J., & Paley, B. (1997). Families as systems. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 243–267.Google Scholar
Cox, M. J., & Paley, B. (2003). Understanding families as systems. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 193–196.Google Scholar
Cromwell, R. E., & Olson, D. (1975). Power in families. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Crosbie-Burnett, M., & Ahrons, C. R. (1985). From divorce to remarriage: Implications for therapy with families in transition. Journal of Psychotherapy & the Family, 1, 121–137.Google Scholar
Crosbie-Burnett, M., & Giles-Sims, J. (1991). Marital power in stepfather families: A test of normative resource theory. Journal of Family Psychology, 4, 484–496.Google Scholar
Crosnoe, R., & McNeely, C. (2008). Peer relations, adolescent behavior, and public health research and practice. Family & Community Health, 31, S71–S80.Google Scholar
Davies, P. T., Sturge-Apple, M. L., Woitach, M. J., & Cummings, E. M. (2009). A process analysis of the transmission of distress from interparental conflict to parenting: Adult relationship security as an explanatory mechanism. Developmental Psychology, 45, 1761–1773.Google Scholar
Doughty, S. E., McHale, S. M., & Feinberg, M. E. (2015). Sibling experiences as predictors of romantic relationship qualities in adolescence. Journal of Family Issues, 36, 589–608.Google Scholar
Dunbar, N. E., Jensen, M. L., Bessarabova, E., Burgoon, J. K., Bernard, D. R., Harrison, K. J., … Eckstein, J. M. (2014). Empowered by persuasive deception: The effects of power and deception on dominance, credibility, and decision making. Communication Research, 41, 852–876.Google Scholar
Dutton, M. A., & Goodman, L. A. (2005). Coercion in intimate partner violence: Toward a new conceptualization. Sex Roles, 52, 743–756.Google Scholar
Emery, R. E. (1992). Family conflicts and their developmental implications: A conceptual analysis of meanings for the structure of relationships. In Shantz, C. U. & Hartup, W. W. (Eds.), Conflict in child and adolescent development (pp. 270–298). New York: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Erel, O., & Burman, B. (1995). Interrelatedness of marital relations and parent-child relations: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 108–132.Google Scholar
Faber, A. J. (2002). The role of hierarchy in parental nurturance. American Journal of Family Therapy, 30, 73–84.Google Scholar
Fagan, J., & Barnett, M. (2003). The relationship between maternal gatekeeping, paternal competence, mothers’ attitudes about the father role, and father involvement. Journal of Family Issues, 24, 1020–1043.Google Scholar
Fan, X., & Chen, M. (2001). Parental involvement and students’ academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 13, 1–22.Google Scholar
Fawcett, E. B., Hawkins, A. J., Blanchard, V. L., & Carroll, J. S. (2010). Do premarital education programs really work? A meta-analytic study. Family Relations, 59, 232–239.Google Scholar
Felker, J. A., Fromme, D. K., Arnaut, G. L., & Stoll, B. M. (2002). A qualitative analysis of stepfamilies. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 1, 125–142.Google Scholar
Fox, G. L., & Blanton, P. W. (1994). Noncustodial fathers following divorce. Marriage & Family Review, 20, 257–282.Google Scholar
Frisco, M. L., & Williams, K. (2003). Perceived housework equity, marital happiness, and divorce in dual-earner households. Journal of Family Issues, 24, 51–73.Google Scholar
Furstenberg, F. J. F., & Nord, C. W. (1985). Parenting apart: Patterns of childrearing after marital disruption. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 44, 893–900.Google Scholar
Gianino, M. (2008). Adaptation and transformation: The transition to adoptive parenthood for gay male couples. Journal of GLBT Family Studies, 2, 205–243.Google Scholar
Giles-Sims, J., & Crosbie-Burnett, M. (1989). Adolescent power in stepfather stepfamilies: A test of normative-resource theory. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 51, 1065–1078.Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. E. (2009). Lesbian parents and their families: Complexity and intersectionality from a feminist perspective. In Lloyd, S. A. & Few, A. L. (Eds.), Handbook of feminist family studies (pp. 108–120). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. E. (2010). Lesbians and gay men as parents. In Herek, G. M. (Ed.), Lesbian and gay parents and their children: Research on the family life cycle (pp. 89–123). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. E., & Perry-Jenkins, M. (2007). The division of labor and perceptions of parental roles: Lesbian couples across the transition to parenthood. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 24, 297–318.Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. E., Smith, J. Z., Perry-Jenkins, M. (2012). The division of labor in lesbian, gay, and heterosexual new adoptive parents. Journal of Marriage and Family, 74, 812–828.Google Scholar
Goldner, V. (1988). Generation and gender: Normative and covert hierarchies. Family Process, 27, 17–31.Google Scholar
Golish, T. D. (2003). Stepfamily communication strengths: Understanding the ties that bind. Communication Research, 29, 41–80.Google Scholar
Gottman, J. M. (2011). The science of trust: Emotional attunement for couples. WW Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Gottman, J. M., Coan, J., Carrere, S., & Swanson, C. (1998). Predicting marital happiness and stability from newlywed interactions. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 5–22.Google Scholar
Gray, M. R., & Steinberg, L. (1999). Unpacking authoritative parenting: Reassessing a multidimensional construct. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 574–587.Google Scholar
Grusec, J. E., & Davidov, M. (2010). Integrating different perspectives on socialization theory and research: A domain-specific approach. Child Development, 81, 687–709.Google Scholar
Halford, W. K., Markman, H. J., Kline, G. H., & Stanley, S. M. (2003). Best practice in couple relationship education. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 29, 385–406.Google Scholar
Hardesty, J. L., Ogolsky, B. G., Raffaelli, M., Whittaker, A., Crossman, K. A., Haselschwerdt, M. L., … Khaw, L. (2017). Coparenting relationship trajectories: Marital violence linked to change and variability after separation. Journal of Family Psychology, 31, 844–854.Google Scholar
Hawkins, A. J. (2014). Continuing the important debate on government-supported healthy marriages and relationships initiatives: A brief response to Johnson's (2014) comment. Family Relations, 63, 305–308.Google Scholar
Hoeve, M., Dubas, J. S., Eichelsheim, V. I., van der Laan, P. H., Smeenk, W., & Gerris, J. R. (2009). The relationship between parenting and delinquency: A meta-analysis. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 37, 749–775.Google Scholar
Jaffe, P. G., Lemon, N. K. D., & Poisson, S. E. (2003). Child custody and domestic violence: A call for safety and accountability. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. D. (2012). Healthy marriage initiatives: On the need for empiricism in policy implementation. American Psychologist, 67, 296–308.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. D. (2013). Optimistic or quixotic? More data on marriage and relationship education programs for lower income couples. American Psychologist, 68, 111–112.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. P. (1995). Patriarchal terrorism and common couple violence: Two forms of violence against women in U. S. families. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 283–294.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. P. (2008). A typology of domestic ciolence: Intimate terrorism, violent resistance, and situational couple violence. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, S. M., & O'Connor, E. (2002). The gay baby boom: The psychology of gay parenthood. New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar
Keijsers, L., & Poulin, F. (2013). Developmental changes in parent–child communication throughout adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 49, 2301–2308.Google Scholar
Kelly, J. (1993). Developing and implementing post-divorce parenting plans: Does the forum make a difference? In Depner, C. E. & Bray, J. H. (Eds.), Nonresidential parenting: New vistas in family living (pp. 136–155). Newbury Park: Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
Kelly, J. B. (2007). Children's living arrangements following separation and divorce: Insights from empirical and clinical research. Family Processes, 46, 35–52.Google Scholar
Kelly, J. B., & Johnson, M. P. (2008). Differentiation among types of intimate partner violence: Research update and implications for interventions. Family Court Review, 46, 476–499.Google Scholar
Kim, J. Y., McHale, S. M., Crouter, A. C., & Osgood, D. W. (2007). Longitudinal linkages between sibling relationships and adjustment from middle childhood through adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 43, 960–973.Google Scholar
Kim, J. Y., McHale, S. M., Wayne Osgood, D., & Crouter, A. C. (2006). Longitudinal course and family correlates of sibling relationships from childhood through adolescence. Child Development, 77, 1746–1761. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00971.xGoogle Scholar
Kim, K., & Rohner, R. P. (2002). Parental warmth, control, and involvement in schooling: Predicting academic achievement among Korean American adolescents. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33, 127–140.Google Scholar
Kim, J. Y., McHale, S. M., Wayne, Osgood D., & Crouter, A. C. (2006). Longitudinal course and family correlates of sibling relationships from childhood through adolescence. Child Development, 77, 1746–1761. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00971.xGoogle Scholar
Knudson-Martin, C., & Mahoney, A. R. (2009b). The myth of equality. In Knudson-Martin, C. & Mahoney, A. R. (Eds.), Couples, gender, and power: Creating change in intimate relationships (pp. 43–61). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Knudson-Martin, C., & Mahoney, A. R. (2009a). Beyond gender: The processes of relationship equality. In Knudson-Martin, C. & Mahoney, A. R. (Eds.), Couples, gender, and power: Creating change in intimate relationships (pp. 63–78). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Knudson-Martin, C. (2013). Why power matters: Creating a foundation of mutual support in couple relationships. Family Process, 52, 5–18.Google Scholar
Knudson-Martin, C., & Mahoney, A. R. (1999). Beyond different worlds: A “postgender” approach to relational development. Family Process, 38, 325–340.Google Scholar
Knudson-Martin, C., & Mahoney, A. R. (2005). Moving beyond gender: Processes that create relationship equality. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 31, 235–258.Google Scholar
Kuczynski, L., Pitman, R., Ta-Young, L., & Harach, L. (2016). Children's influence on parents’ adult development: Mothers’ and fathers’ receptivity to children's requests for change. Journal of Adult Development, 23, 193–203.Google Scholar
Kumpfer, K. L., DeMarsh, J. P., & Child, W. (1989). Strengthening Families Program: Children's skill training curriculum manual (prevention services to children of substance-abusing parents). Salt Lake City: Department of Health, Alcohol and Drug Research Center.Google Scholar
Kumpfer, K. L., Magalhães, C., & Ahearn Greene, J. (2015). Strengthening Families Program. In Ponzetti, J. J. (Ed.), Evidence-based parenting education: A global perspective (pp. 277–293). New York, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kuppens, S., Laurent, L., Heyvaert, M., & Onghena, P. (2013). Associations between parental psychological control and relational aggression in children and adolescents: A multilevel and sequential meta-analysis. Developmental Psychology, 49, 1697–1712.Google Scholar
Ladd, G. W., & Ladd, B. K. (1998). Parenting behaviors and parent–child relationships: Correlates of peer victimization in kindergarten? Developmental Psychology, 34, 1450–1458.Google Scholar
Ladd, G. W., & Pettit, G. S. (2002). Parenting and the development of children's peer relationship. Bornstein, M. H. (Ed.), Handbook of parenting: Vol. 5. Practical Issues in Parenting, (2nd ed., pp. 269–309). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Google Scholar
Lamborn, S. D., Dornbusch, S. M., & Steinberg, L. (1996). Ethnicity and community context as moderators of the relations between family decision making and adolescent adjustment. Child Development, 67, 283–301.Google Scholar
Laurin, K., Fitzsimons, G. M., Finkel, E. J., Carswell, K. L., van Dellen, M. R., Hofmann, W., … Brown, P. C. (2016). Power and the pursuit of a partner's goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110, 840–868.Google Scholar
Lee, Y.-T. (2011). Structural family therapy. In Metcalf, L. (Ed.), Marriage and family therapy: A practice-oriented approach (pp. 229–254). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Lenton, R. L. (1995). Power versus feminist theories of wife abuse. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 37, 305–330.Google Scholar
Lindahl, K. M., & Malik, N. M. (1999). Observations of marital conflict and power: Relations with parenting in the triad. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 320–330.Google Scholar
Lindahl, K. M., Malik, N. M., Kaczynski, K., & Simons, J. S. (2004). Couple power dynamics, systemic family functioning, and child adjustment: A test of a mediational model in a multiethnic sample. Development and Psychopathology, 16, 609–630.Google Scholar
Lips, H. M. (1994). Power in the family. In Handel, G., & Whitchurch, G. G. (Eds.), The psychosocial interior of the family (pp. 341–362). New York: Aldine De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lucier-Greer, M., & Adler-Baeder, F. (2011). An examination of gender role attitude change patterns among continuously married, divorced, and remarried individuals. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 52, 225–243.Google Scholar
Maccoby, E., & Martin, J. (1983). Socialization in the context of the family: Parent-child interaction. In Mussen, P. H. (Series Ed.), Hetherington, E. M. (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 4. Socialization, personality, and social development (pp. 1–101). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Maccoby, E. E. (2007). Historical overview of socialization research and theory. In Grusec, J. E. & Hastings, P. D. (Eds.), Handbook of socialization (pp. 13–41). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Madden-Derdich, D. A., & Leonard, S. A. (2000). Parental role identity and fathers’ involvement in coparental interaction after divorce: Fathers’ perspectives. Family Relations, 49, 311–318.Google Scholar
Mahoney, A. R., & Knudson-Martin, C. (2009). Gender equality in intimate relationships. In Knudson-Martin, C. & Mahoney, A. (Eds.), Couples, gender, and power: Creating change in intimate relationships (pp. 3–16). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Mahrer, N. E., Winslow, E., Wolchik, S. A., Tein, J. Y., & Sandler, I. N. (2014). Effects of a preventive parenting intervention for divorced families on the intergenerational transmission of parenting attitudes in young adult offspring. Child Development, 85, 2091–2105.Google Scholar
Malik, N. M., & Lindahl, K. M. (1998). Aggression and dominance: The roles of power and culture in domestic violence. Clinical Psychology Science and Practice, 5, 409–423.Google Scholar
McDonald, G. W. (1980). Family power: The assessment of a decade of theory and research, 1970-1979. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 42, 841–854.Google Scholar
McHale, S. M., Updegraff, K. A., & Whiteman, S. D. (2012). Sibling relationships and influences in childhood and adolescence. Journal of Marriage and Family, 74, 913–930.Google Scholar
Meter, D. J., & Card, N. A. (2015). Defenders of victims of peer aggression: Interdependence theory and an exploration of individual, interpersonal, and contextual effects on the defender participant role. Developmental Review, 38, 222–240.Google Scholar
Miller, R. B., Anderson, S., & Keala, D. K. (2004). Is Bowen theory valid? A review of basic research. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 30, 453–466.Google Scholar
Minuchin, P. (1988). Relationships within the family: A systems perspective on development. In Hinde, R. A. & Stevenson-Hinde, J. (Eds.), Relationships within families: Mutual influences (pp. 7–26). Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Minuchin, S. (1974). Families and family therapy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Moore, M. R. (2008). Gendered power relations among women: A study of household decision making in black, lesbian families. American Sociological Review, 73, 335–356.Google Scholar
Mounts, N. S. (2008). Linkages between parenting and peer relationships: A model for parental management of adolescents peer relationships. In Kerr, M., Stattin, H., & Engels, R. (Eds.), What can parents do?: New insights into the role of parents in adolescent problem behavior (pp. 163–189). Malden: Wiley.Google Scholar
Murray, K. W., Dwyer, K. M., Rubin, K. H., Knighton-Wisor, S., & Booth-LaForce, C. (2014). Parent–child relationships, parental psychological control, and aggression: Maternal and paternal relationships. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43, 1361–1373.Google Scholar
Nixon, E., Greene, S., & Hogan, D. M. (2012). Negotiating relationships in single-mother households: Perspectives of children and mothers. Family Relations, 61, 142–156.Google Scholar
Omer, H., Steinmetz, S. G., Carthy, T., & Schlippe, A. (2013). The anchoring function: Parental authority and the parent-child bond. Family Process, 52, 193–206.Google Scholar
Parkin, C. M., & Kuczynski, L. (2012). Adolescent perspectives on rules and resistance within the parent-child relationship. Journal of Adolescent Research, 27, 632–658.Google Scholar
Paschall, K. W., & Mastergeorge, A. M. (2016). A review of 25 years of research in bidirectionality in parent–child relationships: An examination of methodological approaches. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 40, 442–451.Google Scholar
Patterson, C. J., & Farr, R. H. (2016). What shall we call ourselves? Last names among lesbian, gay, and heterosexual couples and their adopted children. Journal of GLBT Family Studies.Google Scholar
Patterson, C. J., Sutfin, E. L., & Fulcher, M. (2004). Division of labor among lesbian and heterosexual parenting couples: Correlates of specialized versus shared parents. Journal of Adult Development, 11, 179–189.Google Scholar
Rankin, J. H., & Wells, L. E. (1990). The effect of parental attachments and direct controls on delinquency. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 27, 140–165.Google Scholar
Rothenberg, B. (2003). “We don't have time for social change”: Cultural compromise and the battered woman syndrome. Gender & Society, 17, 771–787.Google Scholar
Rothbaum, F., Pott, M., Azuma, H., Miyake, K., & Weisz, J. (2000). The development of close relationships in Japan and the United States: Paths of symbiotic harmony and generative tension. Child Development, 71, 1121–1142.Google Scholar
Safilios-Rothschild, C. (1970). The study of family power structure: A review 1960–1969. Journal of Marriage and Family, 539–552.Google Scholar
Safilios-Rothschild, C. (1976). A macro-and micro-examination of family power and love: An exchange model. Journal of Marriage and Family, 38, 355–362.Google Scholar
Sagrestano, L. M., Heavey, C. L., & Christensen, A. (1999). Perceived power and physical violence in marital conflict. Journal of Social Issues, 55, 65–79.Google Scholar
Sanders, M. R., Kirby, J. N., Tellegen, C. L., & Day, J. J. (2014). The Triple P-Positive Parenting Program: A systematic review and meta-analysis of a multi-level system of parenting support. Clinical Psychology Review, 34, 337–357.Google Scholar
Schacher, S. J., Auerbach, C. F., & Silverstein, L. B. (2005). Gay fathers expanding the possibilities for us all. Journal of GLBT Family Studies, 1, 31–52.Google Scholar
Schwartz, D., Dodge, K. A., Pettit, G. S., & Bates, J. E. (2000). Friendship as a moderating factor in the pathway between early harsh home environment and later victimization in the peer group. Developmental Psychology, 36, 646–662.Google Scholar
Schwartz, C. R., & Han, H. (2014). The reversal of the gender gap in education and trends in marital dissolution. American Sociological Review, 79, 605–629.Google Scholar
Shaw, D. S., Criss, M. M., Schonberg, M. A., & Beck, J. E. (2004). The development of family hierarchies and their relation to children's conduct problems. Development and Psychopathology, 16, 483–500.Google Scholar
Sigelman, D., Jordan-Berry, C., & Wiles, K. (1984). Violence in college students’ dating relationships. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 14, 53–548.Google Scholar
Silverstein, R., Bass, L. B., Tuttle, A. R., Knudson-Martin, C., & Huenergardt, D. (2006). What does it mean to be relational? A framework for assessment and practice. Family Process, 45, 391–405.Google Scholar
Simons, L. G., & Conger, R. D. (2007). Linking mother–father differences in parenting to a typology of family parenting styles and adolescent outcomes. Journal of Family Issues, 28, 212–241.Google Scholar
Sobolewski, J. M., & King, V. (2005). The importance of the coparenting relationship for nonresident fathers’ ties to children. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 1196–1212.Google Scholar
Soloski, K. L., Monk, J. K., & Durtschi, J. A. (2016). Trajectories of early binge drinking: A function of family cohesion and peer use. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 42, 76–90.Google Scholar
Sparks, A. (2008). Implementation of “Within My Reach:” Providing a relationship awareness and communication skills program to TANF recipients in Oklahoma (Working paper #08-11). Ann Arbor: National Poverty Center. Retrieved from: http://www.npc.umich.edu/publications/working_papers/?publication_id=161.Google Scholar
Sprey, J. (1972). Family power structure: A critical comment. Journal of Marriage and Family, 34, 235–238.Google Scholar
Stark, E. (2007). Coercive control: How men entrap women in personal life. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Steinberg, L. (2001). We know some things: Parent–adolescent relationships in retrospect and prospect. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 11, 1–19.Google Scholar
Stewart, S. D. (1999). Nonresident mothers’ and fathers’ social contact with children. Journal of Marriage and Family, 61, 894–907.Google Scholar
Stewart, A. E. (2012). Issues in Birth Order Research Methodology: Perspectives from Individual Psychology. Journal of Individual Psychology, 68, 75–106.Google Scholar
Stith, S. M., & Farley, S. C. (1993). A predictive model of male spousal violence. Journal of Family Violence, 8, 183–201.Google Scholar
Stith, S. M., McCollum, E. E., & Rosen, K. H. (2011). Couples therapy for domestic violence: Finding safe solutions. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Stormshak, E. A., Bullock, B. M., & Falkenstein, C. A. (2009). Harnessing the power of sibling relationships as a tool for optimizing social–emotional development. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 126, 61–77.Google Scholar
Straus, M. A., & Gelles, R. J., Stenmetz, S. K. (1980). Behind closed doors: Violence in the American family. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Sullivan, M. (1996). Rozzie and Harriet?: Gender and family patterns of lesbian coparents. Gender and Society, 10, 747–767.Google Scholar
Sullivan, M. J. (2008). Coparenting and the parenting coordination process. Journal of Child Custody, 5, 4–24.Google Scholar
Sulloway, F. J. (1995). Birth order and evolutionary psychology: A meta-analytic overview. Psychological Inquiry, 6, 75–80.Google Scholar
Sulloway, F. J. (2001). Birth order, sibling competition, and human behavior. In Holcomb, H. R. III (Ed.), Conceptual challenges in evolutionary psychology: Innovative research strategies (pp. 39–83). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
Sutton-Smith, B., & Rosenberg, B. G. (1970). The Sibling. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Swan, S. C., & Snow, D. L. (2002). A typology of women's use of violence in intimate relationships. Violence against women, 8, 286–319.Google Scholar
Sweeney, M. M. (2010). Remarriage and stepfamilies: Strategic sites for family scholarship in the 21st century. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 667–684.Google Scholar
Tuttle, A. R., Knudson-Martin, C., & Kim, L. (2012). Parenting as relationship: A framework for assessment and practice. Family Process, 51, 73–89.Google Scholar
US Census Bureau (2016). Custodial mothers and fathers and their child support. Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/publications/2016/demo/P60-255.pdfGoogle Scholar
Velonis, A. J. (2016). “He never did anything you typically think of as abuse”: Experiences with violence in controlling and non-controlling relationships in a non-agency sample of women. Violence Against Women, 22, 1031–1054.Google Scholar
Volling, B. L. (2003). Sibling relationships. In Bornstein, M. H. (Ed.), Well-being: Positive development across the life course (pp. 205–220). Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Waller, W. W., & Hill, R. (1951). The family: A dynamic interpretation. New York: Dryden.Google Scholar
Wallerstein, J. S., & Kelly, B. (1976). The effects of parental divorce: Experiences of the child in later latency. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 46, 256–269.Google Scholar
Watkins, C. E. (1992). Birth order research and Adler's theory: A critical review. Individual Psychology, 48, 357–368.Google Scholar
Weaver, S. E., & Coleman, M. (2010). Caught in the middle: Mothers in stepfamilies. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27, 305–326.Google Scholar
Wentzel, K. R., & Feldman, S. S. (1996). Relations of cohesion and power in family dyads to social and emotional adjustment during early adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 6, 225–244.Google Scholar
Whitton, S. W., Stanley, S. M., & Markman, H. J. (2007). If I help my partner, will it hurt me? Perceptions of sacrifice in romantic relationships. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 26, 64–91.Google Scholar
Winter, D. G. (1988). The power motive in women – and men. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 510–519.Google Scholar
References
Abramsky, T., Devries, K., Kiss, L., Nakuti, J., Kyegombe, N., Starmann, E., … Watts, C. (2014). Findings from the SASA! Study: A cluster randomized controlled trial to assess the impact of a community mobilization intervention to prevent violence against women and reduce HIV risk in Kampala, Uganda. BMC Medicine, 12, 122.Google Scholar
Ackermann, L., & de Klerk, G. W. (2002). Social factors that make South African women vulnerable to HIV infection. Health Care for Women International, 23, 163–172.Google Scholar
Amaro, H. (1995). Love, sex, and power. Considering women's realities in HIV prevention. American Psychologist, 50, 437–447.Google Scholar
Amin, S., Ahmed, J., Saha, J., Hossain, M., & Haque, E. (2016). Delaying child marriage through community-based skills-deelopment programs for girls: Results from a randomized controlled study in rural Bangladesh. New York and Dhaka, Bangladesh: Population Council.Google Scholar
Barker, G. (2000). Gender equitable boys in a gender inequitable world: Reflections from qualitative research and program development with young men in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 15, 263–282.Google Scholar
Belay, A. D., Mengesha, Z. B., Woldegebriel, M. K., & Gelaw, Y. A. (2016). Married women's decision making power on family planning use and associated factors in Mizan-Aman, South Ethiopia: A cross sectional study. BMC Women's Health, 16, 12.Google Scholar
Blanc, A. K. (2001). The effect of power in sexual relationships on sexual and reproductive health: An examination of the evidence. Studies in Family Planning, 32, 189–213.Google Scholar
Bogale, B., Wondafrash, M., Tilahun, T., & Girma, E. (2011). Married women's decision making power on modern contraceptive use in urban and rural southern Ethiopia. BMC Public Health, 11, 342.Google Scholar
Dahlberg, L. L., & Krug, E. G. (2002). Violence: A global public health problem. In Krug, E., Dahlberg, L. L., Mercy, J. A., Zwi, A. B., & Lozano, R. (Eds.), World report on violence and health (pp. 1–56). Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
Do, M., & Kurimoto, N. (2012). Women's empowerment and choice of contraceptive methods in selected African countries. International Perspectives on Sexual Reproductive Health, 38, 23–33.Google Scholar
Dworkin, S. L., Treves-Kagan, S., & Lippman, S. A. (2013). Gender-transformative interventions to reduce HIV risks and violence with heterosexually-active men: A review of the global evidence. AIDS and Behavior, 17, 2845–2863.Google Scholar
Engender Health, & Planned Parenthood Association of South Africa. (1999). Men as partners: A program for supplementing the training of life skills Educators. New York, NY: Engender Health & PPASA. Retrieved from https://www.engenderhealth.org/files/pubs/gender/ppasamanual.pdfGoogle Scholar
Fleming, P. J., McCleary-Sills, J., Morton, M., Levtov, R., Heilman, B., & Barker, G. (2015). Risk factors for men's lifetime perpetration of physical violence against intimate partners: Results from the International Men and Gender Equality Survey (IMAGES) in eight countries. PLoS One, 10, e0118639.Google Scholar
Gibbs, A., Washington, L., Willan, S., Ntini, N., Khumalo, T., Mbatha, N., … Jewkes, R. (2017). The Stepping Stones and Creating Futures intervention to prevent intimate partner violence and HIV-risk behaviours in Durban, South Africa: Study protocol for a cluster randomized control trial, and baseline characteristics. BMC Public Health, 17, 336.Google Scholar
Gottert, A., Barrington, C., Pettifor, A., McNaughton-Reyes, H. L., Maman, S., MacPhail, C., … Lippman, S. A. (2016). Measuring men's gender norms and gender role conflict/stress in a high HIV-prevalence South African setting. AIDS and Behavior, 20, 1785–1795.Google Scholar
Gutzmer, K., Ludwig-Barron, N. T., Wyatt, G. E., Hamilton, A. B., & Stockman, J. K. (2016). “Come on baby. you know I love you”: African American women's experiences of communication with male partners and disclosure in the context of unwanted sex. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 45, 807–819.Google Scholar
Harrison, A., O'Sullivan, L. F., Hoffman, S., Dolezal, C., & Morrell, R. (2006). Gender role and relationship norms among young adults in South Africa: Measuring the context of masculinity and HIV risk. Journal of Urban Health, 83, 709–722.Google Scholar
Horne, R. M., Johnson, M. D., Galambos, N. L., & Krahn, H. J. (2017). Time, money, or gender? Predictors of the division of household labour across life stages. Sex Roles 78, 731–743.Google Scholar
Iganus, R., Hill, Z., Manzi, F., Bee, M., Amare, Y., Shamba, D., … Skordis-Worrall, J. (2015). Roles and responsibilities in newborn care in four African sites. Tropical Medicine and International Health, 20, 1258–1264.Google Scholar
Jewkes, R., Nduna, M., Levin, J., Jama, N., Dunkle, K., Khuzwayo, N., … Duvvury, N. (2006). A cluster randomized-controlled trial to determine the effectiveness of Stepping Stones in preventing HIV infections and promoting safer sexual behaviour amongst youth in the rural Eastern Cape, South Africa: Trial design, methods and baseline findings. Tropical Medicine and International Health, 11, 3–16.Google Scholar
Jewkes, R., Nduna, M., Levin, J., Jama, N., Dunkle, K., Khuzwayo, N., … Duvvury, N. (2008). Impact of Stepping Stones on incidence of HIV and HSV-2 and sexual behaviour in rural South Africa: Cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ, 337, a506.Google Scholar
Jewkes, R. K., Dunkle, K., Nduna, M., & Shai, N. (2010). Intimate partner violence, relationship power inequity, and incidence of HIV infection in young women in South Africa: A cohort study. Lancet, 376, 41–48.Google Scholar
Lau, J. T., Yang, X., Wang, Q., Cheng, Y., Tsui, H. Y., Mui, L. W., & Kim, J. H. (2006). Gender power and marital relationship as predictors of sexual dysfunction and sexual satisfaction among young married couples in rural China: A population-based study. Urology, 67, 579–585.Google Scholar
Levtov, R., Barker, G., Contreras-Urbina, M., Heilman, B., & Verma, R. (2013). Pathways to gender-equitable men: Findings from the International Men and Gender Equality Survey in eight countries. Men and Masculinties, 17, 467–501.Google Scholar
McCauley, H. L., Tancredi, D. J., Silverman, J. G., Decker, M. R., Austin, S. B., McCormick, M. C., … Miller, E. (2013). Gender-equitable attitudes, bystander behavior, and recent abuse perpetration against heterosexual dating partners of male high school athletes. American Journal of Public Health, 103, 1882–1887.Google Scholar
McMahon, J. M., Volpe, E. M., Klostermann, K., Trabold, N., & Xue, Y. (2015). A systematic review of the psychometric properties of the Sexual Relationship Power Scale in HIV/AIDS research. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44, 267–294.Google Scholar
Medland, D. (2016, March 7). Today's gender reality in statistics, or making leadership attractive to women. Forbes.Google Scholar
Meiksin, R., Meekers, D., Thompson, S., Hagopian, A., & Mercer, M. A. (2015). Domestic violence, marital control, and family planning, maternal, and birth outcomes in Timor-Leste. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 19, 1338–1347.Google Scholar
MenEngage, & UNFPA. (2014). Engaging men, changing gender norms: Directions for gender-transformative action. Retrieved from http://www.unfpa.org/resources/brief-engaging-men-changing-gender-norms.Google Scholar
Menger, L. M., Kaufman, M. R., Harman, J. J., Tsang, S. W., & Shrestha, D. K. (2015). Unveiling the silence: Women's sexual health and experiences in Nepal. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 17, 359–373.Google Scholar
Michau, L. (2008). The SASA! Activist kit for preventing violence against women and HIV. Kampala, Uganda: Raising Voices.Google Scholar
Population Council. (2016). How to best reduce HIV risk among adolescent girls and young women in sub-Saharan Africa? Implementation science around the DREAMS Partnership. Washington, DC: Population Council.Google Scholar
Pulerwitz, J., Amaro, H., De Jong, W., Gortmaker, S. L., & Rudd, R. (2002). Relationship power, condom use and HIV risk among women in the USA. AIDS Care, 14, 789–800.Google Scholar
Pulerwitz, J., & Barker, G. (2008). Measuring attitudes toward gender norms among young men in Brazil: Development and psychometric evaluation of the GEM Scale. Men and Masculinities, 10, 322–338.Google Scholar
Pulerwitz, J., Barker, G., & Segundo, M. (2004). Promoting healthy relationships and HIV/STI prevention for young men: Positive findings from an intervention study in Brazil. Washington, DC: Population Council.Google Scholar
Pulerwitz, J., Barker, G., & Verma, R. (2012). Changing gender norms for HIV and violence risk reduction: A comparison of male-focused programs in Brazil and India. In Obregon, R. & Waisbord, S. (Eds.), The handbook of global health communication. West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Pulerwitz, J., Gortmaker, S., & DeJong, W. (2000). Measuring relationship power in HIV/STD research. Sex Roles, 42, 637–660.Google Scholar
Pulerwitz, J., Hughes, L., Mehta, M., Kidanu, A., Verani, F., & Tewolde, S. (2015). Changing gender norms and reducing intimate partner violence: Results from a quasi-experimental intervention study with young men in Ethiopia. American Journal of Public Health, 105, 132–137.Google Scholar
Pulerwitz, J., Martin, S., Mehta, M., Castillo, T., Kidanu, A., Verani, F., & Tewolde, S. (2010). Promoting gender equity for HIV and violence prevention: Results from the Male Norms Initiative Evaluation in Ethiopia. Washington, DC: PATH.Google Scholar
Pulerwitz, J., Michaelis, A., Verma, R., & Weiss, E. (2010). Addressing gender dynamics and engaging men in HIV programs: Lessons learned from Horizons research. Public Health Reports, 125, 282–292.Google Scholar
Ricardo, C., Nascimento, M., Fonseca, V., & Segundo, M. (2010). Program H and Program M: Engaging young men and empowering young women to promote gender equality and health. Washington, DC: PAHO/Best Praxtices in Gender and Health.Google Scholar
Ruble, D. N., & Martin, C. L. (1998). Gender development. In Damon, W. & Eisenberg, N. (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: vol 3. social, emotional, and personality development (5th ed., pp. 933–1016). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Sevelius, J. (2009). “There's no pamphlet for the kind of sex I have”: HIV-related risk factors and protective behaviors among transgender men who have sex with nontransgender men. Journal of the Association of Nurses in AIDS Care, 20, 398–410.Google Scholar
Shattuck, D., Burke, H., Ramirez, C., Succop, S., Costenbader, B., Attafuah, J., … Guest, G. (2013). Using the Inequitable Gender Norms Scale and associated HIV risk behaviors among men at high risk for HIV in Ghana and Tanzania. Men and Masculinities, 16, 540–559.Google Scholar
Tschann, J. M., Adler, N. E., Millstein, S. G., Gurvey, J. E., & Ellen, J. M. (2002). Relative power between sexual partners and condom use among adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health, 31, 17–25.Google Scholar
United States President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR). (2017). Working together for an AIDS-free future for girls and women. Retrieved from https://www.pepfar.gov/partnerships/ppp/dreams/index.htmGoogle Scholar
Vu, L., Pulerwitz, J., Burnett-Zieman, B., Banura, C., Okal, J., & Yam, E. (2017). Inequitable gender norms from early adolescence to young adulthood in Uganda: Tool validation and differences across age groups. Journal of Adolescent Health, 60, S15–S21.Google Scholar
Welbourn, A., & Rohr-Rouendaal, P. (1995). Stepping stones: A training package on HIV/AIDS, communication and relationship skills. (Strategies for Hope). London: Actionaid.Google Scholar
Zucker, K. (2001). Biological influences on psychosexual differentiation. In Unger, R. (Ed.), Handbook of the psychology of women and gender (pp. 101–115). Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
References
Ackerman, J. M., Griskevicius, V., & Li, N. P. (2011). Let's get serious: Communicating commitment in romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 1079.Google Scholar
Anderson, C., Ames, D. R., & Gosling, S. D. (2008). Punishing hubris: The perils of overestimating one's status in a group. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 90–101.Google Scholar
Anderson, C., & Berdahl, J. L. (2002). The experience of power: Examining the effects of power on approach and inhibition tendencies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1362–1377.Google Scholar
Atkinson, M. P., Greenstein, T. N., & Lang, M. M. (2005). For women, breadwinning can be dangerous: Gendered resource theory and wife abuse. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 1137–1148.Google Scholar
Attridge, M., Berscheid, E., & Simpson, J. A. (1995). Predicting relationship stability from both partners versus one. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 254–268.Google Scholar
Bartholomew, K. (1994). Assessment of individual differences in adult attachment. Psychological Inquiry, 5, 23–67.Google Scholar
Bartholomew, K., & Horowitz, L. M. (1991). Attachment styles among young adults: A test of a four-category model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 226–244.Google Scholar
Baumann, N., Kaschel, R., & Kuhl, J. (2005). Striving for unwanted goals: Stress-dependent discrepancies between explicit and implicit achievement motives reduce subjective well-being and increase psychosomatic symptoms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 781–799.Google Scholar
Baumeister, R. F., Catanese, K. R., & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Is there a gender difference in strength of sex drive? Theoretical views, conceptual distinctions, and a review of relevant evidence. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 242–273.Google Scholar
Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529.Google Scholar
Baumeister, R. F., & Vohs, K. D. (2004). Sexual economics: Sex as female resource for social exchange in heterosexual interactions. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 339–363.Google Scholar
Beavers, W. R. (1985). Successful marriage: A family systems approach to couples therapy. New York: WW Norton.Google Scholar
Bianchi, S. M., Milkie, M. A., Sayer, L. C., & Robinson, J. P. (2000). Is anyone doing the housework? Trends in the gender division of household labor. Social Forces, 79, 191–228.Google Scholar
Bianchi, S. M., Sayer, L. C., Milkie, M. A., & Robinson, J. P. (2012). Housework: Who did, does or will do it, and how much does it matter? Social Forces, 91, 55–63.Google Scholar
Birnbaum, G. E., Reis, H. T., Mikulincer, M., Gillath, O., & Orpaz, A. (2006). When sex is more than just sex: Attachment orientations, sexual experience, and relationship quality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 929–943.Google Scholar
Bittman, M., England, P., Sayer, L., Folbre, N., & Matheson, G. (2003). When does gender trump money? Bargaining and time in household work. American Journal of Sociology, 10, 186–214.Google Scholar
Blanton, P. W., & Vandergriff-Avery, M. (2001). Marital therapy and marital power: Constructing narratives of sharing relational and positional power. Contemporary Family Therapy, 23, 295–308.Google Scholar
Blau, F. D., & Kahn, L. M. (2006). The gender pay gap: Going, going… but not gone. In Blau, F. D., Brinton, M. C., & Grusky, D. B. (Eds.) The declining significance of gender (pp. 37–66). New York: Russel Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Blood, R. O. Jr., & Wolfe, D. M. (1960). Husbands and wives: The dynamics of family living. Oxford, UK: Free Press Glencoe.Google Scholar
Blumstein, P., & Schwartz, P. (1983). American couples: Money, work, sex. New York: William Morrow & Co.Google Scholar
Boyd, N. M., & Nowell, B. (2014, January). Testing a theory of sense of community and community responsibility in non-profit organizations. Paper presented at the Academy of Management.Google Scholar
Brennan, R. T., Barnett, R. C., & Gareis, K. C. (2001). When she earns more than he does: A longitudinal study of dual-earner couples. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 168–182.Google Scholar
Bryan, A. D., Webster, G. D., & Mahaffey, A. L. (2011). The big, the rich, and the powerful: Physical, financial, and social dimensions of dominance in mating and attraction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 365–382.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1–14.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204–232.Google Scholar
Caldwell, M. A., & Peplau, L. A. (1984). The balance of power in lesbian relationships. Sex Roles, 10, 587–599.Google Scholar
Campbell, W. K., & Foster, C. A. (2002). Narcissism and commitment in romantic relationships: An investment model analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 484–495.Google Scholar
Cate, R. M., Lloyd, S. A., & Henton, J. M. (1985). The effect of equity, equality, and reward level on the stability of students’ premarital relationships. The Journal of Social Psychology, 125, 715–721.Google Scholar
Chen, Z., Fiske, S. T., & Lee, T. L. (2009). Ambivalent sexism and power-related gender-role ideology in marriage. Sex Roles, 60, 765–778.Google Scholar
Chen, S., Lee-Chai, A. Y., & Bargh, J. A. (2001). Relationship orientation as a moderator of the effects of social power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 173.Google Scholar
Clark, M. S., & Mills, J. (1979). Interpersonal attraction in exchange and communal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 12–24.Google Scholar
Clark, M. S., & Mills, J. R. (2011). A theory of communal (and exchange) relationships. In Van Lange, P. A. M., Kruglanski, A. W., & Higgins, E. T. (Eds.) Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 232–250). Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
Cloven, D. H., & Roloff, M. E. (1990). Internal dialogue about interpersonal conflict: Communicative antecedents and relational outcomes. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Speech Communication Association, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Cloven, D. H., & Roloff, M. E. (1993). The chilling effect of aggressive potential on the expression of complaints in intimate relationships. Communications Monographs, 60, 199–219.Google Scholar
Crowley, M. S. (1998). Men's self-perceived adequacy as the family breadwinner: Implications for their psychological, marital, and work-family well-being. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 19, 7–23.Google Scholar
Dechter, A. R. (June, 1992). The effect of women's economic independence on union dissolution. Paper presented at the Summer Research Workshop on Problems of the Low Income Population, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
DeNavas-Walt, C., Proctor, B. D., & Smith, J. C. (2013). Income, poverty, and health insurance coverage in the United States: 2012. United States Census Bureau.Google Scholar
Diekman, A. B., Goodfriend, W., & Goodwin, S. (2004). Dynamic stereotypes of power: Perceived change and stability in gender hierarchies. Sex Roles, 50, 201–215.Google Scholar
Dragon, W., & Duck, S. (Eds.). (2005). Understanding research in personal relationships: A text with readings. London, UK: Sage.Google Scholar
Drigotas, S. M., Rusbult, C. E., & Verette, J. (1999). Level of commitment, mutuality of commitment, and couple well-being. Personal Relationships, 6, 389–409.Google Scholar
Dunbar, N. E. (2004). Theory in progress: Dyadic power theory: Constructing a communication-based theory of relational power. Journal of Family Communication, 4(3-4), 235–248.Google Scholar
Dutton, D. G., & Strachan, C. E. (1987). Motivational needs for power and spouse-specific assertiveness in assaultive and nonassaultive men. Violence and Victims, 2, 145–156.Google Scholar
Eastwick, P. W., & Finkel, E. J. (2008). Sex differences in mate preferences revisited: Do people know what they initially desire in a romantic partner?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 245.Google Scholar
Eastwick, P. W., Wilkey, B. M., Finkel, E. J., Lambert, N. M., Fitzsimons, G. M., Brown, P. C., & Fincham, F. D. (2013). Act with authority: Romantic desire at the nexus of power possessed. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 267–271.Google Scholar
Eaton, A. A., & Rose, S. (2011). Has dating become more egalitarian? A 35 year review using Sex Roles. Sex Roles, 64, 843–862.Google Scholar
Elliot, A. J., Niesta Kayser, D., Greitemeyer, T., Lichtenfeld, S., Gramzow, R. H., Maier, M. A., & Liu, H. (2010). Red, rank, and romance in women viewing men. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139, 399–417.Google Scholar
Falbo, T., & Peplau, L. A. (1980). Power strategies in intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 618–628.Google Scholar
Farrell, A. K., Simpson, J. A., & Rothman, A. J. (2015). The relationship power inventory: Development and validation. Personal Relationships, 22, 387–413.Google Scholar
Faulkner, G. E., Kolts, R. L., & Hicks, G. F. (2008). Sex role ideology, relationship context, and response to sexual coercion in college females. Sex Roles, 59, 139–150.Google Scholar
Felmlee, D. H. (1994). Who's on top? Power in romantic relationships. Sex Roles, 31, 275–295.Google Scholar
Fischer, A. R. (2006). Women's benevolent sexism as reaction to hostility. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30, 410–416.Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, M. K., Salgado, D. M., Suvak, M. K., King, L. A., & King, D. W. (2004). Associations of gender and gender-role ideology with behavioral and attitudinal features of intimate partner aggression. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 5, 91–102.Google Scholar
Fournier, B., Brassard, A., & Shaver, P. R. (2011). Adult attachment and male aggression in couple relationships: The demand-withdraw communication pattern and relationship satisfaction as mediators. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26, 1982–2003.Google Scholar
Foster, J. D., Shrira, I., & Campbell, W. K. (2006). Theoretical models of narcissism, sexuality, and relationship commitment. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 23, 367–386.Google Scholar
Fox, G. L., & Blanton, P. W. (1994). Noncustodial fathers following divorce. Marriage & Family Review, 20, 257–282.Google Scholar
French, J. R., Jr., & Raven, B. (1959). The bases of social power. In Dorwin, C. (Ed.), Studies in social power (pp. 150–167). Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research.Google Scholar
Frisco, M. L., & Williams, K. (2003). Perceived housework equity, marital happiness, and divorce in dual-earner households. Journal of Family Issues, 24, 51–73.Google Scholar
Fry, R., & Cohn, D. (2010). New economics of marriage: The rise of wives. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.Google Scholar
Furdyna, H. E., Tucker, M. B., & James, A. D. (2008). Relative spousal earnings and marital happiness among African American and White women. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70, 332–344.Google Scholar
Gable, S. L., & Impett, E. A. (2012). Approach and avoidance motives and close relationships. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 6, 95–108.Google Scholar
Galinsky, A. D., Magee, J. C., Gruenfeld, D. H., Whitson, J. A., & Liljenquist, K. A. (2008). Power reduces the press of the situation: Implications for creativity, conformity, and dissonance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1450–1466.Google Scholar
Galliher, R. V., Rostosky, S. S., Welsh, D. P., & Kawaguchi, M. C. (1999). Power and psychological well-being in late adolescent romantic relationships. Sex Roles, 40, 689–710.Google Scholar
Gordon, A. M., & Chen, S. (2013). Does power help or hurt? The moderating role of self–other focus on power and perspective-taking in romantic relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 8, 1097–1110.Google Scholar
Grauerholz, E. (1987). Balancing the power in dating relationships. Sex Roles, 17, 563–571.Google Scholar
Gray-Little, B., & Burks, N. (1983). Power and satisfaction in marriage: A review and critique. Psychological Bulletin, 93, 513–538.Google Scholar
Greaves, K. M., Zvonkovic, A. M., Evans, L. S., & Hall, L. D. (1995). Economic resources, influence, and stress among married couples. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 24, 47–70.Google Scholar
Guerrero, L. K., Anderson, P. A., & Afifi, W. A. (Eds.). (2013). Close encounters: Communication in relationships. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
Guinote, A. (2007). Power and goal pursuit. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1076–1087.Google Scholar
Haas, S. M., & Stafford, L. (1998). An initial examination of maintenance behaviors in gay and lesbian relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15, 846–855.Google Scholar
Hadden, B. W., Smith, C. V., & Webster, G. D. (2014). Relationship duration moderates associations between attachment and relationship quality meta-analytic support for the temporal adult romantic attachment model. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 18, 42–58.Google Scholar
Hanks, R. S. (1993). Rethinking family decision making: A family decision making model under constraints on time and information. Marriage & Family Review, 18, 223–240.Google Scholar
Harry, J., & DeVall, W. B. (1978). The social organization of gay males. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar
Harvey, S. M., Beckman, L. J., Browner, C. H., & Sherman, C. A. (2002). Relationship power, decision making, and sexual relations: An exploratory study with couples of Mexican origin. Journal of Sex Research, 39, 284–291.Google Scholar
Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 511–524.Google Scholar
Heckert, D. A., Nowak, T. C., & Snyder, K. A. (1998). The impact of husbands’ and wives’ relative earnings on marital disruption. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 690–703.Google Scholar
Horne, R. M., Johnson, M. D., Galambos, N. L., & Krahn, H. J. (2018). Time, money or gender? Predictors of the division of household labor across the life stages. Sex Roles, 78, 731–743.Google Scholar
Horne, S. G., & Biss, W. J. (2009). Equality discrepancy between women in same-sex relationships: The mediating role of attachment in relationship satisfaction. Sex Roles, 60, 721–730.Google Scholar
Huston, T. L. (1983). Power. In Kelley, H. H., Berscheid, E., Christensen, A. Harvey, J. H., Huston, T. L., Levinger, G., McClintock, E., Peplau, L. A., & Peterson, D. R. (Eds.), Close relationships (pp. 169–219). New York: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Impett, E. A., Gordon, A. M., Kogan, A., Oveis, C., Gable, S. L., & Keltner, D. (2010). Moving toward more perfect unions: Daily and long-term consequences of approach and avoidance goals in romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 948–963.Google Scholar
Impett, E. A., Le, B. M., Kogan, A., Oveis, C., & Keltner, D. (2014). When you think your partner is holding back the costs of perceived partner suppression during relationship sacrifice. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5, 542–549.Google Scholar
Impett, E. A., & Peplau, L. A. (2006). “His” and “her” relationships? A review of the empirical evidence. In Vangelisti, A. L. & Perlman, D. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personal relationships (pp. 273–291). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Inglehart, R., & Norris, P. (2003). Rising tide: Gender equality and cultural change around the world. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Job, V., Bernecker, K., & Dweck, C. S. (2012). Are implicit motives the need to feel certain affect? Motive–affect congruence predicts relationship satisfaction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 1552–1565.Google Scholar
Karremans, J. C., & Smith, P. K. (2010). Having the power to forgive: When the experience of power increases interpersonal forgiveness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 1010–1023.Google Scholar
Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Anderson, C. (2003). Power, approach, and inhibition. Psychological Review, 110, 265–284.Google Scholar
Kiefer, A. K., & Sanchez, D. T. (2007). Scripting sexual passivity: A gender role perspective. Personal Relationships, 14, 269–290.Google Scholar
Kifer, Y., Heller, D., Perunovic, W. Q. E., & Galinsky, A. D. (2013). The good life of the powerful the experience of power and authenticity enhances subjective well-being. Psychological Science, 24, 280–288.Google Scholar
Knudson-Martin, C. (2013). Why power matters: Creating a foundation of mutual support in couple relationships. Family Process, 52, 5–18.Google Scholar
Knudson-Martin, C., & Huenergardt, D. (2010). A socio-emotional approach to couple therapy: Linking social context and couple interaction. Family Process, 49, 369–384.Google Scholar
Kornrich, S., Brines, J., & Leupp, K. (2013). Egalitarianism, housework, and sexual frequency in marriage. American Sociological Review, 78, 26–50.Google Scholar
Kraus, M. W., Chen, S., & Keltner, D. (2011). The power to be me: Power elevates self-concept consistency and authenticity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 974–980.Google Scholar
Kunstman, J. W., & Maner, J. K. (2011). Sexual overperception: Power, mating motives, and biases in social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 282–294.Google Scholar
Kurdek, L. A. (1995). Developmental changes in relationship quality in gay and lesbian cohabiting couples. Developmental Psychology, 31, 86.Google Scholar
Kurdek, L. A. (2005). What do we know about gay and lesbian couples? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 251–254.Google Scholar
Lamont, E. (2013). Negotiating courtship reconciling egalitarian ideals with traditional gender norms. Gender & Society, 28, 189–211.Google Scholar
Laner, M. R., & Ventrone, N. A. (2000). Dating scripts revisited. Journal of Family Issues, 21, 488–500.Google Scholar
Lavee, Y., & Katz, R. (2002). Division of labor, perceived fairness, and marital quality: The effect of gender ideology. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64, 27–39.Google Scholar
Lawler, E. J., & Bacharach, S. B. (1987). Comparison of dependence and punitive forms of power. Social Forces, 66, 446–462.Google Scholar
Lennon, C. A., Stewart, A. L., & Ledermann, T. (2013). The role of power in intimate relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30, 95–114.Google Scholar
Linder, J. R., Crick, N. R., & Collins, W. A. (2002). Relational aggression and victimization in young adults’ romantic relationships: Associations with perceptions of parent, peer, and romantic relationship quality. Social Development, 11, 69–86.Google Scholar
Lopez, F. G., & Brennan, K. A. (2000). Dynamic processes underlying adult attachment organization: Toward an attachment theoretical perspective on the healthy and effective self. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 47, 283.Google Scholar
Lothaller, H., Mikula, G., & Schoebi, D. (2009). What contributes to the (im)balanced division of family work between the sexes? Swiss Journal of Psychology, 68, 143–152.Google Scholar
Lujansky, H., & Mikula, G. (1983). Can equity theory explain the quality and the stability of romantic relationships? British Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 101–112.Google Scholar
Lynn, M., & Shurgot, B. A. (1984). Responses to lonely hearts advertisements: Effects of reported physical attractiveness, physique, and coloration. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 10, 349–357.Google Scholar
Mahoney, A. R., & Knudson-Martin, C. (2009). Gender equality in intimate relationships. In Knudson-Martin, C. & Mahoney, A. R. (Eds.) Couples, gender, and power: Creating change in intimate relationships (pp. 3–16). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224.Google Scholar
Mason, A., & Blankenship, V. (1987). Power and affiliation motivation, stress, and abuse in intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 203–210.Google Scholar
McDonald, G. W. (1980). Family power: The assessment of a decade of theory and research, 1970–1979. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 42, 841–854.Google Scholar
McCullough, M. E., Rachal, K. C., Sandage, S. J., Worthington, E. L. Jr., Brown, S. W., & Hight, T. L. (1998). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships: II. Theoretical elaboration and measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1586–1603.Google Scholar
McGoldrick, M. (1991). For love or money. In Goodrich, T. J. (Ed.), Women and power: Perspectives for family therapy (pp. 239–244). New York: Norton.Google Scholar
McIntosh, A., & Zey, M. (1989). Women as gatekeepers of food consumption: A sociological critique. Food and Foodways, 3, 317–332.Google Scholar
McNulty, J. K., & Widman, L. (2014). Sexual narcissism and infidelity in early marriage. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 43, 1315–1325.Google Scholar
Meier, B. P., & Dionne, S. (2009). Downright sexy: Verticality, implicit power, and perceived physical attractiveness. Social Cognition, 27, 883–892.Google Scholar
Menaghan, E. G., & Parcel, T. L. (1990). Parental employment and family life: Research in the 1980s. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 1079–1098.Google Scholar
Mikula, G., Riederer, B., & Bodi, O. (2012). Perceived justice in the division of domestic labor: Actor and partner effects. Personal Relationships, 19, 680–695.Google Scholar
Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2016). Attachment in adulthood: Structure, dynamics, and change, (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Newell, S. E., & Stutman, R. K. (1991). The episodic nature of social confrontation. Annals of the International Communication Association, 14, 359–395.Google Scholar
Oka, M., Brown, C. C., & Miller, R. B. (2016). Attachment and Relational Aggression: Power as a Mediating Variable. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 44, 24–35.Google Scholar
Oppenheimer, V. K. (1997). Women's employment and the gain to marriage: The specialization and trading model. Annual Review of Sociology, 23, 431–453.Google Scholar
Oriña, M. M., Simpson, J. A., Ickes, W., Asada, K. J. K., & Fitzpatrick, S. (2008). Making it (inter-)personal: Self- and partner-moderated influence during marital conflict discussions. Social Influence, 3, 34–66.Google Scholar
Oriña, M. M., Wood, W., & Simpson, J. A. (2002). Strategies of influence in close relationships. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 459–472.Google Scholar
Overall, N. C., & Fletcher, G. J. (2010). Perceiving regulation from intimate partners: Reflected appraisal and self-regulation processes in close relationships. Personal Relationships, 17, 433–456.Google Scholar
Overall, N. C., Fletcher, G. J., & Simpson, J. A. (2006). Regulation processes in intimate relationships: The role of ideal standards. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 662–685.Google Scholar
Overall, N. C., Hammond, M. D., McNulty, J. K., & Finkel, E. J. (2016). When power shapes interpersonal behavior: Low relationship power predicts men's aggressive responses to low situational power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111, 195–217.Google Scholar
Parker, L. (2009). Disrupting power and privilege in couples therapy. Clinical Social Work Journal, 37, 248–255.Google Scholar
Parsons, T. (1949). The social structure of the family. In Anshen, R. N. (Ed.), The family: Its function and destiny (pp. 173–201). Oxford, UK: Harper.Google Scholar
Patterson, C. J. (2000). Family relationships of lesbians and gay men. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62, 1052–1069.Google Scholar
Peplau, L. A. (1979). Power in dating relationships. In Freeman, J. (Ed.), Women: A feminist perspective, (2nd ed., pp. 106–121). Mountain View: Mayfield Publishing.Google Scholar
Peplau, L. A., & Campbell, S. M. (1989). The balance of power in dating and marriage. In Freeman, J. (Ed.), Women: A feminist perspective (4th ed., pp. 121–137). Mountain View: Mayfield Publishing.Google Scholar
Peplau, L. A., & Cochran, S. D. (1980, September). Sex differences in values concerning love relationships. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Montreal, Canada.Google Scholar
Peplau, L. A., & Cochran, S. D. (1990). A relationship perspective on homosexuality. In McWhirter, D. P., Sanders, S. A. & Reinisch, J. M. (Eds.) Homosexuality/heterosexuality: Concepts of sexual orientation (pp. 321–349). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Peplau, L. A., & Fingerhut, A. W. (2007). The close relationships of lesbians and gay men. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 405–424.Google Scholar
Peplau, L. A., & Gordon, S. L. (1985). Women and men in love: Gender differences in close heterosexual relationships. In O'Leary, V. E., Unger, R. K., & Wallston, B. S. (Eds.), Women, gender, and social psychology (pp. 257–291). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Peplau, L. A., Rubin, Z., & Hill, C. T. (1977). Sexual intimacy in dating relationships. Journal of Social Issues, 33, 86–109.Google Scholar
Peplau, L. A., & Spalding, L. R. (2000). The close relationships of lesbians, gay men, and bisexuals. In Hendrick, C. & Hendrick, S. S. (Eds.) Close relationships: A sourcebook (pp. 111–123). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
Pierce, C. A. (1996). Body height and romantic attraction: A meta-analytic test of the male-taller norm. Social Behavior and Personality, 24, 143–149.Google Scholar
Pierce, L., Dahl, M. S., & Nielsen, J. (2013). In sickness and in wealth: Psychological and sexual costs of income comparison in marriage. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 359–374.Google Scholar
Quam, J. K., Whitford, G. S., Dziengel, L. E., & Knochel, K. A. (2010). Exploring the nature of same-sex relationships. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 53, 702–722.Google Scholar
Reilly, M. E., & Lynch, J. M. (1990). Power-sharing in lesbian partnerships. Journal of Homosexuality, 19, 1–30.Google Scholar
Righetti, F., Luchies, L. B., van Gils, S., Slotter, E. B., Witcher, B., & Kumashiro, M. (2015). The prosocial versus proself power holder how power influences sacrifice in romantic relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41, 779–790.Google Scholar
Rochlen, A. B., & Mahalik, J. R. (2004). Women's perceptions of male partners’ gender role conflict as predictors of psychological well-being and relationship satisfaction. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 5, 147–157.Google Scholar
Rogers, S. J., & DeBoer, D. D. (2001). Changes in wives’ income: Effects on marital happiness, psychological well-being, and the risk of divorce. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 458–472.Google Scholar
Rogers, W. S., Bidwell, J., & Wilson, L. (2005). Perception of and satisfaction with relationship power, sex, and attachment styles: A couples level analysis. Journal of Family Violence, 20, 241–251.Google Scholar
Rollins, B. C., & Bahr, S. J. (1976). A theory of power relationships in marriage. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38, 619–627.Google Scholar
Rose, S., & Frieze, I. H. (1993). Young singles’ contemporary dating scripts. Sex Roles, 28, 499–509.Google Scholar
Ruggles, S. (1997). The rise of divorce and separation in the United States, 1880–1990. Demography, 34, 455–466.Google Scholar
Rusbult, C. E. (1983). A longitudinal test of the investment model: The development (and deterioration) of satisfaction and commitment in heterosexual involvements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 101–117.Google Scholar
Rusbult, C. E., & Van Lange, P. A. (2003). Interdependence, interaction, and relationships, Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 351–375.Google Scholar
Rusbult, C. E., Verette, J., Whitney, G. A., Slovik, L. F., & Lipkus, I. (1991). Accommodation processes in close relationships: Theory and preliminary empirical evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 53–78.Google Scholar
Safilios-Rothschild, C. (1976). A macro-and micro-examination of family power and love: An exchange model. Journal of Marriage and Family, 38, 355–362.Google Scholar
Safilios-Rothschild, C. (1977). The relationship between women's work and fertility: Some methodological and theoretical issues. In Kupinsky, S. (Ed.), The fertility of working women: A synthesis of international research (pp. 355–368). New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Sakaluk, J. K., Todd, L. M., Milhausen, R., Lachowsky, N. J., & Undergraduate Research Group in Sexuality (URGiS). (2014). Dominant heterosexual sexual scripts in emerging adulthood: Conceptualization and measurement. The Journal of Sex Research, 51, 516–531.Google Scholar
Samp, J. A., & Solomon, D. H. (2001). Coping with problematic events in dating relationships: The influence of dependence power on severity appraisals and decisions to communicate. Western Journal of Communication, 65, 138–160.Google Scholar
Sayer, L. C., & Bianchi, S. M. (2000). Women's economic independence and the probability of divorce: A review and reexamination. Journal of Family Issues, 21, 906–943.Google Scholar
Sayer, L. C., England, P., Allison, P., & Kangas, N. (2011). She left, he left: How employment and satisfaction affect men's and women's decisions to leave marriages. American journal of Sociology, 116, 1982.Google Scholar
Scanzoni, J., & Szinovacz, M. (1980). Family decision-making: A developmental sex role model. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Schoen, R., Astone, N. M., Kim, Y. J., Rothert, K., & Standish, N. J. (2002). Women's employment, marital happiness, and divorce. Social Forces, 81, 643–662.Google Scholar
Schreurs, K. M., & Buunk, B. P. (1996). Closeness, autonomy, equity, and relationship satisfaction in lesbian couples. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20, 577–592.Google Scholar
Schwartz, C. R., & Gonalons-Pons, P. (2016). Trends in relative earnings and marital dissolution: Are wives who out-earn their husbands still more likely to divorce? The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences, 2, 218–236.Google Scholar
Seabrook, R. C., Ward, L. M., Reed, L., Manago, A., Giaccardi, S., & Lippman, J. R. (2016). Our scripted sexuality: The development and validation of a measure of the heterosexual script and its relation to television consumption. Emerging Adulthood, 4, 338–355.Google Scholar
Senn, T. E., Carey, M. P., Vanable, P. A., & Seward, D. X. (2009). African American men's perceptions of power in intimate relationships. American Journal of Men's Health, 3, 310–318.Google Scholar
Shaver, P. R., & Mikulincer, M. (2005). Attachment theory and research: Resurrection of the psychodynamic approach to personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 39, 22–45.Google Scholar
Shaver, P. R., Segev, M., & Mikulincer, M. (2011). A behavioral systems perspective on power and aggression. In Shaver, P. R. & Mikulincer, M. (Eds.), Human aggression and violence: Causes, manifestations and consequences (pp. 71–87). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Simpson, J. A., Farrell, A. K., Oriña, M. M., & Rothman, A. J. (2015). Power and social influence in relationships. In Mikulincer, M. & Shaver, P. R. (Eds.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology (pp. 393–420). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Singelis, T. M. (1994). The measurement of independent and interdependent self-construals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 580–591.Google Scholar
Smith, P. K., & Bargh, J. A. (2008). Nonconscious effects of power on basic approach and avoidance tendencies. Social Cognition, 26, 1–24.Google Scholar
Smith, P. K., & Hofmann, W. (2016). Power in everyday life. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113, 10043–10048.Google Scholar
South, S. J. (2001). Time-dependent effects of wives’ employment on marital dissolution. American Sociological Review, 66, 226–245.Google Scholar
Sprecher, S. (1994). Two sides to the breakup of dating relationships. Personal Relationships, 1, 199–222.Google Scholar
Sprecher, S., & Felmlee, D. (1997). The balance of power in romantic heterosexual couples over time from “his” and “her” perspectives. Sex Roles, 37, 361–379.Google Scholar
Sprecher, S., Schmeeckle, M., & Felmlee, D. (2006). The principle of least interest inequality in emotional involvement in romantic relationships. Journal of Family Issues, 27, 1255–1280.Google Scholar
Stanley, S. M., Rhoades, G. K., Scott, S. B., Kelmer, G., Markman, H. J., & Fincham, F. D. (2016). Asymmetrically committed relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 34, 1241–1259.Google Scholar
Steil, J. M. I. (1997). Marital equality: Its relationship to the well-being of husbands and wives. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Stets, J. E., & Henderson, D. A. (1991). Contextual factors surrounding conflict resolution while dating: Results from a national study. Family Relations, 40, 29–36.Google Scholar
Stewart, A. J., & Rubin, Z. (1976). The power motive in the dating couple. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 305–309.Google Scholar
Straus, M. A., & Gelles, R. J. (1990). Physical violence in American families: Risk factors and adaptations to violence in 8,145 families. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Sullivan, O. (2006). Changing gender relations, changing families: Tracing the pace of change over time. New York: Rowan & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
Sullivan, O., & Coltrane, S. (2008, April). Men's changing contribution to housework and childcare: A discussion paper on changing family roles. Paper presented at the 11th Annual Conference of the Council on Contemporary Families, University of Illinois.Google Scholar
Teachman, J. (2010). Wives’ economic resources and risk of divorce. Journal of Family Issues, 31, 1305–1323.Google Scholar
Thibaut, J. W., & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Tichenor, V. J. (1999). Status and income as gendered resources: The case of marital power. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 638–650.Google Scholar
Tichenor, V. (2005). Maintaining men's dominance: Negotiating identity and power when she earns more. Sex Roles, 53, 191–205.Google Scholar
Travaglia, L. K., Overall, N. C., & Sibley, C. G. (2009). Benevolent and hostile sexism and preferences for romantic partners. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 599–604.Google Scholar
Van Lange, P. A., Rusbult, C. E., Drigotas, S. M., Arriaga, X. B., Witcher, B. S., & Cox, C. L. (1997). Willingness to sacrifice in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1373.Google Scholar
Van Willigen, M., & Drentea, P. (2001). Benefits of equitable relationships: The impact of sense of fairness, household division of labor, and decision making power on perceived social support. Sex Roles, 44, 571–597.Google Scholar
Vogel, D. L., Murphy, M. J., Werner-Wilson, R. J., Cutrona, C. E., & Seeman, J. (2007). Sex differences in the use of demand and withdraw behavior in marriage: Examining the social structure hypothesis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 54, 165.Google Scholar
Vogler, C., Lyonette, C., & Wiggins, R. D. (2008). Money, power and spending decisions in intimate relationships. The Sociological Review, 56, 117–143.Google Scholar
Waller, W., & Hill, R. (1951). The family: A dynamic interpretation. Fort Worth: Dryden Press.Google Scholar
Walsh, F. (1989). Reconsidering gender in the marital quid pro quo. In McGoldrick, M., Anderson, C. M., & Walsh, F. (Eds.), Women in families: A framework for family therapy (pp. 267–285). New York: WW Norton.Google Scholar
Walster, E., Walster, G. W., & Traupmann, J. (1978). Equity and premarital sex. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 82–92.Google Scholar
Wei, M., Russell, D. W., Mallinckrodt, B., & Vogel, D. L. (2007). The Experiences in Close Relationship Scale (ECR)-short form: Reliability, validity, and factor structure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 88, 187–204.Google Scholar
Weichselbaumer, D., & Winter-Ebmer, R. (2005). A meta-analysis of the international gender wage gap. Journal of Economic Surveys, 19, 479–511.Google Scholar
Whyte, M. K. (1990). Dating, mating, and marriage. Social institutions and social change. Hawthorne: Aldine Transaction.Google Scholar
Wiederman, M. W., & Allgeier, E. R. (1992). Gender differences in mate selection criteria: Sociobiological or socioeconomic explanation? Ethology and Sociobiology, 13, 115–124.Google Scholar
Wilkie, J. R., Ferree, M. M., & Ratcliff, K. S. (1998). Gender and fairness: Marital satisfaction in two-earner couples. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 577–594.Google Scholar
Wilson, G. D. (2010). Measurement of sex fantasy. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 25, 57–67.Google Scholar
Wilson, P. R. (1968). Perceptual distortion of height as a function of ascribed academic status. The Journal of Social Psychology, 74, 97–102.Google Scholar
Yodanis, C. (2010). The institution of marriage. In Treas, J. & Drobnic, S. (Eds.), Dividing the domestic: Men, women, & housework in cross-national perspective (pp. 175–191). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Zuo, J. (1997). The effect of men's breadwinner status on their changing gender beliefs. Sex Roles, 37, 799–816.Google Scholar
Zurbriggen, E. L. (2000). Social motives and cognitive power–sex associations: Predictors of aggressive sexual behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 559.Google Scholar
References
Adams, H. L., & Williams, L. R. (2014). “It's not just you two”: A grounded theory of peer-influenced jealousy as a pathway to dating violence among acculturating Mexican American adolescents. Psychology of Violence, 4, 1–15.Google Scholar
Anderson, I., & Swainson, V. (2001). Perceived motivation for rape: Gender differences in belief about female and male rape. Current Research in Social Psychology, 6, 107–123.Google Scholar
Anderson, K. L. (2007). Who gets out? Gender as structure and the dissolution of violent heterosexual relationships. Gender & Society, 21, 173–201.Google Scholar
Anderson, K. L., & Umberson, D. (2001). Gendering violence: Masculinity and power in men's accounts of domestic violence. Gender and Society, 15, 358–380.Google Scholar
Antai, D. (2011). Controlling behavior, power relations within intimate relationships and intimate partner physical and sexual violence against women in Nigeria. BMC Public Health, 11, 1–11.Google Scholar
Barker, G. (2016). Male violence or patriarchal violence? Global trends in men and violence. Sexualidad, Salud, y Sociedad, 22, 316–330.Google Scholar
Basile, K. C. (1999). Rape by acquiescence: The ways in which women “give in” to unwanted sex with their husbands. Violence Against Women, 5, 1036–1058.Google Scholar
Black, M. I. (2018, February 21). The boys are not all right. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.comGoogle Scholar
Block, C. R. (2004). Risk factors for death or life-threatening injury for abused women in Chicago. Violence against women and family violence: Developments in research, practice, and policy. Washington, DC: United States Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.Google Scholar
Bussert, J. (1986). Battered women: From a theology of suffering to an ethic of empowerment. Minneapolis, MN: Lutheran Church of America.Google Scholar
Buzawa, E. S. (2003). Domestic violence: The criminal justice response. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Carlson, R. G., Fripp, J., Cook, C., & Kelchner, V. (2015). Examining intimate partner violence, stress and technology use among young adults. The Professional Counselor, 5, 365–378.Google Scholar
Centers for Disease Control (CDC). (2012). Sexual violence: Facts at a glance. Atlanta, GA: CDC.Google Scholar
Chambers, D., Thicknell, E., & Van Loon, J. (2004). Peer regulation of teenage sexual identities. Gender and Education, 16, 397–415.Google Scholar
Conroy, N. E. (2013). Rethinking adolescent peer sexual harassment: Contributions of feminist theory. Journal of School Violence, 12, 340–356.Google Scholar
Conroy, N. E., Krishnakumar, A., & Leone, J. M. (2014). Reexamining issues of conceptualization and willing consent: The hidden role of coercion in experiences of sexual acquiescence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 30, 1828–1846.Google Scholar
Cuadrado-Gordillo, I. (2012). Repetition, power imbalance, and intentionality: Do these criteria conform to teenagers’ perceptions of bullying? A role-based analysis. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27, 1889–1910.Google Scholar
DeKeserdy, W., & MacLeod, L. (1997). Woman abuse: A sociological story. Toronto: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Dobash, R. E., & Dobash, R. P. (1979). Violence against wives: A case against the patriarchy. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Dobash, R. E., & Dobash, R. P. (1992). Violence and social change. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Draucker, C. B., & Martsolf, D. S. (2010). The role of electronic communication technology in adolescent dating violence. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Nursing, 23, 133–142.Google Scholar
DuPont-Reyes, M., Fry, D., Rickert, V., Bell, D., Palmetto, N., & Davidson, L. (2014). Relationship violence, fear, and exposure to youth violence among adolescents in New York City. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 29, 2325–2350.Google Scholar
Dutton, M. A., & Goodman, L. A. (2005). Coercion in intimate partner violence: Toward a new conceptualization. Sex Roles, 52, 743–756.Google Scholar
Felson, R. B. (1996). Big people hit little people: Sex differences in physical power and interpersonal violence. Criminology, 34, 433–452.Google Scholar
Finkelhor, D., & Yllo, K. (1985). License to rape: Sexual abuse of wives. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Flack, W., Hansen, B., Hopper, A., Bryant, L., Lang, K., Massa, A., & Whalen, J. (2015). Some types of hookups may be riskier than others for campus sexual assault. Psychology Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 8, 413–420.Google Scholar
Fleury, R., Sullivan, C., Bybee, D., & Davidson, W. (1998). “Why don't they just call the cops?”: Reasons for differential police contact among women in abusive relationships. Violence and Victims, 13, 333–346.Google Scholar
Fleury-Steiner, R. E., Bybee, D., Sullivan, C. M., Belknap, J., & Melton, H. C. (2006). Contextual factors impacting battered women's intentions to reuse the criminal legal system. Journal of Community Psychology, 34, 327–342.Google Scholar
Gondolf, E. W. (1998). The victims of court-ordered batterers: Their victimization, helpseeking, and perceptions. Violence Against Women, 4, 659–676.Google Scholar
Hamarus, P., & Kaikkonen, P. (2008). School bullying as a creator of pupil peer pressure. Educational Research, 50, 333–345.Google Scholar
Herrenkohl, T. I., Kosterman, R., Mason, W. A., & Hawkins, J. D. (2007). Youth violence trajectories and proximal characteristics of intimate partner violence. Violence and Victims, 22, 259–274.Google Scholar
Holtzworth-Munroe, A., Meehan, J. C., Herron, K., Rehman, U., & Stuart, G. L. (2000). Testing the Holtzworth-Munroe and Stuart (1994) batterer typology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 1000–1019.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. P. (1995). Patriarchal terrorism and common couple violence: Two forms of violence against women. Journal of Marriage and Family, 57, 283–294.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. P. (2001). Conflict and control: Symmetry and asymmetry in domestic violence. In Crouter, A. C., Booth, A., & Clements, M. (Eds.), Couples in conflict (pp. 95–104). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. P. (2008). A typology of domestic violence: Intimate terrorism, violent resistance, and situational couple violence. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. P., & Ferraro, K. (2000). Research on domestic violence in the 1990s: Making distinctions. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62, 948–963.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. P., & Leone, J. M. (2005). The differential effects of intimate terrorism and situational couple violence: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey. Journal of Family Issues, 26, 322–349.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. P., Leone, J. M., & Xu, Y. (2014). Intimate terrorism and situational coupleviolence in general surveys: Ex-spouses required. Violence Against Women, 20, 186–207.Google Scholar
Leone, J. M. (2011). Suicidal behaviors among low income African American female victims of intimate terrorism and situational couple violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26, 2568–2591.Google Scholar
Leone, J. M., Johnson, M. P., & Cohan, C. L. (2007). Victim help seeking: Differences between intimate terrorism and situational couple violence. Family Relations, 56, 427–439.Google Scholar
Leone, J. M., Lape, M., & Xu, Y. (2014). Women's decisions to not seek formal help for partner violence: A comparison of intimate terrorism and situational couple violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 29, 1850–1876.Google Scholar
Lonsway, K. A., & Archambault, J. (2012). The “justice gap” for sexual assault cases: Future directions for reform. Violence Against Women, 18, 145–168.Google Scholar
Makepeace, J. M. (1986). Gender differences in courtship violence victimization. Family Relations, 35, 383–388.Google Scholar
Martin, E. K., Taft, C. T., & Resick, P. A. (2007). A review of marital rape. Aggressive and Violent Behavior, 12, 329–347. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2009.0221Google Scholar
Melander, L. A. (2010). College students’ perceptions of intimate partner cyber harassment. Cyberpsychology, 13, 263–268.Google Scholar
Merritt-Grey, M., & Wuest, J. (1995). Counteracting abuse and breaking free: The process of leaving revealed through women's voices. Health Care for Women International, 16, 399–412.Google Scholar
Meyer, E. J. (2008). Gendered harassment in secondary schools: Understanding teachers’ (non) interventions. Gender and Education, 20, 555–570.Google Scholar
Meyer, S. (2011). Seeking help for intimate partner violence: Victims’ experiences when approaching the criminal justice system for IPV-related support and protection in an Australian jurisdiction. Feminist Criminology, 6, 268–290.Google Scholar
Molidor, C., & Tolman, R. M. (1998). Gender and contextual factors in adolescent dating violence. Violence Against Women, 4, 180–194.Google Scholar
Murnen, S. K., Wright, C., & Kaluzny, G. (2002). If “boys will be boy,” then girls will be victims? A meta-analytic review of the research that relates masculine ideology to sexual aggression. Sex Roles, 46, 359–375.Google Scholar
Nybergh, L., Enander, V., & Krantz, G. (2016). Theoretical consideration's on men's experiences of intimate partner violence: An interview-based study. Journal of Family Violence, 31, 191–202.Google Scholar
O'Sullivan, L. F., & Allgeier, E. R. (1998). Feigning sexual desire: Consenting to unwanted sexual activity in heterosexual dating relationships. The Journal of Sex Research, 35, 234–243.Google Scholar
Pascoe, C. J. (2011). Dude, you're a fag: Masculinity and sexuality in high school. California: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Patchin, J. W., & Hinduja, S. (2016). Bullying today: bullet points and best practices. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.Google Scholar
Phinney, A., & de Hovre, S. (2003). Integrating human rights and public health to prevent interpersonal violence. Health and Human Rights, 6, 64–87.Google Scholar
Reed, E., Silverman, J. G., Raj, A., Decker, M. R., & Miller, E. (2011). Male perpetration of teen dating violence: Associations with neighborhood violence involvement, gender attitudes, and perceived peer and neighborhood norms. Journal of Urban Health: Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 88, 226–239.Google Scholar
Ronfeldt, H. M., Kimerling, R., & Arias, I. (1998). Satisfaction with relationship power and perpetration of dating violence. Journal of Marriage and Family, 60, 70–78.Google Scholar
Ryan, K. M. (2011). The relationship between rape myths and sexual scripts: The social construction of rape. Sex Roles, 65, 774–782.Google Scholar
Sakaluk, J. K., Todd, L. M., Milhausen, R., Lachowsky, N. J., & Undergraduate Research Group in Sexuality (2014). Dominant heterosexual sexual scripts in emerging adulthood: Conceptualization and measurement. The Journal of Sex Research, 51, 516–531.Google Scholar
Sentse, M., Kiuru, N., Veenstra, R., & Salmivalli, C. (2014). A social network approach to the interplay between adolescents’ bullying and likeability over time. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43, 1409–1420.Google Scholar
Silverman, J., Decker, M., Reed, E., Rothman, E., Hathaway, J., Raj, A., & Miller, E. (2006). Social norms and beliefs regarding sexual risk and pregnancy involvement among adolescent males treated for dating violence perpetration. Journal of Urban Health: Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 83, 723–735.Google Scholar
Smith, O., & Skinner, T. (2012). Observing court responses to victims of rape and sexual assault. Feminist Criminology, 7, 298–326.Google Scholar
Stark, E. (2007). Coercive control: How men entrap women in personal life. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Steinmetz, S. (1977-1978). The battered husband syndrome. Victimology, An International Journal, 2, 499–509.Google Scholar
Sugarman, D. B., & Frankel, S. L. (1996). Patriarchal ideology and wife-assault: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Family Violence, 11, 13–40.Google Scholar
Timmerman, M. C. (2004). Safe schools and sexual harassment: The relationship between school climate and coping with unwanted sexual behavior. Health Education Journal, 63, 113–126.Google Scholar
Tontodonato, P., & Crew, K. B. (1992). Dating violence, social learning theory, and gender: A multivariate analysis. Violence and Victims, 7, 3–14.Google Scholar
Vannier, S. A., & O’ Sullivan, L. F. (2010). Sex without desire: Characteristics of occasions of sexual compliance in young adults’ committed relationships. Journal of Sex Research, 47, 429–439.Google Scholar
Weber, M. (1947). The theory of social and economic organization (Henderson, A. M. & Parsons, T., trans). New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (WHO). (2002). World report on violence and health. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (WHO). (2014). Global Status Report on Violence Prevention. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO.Google Scholar
Wright, M. O., Norton, D. L., & Matusek, J. A. (2010). Predicting verbal coercion following sexual refusal during a hookup: Diverging gender patterns. Sex Roles, 62, 647–660.Google Scholar
Yllo, K., & Bograd, M. (Eds.). (1988). Feminist perspectives on wife abuse. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Yonas, M. A., O'Campo, P., Burke, J. G., Peak, G., & Gielen, A. C. (2005). Urban youth violence: Do definitions and reasons for violence vary by gender? Journal of Urban Health, 82, 542–551.Google Scholar
Zweig, J. M., Yahner, J., Dank, M., & Lachman, P. (2014). Can Johnson's typology of adult partner violence apply to teen dating violence? Journal of Marriage and Family, 76, 808–825.Google Scholar
References
Aida, Y., & Falbo, T. (1991). Relationships between marital satisfaction, resources, and power strategies. Sex Roles, 24, 43–56.Google Scholar
Afifi, T. D., & Olson, L. (2005). The chilling effect in families and the pressure to conceal secrets. Communication Monographs, 72, 192–216.Google Scholar
Agnew, C. R. (Ed.) (2014). Social influences on romantic relationships: Beyond the dyad. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Alberts, J. K. (1988). An analysis of couples’ conversational complaint interactions. Communication Monographs, 55, 184–197.Google Scholar
Aydinli, A., Bender, M., Chasiotis, A., Cemalcilar, Z., & van de Vijver, A. J .R. (2014). Different types of helping, different types of motivation: Effects of the alignment of implicit and explicit prosocial motivation on spontaneous and planned helping. Motivation and Emotion, 38, 645–658.Google Scholar
Ball, J., Cowan, P., & Cowan, C. P. (1995). Who's got the power? Gender differences in partners’ perceptions of influence during marital problem-solving discussion. Family Processes, 34, 303–321.Google Scholar
Baumann, N., Chatterjee, M. B., & Hank, P. (2016). Guiding others for their own good: Action orientation is associated with prosocial enactment of the implicit power motive. Motivation and Emotion, 40, 56–68.Google Scholar
Belk, S. S., & Snell, W. E. Jr. (1988). Avoidance strategy use in intimate relationships. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 7, 80–96.Google Scholar
Bugental, D. B., & Lewis, J. C. (1999). The paradoxical misuse of power by those who see themselves as powerless: How does it happen? Journal of Social Issues, 55, 51–64.Google Scholar
Bugental, D. B., Lyon, J. E., Cortez, V., & Krantz, J. (1997). Who's the boss? Accessibility of dominance ideation among individuals with low perceptions of interpersonal power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1297–1309.Google Scholar
Burgoon, J. K., & Hale, J. L. (1984). The fundamental topoi of relational communication. Communication Monographs, 51, 193–214.Google Scholar
Caughlin, J. P., & Vangelisti, A. L. (1999). Desire for change in one's partner as a predictor of the demand/withdraw pattern of marital communication. Communication Monographs, 66, 66–89.Google Scholar
Chusmir, L. H., & Mills, J. (1989). Gender differences in conflict resolution styles of managers: At work and at home. Sex Roles, 20, 149–163.Google Scholar
Cloven, D. H., & Roloff, M. E. (1993). The chilling effect of aggressive potential on the expression of complaints in intimate relationships. Communication Monographs, 60, 198–219.Google Scholar
Courtright, J. A. (2016). Relational communication theory. In Berger, C. R. & Roloff, M. E. (Eds.) and Wilson, S. R., Dillard, J. P., Caughlin, J., & Solomon, D. H. (Associate Eds.). International encyclopedia of interpersonal communication (pp. 1433–1443). Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Crockenberg, S., & Litman, C. (1990). Autonomy as competence in 2-year-olds: Maternal correlates of child defiance, compliance, and self-assertion. Developmental Psychology, 26, 961–997.Google Scholar
DeWall, C. N., Baumeister, R. F., Mead, N. L., & Vohs, K. D. (2011). How leaders self-regulate their task performance: Evidence that power promotes diligence, depletion, and disdain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 47–65.Google Scholar
Dillard, J. P., & Fitzpatrick, M. A. (1985). Compliance-gaining in marital interaction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11, 419–433.Google Scholar
Dillard, J. P., Solomon, D. H., & Palmer, M. T. (1999). Structuring the concept of relational communication. Communication Monographs, 66, 49–65.Google Scholar
Dillard, J. P., Solomon, D. H., & Samp, J. A. (1996). Framing social reality: The relevance of relational judgments. Communication Research, 23, 703–723.Google Scholar
Donovan, W. D., Leavitt, L. A., & Walsh, R. O. (2000). Maternal illusory control predicts socialization strategies and toddler compliance. Developmental Psychology, 36, 402–411.Google Scholar
Dutton, D. G., & Strachan, C. E. (1987). Motivational needs for power and dominance as differentiating variables of assaultive and non-assaultive male populations. Violence and Victims, 2, 145–156.Google Scholar
Eldridge, K. A., & Christensen, A. (2002). Demand–withdraw communication during couple conflict: A review and analysis. In Noller, P. & Feeney, J. A. (Eds.), Understanding marriage: Developments in the study of couple interaction (pp. 289–322). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Falbo, T., & Peplau, L. A. (1980). Power strategies in intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 618–628.Google Scholar
Flurry, L. A., & Burns, A. C. (2005). Children's influence in purchase decisions: A social power theory approach. Journal of Business Research, 58, 593–601.Google Scholar
Fodor, E., Wick, D., & Conroy, N. E. (2012). Power motivation as an influence on reaction to a potential dating partner. Motivation and Emotion, 36, 301–310.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, D. J., Lindholm, K. A., & Bute, J. J. (2006). Dilemmas of talking about lifestyle changes among couples coping with a cardiac event. Social Science and Medicine, 63, 2079–2090.Google Scholar
Gordon, A. M., & Chen, S. (2013). Does power help or hurt?: The moderating role of self-other focus on power and perspective-taking in romantic relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 1097–1110.Google Scholar
Gottman, J. M., Markman, H. J., & Notarius, C. (1977). The topography of marital conflict: A study of verbal and nonverbal behavior. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 39, 461–477.Google Scholar
Guinote, A. (2017). How power affects people: Activating, wanting and goal seeking. Annual Review of Psychology, 68, 353–381.Google Scholar
Haleta, L. L. (1996). Student perceptions of teachers’ use of language: The effects of powerful and powerless language on impression formation and uncertainty. Communication Education, 45, 16–28.Google Scholar
Hall, J. A., Coats, E. J., & LeBau, L. S. (2005). Nonverbal behavior and the vertical dimension of social relations: A meta analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 898–924.Google Scholar
Hammond, M., Clapp-Smith, R., & Palanski, M. (2017). Beyond (just) the workplace: A theory of leader development across multiple domains. Academy of Management Review, 42, 481–498.Google Scholar
Hofer, J., Busch, H., Bond, M. H., Campos, D., Li, M., & Law, R. (2010). The implicit power motive and sociosexuality in men and women: Pancultural effects of responsibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 380–394.Google Scholar
Hosman, L. A. (1989). The evaluative consequences of hedges, hesitations, and intensifiers: Powerful and powerless speech styles. Human Communication Research, 15, 383–406.Google Scholar
Hosman, L. A., & Siltanen, S. A. (1994). The attributional and evaluative consequences of powerful and powerless speech styles: An examination of the ‘control over others’ and ‘control of self’ explanations. Language & Communication, 14, 287–298.Google Scholar
Hosman, J. A., & Siltanen, S. A. (2006). Powerful and powerless language forms: Their consequences for impression formation, attributions of control of self and control of others, cognitive responses, and message memory. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 25, 33–46.Google Scholar
Howard, J. A., Blumstein, P., & Schwartz, P. (1986). Sex, power, and influence tactics in intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 102–109.Google Scholar
Inesi, M. E., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Galinsky, A. (2012). How power corrupts relationships: Cynical attributions for others’ generous acts. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 795–803.Google Scholar
Job, V., Bernecker, K., & Dweck, C. S. (2012). Are implicit motives the need to feel certain affect? Motive–affect congruence predicts relationship satisfaction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 1552–1565.Google Scholar
Johnson, D. I. (2016). Obstacle hypothesis. In Berger, C. R. & Roloff, M. E. (Eds.) and Wilson, S. R., Dillard, J. P., Caughlin, J., & Solomon, D. H. (Associate Eds.). International encyclopedia of interpersonal communication (pp. 1181–1188). Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Johnson, K. L., & Roloff, M. E. (1988). Serial arguing and relational quality: Determinants and consequences of perceived resolvability. Communication Research, 25, 327–343.Google Scholar
Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Anderson, C. (2003). Power, approach, and inhibition. Psychological Review, 110, 265–284.Google Scholar
Knobloch-Fedders, L. M., Critchfield, K. L., Boisson, T., Woods, N., Bitman, R., & Durbin, D. C. (2014). Depression, relationship quality, and couples’ demand/withdraw and demand/submit sequential interactions. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 61, 264–279.Google Scholar
Kochanska, G., & Aksan, N. (1995). Mother-child mutually positive affect, quality of child compliance to requests and prohibitions, and maternal control as correlates of early internalization. Child Development, 66, 236–254.Google Scholar
Kochanska, G., Aksan, N., & Koenig, A. (1995). A longitudinal study of the roots of preschoolers’ conscience: Committed compliance and emerging internalization. Child Development, 66, 1752–1769.Google Scholar
Köllner, M. G., & Schultheiss, O. C. (2014). Meta-analytic evidence of low convergence between implicit and explicit measures of the needs for achievement, affiliation, and power. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 826.Google Scholar
Lammers, J., Dubois, D., Rucker, D. D., & Galinksy, A. D. (2013). Power gets the job: Priming power improves interview outcomes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 776–779.Google Scholar
Leaper, C., & Rodnett, R. D. (2011). Women are more likely than men to use tentative language, aren't they? A meta-analysis testing for gender differences and moderators. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35, 129–141.Google Scholar
Magee, J. C., & Smith, P. K. (2013). The social distance theory of power. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17, 158–186.Google Scholar
Makoul, G., & Roloff, M. E. (1998). The role of efficacy and outcome expectations in the decision to withhold relational complaints. Communication Research, 25, 255–229.Google Scholar
Mason, A., & Blankenship, V. (1987). Power and affiliation motivation, stress, and abuse in intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 203–210.Google Scholar
McClelland, D. C. (1970). The two faces of power. Journal of International Affairs, 24, 29–47.Google Scholar
McClelland, D. C., Floor, E., Davidson, R. J., & Saron, C. (1980). Stressed power motivation, sympathetic activation, immune function, and illness. Journal of Human Stress, 6, 11–19.Google Scholar
McClelland, D. C., Koestner, R., & Weinberger, J. (1989). How do self-attributed and implicit motives differ? Psychological Review, 96, 690–702.Google Scholar
McGinn, M. M., McFarland, P. T., & Christensen, A. (2009). Antecedents and consequences of demand/withdraw. Journal of Family Psychology, 23, 749–757.Google Scholar
McLaren, R. M., Dillard, J. P., Tusing, K. J., & Solomon, D. H. (2014). Relational framing theory: Utterance form and relational context as antecedents of frame salience. Communication Quarterly, 62, 518–535.Google Scholar
Raffaelli, M. (1992). Sibling conflict in early adolescence. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 652–663.Google Scholar
Righetti, F., Luchies, L. B., van Gils, S., Slotter, E. B., Witcher, B., & Kumashiro, M. (2015). The prosocial versus proself power holder: How power influences sacrifice in romantic relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41, 779–790.Google Scholar
Roloff, M. E., & Cloven, D. H. (1990). The chilling effect in interpersonal relationships: The reluctance to speak one's mind. In Cahn, D. D. (Ed.), Intimates in conflict: A communication perspective (pp. 49–76). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Roloff, M. E., & Liu, E. (2016). Conflict avoidance. In Berger, C. R. & Roloff, M. E. (Eds.) and Wilson, S. R., Dillard, J. P., Caughlin, J., & Solomon, D. H. (Associate Eds.). International encyclopedia of interpersonal communication (pp. 401–409). Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ross, H., Ross, M., Stein, N., & Trabasso, T. (2006). How siblings resolve their conflicts: The importance of first offers, planning, and limited opposition. Child Development, 77, 1730–1745.Google Scholar
Scholl, A., Ellemers, N., Sassenberg, K., & Scheepers, D. (2015). Understanding power in social context: How power relates to language and communication in line with responsibilities or opportunities. In Schulze, R. & Pishwa, H. (Eds.), The exercise of power in communication: Devices, reception and reaction (pp. 312–334). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Schultheiss, O. C., & Hale, J. A. (2007). Implicit motives modulate attentional orienting to perceived facial expressions of emotion. Motivation and Emotion, 31, 13–24.Google Scholar
Scudder, J. N., & Andrews, P. H. (1995). A comparison of two alternative models of powerful speech: The impact of power and gender upon the use of threats. Communication Research Reports, 12, 25–33.Google Scholar
Sears, M. S., Repetti, R. L., Reynolds, B. M., & Robles, T. F. (2016). I just want to be left alone: Marital anger and withdrawal in response to overload. Journal of Family Psychology, 30, 569–579.Google Scholar
See, K. E., Morrison, E. W., Rothman, N. B., & Soll, J. B. (2011). The detrimental effects of power on confidence, advice taking, and accuracy. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 116, 272–285.Google Scholar
Smith, P. K., Dijksterhuis, A., & Wigboldus, D. H. J. (2008). Powerful people make good decisions even when they consciously think. Psychological Science, 19, 1258–1259.Google Scholar
Smith, P. K., & Hofmann, W. (2016). Power in everyday life. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113, 100043–100048.Google Scholar
Smith, P. K., Jostmann, N. B., Galinsky, A. D., & van Dijk, W. (2008). Lacking power impairs executive functions. Psychological Science, 19, 441–447.Google Scholar
Smith, P. K., & Trope, Y. (2006). You focus on the forest when you're in charge of the trees: Power priming and abstract information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 578–596.Google Scholar
Solomon, D. H., Knobloch, L. K., & Fitzpatrick, M. A. (2004). Relational power, marital schema, and decisions to withhold complaints: An investigation of the chilling effect on confrontation in marriage. Communication Studies, 55, 146–167.Google Scholar
Solomon, D. H., Knobloch, L. K., Theiss, J. A., & McLaren, R. M. (2016). Relational turbulence theory: Explaining variation in subjective experiences and communication within romantic relationships. Human Communication Research, 42, 507–532.Google Scholar
Solomon, D. H., & Roloff, M. E. (2018). Relationship initiation and growth. In Vangelisti, A. and Perlman, D. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of personal relationships (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Solomon, D. H., & Samp, J. A. (1998). Power and problem appraisal: Perceptual foundations of the chilling effect in dating relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15, 191–209.Google Scholar
Sprecher, S. (2011). The influence of social networks on romantic relationships: Through the lens of the social network. Personal Relationships, 18, 630–644.Google Scholar
Stanton, S. J., & Edelstein, R. S. (2009). The physiology of women's power motive: Implicit power motivation is positively associated with estradiol levels in women. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 1109–1113.Google Scholar
Stanton, S. J., & Schultheiss, O. C. (2009). The hormonal correlates of implicit power motivation. Journal of Research in Personality 43, 942–949.Google Scholar
Stewart, A. J., & Rubin, Z. (1974). The power motive in the dating couple. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 305–309.Google Scholar
Van Kleef, G. A., Oveis, C., Van der Lowe, I., LuoKogan, A., Goetz, J., & Keltner, D. (2008). Power, distress, and compassion: Turning a blind eye to the suffering of others. Psychological Science, 19, 1315–1322.Google Scholar
Vuchinich, D. (1987). Starting and stopping spontaneous family conflict. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 49, 591–601.Google Scholar
Warfel, K. A. (1984). Gender schemas and perceptions of speech style. Communication Monographs, 51, 253–267.Google Scholar
Weigel, D. J., Bennett, K. K., & Ballard-Reisch, D. S. (2006). Roles and influence in marriages: Both spouses’ perceptions contribute to marital commitment. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 35, 74–92.Google Scholar
Winter, D. G., & Barenbaum, N. B. (1985). Responsibility and the power motive in women and men. Journal of Personality 53, 335–355.Google Scholar
References
Acheson, K. (2007). Silence in dispute. In Beck, C. (Ed.), Communication yearbook (Vol. 31, pp. 1–58). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Acheson, K. (2008). Silence as gesture: Rethinking the nature of communicative silences. Communication Theory, 18, 535–555.Google Scholar
Andersen, J. F., Andersen, P. A., & Lustig, M. W. (1987). Opposite sex touch avoidance: A national replication and extension. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 11, 89–109.Google Scholar
Aranguren, M., & Tonnelat, S. (2014). Emotional transactions in the Paris subway: Combining naturalistic videotaping, objective facial coding and sequential analysis in the study of nonverbal emotional behavior. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 38, 495–521.Google Scholar
Bailey, A., & Kelly, S. (2015). Picture power: Gender versus body language in perceived status. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 39, 317–337.Google Scholar
Bashir, N. Y., & Rule, N. O. (2014). Shopping under the influence: Nonverbal appearance-based communicator cues affect consumer judgments. Psychology and Marketing, 31, 539–548.Google Scholar
Berger, C. R. (1994). Power, dominance, and social interaction. In Knapp, M. L. & Miller, G. R. (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (2nd ed., pp. 450–507). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
Berger, J., Wagner, D. G., & Zelditch, M. Jr. (1985). Introduction: Expectation states theory. In Berger, J. & Zelditch, M., Jr. (Eds.), Status, rewards, and influence (pp. 1–72). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Berry, D. S. (1992). Vocal types and stereotypes: Joint effects of vocal attractiveness and vocal maturity on person perception. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 16, 41–54.Google Scholar
Bodie, G. D., & Villaume, W. A. (2008). Men and women holding hands revisited: Effects of mutual engagement and hand dominance on attributions of cross-sex handholding. Communication Research Reports, 25, 243–254.Google Scholar
Buller, D. B. (1987). Communication apprehension and reactions to proxemic violations. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 11, 13–25.Google Scholar
Buller, D. B., LePoire, B. A., Aune, R. K., & Eloy, S. V. (1992). Social perceptions as mediators of the effect of speech rate similarity on compliance. Human Communication Research, 19, 286–311.Google Scholar
Burgoon, J. K., Buller, D. B., Hale, J. L., & deTurck, M. A. (1984). Relational messages associated with nonverbal behaviors. Human Communication Research, 10, 351–378.Google Scholar
Burgoon, J. K., & Dunbar, N. E. (2006). Nonverbal expressions of dominance and power in human relationships. In Manusov, V. & Paterson, M. L. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of nonverbal communication (pp. 279–298). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
Burgoon, J. K., Guerrero, L. K., & Floyd, K. (2016). Nonverbal communication. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Burgoon, J. K., Guerrero, L. K., & Manusov, V. (2011). Nonverbal signals. In Knapp, M. L. & Daly, J. A. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of interpersonal communication (4th ed., pp. 239–282). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
Carney, D. R., Cuddy, A. J. C., & Yap, A. J. (2010). Power posing: Brief nonverbal displays affect neuroendocrine levels and risk tolerance. Psychological Science, 21, 1363–1368.Google Scholar
Carney, D. R., Hall, J. A., & LeBeau, L. S. (2005). Beliefs about the nonverbal expression of social power. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 29, 105–123.Google Scholar
Cashdan, E. (1998). Smiles, speech, and body posture: How women and men display sociometric status and power. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 22, 209–228.Google Scholar
Cekaite, A. (2016). Touch as social control: Haptic organization of attention in adult-child interactions. Journal of Pragmatics, 92, 30–42.Google Scholar
Claeys, A., & Cauberghe, V. (2014). Keeping control: The importance of nonverbal expressions of power by organizational spokespersons in times of crisis. Journal of Communication, 64, 1160–1180.Google Scholar
Craik, J. (1994). The face of fashion: Cultural studies in fashion. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cuddy, A. J. C., Wilmuth, C. A., Yap, A. J., & Carney, D. R. (2015). Preparatory power posing affects nonverbal presence and job interview performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100, 1286–1295.Google Scholar
Dabbs, J. M. (1997). Testosterone, smiling, and facial appearance. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 21, 45–55.Google Scholar
Dovidio, J. F. (1988). Power displays between women and men in discussions of gender-linked tasks: A multichannel study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 580–587.Google Scholar
Dovidio, J. F., & Ellyson, S. L. (1982). Decoding visual dominance: Attributions of power based on relative percentages of looking while speaking and looking while listening. Social Psychology Quarterly, 45, 106–113.Google Scholar
Dovidio, J. F., & Ellyson, S. L. (1985). Patterns of visual dominance behavior in humans. In Ellyson, S. L. & Dovidio, J. F. (Eds.), Power, dominance, and nonverbal communication (pp. 129–149). New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Dovidio, J. F., Ellyson, S. L., Keating, C. F., Heltman, K., & Brown, C. E. (1988). The relationship of social power to visual displays of dominance between men and women. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 233–242.Google Scholar
Dunbar, N. E. (2004). Dyadic power theory: Constructing a communication-based theory of relational power. Journal of Family Communication, 4, 235–248.Google Scholar
Dunbar, N. E. (2015). Power and dominance in nonverbal communication. In Berger, C. R. & Roloff, M. E. (Eds.), International encyclopedia of interpersonal communication (pp. 1349–1353). Chichester, UK: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Dunbar, N. E., & Burgoon, J. K. (2005a). Measuring nonverbal dominance. In Manusov, V. (Ed.), The Sourcebook of nonverbal measures: Going beyond words (pp. 361–374). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Dunbar, N. E., & Burgoon, J. K. (2005b). Perceptions of power and interactional dominance in interpersonal relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 22, 207–233.Google Scholar
Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (2008). Hand movements. In Guerrero, L. K. & Hecht, M. L. (Eds.), The nonverbal communication reader (3rd ed., pp. 105–108). Long Grove: Waveland Press.Google Scholar
Ellyson, S. L., Dovidio, J. F., Corson, R. L., & Vinicur, D. L. (1980). Visual dominance behavior in female dyads: Situational and personality factors. Social Psychology Quarterly, 43, 328–336.Google Scholar
Farley, S. (2008). Attaining status at the expense of likeability: Pilfering power through conversational interruption. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 32, 241–260.Google Scholar
Feltman, R., & Elliot, A. J. (2011). The influence of red on perceptions of relative dominance and threat in a competitive context. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 33, 308–314.Google Scholar
Fromme, D. K., Jaynes, W. E., Taylor, D. K., Hanold, E. G., Daniell, J., Rountree, J. R., & Fromme, M. L. (1989). Nonverbal behavior and attitudes toward touch. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 13, 3–14.Google Scholar
Giles, H., & Coupland, N. (1991). Language: Contexts and consequences. Pacific Grove: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1971). Reactions in public: Microstudies of the social order. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gottman, J., Levenson, R., & Woodin, E. (2001). Facial expressions during marital conflict. Journal of Family Communication, 1, 37–57.Google Scholar
Gottman, J., Markman, H., & Notarius, C. (1977). The topography of marital conflict: A sequential analysis of verbal and nonverbal behavior. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 39, 461–477.Google Scholar
Gregory, S. W., Jr., & Webster, S. (1996). A nonverbal signal in voices of interview partners effectively predicts communication accommodation and social status perceptions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1231–1240.Google Scholar
Hall, J. A. (1996). Touch, status, and gender at professional meetings. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 20, 23–44.Google Scholar
Hall, J. A., Carter, J. D., & Horgan, T. G. (2001). Status roles and recall of nonverbal cues. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 25, 79–100.Google Scholar
Hall, J. A., Coats, E. J., & LeBeau, L. S. (2005). Nonverbal behavior and the vertical dimension of social relations: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 898–924.Google Scholar
Hall, J. A., Horgan, T. G., & Carter, J. D. (2002). Assigned and felt status in relation to observer-coded and participant-reported smiling. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 26, 63–81.Google Scholar
Hertenstein, M. J., Verkamp, J. M., Kerestes, A. M., & Holmes, R. M. (2006). The communicative functions of touch in humans, nonhuman primates, and rats: A review and synthesis of the empirical research. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 132, 5–94.Google Scholar
Henley, N. M., & LaFrance, M. (1984). Gender as culture: Difference and dominance in nonverbal behavior. In Wolfgang, A. (Ed.), Nonverbal behavior: Perspectives, applications, intercultural insights (pp. 351–371). Lewiston: Hogrefe & Huber Publishers.Google Scholar
Hughes, S., Mogilski, J., & Harrison, M. (2014). The perception and parameters of intentional voice manipulation. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 38, 107–127.Google Scholar
Hughes, S., Pastizzo, M., & Gallup, G. (2008). The sound of symmetry revisited: Subjective and objective analyses of voice. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 32, 93–108.Google Scholar
Jones, B. C., Feinberg, D. R., DeBruine, L. M., Little, A. C., & Vukovic, J. (2010). A domain-specific opposite-sex bias in human preferences for manipulated voice pitch. Animal Behaviour, 79, 57–62.Google Scholar
Knutson, B. (1996). Facial expressions of emotion influence interpersonal trait inferences. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 20, 165–182.Google Scholar
Koch, S., Baehne, C., Kruse, L., Zimmermann, F., & Zumbach, J. (2010). Visual dominance and visual egalitarianism: Individual and group-level influences of sex and status in group interactions. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 34, 137–153.Google Scholar
Kramer, R. S. (2016). The Red Power (less) Tie perceptions of political leaders wearing red. Evolutionary Psychology, 14, 1–8.Google Scholar
Krumhuber, E., Manstead, A. S. R., & Kappas, A. (2007). Temporal aspects of facial displays in person and expression perception: The effects of smile dynamics, head-tilt, and gender. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 31, 39–56.Google Scholar
Latta, R. M. (1978). Relation of status incongruence to personal space. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4, 143–146.Google Scholar
Lochman, J. E., & Allen, G. (1981). Nonverbal communication of couples in conflict. Journal of Research in Personality, 15, 253–269.Google Scholar
Manusov, V., & Keeley, M. P. (2015). When family talk is difficult: Making sense of nonverbal communication at the end-of-life. Journal of Family Communication, 15, 387–409.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, D., & Kudoh, T. (1987). Cultural similarities and differences in the semantic dimensions of body postures. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 11, 166–179.Google Scholar
Mazur, A., Rosa, E., Faupel, M., Heller, J., Leen, R., & Thurman, B. (1980). Physiological aspects of communication via mutual gaze. American Journal of Sociology, 86, 50–74.Google Scholar
Mignault, A., & Chaudhuri, A. (2003). The many faces of a neutral face: Head tilt and perception of dominance and emotion. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 27, 111–132.Google Scholar
Mikkonen, I., Vicdan, H., & Markkula, A. (2014). What not to wear? Oppositional ideology, fashion, and governmentality in wardrobe self-help. Consumption Markets and Culture, 17, 254–273.Google Scholar
Miller-Ott, A. E., & Kelly, L. (2016). Competing discourses and meaning making in talk about romantic partners’ cell-phone contact with non-present others. Communication Studies, 67, 58–76.Google Scholar
Neff, K. D., & Harter, S. (2002). The role of power and authenticity in relationship styles emphasizing autonomy, connectedness, or mutuality among couples. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 19, 835–857.Google Scholar
Owyong, Y. S. M. (2009). Clothing semiotics and the social construction of power relations. Social Semiotics, 19, 191–211.Google Scholar
Patterson, M. L. (1983). Nonverbal behavior: A functional perspective. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Peck, J., & Wiggins, J. (2006). It just feels good: Customers’ affective response to touch and its influence on persuasion. Journal of Marketing, 70, 56–69.Google Scholar
Peck, J., & Wiggins Johnson, J. (2011). Autotelic need for touch, haptics, and persuasion: The role of involvement. Psychology and Marketing, 28, 222–239.Google Scholar
Philips, S. U. (1983). The invisible culture: Communication in classroom and community on the Warm Springs Indian Reservation. New York, NY: Longman.Google Scholar
Puccinelli, N. M., Tickle-Degnen, L., & Rosenthal, R. (2003). Effect of dyadic context on judgments of rapport: Dyadic task and partner presence. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 27, 211–236.Google Scholar
Puts, D. A., Hodges, C. R., Cárdenas, R. A., & Gaulin, S. J. C. (2007). Men's voices as dominance signals: Vocal fundamental and format frequencies influence dominance attributions among men. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28, 340–344.Google Scholar
Quadflieg, S., Vermeulen, N., & Rossion, B. (2013). Differential reliance on the Duchenne marker during smile evaluations and person judgments. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 37, 69–77.Google Scholar
Ranehill, E., Dreber, A., Johannesson, M., Leiberg, S., Sul, S., & Weber, R. A. (2015). Assessing the robustness of power posing: No effect on hormones and risk tolerance in a large sample of men and women. Psychological Science, 26, 653–656.Google Scholar
Remland, M. (1981). Developing leadership skills in nonverbal communication: A situational perspective. International Journal of Business Communication, 18, 17–29.Google Scholar
Rezlescu, C., Penton, T., Walsh, V., Tsujimura, H., Scott, S. K., & Banissy, M. J. (2015). Dominant voices and attractive faces: The contribution of visual and auditory information to integrated person impressions. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 39, 355–370.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. D. (1998). Getting down to business: Talk, gaze, and body orientation during openings of doctor-patient consultations. Human Communication Research, 25, 97–123.Google Scholar
Samp, J., & Palevitz, C. (2014). Managing relational transgressions as revealed on Facebook: The influence of dependence power on verbal versus nonverbal responses. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 38, 477–493.Google Scholar
Schmidt, L. C., & Frieze, I. H. (1997). A meditational model of power, affiliation and achievement motives and product involvement. Journal of Business and Psychology, 11, 425–446.Google Scholar
Segrin, C. (1993). The effects of nonverbal behavior on outcomes of compliance gaining attempts. Communication Studies, 44, 169–187.Google Scholar
Sparko, A., & Zebrowitz, L. (2011). Moderating effects of facial expression and movement on the babyface stereotype. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 35, 243–257.Google Scholar
Street, R. L. Jr., & Buller, D. B. (1987). Nonverbal response patterns in physician-patient interactions: Functional analysis. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 11, 234–252.Google Scholar
Stephen, I. D., Oldham, F. H., Perrett, D. I., & Barton, R. A. (2012). Redness enhances perceived aggression, dominance and attractiveness in men's faces. Evolutionary Psychology, 10, 562–572.Google Scholar
Tang, D., & Schmeichel, B. (2015). Look me in the eye: Manipulated eye gaze affects dominance mindsets. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 39, 181–194.Google Scholar
Tigue, C. C., Borak, D. J., O'Connor, J. J. M., Schandl, C., & Feinberg, D. R. (2012). Voice pitch influences voting behavior. Evolution and Human Behavior, 33, 210–216.Google Scholar
Walther, J. B., & Tidwell, L. C. (1995). Nonverbal cues in computer-mediated communication, and the effect of chronemics on relational communication. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 5, 355–378.Google Scholar
Wohlwend, K. E., & Medina, C. L. (2012). Media as nexus of practice: Remaking identities in What Not to Wear. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 33, 545–560.Google Scholar
Zebrowitz, L., & Lee, S. Y. (1999). Appearance, stereotype-incongruent behavior, and social relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 570–585.Google Scholar
Zebrowitz, L. A., & Brownlow, S., & Olson, K. (1992). Baby talk to the babyfaced. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 16, 143–148.Google Scholar