Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T12:19:33.325Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part IV - Skeptical Voices

Null Results, Unintended Consequences

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2020

Judith G. Kelley
Affiliation:
Duke University, North Carolina
Beth A. Simmons
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Alesina, Alberto, and Dollar, David. 2000. Who Gives Foreign Aid to Whom and Why? Journal of Economic Growth 5 (1):33–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alesina, Alberto, and Weder, Beatrice. 2002. Do Corrupt Governments Receive Less Foreign Aid? American Economic Review 92 (4):1126–37.Google Scholar
Baccini, Leonardo, and Urpelainen, Johannes. 2012. Strategic Side Payments: Preferential Trading Agreements, Economic Reform, and Foreign Aid. The Journal of Politics 74 (4):932–49.Google Scholar
Bermeo, Sarah Blodgett. 2017. Aid Allocation and Targeted Development in an Increasingly Connected World. International Organization 71 (4):735–66.Google Scholar
Bermeo, Sarah Blodgett. 2018. Targeted Development: Industrialized Country Strategy in a Globalizing World. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bermeo, Sarah Blodgett, and Leblang, David. 2015. Migration and Foreign Aid. International Organization 69 (3):627–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berthélemy, Jean-Claude. 2006. Bilateral Donors Interest vs. Recipients Development Motives in Aid Allocation: Do All Donors Behave the Same? Review of Development Economics 10 (2):179–94.Google Scholar
Bisbee, James H., Hollyer, James R., Rosendorff, B. Peter, and Vreeland, James Raymond. this volume. The Millennium Development Goals and Education: Accountability and Substitution in Global Indicators. In The Power of Global Performance Indicators, edited by Kelley, Judith and Simmons, Beth A. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Boutton, Andrew, and Carter, David B.. 2014. Fair-Weather Allies? Terrorism and the Allocation of US Foreign Aid. Journal of Conflict Resolution 58 (7):1144–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broome, André, and Quirk, Joel. 2015. Governing the World at a Distance: The Practice of Global Benchmarking. Review of International Studies 41 (5):819–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broome, André, Homolar, Alexandra, and Kranke, Matthias. 2018. Bad Science: International Organizations and the Indirect Power of Global Benchmarking. European Journal of International Relations 24 (3): 514–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bukovansky, Mlada. 2002. Corruption Is Bad: Normative Dimensions of the Anti-Corruption Movement. Working Paper no. 2002/5, Australian National University. https://openresearch-repository.anu.edu.au/bitstream/1885/40136/3/02-5.pdf.Google Scholar
Bukovansky, Mlada. 2015. Corruption Rankings: Constructing and Contesting the Global Anti-Corruption Agenda. In Ranking the World: Grading States as a Tool of Global Governance, edited by Cooley, Alexander and Snyder, Jack, 60–84. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bush, Sarah Sunn. 2017. The Politics of Rating Freedom: Ideological Affinity, Private Authority, and the Freedom in the World Ratings. Perspectives on Politics 15 (3):711–31.Google Scholar
Büthe, Tim. 2012. Beyond Supply and Demand: A Political-Economic Conceptual Model. In Governance by Indicators: Global Power Through Quantification and Rankings, edited by Davis, Kevin, Fisher, Angelina, Kingsbury, Benedict, and Merry, Sally Engle, 29–51. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Callen, Michael, Gulzar, Saad, Hasanain, Ali, and Khan, Yasir. 2016. The Political Economy of Public Sector Absence: Experimental Evidence from Pakistan. NBER Working Paper. http://www.nber.org/papers/w22340.pdf.Google Scholar
Charron, Nicholas. 2011. Exploring the Impact of Foreign Aid on Corruption: Has the “Anti-Corruption Movement” Been Effective? The Developing Economies 49 (1):66–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cingranelli, David L., and Pasquarello, Thomas E.. 1985. Human Rights Practices and the Distribution of U.S. Foreign Aid to Latin American Countries. American Journal of Political Science 29 (3):539–63.Google Scholar
Claessens, Stijn, Cassimon, Danny, and Van Campenhout, Bjorn. 2009. Evidence on Changes in Aid Allocation Criteria. World Bank Economic Review 23 (2):185–208.Google Scholar
Clist, Paul. 2011. 25 Years of Aid Allocation Practice: Whither Selectivity? World Development 39 (10):1724–34.Google Scholar
Cooley, Alexander, and Snyder, Jack. 2015. Conclusion - Rating the Ratings Craze: From ConsumerChoice to Public Policy Outcomes. In Ranking the World: Grading States as a Tool of Global Governance, edited by Cooley, Alexander and Snyder, Jack, 178–93. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Davis, Kevin E., Fisher, Angelina, Kingsbury, Benedict, and Merry, Sally Engle, eds. 2012. Governance by Indicators: Global Power Through Quanatification and Rankings. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Kevin E., Kingsbury, Benedict, and Merry, Sally Engle. 2012. Indicators as a Technology of Global Governance. Law & Society Review 46 (1):71–104.Google Scholar
DeMeritt, Jacqueline H.R. 2012. International Organizations and Government Killing: Does Naming and Shaming Save Lives? International Interactions 38 (5):597–621.Google Scholar
Dietrich, Simone. 2013. Bypass or Engage? Explaining Donor Delivery Tactics in Foreign Aid Allocation. International Studies Quarterly 57 (4):698–712.Google Scholar
Dietrich, Simone. 2016. Donor Political Economies and the Pursuit of Aid Effectiveness. International Organization 70 (1):65–102.Google Scholar
Dunning, Thad. 2004. Conditioning the Effects of Aid: Cold War Politics, Donor Credibility, and Democracy in Africa. International Organization 58 (2):409–23.Google Scholar
Espeland, Wendy Nelson, and Sauder, Michael. 2012. The Dynamism of Indicators. In Governance by Indicators: Global Power through Qunatification and Rankings, edited by Davis, Kevin, Fisher, Angelina, Kingsbury, Benedict, and Merry, Sally Engle, 86–109. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fariss, Christopher J. 2010. The Strategic Substitution of United States Foreign Aid. Foreign Policy Analysis 6 (2):107–31.Google Scholar
Fearon, James D. 2011. Self-Enforcing Democracy. Quarterly Journal of Economics 126 (4):1661–708.Google Scholar
Fisher, Angelina. 2012. From Diagnosing Under-immunization to Evaluating Health Care Systems: Immunization Coverage Indicators as a Technology of Global Governance. In Governance by Indicators: Global Power through Quantification and Rankings, edited by Davis, Kevin, Fisher, Angelina, Kingsbury, Benedict, and Merry, Sally Engle, 217–46. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fleck, Robert K., and Kilby, Christopher. 2010. Changing Aid Regimes? US Foreign Aid from the Cold War to the War on Terror. Journal of Development Economics 91 (2):185–97.Google Scholar
Fukuda-Parr, Sakiko. 2014. Global Goals as a Policy Tool: Intended and Unintended Consequences. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities 15 (2–3):118–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldsmith, Arthur A. 2001. Foreign Aid and Statehood in Africa. International Organization 55 (1):123–48.Google Scholar
Hafner-Burton, Emilie M. 2008. Sticks and Stones: Naming and Shaming the Human Rights Enforcement Problem. International Organization 62:689–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, Hans Krause, and Porter, Tony. 2012. What Do Numbers Do in Transnational Governance? International Political Sociology 6 (4):409–26.Google Scholar
Hendrix, Cullen S., and Wong, Wendy H.. 2013. When Is the Pen Truly Mighty? Regime Type and the Efficacy of Naming and Shaming in Curbing Human Rights Abuses. British Journal of Political Science 43 (3):651–72.Google Scholar
Hjertholm, Peter, and White, Howard. 2000. Survey of Foreign Aid: History, Trends, and Allocation. Working Paper, University of Copenhagen and University of Sussex. http://www.economics.ku.dk/research/publications/wp/2000/0004.pdf.Google Scholar
Holley, Peter. 2015. Afghan President Calls for a “Holy War” Against His Country’s Greatest Enemy- Corruption. The Washington Post, September 1.Google Scholar
Honig, Dan, and Weaver, Catherine. this volume. A Race to the Top?: The Aid Transparency Index and the Normative Power of Global Performance Indicators. Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association.Google Scholar
Hough, Dan. 2017. Analyzing Corruption. Newcastle upon Tyne: Agenda.Google Scholar
Huth, Paul K., Croco, Sarah E., and Appel, Benjamin J.. 2011. Does International Law Promote the Peaceful Settlement of International Disputes? Evidence from the Study of Territorial Conflicts since 1945. American Political Science Review 105 (2):415–36.Google Scholar
International Monetary Fund. 2017. The Role of the Fund in Governance Issues - Review of the Guidance Note - Preliminary Considerations. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar
Jensen, Nathan M., and Malesky, Edmund J.. 2018. Nonstate Actors and Compliance with International Agreements: An Empirical Analysis of the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention. International Organization 72 (1):33–69.Google Scholar
Jolly, David. 2011. New Zealand Has World’s Cleanest Government, Survey Finds. New York Times, November 30.Google Scholar
Keck, Margaret E., and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1998. Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kelley, Judith G. 2017. Scorecard Diplomacy: Grading States to Influence their Reputation and Behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kelley, Judith G., and Simmons, Beth A.. 2015. Politics by Number: Indicators as Social Pressure in International Relations. American Journal of Political Science 59 (1):55–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelley, Judith G., and Simmons, Beth A.. this volume. Introduction: The Power of Global Performance Indicators. Chapter 1 in The Power of Global Performance Indicators.Google Scholar
Kijima, Rie and Lipscy, Phillip Y.. this volume. International Assessments and Education Policy: Evidence from an Elite Survey.Google Scholar
Koliev, Faraj, Sommerer, Thomas, and Tallberg, Jonas. this volume. Reporting Matters: Performance Assessment and Compliance in the ILO. The Power of Global Performance Indicators. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Krain, Matthew. 2012. J’accuse! Does Naming and Shaming Perpetrators Reduce the Severity of Genocides or Politicides? International Studies Quarterly 56 (3):574–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramer, Andrew E. 2016. Railing Against Graft, a Georgian Leads Call for a Cleanup in Ukraine. New York Times, February 3.Google Scholar
Lebovic, James H., and Voeten, Erik. 2006. The Politics of Shame: The Condemnation of Country Human Rights Practices in the UNCHR. International Studies Quarterly 50 (4):861–88.Google Scholar
Lynn, Michael, Flynn, Sean Masaki, and Helion, Chelsea. 2013. Do Consumers Prefer Round Prices? Evidence from Pay-What-You-Want Decisions and Self-Pumped Gasoline Purchases. Journal of Economic Psychology 35:96–102.Google Scholar
Masaki, Takaaki, and Parks, Bradley C.. 2019. When Do Performance Assessments Influence Policy Behavior? Micro-evidence from the 2014 Reform Efforts Survey. The Review of International Organizations. [forthcoming]Google Scholar
Meernik, James, Krueger, Eric L., and Poe, Steven C.. 1998. Testing Models of US Foreign Policy: Foreign Aid During and After the Cold War. The Journal of Politics 60 (1):63–85.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle, Davis, Kevin, and Kingsbury, Benedict, eds. 2015. The Quiet Power of Indicators: Measuring Governance, Corruption, and the Rule of Law. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Morse, Julia C. this volume. Blacklists, Market Enforcement, and the Global Regime to Combat Terrorist Financing. Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association.Google Scholar
Neumayer, Eric. 2003. The Determinants of Aid Allocation by Regional Multilateral Development Nanks and United Nations Agencies. International Studies Quarterly 47 (1):101–22.Google Scholar
Nielsen, Richard A., and Simmons, Beth A.. 2015. Rewards for Ratification: Payoffs for Participating in the International Human Rights Regime? International Studies Quarterly 59:197–208.Google Scholar
Nienaber, Michael. 2014. The Most and Least Corrupt Countries in the World. Reuters, December 2.Google Scholar
Pope, Devin, and Simonsohn, Uri. 2011. Round Numbers as Goals: Evidence From Baseball, SAT Takers, and the Lab. Psychological Science 22:71–9.Google Scholar
Pratto, Felicia, and John, Oliver P.. 1991. Automatic Vigilance: The Attention-Grabbing Power of Negative Social Information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 61 (3):380–91.Google Scholar
Radaelli, Claudio M. 2018. Regulatory Indicators in the European Union and the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development: Performance Assessment, Organizational Processes, and Learning. Public Policy and Administration. [forthcoming, online first]Google Scholar
Roberts, Jordan, and Fernando Tellez, Roberts. this volume. Freedom House’s Scarlet Letter: Assessment Power through Transnational Pressure.Google Scholar
Rosch, Eleanor. 1975. Cognitive Reference Points. Cognitive Psychology 7:532–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rottenburg, Richard, Merry, Sally Engle, Park, Sung-Joon, and Mugler, Johanna, eds. 2015. The World of Indicators: The Making of Governmental Knowledge through Quantification. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandholtz, Wayne, and Gray, Mark M.. 2003. International Integration and National Corruption. International Organization 57 (4):761–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schelling, Thomas C. 1960. The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Schlenker, Wolfram, and Scorse, Jason. 2017. Does Being a “Top 10” Worst Polluter Affect Environmental Releases? Evidence from the U.S. Toxic Release Inventory. Working Paper, Columbia University, NBER, and Monterey Institute of International Studies. https://cenrep.ncsu.edu/cenrep/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/SchlenkerScorse.pdf.Google Scholar
Schueth, Sam. 2015. Winning the Ranking Game: The Republic of Georgia, USAID, and the Doing Business Project. In Ranking the World: Grading States as a Tool of Global Governance, edited by Cooley, Alexander and Snyder, Jack, 151–77. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sending, Ole Jacob, and Sande Lie, Jon Harald. 2015. The Limits of Global Authority: World Bank Benchmarks in Ethiopia and Malawi. Review of International Studies 41 (5):993–1010.Google Scholar
Sharman, Jason C. 2009. The Bark Is the Bite: International Organizations and Blacklisting. Review of International Political Economy 16 (4):573–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shore, Cris, and Wright, Susan. 2015. Governing by Numbers: Audit Culture, Rankings and the New World Order. Social Anthropology 23 (1):22–8.Google Scholar
Sinclair, Timothy. 2005. The New Masters of Capital: American Bond Rating Agencies and the Politics of Creditworthiness. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Sonnemans, Joep. 2006. Price Clustering and Natural Resistance Points in the Dutch Stock Market: A Natural Experiment. European Economic Review 50:1937–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sundstrom, Lisa McIntosh, and Henry, Laura A.. 2017. Private Forest Governance, Public Policy Impacts: The Forest Stewardship Council in Russia and Brazil. Forests 8 (11):445.Google Scholar
The Associated Press. 2014. China, Turkey, Angola Slip in Global Graft Index. The Associated Press, December 3.Google Scholar
The Economist. 2014. Transparency International: A More Combative Approach? The Economist, October 16.Google Scholar
Tierney, Michael J., Nielson, Daniel L., Hawkins, Darren G., Roberts, J. Timmons, Findley, Michael G., Powers, Ryan M., Parks, Bradley, Wilson, Sven E., and Hicks, Robert L.. 2011. More Dollars than Sense: Refining Our Knowledge of Development Finance Using AidData. World Development 39 (11):1891–906.Google Scholar
Transparency International. 2016. Research - CPI - Overview. http://www.transparency.org/research/cpi/overview.Google Scholar
Wang, Hongying, and Rosenau, James N.. 2001. Transparency International and Corruption as an Issue of Global Governance. Global Governance 7 (25):25–49.Google Scholar
Weaver, Catherine. 2008. Hypocrisy Trap: The World Bank and the Poverty of Reform. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Winbourne, Svetlana, and Spector, Bertram I.. 2014. Analysis of USAID Anticorruption Programming Worldwide (2007–2013). Washington, DC: United States Agency for International Development and Management Systems International.Google Scholar
Winters, Matthew S. 2010. Choosing to Target: What Types of Countries Get Different Types of World Bank Projects. World Politics 62 (3):422–58.Google Scholar
Winters, Matthew S., and Martinez, Gina. 2015. The Role of Governance in Determining Foreign Aid Flow Composition. World Development 66:516–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yip, Martin. 2013. Can Hong Kong Stay Corruption-Free Under China? BBC News, July 11.Google Scholar

References

Adserà, Alícia, Boix, Carles, and Payne, Mark. 2003. Are You Being Served? Political Accountability and Quality of Government. Journal of Law, Economics & Organization 19 (2):445–90.Google Scholar
Baron, Reuben M., and Kenny, David A.. 1986. The Moderator–Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51 (6):1173.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beck, Nathaniel, and Katz, Jonathan N.. 2011. Modeling Dynamics in Time-Series-Cross-Section Political Economy Data. Annual Review of Political Science 14:331–52.Google Scholar
Berliner, Daniel. 2014. The Political Origins of Transparency. Journal of Politics 76 (2):479–91.Google Scholar
Berliner, Daniel, and Erlich, Aaron. 2015. Competing for Transparency: Political Competition and Institutional Reform in Mexican States. American Political Science Review 109 (1):110–28.Google Scholar
Besley, Timothy, and Burgess, Robin. 2002. The Political Economy of Government Responsiveness: Theory and Evidence from India. Quarterly Journal of Economics 117 (4):1415–51.Google Scholar
Bremmer, Ian. 2006. The J Curve: A New Way to Understand Why Nations Rise and Fall. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Broz, J. Lawrence. 2002. Political System Transparency and Monetary Commitment Regimes. International Organization 56 (4):861–87.Google Scholar
Brunetti, Aymo, and Weder, Beatrice. 2003. A Free Press Is Bad News for Corruption. Journal of Public Economics 87:1801–24.Google Scholar
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, Smith, Alastair, Siverson, Randolph M., and Morrow, James D.. 2003. The Logic of Political Survival. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bueno de Mesquita, Ethan. 2007. Politics and the Suboptimal Provision of Counterterror. International Organization 61:9–36.Google Scholar
Cameron, William Bruce. 1963. Informal Sociology: A Casual Introduction to Sociological Thinking, vol. 21. Random House.Google Scholar
Campbell, Donald T. 1979. Assessing the Impact of Planned Social Change. Evaluation and Program Planning 2 (1):67–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheibub, José Antonio, Gandhi, Jennifer, and Vreeland, James Raymond. 2010. Democracy and Dictatorship Revisited. Public Choice 143:67–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chong, Alberto, De La O, Ana L., Karlan, Dean, and Wantchekon, Leonard. 2010. Information Dissemination and Local Governments’ Electoral Returns: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Mexico. 106th Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Seattle, March 2010.Google Scholar
Di Tella, Rafael, and Schargrodsky, Ernesto. 2003. The Role of Wages and Auditing during a Crackdown on Corruption in the City of Buenos Aires. Journal of Law, Economics & Organization 269:269–92.Google Scholar
Djankov, Simeon, McLiesh, Caralee, Nenova, Tatiana, and Shleifer, Andrei. 2003. Who Owns the Media? Journal of Law and Economics 46 (2):341–81.Google Scholar
Edwards, Marc A., and Roy, Siddhartha. 2017. Academic Research in the 21st Century: Maintaining Scientific Integrity in a Climate of Perverse Incentives and Hypercompetition. Environmental Engineering Science 34 (1):51–61.Google Scholar
Evans, Alice. 2017. Amplifying Accountability by Benchmarking Results at District and National Levels. Development Policy Review 36 (2):221–40.Google Scholar
Ferraz, Claudio, and Finan, Frederico. 2008. Exposing Corrupt Politicians: The Effects of Brazil’s Publically Released Audits on Electoral Outcomes. Quarterly Journal of Economics 123 (2):703–45.Google Scholar
Fuller, Sarah C., and Ladd, Helen F.. 2013. School-Based Accountability and the Distribution of Teacher Quality across Grades in Elementary School. Education 8 (4):528–59.Google Scholar
Glaeser, Edward L., and Goldin, Claudia, eds. 2006. Corruption and Reform: Lessons from America’s Economic History. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, Taylor, and Lebo, Matthew J.. 2016. Error Correction Methods with Political Time Series. Political Analysis 24 (1):3–30.Google Scholar
Grief, Avner. 2006. Institutions and the Path to the Modern Economy: Lessons from Medieval Trade. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habyarimana, James, Humphreys, Macartan, Posner, Daniel N., and Weinstein, Jeremy M.. 2009. Coethnicity: Diversity and the Dilemmas of Collective Action. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Harding, Robin, and Stasavage, David. 2014. What Democracy Does (and Doesn’t Do) for Basic Services: School Fees, School Inputs, and African Elections. Journal of Politics 76 (1):229–45.Google Scholar
Heckman, James J., Stixrud, Jora, and Urzua, Sergio. 2006. The Effects of Cognitive and Noncognitive Abilities on Labor Market Outcomes and Social Behavior. Journal of Labor Economics 24 (3):411–82.Google Scholar
Heston, Alan, Summers, Robert, and Aten, Bettina. 2009. Penn World Table Version 6.3. Technical Report, Center of International Comparisons at the University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Hollyer, James R., Rosendorff, B. Peter, and Vreeland, James Raymond. 2011. Democracy and Transparency. Journal of Politics 73 (4):1–15.Google Scholar
Hollyer, James R., Rosendorff, B. Peter, and Vreeland, James Raymond. 2014. Measuring Transparency. Political Analysis 22 (4):413–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollyer, James R., Rosendorff, B. Peter, and Vreeland, James Raymond. 2015. Transparency, Protest and Autocratic Instability. American Political Science Review 109 (4):764–84.Google Scholar
Hollyer, James R., Rosendorff, B. Peter, and Vreeland, James Raymond. 2018. Information, Democracy and Autocracy: Economic Transparency and Political (In)Stability, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Holmstrom, Bengt, and Milgrom, Paul. 1991. Multitask Principal-Agent Analyses: Incentive Contracts, Asset Ownership, and Job Design. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 7:24–52.Google Scholar
Honaker, James, King, Gary, Blackwell, Matthew, et al. 2011. Amelia II: A Program for Missing Data. Journal of Statistical Software 45 (7):1–47.Google Scholar
Honig, Dan, and Weaver, Catherine. 2020. A Race to the Top? The Aid Transparency Index and the Normative Power of Global Performance Assessments. The Power of Global Performance Indicators. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hulme, David. 2009. The Millennium Development Goals (MDGs): A Short History of the World’s Biggest Promise. Brooks World Poverty Institute Working Paper 100.Google Scholar
Imai, Kosuke, Keele, Luke, and Yamamoto, Teppei. 2010. Identification, Inference and Sensitivity Analysis for Causal Mediation Effects. Statistical Science 25 (1):51–71.Google Scholar
Islam, Roumeen. 2006. Does More Transparency Go Along with Better Governance? Economics and Politics 18 (2):121–67.Google Scholar
Johns, Leslie. 2012. Courts as Coordinators: Endogenous Enforcement and Jurisdiction in International Adjudication. Journal of Conflict Resolution 56 (2):257–89.Google Scholar
Kapuściński, Ryszard. 1989. The Emperor: Downfall of an Autocrat. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Kelley, Judith G., and Simmons, Beth A.. 2015. Politics by Number: Indicators as Social Pressure in International Relations. American Journal of Political Science 59 (1):55–70.Google Scholar
Kelley, Judith G., and Simmons, Beth A.. 2020. Global Assessment Power in the Twenty-First Century. The Power of Global Performance Indicators. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kelley, Judith G., Simmons, Beth A., and Doshi, Rush. 2020. The Power of Ranking: The Ease of Doing Business Indicator as a Form of Social Pressure. The Power of Global Performance Indicators. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kijima, Rie, and Phillip, Lipscy. 2019. The Politics of International Testing. The Power of Global Performance Indicators. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kosack, Stephen, and Fung, Archon. 2014. Does Transparency Improve Governance? Annual Review of Political Science 17:65–87.Google Scholar
Le, Ahn, and Malesky, Edmund. 2020. Do Subnational Assessments (SPAs) Lead to Improved Governance? Evidence from a Field Experiment in Vietnam. The Power of Global Performance Indicators. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lebovic, James H., and Voeten, Erik. 2009. The Cost of Shame: International Organizations and Foreign Aid in the Punishing of Human Rights Violations. Journal of Peace Research 46 (1):79–97.Google Scholar
Macartney, Hugh. 2016. The Dynamic Effects of Educational Accountability. Journal of Labor Economics 34 (1):1–28.Google Scholar
Mani, Anandi, and Mukand, Sharun. 2007. Democracy, Visibility and Public Good Provision. Journal of Development Economics 83 (2):506–29.Google Scholar
Mark, Copelovitch, Christopher, Gandrud, Mark, Hallerberg. 2018. Financial Data Transparency, International Institutions, and Sovereign Borrowing Costs, International Studies Quarterly, 62(1):Pages 23–41.Google Scholar
Milgrom, Paul R., and North, Douglass C.. 1990. The Role of Institutions in the Revival of Trade: The Law Merchant, Private Judges, and the Champaign Fairs. Economics & Politics 2 (1):1–23.Google Scholar
Morse, Julia C. 2020. Blacklists, Market Enforcement, and the Global Regime to Combat Terrorist Financing. The Power of Global Performance Indicators. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, John G., and Welch, Susan. 1980. The Effects of Charges of Corruption on Voting Behavior in Congressional Elections. American Political Science Review 74:697–708.Google Scholar
Reinikka, Ritva, and Svensson, Jakob. 2003. The Power of Information: Evidence from a Newspaper Campaign to Reduce Capture. Working Paper: Institute for International Economic Studies, Stockholm University.Google Scholar
Risse, Thomas, and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1999. The Socialization of International Human Rights Norms into Domestic Practices: Introduction. In The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change, edited by Risse, Thomas, Sikkink, Kathryn, and Ropp, Stephen C., 1–38. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Skagerlind, Helena Hede. 2020. The Power of Indicators in Global Development Policy: The Millennium Development Goals. The Power of Global Performance Indicators. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stasavage, David. 2005. Democracy and Education Spending in Africa. American Journal of Political Science 49 (2):343–58.Google Scholar

References

Annan, Kofi. 1998. The Quiet Revolution. Global Governance 4 (2):123–38.Google Scholar
Avant, Deborah D., Finnemore, Martha, and Susan, K. Sell, eds. 2010. Who Governs the Globe? Cambridge Studies in International Relations; 114. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bäckstrand, Karin. 2006. Multi-Stakeholder Partnerships for Sustainable Development: Rethinking Legitimacy, Accountability and Effectiveness. European Environment 16 (5):290–306.Google Scholar
Baldwin, David A. 2016. Power and International Relations: A Conceptual Approach. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Barnett, Michael, and Duvall, Raymond. 2005. Power in International Politics. International Organization 59 (1):39–75.Google Scholar
Börzel, Tanja, and Risse, Thomas. 2005. Public-Private Partnerships: Effective and Legitimate Tools of International Governance. In Complex Sovereignty, edited by Pauly, Lou and Grande, Edgar, 195–216. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Büthe, Tim. 2012. Beyond Supply and Demand: A Political-Economic Conceptual Model. In Governance by Indicators: Global Power Through Classification and Rankings, edited by Davis, Kevin, Fisher, Angelina, Kingsbury, Benedict and Merry, Sally Engle. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 29–51.Google Scholar
Creamer, Cosette D., and Simmons, Beth A.. 2018. The Dynamic Impact of Periodic Review on Women’s Rights. Law and Contemporary Problems 81 (4):31–72.Google Scholar
Creamer, Cosette D., and Simmons, Beth A.. forthcoming, 2020. Do Self-Reporting Regimes Matter? Evidence from the Convention Against Torture. International Studies Quarterly.Google Scholar
Davis, Kevin E., Kingsbury, Benedict, and Engle Merry, Sally. 2012. Indicators as a Technology of Global Governance. Law & Society Review 46 (1):71–104.Google Scholar
De Búrca, Gráinne, Keohane, Robert O., and Sabel, Charles. 2014. Global Experimentalist Governance. British Journal of Political Science 44 (3):477–86.Google Scholar
Grant, Ruth W., and Keohane, Robert O.. 2005. Accountability and Abuses of Power in World Politics. American Political Science Review 99 (1):29–43.Google Scholar
Hale, Thomas, and Held, David. 2011. Handbook of Transnational Governance. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Hale, Thomas, and Roger, Charles. 2014. Orchestration and Transnational Climate Governance. The Review of International Organizations 9 (1):59–82.Google Scholar
Halliday, Terence C. 2012. Legal Yardsticks: International Financial Institutions as Diagnosticians and Designers of the Laws of Nations. In Governance by Indicators: Global Power Through Quantification and Rankings, edited by Davis, Kevin E., Angelina, Fisher, Kingsbury, Benedict, and Engle Merry, Sally. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kelley, Judith. 2017. Scorecard Diplomacy: Grading States to Influence their Reputation and Behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kelley, Judith, and Simmons, Beth A.. 2015. Politics by Number: Indicators as Social Pressure in International Relations. American Journal of Political Science 59 (1):1146–61.Google Scholar
Kelley, Judith G., Simmons, Beth A, and Doshi, Rush. this volume. The Power of Ranking: The Ease of Doing Business and Global Regulatory Behavior. Chapter 2 in The Power of Global Performance Indicators.Google Scholar
Kijima, Rie and Lipscy, Phillip Y. this volume. International Assessments and Education Policy: Evidence from an Elite Survey.Google Scholar
Löwenheim, Oded. 2008. Examining the State: A Foucauldian Perspective on International “Governance Indicators”. Third World Quarterly 29 (2):255–74.Google Scholar
O’Rourke, Dara. 2006. Multi-Stakeholder Regulation: Privatizing or Socializing Global Labor Standards? World Development 34 (5):899–918.Google Scholar
Osborne, Stephen. 2002. Public-Private Partnerships: Theory and Practice in International Perspective. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schäferhoff, Marco, Campe, Sabine, and Kaan, Christopher. 2009. Transnational Public-Private Partnerships in International Relations: Making Sense of Concepts, Research Frameworks, and Results. International Studies Review 11 (3):451–74.Google Scholar
Szyszczak, Erika. 2006. Experimental Governance: The Open Method of Coordination. European Law Journal 12 (4):486–502.Google Scholar
Zürn, Michael. 2018. A Theory of Global Governance: Authority, Legitimacy, and Contestation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×