Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T13:56:13.115Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 18 - A Social Psychological Approach to Understanding China’s Democratisation

from Part III - For the People

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 February 2022

Ashley Weinberg
Affiliation:
University of Salford
Get access

Summary

As an alternative to structural and elite-centred approaches, this chapter employs a social psychological approach in examining the democratisation of China. Differing from institutional analyses in political studies, it focuses on the role of ordinary people in politics and democratisation. In addition, how ordinary Chinese people view democracy and the current regime is considered as a determining factor in democratisation and aspirations for its development. Based on accumulated empirical findings, this chapter constructs an integrated theoretical framework within which to analyse China’s democratisation. Guided by this framework, the political psychological impact of economic modernisation, the influence of political culture as well as popular perceptions of democracy are investigated in a Chinese context. The analysis indicates a possible trajectory by which democratisation could yet take place in China. Two idealised types of democratisation are also discussed.

Type
Chapter
Information
Psychology of Democracy
Of the People, By the People, For the People
, pp. 403 - 422
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Almond, G. and Verba, S. (1989). The civic culture revisited. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Almond, G. and Verba, S. (1963). The civic culture: Political attitudes and democracy in five nations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bratton, M., Mattes, R. and Gyimah-Boadi, E. (2005). Public opinion, democracy and market reform in Africa. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chen, J. (2004). Popular political support in urban China. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Chu, Y. (2013). Sources of regime legitimacy and the debate over the Chinese model. China Review, 13(1), 142.Google Scholar
Chu, Y. (2012). The Taiwan factor. Journal of Democracy, 23(1), 4256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chu, Y., Diamond, L., Nathan, A. J. and Shin, D. C. (Eds.). (2008). How East Asians view democracy. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, R. A. (1989). Democracy and its critics. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, R. A. (1971). Polyarchy: Participation and opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dalton, R. J., Shin, D. C. and Jou, W. (2007). Understanding democracy: Data from unlikely places. Journal of Democracy, 18(4), 142156.Google Scholar
Deutsch, K. W. (1963). The nerves of government. London: Free Press.Google Scholar
Diamond, L. (2008). Introduction. In Diamond, L. and Plattner, M. F. (Eds.), How people view democracy, pp. ixxxvii. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Dickson, B. (2016). The dictator’s dilemma: The Chinese Communist Party’s strategy for survival. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Guan, Y. (2018). Demand for democracy in resilient authoritarianism: Evidence from rural China. Democratization, 25(7), 10731092.Google Scholar
Hua, S. (2001). Chinese political culture 1989–2000. New York: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Huntington, S. P. (1996). The clash of civilizations and the remaking of world order. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Huntington, S. P. (1968). Political order in changing societies. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hsu, F. (1981). Americans and Chinese: Passage to differences, third edition. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Hsu, F. (1949). Under the Ancestors’ shadow: Chinese culture and personality. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Inglehart, R. (1990). Culture shift in advanced industrial society. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglehart, R. and Baker, W. E. (2000). Modernization, cultural change, and the persistence of traditional values. American Sociological Review, 65(1), 1951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglehart, R. and Welzel, C. (2010). Changing mass priorities: The link between modernization and democracy. Perspectives on Politics, 8(2), 551567.Google Scholar
Inglehart, R. and Welzel, C. (2005). Modernization, cultural change, and democracy: The human development sequence. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jamal, A. and Tessler, M. A. (2008). Attitudes in the Arab world. Journal of Democracy, 19(1), 97110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karl, T. L. (1995). The hybrid regimes of central America. Journal of Democracy, 6(3), 7286.Google Scholar
Levitsky, S. and Way, L. (2002). The rise of competitive authoritarianism. Journal of Democracy, 13(2), 5165.Google Scholar
Linz, J. and Stepan, A. (1996). Problems of democratic transition and consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and post-Communist Europe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Linz, J. and Stepan, A. (1978). The breakdown of democratic regimes. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Lipset, S. M. (1959). Some social requisites of democracy: Economic development and political legitimacy. American Political Science Review, 53(1), 69105.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, S. and Bizzarro, F. (2019). The fates of third-wave democracies. Journal of Democracy, 30(1), 99113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manion, M. (2010). A survey of survey research on Chinese politics: What have we learned? In Carlson, A., Gallagher, M. E. and Lieberthal, K. (Eds.), Contemporary Chinese politics: New sources, methods, and field strategies, pp. 181199. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Meyer, T. (2007). The theory of social democracy. Cambridge, UK: Polity.Google Scholar
Mishler, W. and Rose, R. (2005). What are the political consequences of trust? A test of cultural and institutional theories in Russia. Comparative Political Studies, 38(9), 10501078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moghaddam, F. M. (2016). The psychology of democracy. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murthy, V. (2000). The democratic potential of Confucian minben thought. Asian Philosophy, 10(1), 3347.Google Scholar
Nathan, A. (1990). China’s crisis: Dilemmas of reform and prospects for democracy. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
O’Donnell, G., Schmitter, P. and Whitehead, L. (1986). Transitions from authoritarian rule: Tentative conclusions about uncertain democracies. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Pye, L. W. (1968). The spirit of Chinese politics: A psychocultural study of the authority crisis in political development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pye, L. W. and Verba, S. (1965). Political culture and political development. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Qi, L. and Shin, D. C. (2011). How mass political attitudes affect democratization: Exploring the facilitating role critical democrats play in the process. International Political Science Review, 32(3), 245262.Google Scholar
Rohrschneider, R. (1999). Learning democracy: Democratic and economic values in unified Germany. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rueschemeyer, D., Stephens, E. H. and Stephens, J. D. (1992). Capitalist development and democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Saich, T. (2016). How China’s citizens view the quality of governance under Xi Jinping. Journal of Chinese Governance, 1(1), 120.Google Scholar
Sandholtz, W. and Gray, M. (2003). International integration and national corruption. International Organization, 57(4), 761800.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. A. (1976/1942). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Shi, T. (2014). The cultural logic of politics in mainland China and Taiwan. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shi, T. (2008). China: Democratic values supporting an authoritarian system. In Chu, Y., Diamond, L., Nathan, A. J. and Shin, D. C. (Eds.), How East Asians view democracy, pp. 209237. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Shi, T. and Lu, J. (2010). The shadow of Confucianism. Journal of Democracy, 21(4), 123130.Google Scholar
Shin, D. C. (2012). Confucianism and democratization in East Asia. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shin, D. C. and Wells, J. (2005). Is democracy the only game in town? Journal of Democracy, 16(2), 88101.Google Scholar
Stinchcombe, A. L. (1965). Social structure and organizations. In March, J. G. (Ed.), Handbook of organizations, pp. 142193. Chicago: Rand McNally and Company.Google Scholar
Tang, W. (2016). Populist authoritarianism. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tang, W. (2005). Public opinion and political change in China. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
The Asian Barometer Survey dataset. (2016). Wave 4th survey. Available at: www.asianbarometer.org/survey/wave-4th-survey.Google Scholar
van de Walle, N. (2002). Africa’s range of regimes. Journal of Democracy, 13(2), 6680.Google Scholar
Weatherly, R. (1999). The discourse of human rights in China. London: Macmillan Press.Google Scholar
Welzel, C. and Inglehart, R. (2008). The role of ordinary people in democratization. Journal of Democracy, 19(1), 126140.Google Scholar
Welzel, C., Inglehart, R. and Klingemann, H.-D. (2003). The theory of human development: A cross-cultural analysis. European Journal of Political Research, 42(2), 341380.Google Scholar
Zagrebina, A. (2019). Concepts of democracy in democratic and nondemocratic countries. International Political Science Review, doi:10.1177/0192512118820716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhai, Y. (2020). Popular perceptions of democracy in China: Characteristics and longitudinal changes. Asian Survey, 60(3), 557582.Google Scholar
Zhai, Y. (2019a). Popular conceptions of democracy and democratic satisfaction in China. International Political Science Review, 40(2), 246262.Google Scholar
Zhai, Y. (2019b). Popular democratic perception matters for political trust in authoritarian regimes. Politics, 39(4), 411429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhai, Y. (2018). Traditional values and political trust in China. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 53(3), 350365.Google Scholar
Zhai, Y. (2017a). Values of deference to authority in Japan and China. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 58(2), 120139.Google Scholar
Zhai, Y. (2017b). Do Confucian values deter Chinese citizens’ support for democracy? Politics and Religion, 10(2), 261285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhai, Y. (2016). Remarkable economic growth, but so what? The impacts of modernization on Chinese citizens’ political satisfaction. International Political Science Review, 37(4), 533549.Google Scholar
Zhang, M. (2013). What kind of democracy do the Chinese want: Chinese ‘Political Man’ 2012. Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Zhao, B. (1997). Consumerism, Confucianism, communism: Making sense of China today. New Left Review, 222, 4359.Google Scholar
Zhao, S. (1998). A state-led nationalism: The patriotic education campaign in post-Tiananmen China. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 31(3), 287302.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×