Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T15:14:14.876Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

19 - Participatory Design Won’t Fix Unequal Southern African Cities

But We Should Still Do It, Just Better

from Part III - Sustainable Urban Planning in Africa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 December 2023

By
Jhono Bennett
Edited by
Patrick Brandful Cobbinah  and
Eric Gaisie
Patrick Brandful Cobbinah
Affiliation:
University of Melbourne
Eric Gaisie
Affiliation:
University of Melbourne
Get access

Summary

Inclusionary spatial developmental practices regarding in situ upgrading of informal settlements in South Africa are widely recognised across disciplines as a crucial aspect in the redevelopment of South African cities. Under Goal 11, the SDGs explain in detail how such participatory principles are crucial to the sustainable development of all cities. Although the rhetoric around inclusionary development is well established, there remains considerable murkiness about what participative spatial development processes entail, what these practices look like in action, and where their value lies regarding the spatial implications of in situ upgrading in informal settlements. The chapter identifies and unpacks an identified ‘practice gap’ between the nature of participatory design processes and the reality of actioning such work, and argues for a more reflective and critically proactive approach. The study seeks to add to the growing discourse on practice-led knowledge towards reimaging practice frameworks across the sector of socio-technical spatial development for informal settlements. This is done through a careful blend of practice-based experience in South Africa with selected project partners. These reflections are then summarised towards supporting those working through the challenges of participatory spatial development processes in South Africa, and similar African contexts.

Keywords

participative practicespatial designinformal settlement upgradingintersectional approach
Type
Chapter
Information
Reimagining Urban Planning in Africa , pp. 345 - 371
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1to1, Agency of Engagement (2019). A reflective engagement: 2010–2018 (Edited by Bennett, J.). Johannesburg: 1to1 – Agency of Engagement. https://1to1.org.za/2019/02/01/a-reflective-engagement-2010-2018/Google Scholar
Agee, J. (2009). Developing qualitative research questions: A reflective process. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 22(4), 431–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvesson, M., & Sköldberg, K. (2000). Reflexive methodology: New vistas for qualitative research. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
Amin, A., & Cirolia, L. R. (2018). Politics/matter: Governing Cape Town’s informal settlements. Urban Studies, 55(2), 274–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amin, A., & Thrift, N. J. (2016). Seeing like a city. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Arnstein, S. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ballard, R. (2008). Between the community hall and the city hall: Five research questions on participation. Transformation: Critical Perspectives on Southern Africa, 66(1), 168–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ballard, R. (2012). Geographies of development: Without the poor. Progress in Human Geography, 36(5), 563–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ballard, R. (2015). Geographies of development III: Militancy, insurgency, encroachment and development by the poor. Progress in Human Geography, 39(2), 214–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, J. (2017). Co-designing the driver’s seat: A call for an ‘open’ approach to drawing production in spatial design practice. In The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in the South (SOTL) conference proceedings (p. 121). Johannesburg, Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in the South. www.sotlinthesouth.co.zaGoogle Scholar
Bhan, G. (2019). Notes on a southern urban practice. Environment and Urbanization, 31(2), 639–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Botes, L., and Van Dingie, R. (2000). Community participation in development: Nine plagues and twelve commandments. Community Development Journal, 35(1), 41–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown-Luthango, M. (2013). Community–university engagement: The Philippi CityLab in Cape Town and the challenge of collaboration across boundaries. Higher Education, 65(3), 309–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, R. (2017). Can we know better? Reflections for development. The Schumacher Centre. Rugby: Practical Action Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cirolia, L. R., & Scheba, S. (2019). Towards a multi-scalar reading of informality in Delft, South Africa: Weaving the ‘everyday’ with wider structural tracings. Urban Studies, 56(3), 594–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cirolia, L. R., Görgens, T., Van Donk, M., Smit, W., & Drimie, S. (2017). Upgrading informal settlements in South Africa: An introduction. In Cirolia, L. Görgens, T., Van Donk, M., Smit, W. & Drimie, S. (eds.), Upgrading informal settlements in South Africa: A partnership-based approach. Cape Town: UCT Press.Google Scholar
Combrinck, C. (2015). A model to address marginality of the architectural profession in the South African discourse on informal settlement upgrade. University of Pretoria. http://hdl.handle.net/2263/50863.Google Scholar
Connell, R. (2014). Using southern theory: Decolonizing social thought in theory, research and application. Planning Theory, 13(2), 210–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooke, B., & Kothari, U. (eds.) (2001). Participation: The new tyranny? London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
De Souza, M. L. (2011). The words and the things. City, 15(1), 73–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickinson, J., Hulme, D., & Turner, M. M. (1991). Sociology and development: Theories, policies and practices. Contemporary Sociology, 20(6), 875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eichler, E. P., & Kaplan, M. (1970). The community builders. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Everatt, D. (2018). Poverty and inequality in the Gauteng city-region: Changing space, changing city. Edited by Harrison, P. et al. Johannesburg: Wits University Press.Google Scholar
Fainstein, S. (1997). Justice, politics, and the creation of urban space. In Merrifield, A. & Swyngedouw, E. (eds.), The urbanization of injustice (pp. 18–44). Washington Square: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Fieuw, W. (2014). Deep rooted knowledge? Assessing the lack of community participation in UISP projects ineffective housing programme. Perspectives from Civil Society on Local Governance in South Africa, 59, 59–73.Google Scholar
Fox, N. J. (2003). Practice-based evidence: Towards collaborative and transgressive research. Sociology, 37(1), 81–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaigher, M. (1992). Care groups in Venda: Primary health care knowledge as a The, strategy for community development. PhD dissertation. University of the Free State, Bloemfontein.Google Scholar
Gaventa, J., & Tandon, R. (2010). Citizen engagement in a globalizing world: Introduction. In Gaventa, J. & Tandon, R. (eds.), Globalizing citizens: New dynamics of inclusion and exclusion (pp. 3–30). London: Zed Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GDI (Global Development Institute) (2018). Scaling up participation in urban planning: How community involvement in urban development can help achieve inclusive cities. www.gdi.manchester.ac.uk/research/groups/global-urban-futures/scaling-up-participation-in-urban-planning/Google Scholar
Gorgens, T. (2017). Facilitating state–community interfaces. In Cirolia, L., Görgens, T., van Donk, M., Smit, W. & Drimie, S. (eds.), Upgrading informal settlements in South Africa: A partnership-based approach (pp. 278–304). Cape Town: UCT Press.Google Scholar
Gotz, G., Mubiwa, B., & Wray, C. (2014). Spatial change in Johannesburg and the Gauteng city-region. In Harrison, P. Gotz, G., Todes, A. & Wray, C. (eds.), Changing space, changing city: Johannesburg after apartheid (pp. 269–292). Johannesburg: Wits University Press.Google Scholar
Guijt, I. M., & Shah, M. K. (eds.) (1999). The myth of community: Gender issues in participatory development.New Delhi: Vistaar Publications.Google Scholar
Hamdi, N. (2010). The placemakers’ guide to building community: Planning, design and placemaking in practice. London: Earthscan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamdi, N. (2013). Small change: About the art of practice and the limits of planning in cities. London: Earthscan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamdi, N. (2014). Nabeel Hamdi – Participation in practice. www.youtube.com/watch?v=7r9IYl4CtKIGoogle Scholar
Hamdi, N., & Goethert, R. (1997). Action planning for cities: A guide to community practice. Chichester: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Harrison, P., Gotz, G., Todes, A., & Wray, C.(eds.) (2014). Changing space, changing city: Johannesburg after apartheid. Johannesburg: Wits University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, D. (2003). The right to the city. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 27(4), 939–941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horn, P., Mitlin, D., Bennett, J., Chitekwe-Biti, B., & Makau, J.(2018). Towards citywide participatory planning: Emerging community-led practices in three African cities. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3225770CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huchzermeyer, M. (2009). The struggle for in situ upgrading of informal settlements: A reflection on cases in Gauteng. Development Southern Africa, 26(1), 59–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huchzermeyer, M. (2010). Pounding at the tip of the Iceberg: The dominant politics of informal settlement eradication in South Africa. Politikon, 37(1), 129–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huchzermeyer, M. (2011). Cities with ‘slums’: From informal settlement eradication to a right to the city in Africa. Claremont, South Africa: UCT Press.Google Scholar
Huchzermeyer, M. (2016). Informal settlements at the intersection between urban planning and rights: Advances through judicialisation in the South African case. In Deboulet, A. (ed.), Rethinking precarious neighborhoods (pp. 195–210). Paris: Agence Française de Développement.Google Scholar
Isandla Institute (2011). The right to the city in a South African context. Isandla Institute. www.isandla.org.za/en/projects/urban-land/item/download/21_b63dbb74546c4a8e69dbc9f360bd0ba7Google Scholar
Isandla Institute & Görgens, T. (2013). Planning for informality: Exploring the potential of collaborative planning forums – a propositional framework. Cape Town: Isandla Institute.Google Scholar
Botes, L. J. S. (1999). Community participation in the upgrading of informal settlements: Theoretical and practical guidelines. PhD dissertation, University of the Free State.Google Scholar
Kaza, N. (2006). Tyranny of the median and costly consent: A reflection on the justification for participatory urban planning processes. Planning Theory, 5(3), 255–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klug, N., & Vawda, S. (2009). Upgrading of informal settlements: An assessment with reference to the application of ‘breaking new ground’ in Cape Town and Johannesburg. Town and Regional Planning, 54(54), 37–49.Google Scholar
Lévy, K. (2014). Small atlas of Johannesburg: A graphical and critical analysis of urban trends and issues. Johannesburg: Africae, Agence française de développement.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luna, F. P., & Bunge, M. (2000). Social science under debate: A philosophical perspective. Reis, 91, 191–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manià, K., Van Rensburg, A. J., & Bird, R. (2017). Writing into design: An embedded writing course for architectural studies. South African Journal of Higher Education, 31(5), 172–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manjeya, E., Chirisa, I., & Chavunduka, C. M. (2020). Spatial justice and the design of future cities in the developing world. In The Palgrave encyclopedia of urban and regional futures (pp. 1–11). Cham: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
Matlala, B., & Bénit-Gbaffou, C. (2012). Against ourselves – Local activists and the management of contradicting political loyalties: The case of Phiri, Johannesburg. Geoforum, 43(2), 207–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsipa, M. (2014). Urban renewal in Johannesburg. University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Mbembe, A. (2021). The politics of the future. In Mbembe, A. (ed.), Out of the dark night: Essays on decolonization. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
McCann, E., Roy, A., & Ward, K. (2013). Urban pulse-assembling/worlding cities. Urban Geography, 34(5), 581–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miraftab, F. (2003). The perils of participatory discourse: Housing policy in postapartheid South Africa. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 22(3), 226–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miraftab, F. (2009). Insurgent planning: Situating radical planning in the global south. Planning Theory, 8(1), 32–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitlin, D. (2008). With and beyond the state – Co-production as a route to political influence, power and transformation for grassroots organizations. Environment and Urbanization, 20(2), 339–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mumford, E. (1996). An ethical approach: Socio-technical design. In Systems design ethical tools for ethical change (pp. 64–78). London: Macmillan Education UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, M. J. (2011). City of extremes: The spatial politics of Johannesburg. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Ntsime, P. T. (2004). Deconstructing sustainable development: Towards a participatory methodology for natural resource management. Development Southern Africa, 21(4), 707–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NUSP (National Upgrade Support Programme) (2013a). Upgrading informal settlements policy (UISP). Chapter 3: South African housing code. Pretoria: South African National Government.Google Scholar
NUSP (National Upgrade Support Programme) (2013b). Sustainable housing policy & practice. Pretoria: South African Department of Human Settlements. http://upgradingsupport.org/uploads/files/sustainable_housing_policy_and_practice.pdf.Google Scholar
Oldfield, S. (2008). Who’s serving whom? Partners, process, and products in service-learning projects in South African Urban Geography. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 32(2), 269–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parnell, S., & Oldfield, S. (2014). The Routledge handbook on cities of the global south. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parnell, S. S., & Pieterse, E. A. (2014). Africa’s urban revolution, African Centre for Cities (ACC). Cape Town: UCT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petti, A., Hilal, S., & Weizman, E. (2013). Architecture after revolution. Berlin: Sternberg Press.Google Scholar
Pieterse, E. (2009). Exploratory notes on African urbanism. Paper presented at Third European Conference on African Studies. Leipzig. www.aegis-eu.org/archive/ecas2009/files/conference_book_ecas_web.pdfGoogle Scholar
Pieterse, E., & Van Donk, M. (2014). Citizenship, deign activism and institutionalising informal settlement upgrading. In From housing to human settlements: Evolving perspectives (pp. 153–172). Johannesburg: South African Cities Network.Google Scholar
Pithouse, R. (2009). A progressive policy without progressive politics: Lessons from the failure to implement ‘breaking new ground’. Town Planning Journal, 54(54), 1–14.Google Scholar
Pithouse, R. (2014). An urban commons? Notes from South Africa. Community Development Journal, 49(SUPPL.1), 31–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PlanAct (2017). PlanAct annual report: April 2017–March 2018. https://planact.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/PLANACT-AR-17_18-002...pdfGoogle Scholar
Rankin, K. N. (2010). Reflexivity and post-colonial critique: Toward an ethics of accountability in planning praxis. Planning Theory, 9(3), 181–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Revi, A., Satterthwaite, D., Aragón-Durand, F., Corfee-Morlot, J., Kiunsi, R. B., Pelling, M., ... & Sverdlik, A. (2014). Towards transformative adaptation in cities: The IPCC’s Fifth Assessment. Environment and Urbanization, 26(1), 11–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rietbergen-McCracken, J., & Naraya, D. (1998). Participation and Social assessment: tools and technique. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Rigon, A., & Broto, V. C. (2021). Inclusive urban development in the global south. Edited by Rigon, A. & Broto, V. C.. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roy, A. Urban informality: Toward an epistemology of planning’, Journal of the American Planning Association, 71(2), 147–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SACN (2014). From housing to human settlements – Evolving perspectives. Johannesburg, South Africa. http://sacitiesnetwork.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/From_Housing_to_Human_Settlements_Timeline-2.pdfGoogle Scholar
SACN (2016). State of South African cities report, ’16. Edited by Davidson, K. & Karuri-Sebina, G.. Johannesburg, South Africa: e South African Cities Network. www.sacities.net/the-state-of-south-african-cities-report-2016Google Scholar
Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Simone, A. M. (2016). City of potentialities: An introduction. Theory, Culture and Society, 33(7–8), 5–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, A. (2018). The promise of infrastructure. Edited by Anand, N., Gupta, A., & Appel, H.. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Tissington, K. (2012a). Informal settlement upgrading in South Africa: Linkages to livelihood creation, informal sector development and economic opportunity generation., Working Paper No. 2. Socio-Economic Rights Institute of South Africa.Google Scholar
Tissington, K. (2012b). Towards greater community participation in informal settlement upgrading: A case study from Slovo Park, Johannesburg. A in South Africa. 50–61. www.ggln.org.za/media/k2/attachments/SoLG.2012-SERI.pdfGoogle Scholar
Turner, J. F. C., & Ward, C. (1991). Housing by people: Towards autonomy in building environments. Reprint. London: Boyars (Ideas in Progress).Google Scholar
Tuurnas, S. (2016). Looking beyond the simplistic ideals of participatory projects: Fostering effective co-production? International Journal of Public Administration, 39(13), 1077–1087.Google Scholar
United Nations (2019). Goal 11: Targets and indicators. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/sdg11Google Scholar
UN-Habitat (2016). World cities report 2016 – Urbanization and development: Emerging futures. Nairobi: UN-Habitat.Google Scholar
Valencia, S. C., Simon, D., Croese, S., Nordqvist, J., Oloko, M., Sharma, T., ... & Versace, I. (2019). Adapting the Sustainable Development Goals and the New Urban Agenda to the city level: Initial reflections from a comparative research project. International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development, 11(1), 4–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Der Walt, S., & De Treveau, C. (2022). Neighbourhood well-being: Rethinking the community centre. Spatial Determinants of Wellbeing Paper Series, 1(1). doi: 978-0-6397-1336-6.Google Scholar
Van Donk, M., & Gorgens, T. (2012). Exploring the potential of the ‘Right to the City’ to integrate the vision and practice of civil society in the struggle for the socio-spatial transformation of South African cities. Paper presented at Strategies to Overcome Poverty and Inequality. Carnegie III, 3–7 September.Google Scholar
Winkler, T. (2013). At the coalface: Community–university engagements and planning education. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 33(2), 215–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winschiers-Theophilus, H., Chivuno-Kuria, S., Kapuire, G. K., Bidwell, N. J., & Blake, E. (2010). Being participated - A community approach. In Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Participatory Design Conference. (pp. 1–10). Sydney: ACM Press.Google Scholar
Yiftachel, O. (2015). Epilogue – From ‘gray space’ to equal ‘Metrozeneship’? Reflections on urban citizenship. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 39(4), 726–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yiftachel, O., & Huxley, M. (2000). On space, planning and communication: A brief rejoinder. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 24(4), 922–924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, I. M., & Allen, D. S. (2011). Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Zondo, N., & Royston, L. (2016). Upgrading informal settlements: The importance of the Slovo Park judgment. Daily Maverick. www.dailymaverick.co.za/article/2016-04-11-upgrading-informal-settlements-the-importance-of-the-slovo-park-judgment/#.VyGvsmBf3IUGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×