Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T20:01:29.368Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

14 - A Corpus-Based Multidimensional Analysis of EMI University Classroom Discourse

The Case of Singapore

from Part II - Empirical Chapters (Case Studies)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 December 2024

Samantha M. Curle
Affiliation:
University of Bath
Jack Pun
Affiliation:
City University of Hong Kong
Get access

Summary

English Medium Instruction (EMI) researchers have called for studies that extend our understanding of EMI classroom discourse and the role of language in EMI in general (Dalton-Puffer & Smit, 2013; McKinley & Rose, 2022; Macaro, 2019). Corpus-based analytical frameworks are well-suited to analyze large amounts of naturally occurring language data and thus to provide reliable and verifiable findings about situationally defined language use such as language use in EMI contexts (see also Chapter 9, Author, this volume).

The primary goal of this chapter is to introduce the principles and practices of carrying out an additive multi-dimensional (MD) analysis (Biber, 1988; Berber Sardina et al., 2019) affording an empirically driven comprehensive linguistic analysis of variation in a register that could be applied to an EMI context. Our case study showcases the methodology using 500,000 words of text from the Singapore EMI corpus (SEMIC). Relying on the results of the MD analysis, this chapter also demonstrates how to identify text types via cluster analysis, which could provide additional information about classroom discourse. It will demonstrate show how these advanced quantitative analytical frameworks can be applied to analyze EMI classroom discourse. The chapter will also highlight practical aspects of MD analysis.

Type
Chapter
Information
Researching English Medium Instruction
Quantitative Methods for Students and Researchers
, pp. 240 - 259
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alsop, S., & Nesi, H. (2014). The pragmatic annotation of a corpus of academic lectures. In Calzolari, N., Choukri, K., Declerck, T., Loftsson, H., Maegaard, B., Mariani, J., Moreno, A., Odijk, J., & Piperidis, S. (Eds.), Language resources evaluation conference proceedings. (pp. 15601563). Amsterdam, Netherlands: European Language Resources Association.Google Scholar
Berber Sardinha, T., Veirano Pinto, M., Mayer, C., Zuppardi, M. C., & Kauffmann, C. H. (2019). Adding registers to a previous multi-dimensional analysis. In Berber Sardinha, T. & Veirano Pinto, M. (Eds.), Multi-dimensional analysis: Research methods and current issues (pp. 165186). London: Bloomsbury.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D. (1988). Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D. (1995). Dimensions of register variation: A cross-linguistic perspective. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D. (2006). University language. New York: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., & Conrad, S. (2009). Register, genre, and style. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., & Finegan, E. (Eds.). (1994). Sociolinguistic perspectives on register. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., & Gray, B. (2013). Discourse characteristics of writing and speaking task types on the TOEFL iBT Test: A lexico-grammatical analysis. TOEFL iBT Research Report TOEFL iBT19. Princeton, NJ: ETS. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/j.2333–8504.2013.tb02311.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., Conrad, S., Reppen, R., Byrd, P., & Helt, M. (2002). Speaking and writing in the university: A multidimensional comparison. TESOL Quarterly, 36(1), 948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., Conrad, S., Reppen, R., Byrd, P., Helt, M., Clark, V., Cortes, V., Csomay, E., & Urzua, A. (2004). Representing language use in the university: Analysis of the TOEFL 2000 spoken and written academic language corpus. TOEFL Monograph series, Educational Testing Services.Google Scholar
Csomay, E. (2002). Variation in academic lectures: Interactivity and level of instruction. In Reppen, R., Fitzmaurice, S., & Biber, D. (Eds.), Using corpora to explore linguistic variation. (pp. 203224). New York: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Csomay, E. (2005). Linguistic variation within university classroom talk: A corpus-based perspective. Linguistics and Education, 15(3), 243274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Csomay, E. (2006). Academic talk in American university classrooms: Crossing the boundaries of oral – literate discourse. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5(2), 117135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Csomay, E. (2021). Styles of classroom conduct: A corpus-based linguistic analysis. Paper presented at the Corpus Linguistics Conference (July 13–16), Limerick, Ireland, July 14 (online).Google Scholar
Csomay, E. (2022). Teaching styles at the university: A corpus-driven linguistic analysis. Paper presented at the CamTESOL conference (virtual) (February 18–20).Google Scholar
Csomay, E., & Crawford, W. (2022). Teaching styles at the university: A corpus-driven linguistic analysis. Paper presented at the American Association for Applied Linguists Conference (March 19–22), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Csomay, E., & Crawford, W. (2024). Doing corpus linguistics (2nd ed.). Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Csomay, E., & Wu, S.M. (2020). Language variation in university classrooms: A corpus-driven geographical perspective, Register Studies. 2/1: 132166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curle, S., Jablonkai, R. R., Mittelmeier, J., Sahan, K., & Veitch, A. (2020). English Medium Part 1: Literature review. In Galloway, N. (Ed.), English in higher education (Report No. 978-0-86355-977–8). London: British Council. www.teachingenglish.org.uk/article/english-higher-education-%E2%80%93-english-medium-part-1-literature-review.Google Scholar
Dalton-Puffer, C., & Smit, U. (2013). Content and language integrated learning: A research agenda. Language Teaching, 46(4), 545559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, B. (2019). Tagging and counting linguistic features for Multi-Dimensional Analysis. In Sardinha, T. B. & Pinto, M. V. (Eds.), Multi-dimensional analysis: Research methods and current issues (pp. 4366). London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Hanington, L., & Renandya, W. (2017). Developing English language skills in the Singapore higher education context. In Park, E.S. & Spolsky, B. (Eds.), English education at the tertiary level in Asia (pp. 152167). Singapore: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hymes, D. (1972). Toward ethnographies of communication. In Giglioli, P.P. (Ed.), Language and social context. (pp. 2144). Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Ismailov, M., Chiu, T. K. F., Dearden, J., Yamamoto, Y., & Djalilova, N. (2021). Challenges to internationalization of university programmes: A systematic thematic synthesis of qualitative research on learner-centered English Medium Instruction (EMI) pedagogy. Sustainability, 13, 12642. https://doi.org./10.3390/su132212642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iswaran, S. (2009, August 15). “Crossing cultures, bridging minds: A role for Singapore’s languages and literatures.” Opening address by the Senior Minister for Trade and Industry and Education at the SIM university public forum. www.moe.gov.sg/media/speeches/2009/08/15/openingaddress-by-mr-s-iswara.php.Google Scholar
Jablonkai, R. R. (2021). Corpus linguistic methods in EMI research: A missed opportunity? In Pun, J. & Curle, S. (Eds.), Research methods in EMI. (pp. 92106). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jablonkai, R. R., & Hou, J. (2021). English medium of instruction in Chinese higher education: A systematic mapping review of empirical research. Applied Linguistics Review, 14(6): 14831512. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2021-0179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macaro, E. (2019). Exploring the role of language in English medium instruction. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 23(3), 263267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macaro, E., Curle, S., Pun, J., An, J., & Dearden, J. (2018). A systematic review of English medium instruction in higher education. Language Teaching, 51(1), 3676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×