Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T20:31:01.217Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - Questionnaire Survey in Researching EMI

from Part II - Empirical Chapters (Case Studies)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 December 2024

By
Qianwen Joyce Yu
Edited by
Samantha M. Curle  and
Jack Pun
Samantha M. Curle
Affiliation:
University of Bath
Jack Pun
Affiliation:
City University of Hong Kong
Get access

Summary

Questionnaire survey is among the main research instruments for data collection, where participants are required to respond by selecting from existing options or writing out answers. With the availability of easy-to-use online survey platforms that enhancing research efficiency in terms of time, cost, and access to participants, scholars have brought to bear a large number of questionnaire survey-based approaches to researching English Medium Instruction (EMI), putting stakeholders’ perspectives under the microscope. This chapter discusses how to plan and conduct a questionnaire survey study in EMI. Starting with the definition of questionnaire survey, this chapter centers on some key issues related to its use in EMI research, such as the selection of a sample frame, as well as design and distribution of questionnaire design. These issues are then exemplified in the subsequent case study of the acceptability and usefulness of collaborative writing activities in promoting university students’ online engagement.

Keywords

questionnaire surveyEnglish Medium Instructionresearch efficiencysample frameonline engagement
Type
Chapter
Information
Researching English Medium Instruction
Quantitative Methods for Students and Researchers
 , pp. 183 - 206
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Al-Nofaie, H. (2020). Saudi University Students’ perceptions towards virtual education during Covid-19 pandemic: A case study of language learning via blackboard. Arab World English Journal, 11(3), 4–20. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol11no3.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, T. (2003). Modes of interaction in distance education: Recent developments and research questions. In Moore, M. G. & Anderson, W. G. (Eds.), Handbook of distance education (pp. 129–144). Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Asare, A. O., Yap, R., Truong, N., & Sarpong, E. O. (2021). The pandemic semesters: Examining public opinion regarding online learning amidst COVID‐19. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(6), 1591–1605. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12574CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barker, B. O. (2002). The internet can improve education. In Cothran, H. (Ed.) The Internet: Opposing viewpoints (pp. 79–87). Bristol: Greenhaven.Google Scholar
Bavel, J. J. V., Baicker, K., Boggio, P. S., Capraro, V., Cichocka, A., Cikara, M., Crockett, M. J., Crum, A. J., Douglas, K. M., Druckman, J. N., Drury, J., Dube, O., Ellemers, N., Finkel, E. J., Fowler, J. H., Gelfand, M., Han, S., Haslam, S. A., Jetten, J., Kitayama, S., Mobbs, D., Napper, L. E., Packer, D. J., Pennycook, G., Peters, E., Petty, R. E., Rand, D. G., Reicher, S. D., Schnall, S., Shariff, A., Skitka, L. J., Smith, S. S., Sunstein, C. R., Tabri, N., Tucker, J. A., Linden, S. v. d., Lange, P. v., Weeden, K. A., Wohl, M. J. A., Zaki, J., Zion, S. R., & Willer, R. (2020). Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(5), 460–471. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0884-zCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beldarrain, Y. (2006). Distance education trends: Integrating new technologies to foster student interaction and collaboration. Distance Education, 27(2), 139–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587910600789498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benbunan-Fich, R., Hiltz, S., & Harasim, L. (2005). The online interaction learning model: An integrated theoretical framework for learning networks. In Hiltz, S. & Goldman, R. (Eds.), Learning together online: Research on asynchronous learning networks (pp. 19–38). Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Boykin, A., Evmenova, A. S., Regan, K., & Mastropieri, M. (2019). The impact of a computer-based graphic organizer with embedded self-regulated learning strategies on the argumentative writing of students in inclusive cross-curricula settings. Computers and Education, 137, 78–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.03.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bozkurt, A., Jung, I., Xiao, J., Vladimirschi, V., Schuwer, R., Egorov, G., Lambert, S. R., Al-Freih, M., Pete, J., OlcottJr, D., Rodes, V., Aranciaga, I., Bali, M., AlvarezJr, A. V., Roberts, J., Pazurek, A., Raffaghelli, J. E., Panagiotou, N., de Coëtlogon, P., Shahadu, S., Brown, M., Asino, T. I., Tumwesige, J., Ramirez Reyes, T., Barrios Ipenza, E., Ossiannilsson, E., Bond, M., Belhamel, K., Irvine, V., Sharma, R. C., Adam, T., Janssen, B., Sklyarova, T., Olcott, N., Ambrosino, A., Lazou, C., Mocquet, B., Mano, M., & Paskevicius, M. (2020). A global outlook to the interruption of education due to COVID-19 Pandemic: Navigating in a time of uncertainty and crisis. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 1–126.Google Scholar
Brown, J. D. (2001). Using surveys in language programs. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bryman, A. (2012). Social research methods. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Carini, R. M., Kuh, G. D., & Klein, S. P. (2006). Student engagement and student learning: Testing the linkages. Research in Higher Education, 47(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-005-8150-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Çebi, A., & Güyer, T. (2020). Students’ interaction patterns in different online learning activities and their relationship with motivation, self-regulated learning strategy and learning performance. Education and Information Technologies, 25(5), 3975–3993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, P.-S. D., Gonyea, R., & Kuh, G. (2008). Learning at a distance: Engaged or not? Innovate: Journal of Online Education, 4(3), 3.Google Scholar
Conrad, R.-M., & Donaldson, J. A. (2011). Engaging the online learner: Activities and resources for creative instruction (Vol. 38). New York: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Curle, S., & Derakhshan, A. (2021). Trends in using questionnaires for EMI research: Suggestions for future improvements. In Pun, J. & Curle, S. (Eds.), Research methods in English medium instruction (pp. 32–45). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003025115-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dede, C. (2000). Advanced technologies and distributed learning in higher education. In Hanna, D. (Ed.) Higher education in an era of digital competition: Choices and challenges (pp. 71–92). Atwood.Google Scholar
Dennen, V. P., Aubteen Darabi, A., & Smith, L. J. (2007). Instructor-Learner Interaction in Online Courses: The relative perceived importance of particular instructor actions on performance and satisfaction. Distance Education, 28(1), 65–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587910701305319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixson, M. D. (2015). Measuring student engagement in the online course: The Online Student Engagement Scale (OSE). Online Learning (Newburyport, Mass.), 19(4), 143. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v19i4.561Google Scholar
Dörnyei, Z., & Taguchi, T. (2010). Questionnaires in second language research: Construction, administration, and processing (2nd ed.). Delaware, PA: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203864739Google Scholar
Drljača Margić, B., & Vodopija-Krstanović, I. (2018). Language development for English-medium instruction: Teachers’ perceptions, reflections and learning. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 35, 31–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2018.06.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyment, J., Downing, J., & Budd, Y. (2013). Teacher educator engagement in an online environment. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 38(1), 134–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elmer, T., Mepham, K., & Stadtfeld, C. (2020). Students under lockdown: Assessing change in students’ social networks and mental health during the COVID-19 crisis. PLoS One, 15, e0236337–e0236337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaytan, J., & McEwen, B. C. (2007). Effective online instructional and assessment strategies. The American Journal of Distance Education, 21(3), 117–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923640701341653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, K. M., Eslami, Z. R., & Hillman, S. (2021). From English as the medium to English as a medium: Perspectives of EMI students in Qatar. System (Linköping), 99, 102508–. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102508Google Scholar
Handelsman, M. M., Briggs, W. L., Sullivan, N., & Towler, A. (2005). A measure of college student course engagement. The Journal of Educational Research (Washington, D.C.), 98(3), 184–192. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.98.3.184-192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hiltz, S., & Shea, P. (2005). The student in the online classroom. In Hiltz, S. & Goldman, R. (Eds.) Learning together online: Research on asynchronous learning networks (pp. 145–168). New Jersey: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Holzer, J., Lüftenegger, M., Korlat, S., Pelikan, E., Salmela-Aro, K., Spiel, C., & Schober, B. (2021). Higher education in times of COVID-19: University students’ basic need satisfaction, self-regulated learning, and well-being. AERA Open, 7, 233285842110031–23328584211003164. https://doi.org/10.1177/CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hughes, G. (2007). Diversity, identity and belonging in e-learning communities: Some theories and paradoxes. Teaching in Higher Education, 12(5–6), 709–720. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510701596315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiang, H., Islam, A. Y. M. A., Gu, X., & Spector, J. M. (2021). Online learning satisfaction in higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic: A regional comparison between Eastern and Western Chinese universities. Education and Information Technologies, 26(6), 6747–6769. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639–021-10519-xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jiang, L., Zhang, L. J., & May, S. (2019). Implementing English-medium instruction (EMI) in China: Teachers’ practices and perceptions, and students’ learning motivation and needs. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 22(2), 107–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2016.1231166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemery, E. (2000). Developing on-line collaboration. In Aggarwal, A. (Ed.), Web-based learning and teaching technologies: Opportunities and challenges (pp. 227–245). Idea Group.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kessler, G., Bikowski, D., & Boggs, J. (2012). Collaborative writing among second language learners in academic web-based projects. Language Learning & Technology, 16(1), 91–109.Google Scholar
Kim, V., & Thompson, G. (2022). The interplay between gender and major on content knowledge and self-beliefs in the English-medium instruction context: A comparative study between university students from Japan and South Korea. System (Linköping), 107, 102824–. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102824Google Scholar
Kuh, G. D. (2001). Assessing what really matters to student learning. Change, 33(3), 10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuh, G. D. (2003). What we are learning about student engagement from NSSE. Change, 35(2), 24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labrague, L. J., De Los Santos, J. A. A., & Falguera, C. C. (2021). Social and emotional loneliness among college students during the COVID-19 pandemic: The predictive role of coping behaviors, social support, and personal resilience. Perspective in Psychiatric Care, 57(4), 1578–1584. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppc.12721CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewis, C. C., & Abdul-Hamid, H. (2006). Implementing effective online teaching practices: Voices of exemplary faculty. Innovative in Higher Education, 31(2), 83–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-006-9010-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, J., & Mak, L. (2022, 2022/04/01/). The effects of using an online collaboration tool on college students’ learning of academic writing skills. System, 105, 102712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macaro, E., Tian, L., & Chu, L. (2020). First and second language use in English medium instruction contexts. Language Teaching Research: LTR, 24(3), 382–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168818783231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madeline, O.-R., Ricky, W. T., Tracy, I., Roberts, T. G., & Emily, R. (2005). College students’ perceptions of quality in distance education: The importance of communication. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 6(2), 97.Google Scholar
Meyer, K. A. (2014). Student engagement online: What works and why. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China. (2001). Guidelines for strengthening college undergraduate programs and enhancing the quality of instruction. www.moe.gov.cn/publicfiles/business/htmlfiles/moe/moe_1623/201006/88633.html.Google Scholar
Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China. (2020a). Guidance on the Organization and Management of Online Teaching in Colleges and Universities during the Epidemic Prevention and Control Period. www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A08/s7056/202002/t20200205_418138.html.Google Scholar
Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China. (2020b). Ministry of Education: Students’ satisfaction of online teaching in the spring term reaches 85%. www.moe.gov.cn/fbh/live/2020/52320/mtbd/202008/t20200828_481896.html.Google Scholar
Moore, M. J. (1993). Three types of interaction. In Harry, K., John, M., & Keegan, D. (Eds.), Distance education: New perspectives (pp. 19–24). Routledge.Google Scholar
O′ Shea, S., Stone, C., & Delahunty, J. (2015). “I ‘feel’ like I am at university even though I am online.” Exploring how students narrate their engagement with higher education institutions in an online learning environment. Distance Education, 36(1), 41–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2015.1019970CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palloff, R. M., & Pratt, K. (2001). Lessons from the cyberspace classroom: The realities of online teaching (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Pittaway, S. M. (2012). Student and staff engagement: Developing an engagement framework in a faculty of education. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 37(4), 37–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qiu, X., & Fang, C. (2022). Creating an effective English-Medium Instruction (EMI) classroom: Chinese undergraduate students’ perceptions of native and non-native English-speaking content teachers and their experiences. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 25(2), 641–655. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2019.1707769CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, C. C., & Hullinger, H. (2008). New benchmarks in higher education: Student engagement in online learning. Journal of Education for Business, 84(2), 101–108. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOEB.84.2.101-109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salas‐Pilco, S. Z., Yang, Y., & Zhang, Z. (2022). Student engagement in online learning in Latin American higher education during the COVID‐19 pandemic: A systematic review. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(3), 593–619. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13190CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schleicher, A. (2020). Education disrupted – Education rebuilt. Spotlight: Quality education for all during Covid-19 crisis. OECD/Hundred Research Report #011. https://hundred-cdn.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/report/file/15/hundred_spotlight_covid-19_digital.pdf.Google Scholar
Shehadeh, A. (2011). Effects and student perceptions of collaborative writing in L2. Journal of Second Language Writing, 20(4), 286–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2011.05.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skyrme, G. (2007). Entering the university: The differentiated experience of two Chinese international students in a New Zealand university. Studies in Higher Education (Dorchester-on-Thames), 32(3), 357–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070701346915CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Su, Y., Zheng, C., Liang, J.-C., & Tsai, C.-C. (2018). Examining the relationship between English language learners’ online self-regulation and their self-efficacy. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34(3), 105–121. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swan, K., Shea, P., Fredericksen, E., Pickett, A., Pelz, W., & Maher, G. (2000). Building knowledge building communities: Consistency, contact and communication in the virtual classroom. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 23(4), 359–383. https://doi.org/10.2190/W4G6-HY52-57P1-PPNECrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xie, W., & Curle, S. (2022). Success in English medium instruction in China: Significant indicators and implications. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 25(2), 585–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2019.1703898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, S. (2006). Student views of effective online teaching in higher education. The American Journal of Distance Education, 20(2), 65–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, Q. J., & Huang, Q. (2022). Online teaching and academic resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic: Lived experience of college students in mainland China. In Pun, J., Curle, S., & Yuksel, D. (Eds.) The use of technology in English medium education. Oxford, UK: Springer.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P. R., & Zeidner, M. (Eds.) Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–40). Oxford, UK: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×