Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T06:40:50.378Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - The Housing Regimes and Hà Nội Wards' Role

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2015

Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

This chapter discusses the role of Hà Nội's wards in enforcing the housing regimes of Vietnam from 1954 to 1998, and how that role affects Vietnamese party-state–society relations. It argues that Hà Nội's wards play a critical role in mediating between the party-state and ward residents. It examines illegal housing construction in Hà Nội from 1975 to 1995, and what the wards did to deal with it. While the time-frame is so limited, the problems of illegal construction is still a current problem of law and order in urban areas and it represents the disregarding and/or negotiation of party-state boundaries. Along with raised living standards and new areas of urbanization, illegal construction has spread beyond Hà Nội.

By “housing regime” I mean official “answers to questions such as who may use [housing units], do what with [them], and with what rights and obligations.” Therefore, a housing regime has official rules aimed at regulating various housing issues and activities, such as ownership, purchase, use, construction, and renovation. There are two distinct Vietnamese housing regimes from 1954 to the present in the Democratic Republic of Vietnam (DRV, 1945–75) and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam (SRV, from 1975). The first, which I call the socialist housing regime, lasted from 1954 to 1990. Its main feature was heavy state regulation in all housing matters. Housing demand was mainly to be satisfied by the state. The second, which I call the liberalized housing regime, began in 1991 and continues until now. Its main feature has been allowing the private sector to participate in the housing sector.

The socialist housing regime drastically and negatively affected housing conditions, especially after 1975. It discouraged private construction by requiring numerous licences and permits. Moreover, the state bureaucracy took many months, even years, to issue those licences and permits.

Type
Chapter
Information
Wards of Hanoi , pp. 203 - 252
Publisher: ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×