Adams, Eric M. ‘Building a Law of Human Rights: Roncarelli v. Duplessis in Canadian Constitutional Culture’. McGill Law Journal 55, no. 3 (2010): 437–60.
Adler, Matthew D. ‘Rights against Rules: The Moral Structure of American Constitutional Law’. Michigan Law Review 97, no. 1 (1998): 1–173.
Albertyn, Catherine, and Davis, Dennis. ‘Legal Realism, Transformation and the Legacy of Dugard’. South African Journal on Human Rights 26, no. 2 (2010): 188–216.
Aleinikoff, T. Alexander. ‘Constitutional Law in the Age of Balancing’. Yale Law Journal 96, no. 5 (1987): 943–1005.
Alexy, Robert. A Theory of Constitutional Rights. Translated by Rivers, Julian. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.
Allan, James. ‘Statutory Bills of Rights: You Read Words in, You Read Words out, You Take Parliament's Clear Intentions and You Shake It All About – Doin’ the Sankey Hanky Panky’. In The Legal Protection of Human Rights: Sceptical Essays, edited by Campbell, Tom, Ewing, K. D., and Tomkins, Adam, 108–26. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.
Allan, T. R. S.Constitutional Justice: A Liberal Theory of the Rule of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.
Allan, T. R. S. ‘Democracy, Legality, and Proportionality’. In Proportionality and the Rule of Law: Rights, Justification, Reasoning, edited by Huscroft, Grant, Miller, Bradley W., and Webber, Grégoire, 205–33. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014.
Allan, T. R. S.The Sovereignty of Law: Freedom, Constitution, and Common Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.
Anderson, Gavin W. ‘The New Borders of the Constitutional’. Osgoode Hall Law Journal 50, no. 3 (2013): 737–62.
Andrews, Penelope, and Ellmann, Stephen, eds. The Post-Apartheid Constitutions: Perspectives on South Africa's Basic Law. Johannesburg: Witwatersrand University Press, 2001.
Antoine, Rose-Marie Belle. Commonwealth Caribbean Law and Legal Systems. 2nd edn. New York: Routledge-Cavendish, 2008.
Arnull, Anthony. The European Union and Its Court of Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.
Austen-Baker, Richard. Implied Terms in English Contract Law. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2011.
Baar, Carl. ‘The Courts in Canada’. In The Political Role of Law Courts in Modern Democracies, edited by Waltman, Jerold L. and Holland, Kenneth M., 53–82. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1988.
Bailey, Michael A., and Maltzman, Forrest. ‘Does Legal Doctrine Matter? Unpacking Law and Policy Preferences on the U.S. Supreme Court’. American Political Science Review 102, no. 3 (2008): 369–84.
Baker, Dennis. Not Quite Supreme: The Courts and Coordinate Constitutional Interpretation. Montreal, QC: McGill-Queen's University Press, 2010.
Baker, J. H.The Common Law Tradition: Lawyers, Books and the Law. London: Hambledon Press, 2000.
Bale, Gordon. ‘The New Brunswick Origin of Canadian Judicial Review’. University of New Brunswick Law Journal 40 (1991): 100–129.
Barak, Aharon. ‘Proportionality (2)’. In The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law, edited by Rosenfeld, Michel and Sajó, András, 738–55. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
Barber, N. W. ‘The Afterlife of Parliamentary Sovereignty’. International Journal of Constitutional Law 9, no. 1 (2011): 144–54.
Barnard-Naudé, Jaco. ‘The Post-Apartheid Legal Order’. In Introduction to Law and Legal Skills in South Africa: Jurisprudence, edited by Humby, Tracy, Kotzé, Louis, and du Plessis, Anél, 11–44. Cape Town: Oxford University Press, 2012.
Bates, Ed. ‘British Sovereignty and the European Court of Human Rights’. Law Quarterly Review 128, no. 3 (2012): 382–411.
Baum, Lawrence. Judges and Their Audiences: A Perspective on Judicial Behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2006.
Baxi, Upendra. ‘The Colonialist Heritage’. In Comparative Legal Studies: Traditions and Transitions, edited by Legrand, Pierre and Munday, Roderick, 46–75. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
Beatson, Jack, Grosz, Stephen, Hickman, Tom, Singh, Rabinder, and Palmer, Stephanie. Human Rights: Judicial Protection in the United Kingdom. London: Sweet and Maxwell, 2008.
Beatty, David M.The Ultimate Rule of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.
Beck, Gunnar. The Legal Reasoning of the Court of Justice of the EU. Oxford: Hart, 2012.
Bell, John, and Engle, George. Cross: Statutory Interpretation. 3rd edn. London: Butterworths, 1995.
Bellamy, Richard. ‘Political Constitutionalism and the Human Rights Act’. International Journal of Constitutional Law 9, no. 1 (2011): 86–111.
Berger, Benjamin L. ‘The Abiding Presence of Conscience: Criminal Justice against the Law and the Modern Constitutional Imagination’. University of Toronto Law Journal 61, no. 4 (2011): 579–616.
Berger, Benjamin L. ‘Children of Two Logics: A Way into Canadian Constitutional Culture’. International Journal of Constitutional Law 11, no. 2 (2013): 319–38.
Berryman, Jeffrey. The Law of Equitable Remedies. 2nd edn. Toronto: Irwin Law, 2013.
Bickel, Alexander M.Reform and Continuity: The Electoral College, the Convention, and the Party System. New York: Harper and Row, 1971.
Bickel, Alexander M.The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics. 2nd edn. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1986.
Bilchitz, David. Poverty and Fundamental Rights: The Justification and Enforcement of Socio-Economic Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
Bilder, Mary Sarah. ‘The Corporate Origins of Judicial Review’. Yale Law Journal 116, no. 3 (2006): 502–66.
Bishop, Michael. ‘Remedies’. In Constitutional Law of South Africa, edited by Woolman, Stuart, Bishop, Michael, and Brickhill, Jason, 2nd edn, vol. 1, 9-i to 9–199. Cape Town: Juta, 2012.
Bomhoff, Jacco. Balancing Constitutional Rights: The Origins and Meanings of Postwar Legal Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
Bone, Robert G. ‘Lon Fuller's Theory of Adjudication and the False Dichotomy between Dispute Resolution and Public Law Models of Litigation’. Boston University Law Review 75, no. 5 (1995): 1273–324.
Bonner, David, Fenwick, Helen, and Harris-Short, Sonia. ‘Judicial Approaches to the Human Rights Act’. International and Comparative Law Quarterly 52, no. 3 (2003): 549–85.
Bradley, A. W., and Ewing, K. D.. Constitutional and Administrative Law. 15th edn. Harlow: Longman, 2010.
Bronstein, Victoria. ‘Conflicts’. In Constitutional Law of South Africa, edited by Woolman, Stu, Bishop, Michael, and Brickhill, Jason, 2nd edn, vol. 1, 16-i to 16-28. Cape Town: Juta, 2012.
Brown, Henry S.Supreme Court of Canada Practice 2015. Toronto, ON: Carswell, 2014.
Browne-Wilkinson, Lord. ‘A Bill of Rights for the United Kingdom – the Case Against’. Texas International Law Journal 32, no. 3 (1997): 435–40.
Brun, Henri, Tremblay, Guy, and Brouillet, Eugénie. Droit constitutionnel. 6th edn. Cowansville, QC: Yvon Blais, 2014.
Butler, Andrew S., and Butler, Petra. The New Zealand Bill of Rights Act: A Commentary. Wellington: LexisNexis NZ, 2005.
Campbell, Tom. ‘Incorporation through Interpretation’. In Sceptical Essays on Human Rights, edited by Campbell, Tom, Ewing, K. D., and Tomkins, Adam, 79–101. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.
Cane, Peter. Administrative Law. 5th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.
Chanock, Martin. ‘A Post-Calvinist Catechism or a Post-Communist Manifesto? Intersecting Narratives in the South African Bill of Rights Debate’. In Promoting Human Rights through Bills of Rights: Comparative Perspectives, edited by Alston, Philip, 392–428. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.
Chayes, Abram. ‘The Role of the Judge in Public Law Litigation’. Harvard Law Review 89, no. 7 (1976): 1281–316.
Chen-Wishart, Mindy. Contract Law. 4th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
Choudhry, Sujit. ‘Migration as a New Metaphor in Comparative Constitutional Law’. In The Migration of Constitutional Ideas, edited by Choudhry, Sujit, 1–35. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
Choudhry, Sujit, and Hunter, Claire E.. ‘Measuring Judicial Activism on the Supreme Court of Canada: A Comment on Newfoundland (Treasury Board) v. NAPE’. McGill Law Journal 48, no. 3 (2003): 525–64.
Choudhry, Sujit, and Roach, Kent. ‘Putting the Past behind Us? Prospective Judicial and Legislative Constitutional Remedies’. Supreme Court Law Review (2d) 21 (2003): 205–66.
Christiansen, Eric. ‘Transformative Constitutionalism in South Africa: Creative Uses of Constitutional Court Authority to Advance Substantive Justice’. Journal of Gender, Race and Justice 13, no. 3 (2010): 575–614.
Christiansen, Eric C. ‘Adjudicating Non-Justiciable Rights: Socio-Economic Rights and the South African Constitutional Court’. Columbia Human Rights Law Review 38, no. 2 (2007): 321–86.
Clayton, Richard, and Tomlinson, Hugh, eds. The Law of Human Rights. Vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.
Cohen-Eliya, Moshe, and Porat, Iddo. Proportionality and Constitutional Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
Corder, Hugh. ‘South Africa's First Bill of Rights: Random Recollections of One of Its Drafters’. International Journal of Legal Information 32, no. 2 (2004): 313–21.
Craig, Paul. Administrative Law. 6th edn. London: Sweet and Maxwell, 2008.
Currie, Iain, and De Waal, Johan. The Bill of Rights Handbook. 6th edn. Cape Town: Juta, 2013.
de Vos, Pierre. ‘Grootboom, the Right of Access to Housing and Substantive Equality as Contextual Fairness’. South African Journal on Human Rights 17, no. 2 (2001): 258–76.
de Vos, W. le R. ‘The Impact of the New Constitution upon Civil Procedure’. Stellenbosch Law Review 6, no. 1 (1995): 34–53.
Dicey, Albert Venn. Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution. 10th edn. London: Macmillan, 1965.
Dixon, Rosalind. ‘The Supreme Court of Canada, Charter Dialogue, and Deference’. Osgoode Hall Law Journal 47, no. 2 (2009): 235–86.
Dodek, Adam. ‘A Tale of Two Maps: The Limits of Universalism in Comparative Judicial Review’. Osgoode Hall Law Journal 47, no. 2 (2009): 287–316.
Dorf, Michael C. ‘Dicta and Article III’. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 142, no. 6 (1994): 1997–2069.
Dorf, Michael C. ‘Facial Challenges to State and Federal Statutes’. Stanford Law Review 46, no. 2 (1994): 235–304.
Dorsett, Shaunnagh, and McLaren, John. ‘Laws, Engagements and Legacies: The Legal Histories of the British Empire – an Introduction’. In Legal Histories of the British Empire: Laws, Engagements and Legacies, edited by Dorsett, Shaunnagh and McLaren, John, 1–11. Abingdon, UK: Routledge, 2014.
Dugard, Jackie. ‘Court of First Instance? Towards a Pro-Poor Jurisdiction for the South African Constitutional Court’. South African Journal on Human Rights 22, no. 2 (2006): 261–82.
Dugard, Jackie. ‘Courts and Structural Poverty in South Africa: To What Extent Has the Constitutional Court Expanded Access and Remedies to the Poor?’ In Constitutionalism of the Global South: The Activist Tribunals of India, South Africa, and Colombia, edited by Maldonado, Daniel Bonilla, 293–327. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
Duplé, Nicole. Droit constitutionnel: Principes fondamentaux. 5th edn. Montreal, QC: Wilson et Lafleur, 2011.
Dussault, René, and Borgeat, Louis. Traité de droit administratif. 2nd edn. 3 vols. Québec: Presses de l'Université Laval, 1984.
Dworkin, Ronald. Law's Empire. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 1986.
Dworkin, Ronald. ‘Rights as Trumps’. In Theories of Rights, edited by Waldron, Jeremy, 153–67. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984.
Dworkin, Ronald. Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1978.
Dyzenhaus, David. ‘Constitutionalism in an Old Key: Legality and Constituent Power’. Global Constitutionalism 1, no. 2 (2012): 229–60.
Dyzenhaus, David. ‘Disobeying Parliament? Privative Clauses and the Rule of Law’. In The Least Examined Branch: The Role of Legislatures in the Constitutional State, edited by Bauman, Richard W. and Kahana, Tsvi, 499–518. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
Dyzenhaus, David. ‘The Unwritten Constitution and the Rule of Law’. In Constitutionalism in the Charter Era, edited by Huscroft, Grant and Brodie, Ian, 383–412. Markham, ON: LexisNexis Butterworths, 2004.
Dyzenhaus, David, and Taggart, Michael. ‘Reasoned Decisions and Legal Theory’. In Common Law Theory, edited by Edlin, Douglas E., 134–67. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
Eisenberg, Melvin Aron. The Nature of the Common Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1988.
Ekins, Richard. ‘A Critique of Radical Approaches to Rights-Consistent Statutory Interpretation’. European Human Rights Law Review, no. 6 (2003): 641–50.
Ekins, Richard. ‘Rights, Interpretation and the Rule of Law’. In Modern Challenges to the Rule of Law, edited by Ekins, Richard, 165–87. Wellington: LexisNexis, 2011.
Elliott, Mark. ‘The Human Rights Act 1998 and the Standard of Substantive Review’. Cambridge Law Journal 60, no. 2 (2001): 301–36.
Elliott, Mark, and Thomas, Robert. Public Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.
Endicott, Timothy. Administrative Law. 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.
Epp, Charles R. ‘External Pressure and the Supreme Court's Agenda’. In Supreme Court Decision-Making, edited by Clayton, Cornell W. and Gillman, Howard, 255–79. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999.
Erdos, David. Delegating Rights Protection: The Rise of Bills of Rights in the Westminster World. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.
Ewing, K. D. ‘The Human Rights Act and Parliamentary Democracy’. Modern Law Review 62, no. 1 (1999): 79–99.
Fallon, Richard H.. Implementing the Constitution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001.
Fallon, Richard H. Jr., and Meltzer, Daniel J.. ‘New Law, Non-Retroactivity, and Constitutional Remedies’. Harvard Law Review 104, no. 8 (1991): 1731–833.
Feldman, David. ‘Institutional Roles and Meanings of “Compatibility” under the Human Rights Act 1998’. In Judicial Reasoning under the UK Human Rights Act, edited by Fenwick, Helen, Phillipson, Gavin, and Masterman, Roger, 87–113. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
Feldman, David. ‘The Nature and Significance of “Constitutional” Legislation’. Law Quarterly Review 129, no. 3 (2013): 343–58.
Feldman, David. ‘Public Interest Litigation and Constitutional Theory in Comparative Perspective’. Modern Law Review 55, no. 1 (1992): 44–72.
Feldman, Stephen M. ‘The Rule of Law or the Rule of Politics? Harmonizing the Internal and External Views of Supreme Court Decision Making’. Law and Social Inquiry 30, no. 1 (2005): 89–135.
Fenwick, Helen, Phillipson, Gavin, and Masterman, Roger. Judicial Reasoning under the UK Human Rights Act. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
Fielding, Nigel G. ‘Judges and Their Work’. Social and Legal Studies 20, no. 1 (2011): 97–115.
Fiss, Owen M. ‘Foreword: The Forms of Justice’. Harvard Law Review 93, no. 1 (1979): 1–58.
Fitzgerald, P. J.Salmond on Jurisprudence. 12th edn. London: Sweet and Maxwell, 1966.
Flemming, Roy B.Tournament of Appeals: Granting Judicial Review in Canada. Vancouver: UBC Press, 2004.
Fontana, David. ‘Docket Control and the Success of Constitutional Courts’. In Comparative Constitutional Law, edited by Ginsburg, Tom and Dixon, Rosalind, 624–41. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2011.
Frankenberg, Günter. ‘Comparative Constitutional Law’. In The Cambridge Companion to Comparative Law, edited by Bussani, Mauro and Mattei, Ugo, 171–90. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
Fridman, G. H. L.The Law of Contract in Canada. 6th edn. Toronto, ON: Carswell, 2011.
Friedland, M. L. ‘Prospective and Retrospective Judicial Lawmaking’. University of Toronto Law Journal 24, no. 2 (1974): 170–90.
Friedman, Barry. ‘Taking Law Seriously’. Perspectives on Politics 4, no. 2 (2006): 261–76.
Fuller, Lon L.Anatomy of the Law. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1976.
Fuller, Lon L.The Problems of Jurisprudence. Brooklyn, NY: Foundation Press, 1949.
Furmston, Michael. Cheshire, Fifoot and Furmston's Law of Contract. 16th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
Galligan, Denis J., and Versteeg, Mila, eds. Social and Political Foundations of Constitutions. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
Garant, Patrice, Garant, Philippe, and Garant, Jérôme. Droit administratif. 6th edn. Cowansville, QC: Yvon Blais, 2010.
Gardbaum, Stephen. ‘A Comparative Perspective on Reforming the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act’. Policy Quarterly 10, no. 4 (2014): 33–38.
Gardbaum, Stephen. ‘The “Horizontal Effect” of Constitutional Rights’. Michigan Law Review 102, no. 3 (2003): 387–459.
Gardbaum, Stephen. ‘How Successful and Distinctive Is the Human Rights Act? An Expatriate Comparatist's Assessment’. Modern Law Review 74, no. 2 (2011): 195–215.
Gardbaum, Stephen. ‘The New Commonwealth Model of Constitutionalism’. American Journal of Comparative Law 49, no. 4 (2001): 707–60.
Gardbaum, Stephen. The New Commonwealth Model of Constitutionalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
Gibson, Dale. ‘Enforcement of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms’. In Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, 4th edn, edited by Beaudoin, Gérald-A. and Mendes, Errol, 1321–98. Markham, ON: LexisNexis Canada, 2005.
Gibson, James L., and Caldeira, Gregory A.. ‘Defenders of Democracy? Legitimacy, Popular Acceptance, and the South African Constitutional Court’. Journal of Politics 65, no. 1 (2003): 1–30.
Gillman, Howard. ‘What's Law Got to Do with It? Judicial Behavioralists Test the “Legal Model” of Judicial Decision Making’. Law and Social Inquiry 26, no. 2 (2001): 465–504.
Ginsburg, Tom, ed. Comparative Constitutional Design. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
Girard, Philip. ‘Imperial Legacies: Chartered Enterprises in Northern British America’. In Legal Histories of the British Empire: Laws, Engagements and Legacies, edited by Dorsett, Shaunnagh and McLaren, John, 127–40. Abingdon, UK: Routledge, 2014.
Glass, Arthur. ‘The Vice of Judicial Activism’. In Judicial Power, Democracy and Legal Positivism, edited by Campbell, Tom and Goldsworthy, Jeffrey, 355–69. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate, 2000.
Glenn, H. Patrick. The Cosmopolitan State. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.
Glenn, H. Patrick. Legal Traditions of the World: Sustainable Diversity in Law. 5th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
Glenn, H. Patrick. On Common Laws. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.
Goldsworthy, Jeffrey. ‘Judicial Review, Legislative Override, and Democracy’. In Protecting Human Rights: Instruments and Institutions, edited by Campbell, Tom, Goldsworthy, Jeffrey, and Stone, Adrienne, 263–79. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.
Goldsworthy, Jeffrey. Parliamentary Sovereignty: Contemporary Debates. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
Goldsworthy, Jeffrey. ‘Questioning the Migration of Constitutional Ideas: Rights, Constitutionalism and the Limits of Convergence’. In The Migration of Constitutional Ideas, edited by Choudhry, Sujit, 115–41. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
Guttman, Daniel F. ‘Hislop v. Canada – A Retroactive Look’. Supreme Court Law Review (2d) 42 (2008): 547–66.
Haigh, Richard, and Sobkin, Michael. ‘Does the Observer Have an Effect? An Analysis of the Use of the Dialogue Metaphor in Canada's Courts’. Osgoode Hall Law Journal 45, no. 1 (2007): 67–90.
Halliday, Terence C. ‘Why the Legal Complex Is Integral to Theories of Consequential Courts’. In Consequential Courts: Judicial Roles in Global Perspective, edited by Kapiszewski, Diana, Silverstein, Gordon, and Kagan, Robert A., 337–48. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
Harding, Andrew, and Leyland, Peter. ‘Comparative Law in Constitutional Contexts’. In Comparative Law: A Handbook, edited by Örücü, Esin and Nelken, David, 313–38. Oxford: Hart, 2007.
Harel, Alon. Why Law Matters. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
Harlow, Carol. ‘Public Law and Popular Justice’. Modern Law Review 65, no. 1 (2002): 1–18.
Harlow, Carol, and Rawlings, Richard. Law and Administration. 3rd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
Heclo, Hugh. ‘Thinking Institutionally’. In The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions, edited by Rhodes, R. A. W., Binder, Sarah A., and Rockman, Bert A., 731–42. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.
Hedley, Steve. ‘Courts as Public Authorities, Private Law as Instrument of Government’. In Private Law: Key Encounters with Public Law, edited by Barker, Kit and Jensen, Darryn, 89–116. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
Heydon, J. D. ‘Are Bills of Rights Necessary in Common Law Systems?’ Law Quarterly Review 130, no. 3 (2014): 392–412.
Hickman, Tom. ‘Bill of Rights Reform and the Case for Going beyond the Declaration of Incompatibility Model’. New Zealand Law Review (forthcoming).
Hickman, Tom. ‘Negotiable Rights, What Rights?’ Modern Law Review 75, no. 3 (2012): 437–54.
Hickman, Tom. Public Law after the Human Rights Act. Oxford: Hart, 2010.
Hiebert, Janet L. ‘Governing Like Judges?’ In The Legal Protection of Human Rights: Sceptical Essays, edited by Campbell, Tom, Ewing, K. D., and Tomkins, Adam, 40–65. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.
Hiebert, Janet L. ‘New Constitutional Ideas: Can New Parliamentary Models Resist Judicial Dominance When Interpreting Rights?’ Texas Law Review 82, no. 7 (2004): 1963–87.
Hiebert, Janet L. ‘Parliament and the Human Rights Act: Can the JCHR Help Facilitate a Culture of Rights?’ International Journal of Constitutional Law 4, no. 1 (2006): 1–38.
Hiebert, Janet L., and Kelly, James B.. Parliamentary Bills of Rights: The Experiences of New Zealand and the United Kingdom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.
Hilbink, Lisa. ‘Beyond Manicheanism: Assessing the New Constitutionalism’. Maryland Law Review 65, no. 1 (2006): 15–31.
Hirschl, Ran. Comparative Matters: The Renaissance of Comparative Constitutional Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
Hirschl, Ran. ‘From Comparative Constitutional Law to Comparative Constitutional Studies’. International Journal of Constitutional Law 11, no. 1 (2013): 1–12.
Hoffman, David, and Rowe, John. Human Rights in the UK: An Introduction to the Human Rights Act 1998. 3rd edn. Harlow, UK: Pearson Longman, 2010.
Hofmeyr, Kate. ‘A Central-Case Analysis of Constitutional Remedial Power’. South African Law Journal 125, no. 3 (2008): 521–52.
Hogan, Gerard W., and Whyte, Gerry. J. M. Kelly: The Irish Constitution. 4th edn. Dublin: LexisNexis Butterworths, 2003.
Hogg, Peter W.Constitutional Law of Canada. 5th edn. 2 vols. Scarborough, ON: Thomson/Carswell, 2007.
Hunt, Murray. ‘The Human Rights Act and Legal Culture: The Judiciary and the Legal Profession’. Journal of Law and Society 26, no. 1 (1999): 86–102.
Huscroft, Grant. ‘Proportionality and the Relevance of Interpretation’. In Proportionality and the Rule of Law: Rights, Justification, Reasoning, edited by Huscroft, Grant, Miller, Bradley W., and Webber, Grégoire, 186–202. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014.
Huscroft, Grant. ‘Rationalizing Judicial Power: The Mischief of Dialogue Theory’. In Contested Constitutionalism: Reflections on the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, edited by Kelly, James B. and Manfredi, Christopher, 50–65. Vancouver: UBC Press, 2009.
Huscroft, Grant, Miller, Bradley W., and Webber, Grégoire. Introduction to Proportionality and the Rule of Law: Rights, Justification, Reasoning, edited by Huscroft, Grant, Miller, Bradley W., and Webber, Grégoire, 1–17. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014.
Ibhawoh, Bonny. ‘Asserting Judicial Sovereignty: The Debate over the Abolition of Privy Council Jurisdiction in British Africa’. In Legal Histories of the British Empire: Laws, Engagements and Legacies, edited by Dorsett, Shaunnagh and McLaren, John, 30–44. Abingdon, UK: Routledge, 2014.
Issalys, Pierre, and Lemieux, Denis. L'action gouvernementale: Précis de droit des institutions administratives. 3rd edn. Cowansville, QC: Yvon Blais, 2009.
Jackson, Vicki C. ‘Comparative Constitutional Law: Methodologies’. In The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law, edited by Rosenfeld, Michel and Sajó, András, 54–74. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
Jackson, Vicki C.Constitutional Engagement in a Transnational Era. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.
Jaffe, Louis L. ‘The Citizen as Litigant in Public Actions: The Non-Hohfeldian or Ideological Plaintiff’. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 116, no. 6 (1968): 1033–47.
Jones, David Philllip, and de Villars, Anne S.. Principles of Administrative Law. 5th edn. Toronto, ON: Carswell, 2009.
Jones, Peris, and Stokke, Kristian, eds. Democratising Development: The Politics of Socio-Economic Rights in South Africa. Leiden, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff, 2005.
Juratowitch, Ben. ‘Questioning Prospective Overruling’. New Zealand Law Review, no. 3 (2007): 393–416.
Juratowitch, Ben. Retroactivity and the Common Law. Oxford: Hart, 2008.
Kavanagh, Aileen. ‘Choosing between Sections 3 and 4 of the Human Rights Act 1998: Judicial Reasoning after Ghaidan v. Mendoza’. In Judicial Reasoning under the UK Human Rights Act, edited by Fenwick, Helen, Phillipson, Gavin, and Masterman, Roger, 114–42. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
Kavanagh, Aileen. Constitutional Review under the UK Human Rights Act. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
Kavanagh, Aileen. ‘Judging the Judges under the Human Rights Act: Deference, Disillusionment and the “War on Terror”’. Public Law, no. 2 (2009): 287–304.
Kavanagh, Aileen. ‘Special Advocates, Control Orders and the Right to a Fair Trial’. Modern Law Review 73, no. 5 (2010): 836–57.
Kavanagh, Aileen. ‘What's So Weak about “Weak-Form Review”? The Case of the UK Human Rights Act 1998’. International Journal of Constitutional Law (forthcoming).
Kellaway, E. A.Principles of Legal Interpretation of Statutes, Contracts and Wills. Durban, South Africa: Butterworths, 1995.
Keyes, John Mark. Executive Legislation. 2nd edn. Toronto, ON: LexisNexis Canada, 2010.
King, Jeff A. ‘Institutional Approaches to Judicial Restraint’. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 28, no. 3 (2008): 409–41.
King, Jeff. Judging Social Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
King, Jeff. ‘Parliament's Role Following Declarations of Incompatibility under the Human Rights Act’. In Parliaments and Human Rights: Redressing the Democratic Deficit, edited by Hunt, Murray, Hooper, Hayley, and Yowell, Paul, 165–92. Oxford: Hart, 2015.
Klare, Karl E. ‘Legal Culture and Transformative Constitutionalism’. South African Journal on Human Rights 14, no. 1 (1998): 146–88.
Klug, Heinz. The Constitution of South Africa: A Contextual Analysis. Oxford: Hart, 2010.
Klug, Heinz. ‘Constitutional Authority and Judicial Pragmatism: Politics and Law in the Evolution of South Africa's Constitutional Court’. In Consequential Courts: Judicial Roles in Global Perspective, edited by Kapiszewski, Diana, Silverstein, Gordon, and Kagan, Robert A., 93–113. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
Kritzer, Herbert M. ‘Toward a Theorization of Craft’. Social and Legal Studies 16, no. 3 (2007): 321–40.
Kronman, Anthony T. ‘Alexander Bickel's Philosophy of Prudence’. Yale Law Journal 94, no. 7 (1985): 1567–616.
Kumm, Mattias. ‘Constitutional Rights as Principles: On the Structure and Domain of Constitutional Justice’. International Journal of Constitutional Law 2, no. 3 (2004): 574–96.
Kumm, Mattias. ‘Political Liberalism and the Structure of Rights: On the Place and Limits of the Proportionality Requirement’. In Law, Rights and Discourse: The Legal Philosophy of Robert Alexy, edited by Pavlakos, George, 131–66. Oxford: Hart, 2007.
Kyritsis, Dimitrios. ‘Principles, Policies and the Power of Courts’. Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 20, no. 2 (2007): 379–97.
Landau, David. ‘The Reality of Social Rights Enforcement’. Harvard International Law Journal 53, no. 1 (2012): 402–59.
Lang, Michael. ‘Limitation of the Temporal Effects of Judgments of the ECJ’. Intertax 35, no. 4 (2007): 230–45.
Law, David S. ‘Constitutions’. In The Oxford Handbook of Empirical Legal Research, edited by Cane, Peter and Kritzer, Herbert M., 376–98. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.
Law, David S. ‘Generic Constitutional Law’. Minnesota Law Review 89, no. 3 (2005): 652–742.
Lawrence, Sonia. ‘A New Subtlety in Judicial Supremacy: Review of the 2003–2004 Constitutional Cases’. Supreme Court Law Review (2d) 26 (2004): 77–146.
Leckey, Robert. ‘Complexifying Roncarelli's Rule of Law’. McGill Law Journal 55, no. 3 (2010): 721–41.
Leclair, Jean. ‘Réflexions critiques au sujet de la métaphore du dialogue en droit constitutionnel canadien’. Revue du Barreau 63, special issue (2003): 377–420.
Leclair, Jean, and Morissette, Yves-Marie. ‘L'indépendance judiciaire et la Cour suprême: Reconstruction historique douteuse et théorie constitutionnelle de complaisance’. Osgoode Hall Law Journal 36, no. 3 (1998): 485–514.
Legrand, Pierre. ‘Against a European Civil Code’. Modern Law Review 60, no. 1 (1997): 44–63.
Legrand, Pierre. ‘Foreign Law: Understanding’. Journal of Comparative Law 6, no. 2 (2011): 67–177.
Lehmann, Karin. ‘In Defense of the Constitutional Court: Litigating Socio-Economic Rights and the Myth of the Minimum Core’. American University International Law Review 22, no. 1 (2007): 163–97.
Leigh, Ian, and Lustgarten, Laurence. ‘Making Rights Real: The Courts, Remedies, and the Human Rights Act’. Cambridge Law Journal 58, no. 3 (1999): 509–45.
Leigh, Ian, and Masterman, Roger. Making Rights Real: The Human Rights Act in Its First Decade. Oxford: Hart, 2008.
Lemmens, Koen. ‘Comparative Law as an Act of Modesty: A Pragmatic and Realistic Approach to Comparative Legal Scholarship’. In Practice and Theory in Comparative Law, edited by Adams, Maurice and Bomhoff, Jacco, 302–25. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
Lester, Anthony, Pannick, David, and Herberg, Javan. Human Rights Law and Practice. 3rd edn. London: LexisNexis, 2009.
Levinson, Daryl J. ‘Rights Essentialism and Remedial Equilibration’. Columbia Law Review 99, no. 4 (1999): 857–940.
Lewis, Jonathan. ‘The Constitutional Court of South Africa: An Evaluation’. Law Quarterly Review 125, no. 3 (2009): 440–67.
Leyland, Peter. The Constitution of the United Kingdom: A Contextual Analysis. 2nd edn. Oxford: Hart, 2012.
Liebenberg, Sandra. Socio-Economic Rights: Adjudication under a Transformative Constitution. Claremont, South Africa: Juta, 2010.
Lieven, Nathalie, and Kilroy, Charlotte. ‘Access to the Court under the Human Rights Act: Standing, Third Party Intervenors and Legal Assistance’. In Delivering Rights: How the Human Rights Act Is Working, edited by Jowell, Jeffrey and Cooper, Jonathan, 115–46. Oxford: Hart, 2003.
Lindell, Geoffrey. ‘Invalidity, Disapplication and the Construction of Acts of Parliament: Their Relationship with Parliamentary Sovereignty in the Light of the European Communities Act and the Human Rights Act’. Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies 2 (2000): 399–415.
Liston, Mary. Honest Counsel: Institutional Dialogue and the Canadian Rule of Law. PhD Thesis, University of Toronto, 2007.
Lobban, Michael. The Common Law and English Jurisprudence, 1760–1850. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991.
Loots, Cheryl. ‘Standing to Enforce Fundamental Rights’. South African Journal on Human Rights 10, no. 1 (1994): 49–59.
Loots, Cheryl. ‘Standing, Ripeness and Mootness’. In Constitutional Law of South Africa, edited by Woolman, Stuart, Bishop, Michael, and Brickhill, Jason, 2nd edn, vol. 1, 7-i to 7-23. Cape Town: Juta, 2012.
Loveland, Ian. Constitutional Law, Administrative Law, and Human Rights: A Critical Introduction. 6th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
Lovell, John. ‘From Now On: Temporal Issues in Constitutional Adjudication’. National Journal of Constitutional Law 18, no. 1 (2005): 17–43.
Macdonald, Roderick A. ‘Book Review: A Common Law Theory of Judicial Review’. Canadian Journal of Law and Society 22, no. 1 (2007): 141–43.
Macfarlane, Emmett. ‘Conceptual Precision and Parliamentary Systems of Rights: Disambiguating “Dialogue”’. Review of Constitutional Studies 17, no. 2 (2012): 73–100.
Macfarlane, Emmett. ‘Dialogue or Compliance? Measuring Legislatures’ Policy Responses to Court Rulings on Rights’. International Political Science Review 34, no. 1 (2013): 39–56.
Macfarlane, Emmett. Governing from the Bench: The Supreme Court of Canada and the Judicial Role. Vancouver: UBC Press, 2013.
Macklem, Timothy. ‘Entrenching Bills of Rights’. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 26, no. 1 (2006): 107–29.
Maiman, Richard. ‘“We've Had to Raise Our Game”: Liberty's Litigation Strategy under the Human Rights Act 1998’. In Human Rights Brought Home: Socio-Legal Perspectives on Human Rights in the National Context, edited by Halliday, Simon and Schmidt, Patrick, 87–109. Oxford: Hart, 2004.
Mak, Elaine. Judicial Decision-Making in a Globalised World: A Comparative Analysis of the Changing Practices of Western Highest Courts. Oxford: Hart, 2013.
Maldonado, Daniel Bonilla, ed. Constitutionalism of the Global South: The Activist Tribunals of India, South Africa, and Colombia. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
Maldonado, Daniel Bonilla. ‘Introduction: Toward a Constitutionalism of the Global South’. In Constitutionalism of the Global South: The Activist Tribunals of India, South Africa, and Colombia, edited by Maldonado, Daniel Bonilla, 1–37. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
Manfredi, Christopher P. ‘The Life of a Metaphor: Dialogue in the Supreme Court, 1998–2003’. In Constitutionalism in the Charter Era, edited by Huscroft, Grant and Brodie, Ian, 105–31. Markham, ON: LexisNexis Butterworths, 2004.
Manfredi, Christopher P. ‘Strategic Behaviour and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms’. In The Myth of the Sacred: The Charter, the Courts, and the Politics of the Constitution in Canada, edited by James, Patrick, Abelson, Donald E., and Lusztig, Michael, 147–67. Montreal, QC: McGill-Queen's University Press, 2002.
Manfredi, Christopher P., and Kelly, James B.. ‘Dialogue, Deference and Restraint: Judicial Independence and Trial Procedures’. Saskatchewan Law Review 64, no. 2 (2001): 323–46.
Mbazira, Christopher. Litigating Socio-Economic Rights in South Africa: A Choice between Corrective and Distributive Justice. Pretoria: Pretoria University Law Press, 2009.
McCamus, John D.The Law of Contracts. 2nd edn. Toronto, ON: Irwin Law, 2012.
McCann, Michael. ‘Litigation and Legal Mobilization’. In The Oxford Handbook of Law and Politics, edited by Whittington, Keith E., Kelemen, R. Daniel, and Caldeira, Gregory A., 522–40. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
McCormick, Peter J. ‘“Was It Something I Said?” Losing the Majority on the Modern Supreme Court of Canada, 1984–2011’. Osgoode Hall Law Journal 50, no. 1 (2012): 93–128.
McCrudden, Christopher. ‘A Common Law of Human Rights? Transnational Judicial Conversations on Constitutional Rights’. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 20, no. 4 (2000): 499–532.
McKendrick, Ewan. Contract Law. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011.
McLaren, John. Dewigged, Bothered, and Bewildered: British Colonial Judges on Trial, 1800–1900. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press, 2011.
McLean, Kirsty. Constitutional Deference, Courts and Socio-Economic Rights in South Africa. Pretoria: Pretoria University Law Press, 2009.
McNamara, Luke. Human Rights Controversies: The Impact of Legal Form. Abingdon, UK: Routledge-Cavendish, 2007.
Mendes, Errol, and Beaulac, Stéphane, eds. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. 5th edn. Markham, ON: LexisNexis, 2013.
Meuwese, Anne, and Versteeg, Mila. ‘Quantitative Methods for Comparative Constitutional Law’. In Practice and Theory in Comparative Law, edited by Adams, Maurice and Bomhoff, Jacco, 230–57. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
Michelman, Frank I. ‘The Rule of Law, Legality and the Supremacy of the Constitution’. In Constitutional Law of South Africa, edited by Woolman, Stuart, Bishop, Michael, and Brickhill, Jason, 2nd edn, vol. 1, 11-i to 11-44. Cape Town: Juta, 2012.
Miles, Joanna. ‘Standing under the Human Rights Act 1998: Theories of Rights Enforcement and the Nature of Public Law Adjudication’. Cambridge Law Journal 59, no. 1 (2000): 133–67.
Mohr, Thomas. ‘A British Empire Court – a Brief Appraisal of the History of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council’. In Power in History: From Medieval to the Post-Modern World, edited by McElligott, Anthony, Chambers, Liam, Breathnach, Ciara, and Lawless, Catherine, 125–42. Dublin: Irish Academic Press, 2011.
Mohr, Thomas. ‘British Imperial Statutes and Irish Law: Imperial Statutes Passed before the Creation of the Irish Free State’. Journal of Legal History 31, no. 3 (2010): 299–321.
Möller, Kai. The Global Model of Constitutional Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
Monahan, Patrick, and Shaw, Byron. Constitutional Law. 4th edn. Toronto, ON: Irwin Law, 2013.
Mubangizi, John C.The Protection of Human Rights in South Africa: A Legal and Practical Guide. Lansdowne, South Africa: Juta, 2004.
Mullan, David J.Administrative Law. Toronto, ON: Irwin Law, 2001.
Muttart, Daved M. ‘Dodging the Issue: Activism in the Supreme Court of Canada’. University of New Brunswick Law Journal 54, no. 1 (2005): 101–13.
Nardell, Gordon. ‘The Human Rights Act: Procedure, Standing and Remedies’. In Human Rights for the New Millennium, edited by Butler, Frances, 65–84. The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2000.
National Council of Welfare. Justice and the Poor. Ottawa: Minister of Public Works and Government Services Canada, 2000.
Newman, Donald J. ‘Pleading Guilty for Considerations: A Study of Bargain Justice’. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 46, no. 6 (1956): 780–90.
Ngcobo, Sandile. ‘South Africa's Transformative Constitution: Towards an Appropriate Doctrine of Separation of Powers’. Stellenbosch Law Review 22, no. 1 (2011): 37–49.
Ngcukaitobi, Tembeka. ‘The Evolution of Standing Rules in South Africa and Their Significance in Promoting Social Justice’. South African Journal on Human Rights 18, no. 4 (2002): 590–613.
Nicol, Danny. ‘Law and Politics after the Human Rights Act’. Public Law, no. 4 (2006): 722–51.
Nicol, Danny, and Marriott, Jane. ‘The Human Rights Act, Representative Standing and the Victim Culture’. European Human Rights Law Review, no. 6 (1998): 730–41.
O'Connell, Paul. Vindicating Socio-Economic Rights: International Standards and Comparative Experiences. Abingdon, UK: Routledge, 2012.
O'Regan, Kate. ‘Text Matters: Some Reflections on the Forging of a New Constitutional Jurisprudence in South Africa’. Modern Law Review 75, no. 1 (2012): 1–32.
Parkinson, Charles. Bills of Rights and Decolonization: The Emergence of Domestic Human Rights Instruments in Britain's Overseas Territories. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
Petter, Andrew. ‘Legalize This: The Chartering of Canadian Politics’. In Contested Constitutionalism: Reflections on the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, edited by Kelly, James B. and Manfredi, Christopher P., 211–31. Vancouver: UBC Press, 2009.
Phillips, Sir Fred. Commonwealth Caribbean Constitutional Law. London: Cavendish, 2002.
Phillipson, Gavin. ‘Deference, Discretion, and Democracy in the Human Rights Act Era’. Current Legal Problems 60, no. 1 (2007): 40–78.
Pierson, Paul, and Skocpol, Theda. ‘Historical Institutionalism in Contemporary Political Science’. In Political Science: The State of the Discipline, edited by Katznelson, Ira and Milner, Helen V., 693–721. New York: W. W. Norton, 2002.
Pinard, Danielle. ‘A Plea for Conceptual Consistency in Constitutional Remedies’. National Journal of Constitutional Law 18, no. 2 (2006): 105–68.
Plucknett, Theodore F. T.A Concise History of the Common Law. 5th edn. London: Butterworth, 1956.
Poole, Thomas. ‘Constitutional Exceptionalism and the Common Law’. International Journal of Constitutional Law 7, no. 2 (2009): 247–74.
Poole, Thomas. ‘Dogmatic Liberalism? T. R. S. Allan and the Common Law Constitution’. Modern Law Review 65, no. 3 (2002): 463–75.
Poole, Thomas. ‘Questioning Common Law Constitutionalism’. Legal Studies 25, no. 1 (2005): 142–63.
Rautenbach, Christa. ‘South African Common and Customary Law on Intestate Succession: A Question of Harmonisation, Integration or Abolition’. Journal of Comparative Law 3, no. 1 (2008): 119–32.
Raz, Joseph. Practical Reason and Norms. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.
Raz, Joseph. ‘Rights and Politics’. Indiana Law Journal 71, no. 1 (1995): 27–44.
Riles, Annelise. ‘A New Agenda for the Cultural Study of Law: Taking on the Technicalities’. Buffalo Law Review 53, no. 3 (2005): 973–1033.
Ripinsky, Sergey, and Williams, Kevin. Damages in International Investment Law. London: British Institute of International and Comparative Law, 2008.
Roach, Kent. ‘The Challenges of Crafting Remedies for Violations of Socio-Economic Rights’. In Social Rights Jurisprudence: Emerging Trends in International and Comparative Law, edited by Langford, Malcolm, 46–58. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
Roach, Kent. ‘Common Law Bills of Rights as Dialogue between Courts and Legislatures’. University of Toronto Law Journal 55, no. 3 (2005): 733–66.
Roach, Kent. ‘Constitutional and Common Law Dialogues between the Supreme Court and Canadian Legislatures’. Canadian Bar Review 80, nos 1–2 (2001): 481–533.
Roach, Kent. Constitutional Remedies in Canada. 1st edn. Aurora, ON: Canada Law Book, 1994.
Roach, Kent. Constitutional Remedies in Canada. 2nd edn. Toronto, ON: Canada Law Book, 2013.
Roach, Kent. ‘Dialogic Judicial Review and Its Critics’. Supreme Court Law Review (2d) 23 (2004): 49–104.
Roach, Kent. ‘Enforcement of the Charter – Subsections 24(1) and 52(1)’. In Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, 5th edn, edited by Mendes, Errol and Beaulac, Stéphane, 1123–87. Markham, ON: LexisNexis, 2013.
Roach, Kent. ‘Principled Remedial Discretion under the Charter’. Supreme Court Law Review (2d) 25 (2004): 101–50.
Roach, Kent. ‘Remedial Consensus and Dialogue under the Charter: General Declarations and Delayed Declarations of Invalidity’. University of British Columbia Law Review 35, no. 2 (2002): 211–70.
Roach, Kent. ‘Sharpening the Dialogue Debate: The Next Decade of Scholarship’. Osgoode Hall Law Journal 45, no. 1 (2007): 169–92.
Roach, Kent. The Supreme Court on Trial: Judicial Activism or Democratic Dialogue. Toronto, ON: Irwin Law, 2001.
Roach, Kent, and Budlender, Geoff. ‘Mandatory Relief and Supervisory Jurisdiction: When Is It Appropriate, Just and Equitable?’ South African Law Journal 122, no. 2 (2005): 325–51.
Robinson, Tracy. ‘Gender, Nation and the Common Law Constitution’. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 28, no. 4 (2008): 735–62.
Rogers, James R. ‘Information and Judicial Review: A Signaling Game of Legislative–Judicial Interaction’. American Journal of Political Science 45, no. 1 (2001): 84–99.
Roux, Theunis. The Politics of Principle: The First South African Constitutional Court, 1995–2005. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
Rundle, Kristen. Forms Liberate: Reclaiming the Jurisprudence of Lon L Fuller. Oxford: Hart, 2012.
Russell, Peter H.The Judiciary in Canada: The Third Branch of Government. Toronto, ON: McGraw-Hill Ryerson, 1987.
Ryder, Bruce. ‘Suspending the Charter’. Supreme Court Law Review (2d) 21 (2003): 267–95.
Sadurski, Wojciech. ‘Judicial Review and the Protection of Constitutional Rights’. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 22, no. 2 (2002): 275–99.
Sales, Sir Philip, and Ekins, Richard. ‘Rights-Consistent Interpretation and the Human Rights Act 1998’. Law Quarterly Review 127, no. 2 (2011): 217–38.
Santos, Boaventura de Sousa. ‘Law: A Map of Misreading. Toward a Postmodern Conception of Law’. Journal of Law and Society 14, no. 3 (1987): 279–302.
Sathanapally, Aruna. Beyond Disagreement: Open Remedies in Human Rights Adjudication. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
Schauer, Frederick. ‘Refining the Lawmaking Function of the Supreme Court’. University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform 17, no. 1 (1983): 1–24.
Schmidt, Patrick, and Halliday, Simon. ‘Introduction: Socio-Legal Perspectives on Human Rights in the National Context’. In Human Rights Brought Home: Socio-Legal Perspectives on Human Rights in the National Context, edited by Halliday, Simon and Schmidt, Patrick, 1–21. Oxford: Hart, 2004.
Schneiderman, David. ‘Banging Constitutional Bibles: Observing Constitutional Culture in Transition’. University of Toronto Law Journal 55, no. 3 (2005): 833–52.
Schneiderman, David. ‘Judging in Secular Times: Max Weber and the Rise of Proportionality’. Supreme Court Law Review (2d) 63 (2013): 557–77.
Seedorf, Sebastian, and Sibanda, Sanele. ‘Separation of Powers’. In Constitutional Law of South Africa, edited by Woolman, Stuart, Bishop, Michael, and Brickhill, Jason, 2nd edn, vol. 1, 12-i to 12-98. Cape Town: Juta, 2012.
Segal, Jeffrey Allan, and Spaeth, Harold J.. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
Seidman, Louis Michael. ‘Acontextual Judicial Review’. Cardozo Law Review 32, no. 4 (2011): 1143–81.
Seron, Carroll, and Silbey, Susan S.. ‘Profession, Science, and Culture: An Emergent Canon of Law and Society Research’. In The Blackwell Companion to Law and Society, edited by Sarat, Austin, 30–59. Oxford: Blackwell, 2004.
Sgayias, David. ‘Charter Remedies in 2001: Proceeding Cautiously’. Supreme Court Law Review (2d) 16 (2002): 405–19.
Shah, Sangeeta, and Poole, Thomas. ‘The Impact of the Human Rights Act on the House of Lords’. Public Law, no. 2 (2009): 347–71.
Shah, Sangeeta, Poole, Thomas, and Blackwell, Michael. ‘Rights, Interveners and the Law Lords’. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 34, no. 2 (2014): 295–324.
Shapiro, Martin. ‘Law and Politics: The Problem of Boundaries’. In The Oxford Handbook of Law and Politics, edited by Whittington, Keith E., Daniel Kelemen, R., and Caldeira, Gregory A., 767–74. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
Sharpe, Robert. ‘The Impact of a Bill of Rights on the Role of the Judiciary: A Canadian Perspective’. In Promoting Human Rights through Bills of Rights: Comparative Perspectives, edited by Alston, Philip, 431–53. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.
Sharpe, Robert J. ‘Mootness, Abstract Questions and Alternative Grounds: Deciding Whether to Decide’. In Charter Litigation, edited by Sharpe, Robert J., 327–56. Toronto, ON: Butterworths, 1987.
Siegel, Reva B. ‘Constitutional Culture, Social Movement Conflict and Constitutional Change: The Case of the De Facto Era’. California Law Review 94, no. 5 (2006): 1323–419.
Slattery, Brian. ‘The Pluralism of the Charter: Revisiting the Oakes Test’. In The Limitation of Charter Rights: Critical Essays on R. v. Oakes, edited by Tremblay, Luc B. and Webber, Grégoire C. N., 13–35. Montreal, QC: Thémis, 2009.
Smith, Rogers M. ‘Historical Institutionalism and the Study of Law’. In The Oxford Handbook of Law and Politics, edited by Whittington, Keith E., Kelemen, R. Daniel, and Caldeira, Gregory A., 46–59. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
Smith, Stephen A. ‘Duties, Liabilities, and Damages’. Harvard Law Review 125, no. 7 (2012): 1727–48.
Sossin, Lorne. Boundaries of Judicial Review: The Law of Justiciability in Canada. 2nd edn. Toronto, ON: Carswell, 2012.
Strayer, Barry L.The Canadian Constitution and the Courts: The Function and Scope of Judicial Review. 3rd edn. Toronto, ON: Butterworths, 1988.
Strayer, Barry L.Judicial Review of Legislation in Canada. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press, 1968.
Sullivan, Ruth. Sullivan on the Construction of Statutes. 6th edn. Markham, ON: LexisNexis, 2014.
Sumner, L. W. ‘Politicians, Judges, and the Charter’. Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 21, no. 1 (2008): 227–38.
Sunkin, Maurice. ‘Judicial Review’. In The New Oxford Companion to Law, edited by Cane, Peter and Conaghan, Joanne, 653–55. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
Swan, Angela, and Adamski, Jakub. Canadian Contract Law. 3rd edn. Markham, ON: LexisNexis, 2012.
Swart, Mia. ‘Left out in the Cold? Crafting Constitutional Remedies for the Poorest of the Poor’. South African Journal on Human Rights 21, no. 2 (2005): 215–40.
Swinfen, David B.Imperial Appeal: The Debate on the Appeal to the Privy Council, 1833–1986. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press, 1987.
Swinfen, D. B.Imperial Control of Colonial Legislation, 1813–1865: A Study of British Policy towards Colonial Legislative Powers. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1970.
Tamanaha, Brian Z.Beyond the Formalist–Realist Divide: The Role of Politics in Judging. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2010.
Tamanaha, Brian Z. ‘The Internal/External Distinction and the Notion of a “Practice” in Legal Theory and Sociolegal Studies’. Law and Society Review 30, no. 1 (1996): 163–204.
Tata, Cyrus. ‘Sentencing as Craftwork and the Binary Epistemologies of the Discretionary Decision Process’. Social and Legal Studies 16, no. 3 (2007): 425–47.
Thomas, Kendall. ‘Beyond the Privacy Principle’. Columbia Law Review 92, no. 6 (1992): 1431–516.
Tomkins, Adam. Our Republican Constitution. Oxford: Hart, 2005.
Tomkins, Adam. ‘The Role of the Courts in the Political Constitution’. University of Toronto Law Journal 60, no. 1 (2010): 1–22.
Tremblay, Luc B. ‘Marbury v. Madison and Canadian Constitutionalism: Rhetoric and Practice’. George Washington International Law Review 36, no. 3 (2004): 515–41.
Tribe, Laurence H.American Constitutional Law. Vol. 1. 3rd edn. New York: Foundation Press, 2000.
Tribe, Laurence H.The Invisible Constitution. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
Tsakyrakis, Stavros. ‘Proportionality: An Assault on Human Rights?’ International Journal of Constitutional Law 7, no. 3 (2009): 468–93.
Tushnet, Mark. ‘The Rise of Weak-Form Judicial Review’. In Comparative Constitutional Law, edited by Ginsburg, Tom and Dixon, Rosalind, 321–33. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2011.
Tushnet, Mark. ‘Some Reflections on Method in Comparative Constitutional Law’. In The Migration of Constitutional Ideas, edited by Choudhry, Sujit, 67–83. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
Tushnet, Mark. Weak Courts, Strong Rights: Judicial Review and Social Welfare Rights in Comparative Constitutional Law. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2008.
Twomey, Anne. ‘Fundamental Common Law Principles as Limitations upon Legislative Power’. Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal 9, no. 1 (2009): 47–71.
van Caenegem, R. C.The Birth of the English Common Law. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.
van der Merwe, C. G., du Plessis, Jacques, de Wall, Marius, Zimmermann, Reinhard, and Farlam, Paul. ‘The Republic of South Africa’. In Mixed Jurisdictions Worldwide: The Third Legal Family, edited by Palmer, Vernon Valentine, 95–215. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
Van der Merwe, Schalk, Van Huyssteen, L. F., Reinecke, M. F. B., and Lubbe, G. F.. Contract: General Principles. 3rd edn. Lansdowne, South Africa: Juta, 2007.
Vermeule, Adrian. ‘The Atrophy of Constitutional Powers’. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 32, no. 3 (2012): 421–44.
Vick, Douglas W. ‘The Human Rights Act and the British Constitution’. Texas International Law Journal 37, no. 2 (2002): 329–72.
Vining, Joseph. Legal Identity: The Coming of Age of Public Law. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1978.
Waddams, S. M.The Law of Contracts. 6th edn. Toronto, ON: Canada Law Book, 2010.
Wade, Sir William, and Forsyth, Christopher. Administrative Law. 10th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.
Wadham, John, Mountfield, Helen, Prochaska, Elizabeth, and Brown, Christopher. Blackstone's Guide to the Human Rights Act 1998. 6th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.
Waldron, Jeremy. ‘Compared to What? Judicial Activism and New Zealand's Parliament’. New Zealand Law Journal, no. 11 (2005): 441–45.
Waldron, Jeremy. ‘The Core of the Case against Judicial Review’. Yale Law Journal 115, no. 6 (2006): 1346–406.
Walters, Mark D. ‘The Common Law Constitution in Canada: Return of Lex non scripta as Fundamental Law’. University of Toronto Law Journal 51, no. 2 (2001): 91–141.
Walters, Mark D. ‘The Common Law Constitution and Legal Cosmopolitanism’. In The Unity of Public Law, edited by Dyzenhaus, David, 431–54. Oxford: Hart, 2004.
Waltman, Jerold L. Introduction to The Political Role of Law Courts in Modern Democracies, edited by Waltman, Jerold L. and Holland, Kenneth M., 1–5. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1988.
Waluchow, W. J.A Common Law Theory of Judicial Review: The Living Tree. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
Watt, Gary. ‘Comparison as Deep Appreciation’. In Methods of Comparative Law, edited by Monateri, Pier Giuseppe, 82–103. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2012.
Webber, Grégoire. ‘On the Loss of Rights’. In Proportionality and the Rule of Law: Rights, Justification, Reasoning, edited by Huscroft, Grant, Miller, Bradley W., and Webber, Grégoire, 123–54. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014.
Webber, Grégoire C. N. ‘Proportionality, Balancing, and the Cult of Constitutional Rights Scholarship’. Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 23, no. 1 (2010): 179–202.
Webber, Grégoire C. N. ‘The Unfulfilled Potential of the Court and Legislature Dialogue’. Canadian Journal of Political Science 42, no. 2 (2009): 443–65.
White, James Boyd. Justice as Translation: An Essay in Cultural and Legal Criticism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990.
Whittington, Keith E. ‘Once More unto the Breach: Postbehavioralist Approaches to Judicial Politics’. Law and Social Inquiry 25, no. 2 (2000): 601–34.
Wilson, Stuart, and Dugard, Jackie. ‘Taking Poverty Seriously: The South African Constitutional Court and Socio-Economic Rights’. Stellenbosch Law Review 22, no. 3 (2011): 664–82.
Woolf, Lord, and Jowell, Jeffrey L. De Smith, Woolf and Jowell: Judicial Review of Administrative Action. 5th edn. London: Sweet and Maxwell, 1995.
Woolman, Stu. ‘The Amazing, Vanishing Bill of Rights’. South African Law Journal 124, no. 4 (2007): 762–94.
Woolman, Stuart, Bishop, Michael, and Brickhill, Jason, eds. Constitutional Law of South Africa. 2nd edn. 4 vols. Cape Town: Juta, 2012.
Young, Alison L. ‘Judicial Sovereignty and the Human Rights Act 1998’. Cambridge Law Journal 61, no. 1 (2002): 53–65.
Young, Alison L.Parliamentary Sovereignty and the Human Rights Act. Oxford: Hart, 2009.
Young, Alison L. ‘Proportionality Is Dead: Long Live Proportionality!’ In Proportionality and the Rule of Law: Rights, Justification, Reasoning, edited by Huscroft, Grant, Miller, Bradley W., and Webber, Grégoire, 43–66. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014.
Young, Alison L. ‘Will You, Won't You, Will You Join the Deference Dance?’ Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 34, no. 2 (2014): 375–94.
