Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T07:35:12.713Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2024

C. Mantzavinos
C. Mantzavinos
Affiliation:
University of Athens, Greece
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
The Constitution of Science , pp. 177 - 206
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acierno, Louis (1994): The History of Cardiology, London and New York: The Parthenon Publishing Group.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, Marcus (2009): “Empirical Evidence and the Knowledge-That/Knowledge-How Distinction”, Synthese, vol. 170, pp. 97–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adorno, Theodor et al. (eds.) (1969): Der Positivismusstreit in der deutschen Soziologie, Neuwied, Berlin: Hermann Luchterhand Verlag.Google Scholar
Albert, Hans (1963/1993): “Wertfreiheit als methodisches Prinzip”, in Beckerath, Erwin von and Giersch, Herbert (eds.): Probleme der Normativen Ökonomik und der Wirtschaftspolitischen Beratung, Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1963, pp. 32–63 and reprinted in Topitsch, Ernst (ed.): Logik der Sozialwissenschaften, 12th ed., Athenäum, Hain, Hanstein: Neue wissenschaftliche Bibliothek, 1993, pp. 196–225.Google Scholar
Albert, Hans (1966): “Theorie und Praxis: Max Weber und das Problem der Wertfreiheit und der Rationalität”, in Oldemeyer, Ernst (ed.): Die Philosophie und die Wissenschaften, Simon Moser zum 65. Geburtstag, Meisenheim, pp. 246–272 and reprinted in Albert and Topitsch (1979), pp. 200–236.Google Scholar
Albert, Hans (1968/1985): Treatise on Critical Reason, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Albert, Hans (1969): “Der Mythos der totalen Vernunft: Dialektische Ansprüche im Lichte undialektischer Kritik”, in Adorno, et al. (eds.): (1969), pp. 193–234.Google Scholar
Albert, Hans (1975): Transzendentale Träumereien, Hamburg: Hoffmann und Campe.Google Scholar
Albert, Hans (1982): Die Wissenschaft und die Fehlbarkeit der Vernunft, Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).Google Scholar
Albert, Hans (1987): Kritik der reinen Erkenntnislehre, Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).Google Scholar
Albert, Hans (2010): “The Economic Tradition and the Constitution of Science”, Public Choice, vol. 144, pp. 401–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albert, Hans and Topitsch, Ernst (eds.) (1979): Werturteilsstreit, Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Albert, Max (2011): “Methodology and Scientific Competition”, Episteme, vol. 8, pp. 165–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albert, Max, Schmidtchen, Dieter, and Voigt, Stefan (eds.) (2008): Scientific Competititon, Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Alt, James and Crystal, K. Alec (1983): Political Economics, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, Elisabeth (2004): “Uses of Value Judgments in Science: A General Argument, with Lessons from a Case Study of Feminist Research on Divorce”, Hypatia, vol. 19, pp. 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, John R. (2010): Cognitive Psychology and Its Implications, 7th ed., New York: Worth Publishers.Google Scholar
Anderson, Lanier (2003): “The Debate over the Geisteswissenschaften in German Philosophy, 1880–1910”, in Baldwin, Thomas (ed.): The Cambridge History of Philosophy: 1870–1945, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 221–234.Google Scholar
Andrews, Kristin (2016): “Animal Cognition”, in Zalta, Edward N. (ed.): Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2016 Edition), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2016/entries/cognition-animal/.Google Scholar
Apel, Karl-Otto (1973): “Das Apriori der Kommunikationsgemeinschaft und die Grundlagen der Ethik: Zum Problem einer rationale Begründung der Ethik im Zeitalter der Wissenschaft”, in Transformation der Philosophie, Bd. 2, Das Apriori der Kommunikationsgesellschaft, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, pp. 358–435.Google Scholar
Apel, Karl-Otto (1976): “Sprechakttheorie und transzendentale Sprachpragmatik zur Frage ethischer Normen”, in Sprachpragmatik und Philosophie, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, pp. 10–173.Google Scholar
Arabatzis, Theodore (2006): “On the Inextricability of the Context of Discovery and the Context of Justification”, in Schickore, Jutta and Steinle, Friedrich (eds.): Revisiting Discovery and Justification, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 215–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arabatzis, Theodore (2017): “What’s in It for the Historian of Science? Reflections on the Value of Philosophy of Science for History of Science”, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 31, pp. 69–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arabatzis, Theodore and Kindi, Vasso (2013): “The Problem of Conceptual Change in the Philosophy and History of Science”, in Vosniadou, Stella (ed.): International Handbook of Research on Conceptual Change, London and New York: Routledge, pp. 343–359.Google Scholar
Aristotle, (1957): Metaphysica, (ed.) Jaeger, Werner, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Aristotle, (1996): Politics, (ed.) Everson, Stephen, Politics and The Constitution of Athens, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Austin, John L. (1962): How to Do Things with Words, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Ayer, Alfred Jules (1936/1952): Language, Truth and Logic, 2nd ed., New York: Dover Edition.Google Scholar
Axelrod, Robert (1986): “An Evolutionary Approach to Norms”, American Political Science Review, vol. 80, pp. 1095–1111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bacon, Francis (1620/2000): The New Organon, (eds.) Jardine, Lisa, and Silverthorne, Michael, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bandura, Albert (1986): Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Bargh, John and Chartrand, Tanya (1999): “The Unbearable Automaticity of Being”, American Psychologist, vol. 54, pp. 461–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bechtel, William and Abrahamsen, Adele (2005): “Explanation: A Mechanistic Alternative”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Biology and Biomedical Sciences, vol. 36, pp. 421–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernholz, Peter, Streit, Manfred E., and Vaubel, Roland (1998): Political Competition, Innovation and Growth, Berlin and New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bicchieri, Cristina (2005): The Grammar of Society, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bicchieri, Cristina (2016): Norms in the Wild, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Biddle, Justin (2013): “State of the Field: Transient Underdetermination and Values in Science”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, vol. 44, pp. 124–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bird, Alexander (2007): “What Is Scientific Progress?”, Noûs, vol. 41, pp. 64–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bird, Alexander (2016): “Scientific Progress”, in Humphreys, Paul (ed.): The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Science, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 544–563.Google Scholar
Bird, Alexander (2019): “The Aim of Belief and the Aim of Science”, Theoria: An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science, vol. 34, pp. 171–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bird, Alexander (2023): “The Epistemic Approach: Scientific Progress as Accumulation of Knowledge”, in Shan, Yafeng, (ed.): New Philosophical Perspectives on Scientific Progress, New York and London: Routledge, pp. 13–26.Google Scholar
Blackburn, Simon and Simmons, Keith (eds.) (1999): Truth, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Blackburn, Simon (1971/1993): “Moral Realism” in Casey, J. (ed.): Morality and Moral Reasoning, London: Methuen, 1971, reprinted in Essays on Quasi-Realism, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993, pp. 111–123.Google Scholar
Blackburn, Simon (1988): Ruling Passions: A Theory of Practical Reason, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Blackburn, Simon (1993): Essays on Quasi-Realism, Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaug, Mark (1997): Economic Theory in Retrospect, 5th ed., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloor, David (1976/1991): Knowledge and Social Imagery, 2nd ed., Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Böckenförde, Ernst-Wolfgang (1976): Staat, Gesellschaft, Freiheit: Studien zur Staatstheorie und zum Verfassungsrecht, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Bokulich, Alisa (2018): “Representing and Explaining: The Eikonic Conception of Scientific Explanation”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 85, pp. 793–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouterse, Jeroen and Karstens, Bart (2015): “A Diversity of Divisions: Tracing the History of the Demarcation between the Sciences and the Humanities”, Isis, vol. 106, pp. 341–352.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boyd, Richard (1988): “How to Be a Moral Realist”, in Sayre-McCord, Geoffrey (ed.): Essays on Moral Realism, Ithaca: Cornell University Press, pp. 187–228.Google Scholar
Boyd, Robert and Richerson, Peter J. (1985): Culture and the Evolutionary Process, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Boyd, Robert and Richerson, Peter J. (2009): “Culture and the Evolution of Human Cooperation”, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, vol. 364, pp. 3281–3288.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boyer-Kassem, Thomas, Mayo-Wilson, Conor, and Weisberg, Michael (eds.) (2018): Scientific Collaboration and Collective Knowledge: New Essays, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brennan, Geoffrey and Buchanan, James (1985): The Reason of Rules: Constitutional Political Economy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bresson, Alain (2016): The Making of the Ancient Economy: Institutions, Markets, and Growth in the City States. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Brigandt, Ingo (2015): “Social Values Influence the Adequacy Conditions of Scientific Theories: Beyond Inductive Risk”, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, vol. 45, pp. 326–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bright, Liam Kofi (2017): “On Fraud”, Philosophical Studies, vol. 174, pp. 291–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bright, Liam Kofi (2018): “Du Bois’ Democratic Defence of the Value Free Ideal”, Synthese, vol. 195, pp. 2227–2245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brink, David (1989): Moral Realism and the Foundations of Ethics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Matthew J. (2013): “Values in Science beyond Underdetermination and Inductive Risk”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 80, pp. 829–839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, James (1975): The Limits of Liberty. Between Anarchy and Leviathan, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Buchanan, James (1989): “The Relatively Absolute Absolutes”, in Buchanan, James (ed.): Essays in Political Economy, Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, pp. 96–109.Google Scholar
Buchanan, James (2001): “Law and the Invisible Hand”, in Moral Science and Moral Order, the Collected Works of James M. Buchanan Vol. 17, Indianapolis: The Liberty Press, pp. 96–109.Google Scholar
Buchanan, James and Tullock, Gordon (1962): The Calculus of Consent: Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Bueter, Anke (2015): “The Irreducibility of Value-Freedom to Theory Assessment”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, vol. 49, pp. 18–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burke, Edmund (1791/1962): An Appeal from the New to the Old Whigs, ed. Robson, J. M., Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Campbell, Donald (1965): “Variation and Selective Retention in Socio-Cultural Evolution”, in Barringer, Herbert R., Blanksten, George I., and Mack, Raymond W. (eds.): Social Change in Developing Areas, Cambridge, MA: Schenkman, pp. 19–49.Google Scholar
Capella, Martianus (1977): The Marriage of Philology and Mercury, (eds.) Stahl, William Harris and Burge, E. L., New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Carrier, Martin (2013): “Values and Objectivity in Science: Value-Ladenness, Pluralism and the Epistemic Attitude”, Science & Education, vol. 22, pp. 2547–2568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrier, Martin (2017): “Facing the Credibility Crisis of Science: On the Ambivalent Role of Pluralism in Establishing Relevance and Reliability”, Perspectives on Science, vol. 25, pp. 439–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrier, Martin (2018): “Identifying Agnotological Ploys: How to Stay Clear of Unjustified Dissens”, in Christian, A. et al. (eds.): Philosophy of Science – Between the Natural Sciences, the Social Sciences, and the Humanities, New York: Springer, pp. 155–169.Google Scholar
Carrier, Martin (2022): “What Does Good Science-Based Advice to Politics Look Like?”, Journal for General Philosophy of Science, vol. 53, pp. 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chakravartty, Anjan (2017): Scientific Ontology: Integrating Naturalized Metaphysics and Voluntarist Epistemology, Oxford. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, Hasok (2012): Is Water H2O? Evidence, Realism and Pluralism, Berlin and New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ChoGlueck, Christopher (2018): “The Error Is in the Gap: Synthesizing Accounts for Societal Values in Science”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 85, pp. 704–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clauberg, Johannes (1654): Logica, Vetus & Nova, Amsterdam: Ex Officina Elzeviriana.Google Scholar
Coase, Ronald (1937): “The Nature of the Firm”, Economica, vol. 4, pp. 386–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coase, Ronald (1960): “The Problem of Social Cost”, Journal of Law and Economics, vol. 3, pp. 1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Floris (2015): The Rise of Modern Science Explained: A Comparative History, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, James (1990a): Foundations of Social Theory, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Coleman, James (1990b): “The Emergence of Norms”, in Hechter, Michael, Opp, Karl-Dieter, and Wippler, Reinhard (eds.): Social Institutions, Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 35–59.Google Scholar
Collins, Harry (2023): “Science as Craftwork with Integrity”, in Ludwig, David, Koskinen, Inkari, Mncube, Zinhle, Poliseli, Luana, and Reyes-Galindo, Luis (eds.): Global Epistemologies and Philosophies of Science, London and New York: Routledge, pp. 296–307.Google Scholar
Condorcet, Marie Jean Antoine Nicolas de Caritat (1785): Essai sur l’ Application de l’ Analyse à la Probabilité des Décisions Rendues à la Pluralité des Voix, Paris: L’ Imprimerie Royale, Facsimile edition: New York, Chelsea, 1972.Google Scholar
Contessa, Gabriele (2021): “On the Mitigation of Inductive Risk”, European Journal for Philosophy of Science, vol. 11, p. 64, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-021-00381-6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Congleton, Roger (1989): “Efficient Status Seeking: Externalities, and the Evolution of Status Games”, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, vol. 11, pp. 175–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, John (1997): Plato, Complete Works, Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
Copp, David (2015): “Explaining Normativity”, Proceedings and Addresses of American Philosophical Association, vol. 89, 2015, pp. 48–73.Google Scholar
Craver, Carl (2007): Explaining the Brain, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craver, Carl (2014): “The Ontic Account of Scientific Explanation”, in Kaiser, Marie et al. (eds.): Explanation in the Special Sciences: The Case of Biology and History, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 27–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D’ Andrade, Roy (1995): The Development of Cognitive Anthropology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damasio, Antonio (1994): Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain, New York: Avon Books.Google Scholar
Damasio, Antonio (1999): The Feeling of What Happens: Body and Emotion in the Making of Consciousness, New York: Harcourt Brace & Company.Google Scholar
Daston, Lorraine (1992): “Objectivity and the Escape from Perspective”, Social Studies of Science, vol. 22, pp. 597–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daston, Lorraine (2014): “Objectivity and Impartiality: Epistemic Virtues in the Humanities”, in The Making of the Humanities, Vol. III, The Modern Humanities, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, pp. 27–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daston, Lorraine and Galison, Peter (2007): Objectivity, New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald (1984): Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Davies, Martin (2015): “Knowledge (Explicit, Implicit and Tacit): Philosophical Aspects”, in Wright, James D. (ed.): International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed., vol. 13, London: Elsevier, pp. 74–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deaton, Angus and Cartwright, Nancy (2018): “Understanding and Misunderstanding Randomized Controlled Experiments”, Social Science & Medicine, vol. 210, pp. 2–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Maistre, Joseph (1794–1795/1965): “Study on Sovereignty”, in Lively, J. (ed.): Works, New York: Macmillan, pp. 93–130.Google Scholar
De Melo-Martín, Inmaculada and Intemann, Kristen (2016): “The Risk of Using Inductive Risk to Challenge the Value-Free Ideal”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 83, pp. 500–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dellsén, Finnur (2021): “Understanding Scientific Progress: The Noetic Account”, Synthese, vol. 199, pp. 11249–11278.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dellsén, Finnur (2023): “The Noetic Approach: Scientific Progress as Enabling Understanding”, in Shan, Yafeng (ed.): New Philosophical Perspectives on Scientific Progress, New York and London: Routledge, pp. 62–81.Google Scholar
Denzau, Arthur and North, Douglass C. (1994): “Shared Mental Models: Ideologies and Institutions”, Kyklos, vol. 47, pp. 3–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devitt, Michael (2011): “Methodology and the Nature of Knowing How”, Journal of Philosophy, vol. 108, pp. 205–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dhami, Sanjit (2017): The Foundations of Behavioral Economic Analysis, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dietrich, Michael and Honnenberger, Philip (2020): “Duhem’s Problem Revisited: Logical vs. Epistemic Formulations and Solutions”, Synthese, vol. 197, pp. 337–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiMaggio, Paul (1997): “Culture and Cognition”, Annual Review of Sociology, vol. 23, pp. 263–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiMaggio, Paul and Powell, Walter (eds.) (1991): The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Dilthey, Wilhelm (1883/1990): Gesammelte Schriften, I. Band: Einleitung in die Geisteswissenschaften, 9. Auflage, Stuttgart: B.G. Teubner Verlagsgesellschaft und Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Dilthey, Wilhelm (1924/1990): Gesammelte Schriften V. Band: Die geistige Welt. Einleitung in die Philosophie des Lebens. Erste Hälfte: Abhandlungen zur Grundlegung der Geisteswissenschaften, 8. Auflage, Stuttgart: B.G. Teubner Verlagsgesellschaft und Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Dilthey, Wilhelm (1927/1992): Gesammelte Schriften VII. Band: Der Aufbau der geschichtlichen Welt in den Geisteswissenschaften, 8. unv. Auflage, Stuttgart: B.G. Teubner Verlagsgesellschaft und Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixit, Avinash, Skeath, Susan, and Reiley, David (2015): Games of Strategy. 4th ed., New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Donald, Merlin (1991): The Origins of the Modern Mind: Three Stages in the Evolution of Culture and Cognition, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dorato, Mauro (2004): “Epistemic and Nonepistemic Values in Science”, in Machamer, Peter and Wolters, Gereon (eds.): Science, Values and Objectivity, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, pp. 52–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorr, Cian, Nebel, Jacob, and Zuehl, Jake (2022): “The Case for Comparability”, forthcoming in Noûs.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, Heather (2000): “Inductive Risk and Values in Science”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 67, pp. 559–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, Heather (2004): “The Irreducible Complexity of Objectivity”, Synthese, vol. 138, pp. 453–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, Heather (2009): Science, Policy, and the Value-Free Ideal, Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dressel, Markus (2022): “Inductive Risk: Does It Really Refute Value-Freedom?”, Theoria. An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science, vol. 37, pp. 181–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duhem, Pierre (1906/1981): La Théorie Physique. Son Objet – Sa Structure, Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Duhem, Pierre (1908/2003): Sauver les Apparences. ΣΩΖΕΙΝ ΤΑ ΦΑΙΝΟΜΕΝΑ, Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Duhem, Pierre (1915): La Science Allemande, Paris: Librairie Scientifique A. Hermann & Fils.Google Scholar
Dupré, John (2007): “Fact and Value”, in Kincaid, Harold, Dupré, John, and Wylie, Alison (eds.): Value-Free Science? Ideals and Illusions, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 27–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eddington, Arthur (1920): Space, Time and Gravitation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Elbert, George (2004): “Evidence, Logic and Moral Authority: Experience and the Erosion of Certainties in Illiterate and Literate Societies”, in Carrier, Martin, et al. (eds.): Knowledge and the World: Challenges beyond the Science Wars, Berlin: Springer, pp. 211–236.Google Scholar
Elgin, Catherine (2017): True Enough, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elkins, Zachary, Ginsburg, Tom, and Melton, James (2009): The Endurance of Nations Constitutions, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellickson, Robert (1991): Order without Law, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, Kevin C. (2017): The Tapestry of Values: An Introduction to Values in Science, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, Kevin C. (2022): Values in Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, Kevin C. and Daniel, J. McKaughan (2009): “How Values in Scientific Discovery and Pursuit Alter Theory Appraisal”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 76, pp. 598–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, Kevin C. and Daniel, J. McKaughan (2014): “Nonepistemic Values and the Multiple Goals of Science”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 81, pp. 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, Kevin C. and Steel, Daniel (eds.) (2017): Current Controversies in Values and Science, New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elster, Jon (1989a): The Cement of Society, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elster, Jon (1989b): Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elster, Jon (2012): “The Optimal Design of a Constituent Assembly”, in Landemore, Hélène and Elster, Jon (eds.): Collective Wisdom: Principles and Mechanisms, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 148–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elster, Jon (2015): Explaining Social Behavior: More Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences, 2nd ed., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jon, Elster et al. (eds.) (2018): Constituent Assemblies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ensminger, Jean (1992): Making a Market: The Institutional Transformation of an African Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ensminger, Jean and Henrich, Joseph (eds.) (2014): Experimenting with Social Norms: Fairness and Punishment in Cross-Cultural Perspective, New York: Russell Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Estlund, David (2008): Democratic Authority: A Philosophical Framework, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Fara, Patricia (2009): Science. A Four Thousand Year History, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Adam (1767/1966): An Essay on the History of Civil Society, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Fernández Pinto, Manuela (2020): “Commercial Interests and the Erosion of Trust in Science”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 87, pp. 1003–1013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feyerabend, Paul (1975/2010): Against Method, 4th ed., London and New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Feyerabend, Paul (1976/1991): “Second Dialogue”, in Feyerabend, Paul (eds.): Three Dialogues on Knowledge, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, pp. 47–123.Google Scholar
Feyerabend, Paul (1978): Science in a Free Society. London: New Left Books.Google Scholar
Files, Craig (1996): “Goodman’s Rejection of Resemblance”, British Journal of Aesthetics, vol. 36(4), pp. 398–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fine, Arthur (1998): “The Viewpoint of No-One in Particular”, Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, vol. 72, pp. 9–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Føllesdal, Dagfinn (1979): “Hermeneutics and the Hypothetico-Deductive Method”, Dialectica, vol. 33, pp. 319–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franco, Paul (2017): “Assertion, Nonepistemic Values, and Scientific Practice”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 84, pp. 160–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeth, Tony, Alexander, Jones, Steele, John M., and Yanis, Bitsakis (2008): “Calendars with Olympiad and Eclipse Prediction on the Antikythera Mechanism”, Nature, vol. 454, pp. 614–617.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Freeth, Tony and Alexander, Jones (2012): “The Cosmos in the Antikythera Mechanism”, Institute for the Study of the Ancient World (ISAW) Papers 4, available at http://dlib.nyu.edu/awdl/isaw/isaw-papers/4/.Google Scholar
Freeth, Tony, Higgon, David, Dacanalis, Aris, MacDonald, Lindsay, Georgakopoulou, Myrto, and Wojcik, Adam (2021): “A Model of the Cosmos in the Ancient Greek Antikythera Mechanism”, Nature Scientific Reports, vol. 11, p. 5821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Michael (1974): “Explanation and Scientific Understanding”, Journal of Philosophy, vol. 71, pp. 5–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Michael (2001): The Dynamics of Reason, Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Friedman, Michael (2002): “Kant, Kuhn, and the Rationality of Science”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 69, pp. 171–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Michael (2011): “Extending the Dynamics of Reason”, Erkenntnis, vol. 75, pp. 431–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frigg, Roman and Hunter, Matthew (eds.) (2010): Beyond Mimesis and Convention. Representation in Art and Science, Heidelberg, London and New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galston, William A. (2011): “Pluralist Constitutionalism”, in Paul, Ellen Frankel, Fred D., Miller, Jr., and Jeffrey, Paul (eds.): What Should Constitutions Do?, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 228–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gascoigne, John (2019): Science and the State, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geddes, Barbara, Wright, Joseph, and Frantz, Erica (2014): “Autocratic Breakdown and Regime Transitions: A New Data Set”, Perspectives on Politics, vol. 12, pp. 313–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gemtos, Petros (2016): Methodologia ton koinonikon epistimon (Methodology of the Social Sciences), 5th enlarged edition, Athens: Papazisis.Google Scholar
Gentner, Derdre, Holyoak, Keith, and Kokinov, Boicho (eds.) (2001): The Analogical Mind: Perspectives from Cognitive Science, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbard, Allan (1990): Wise Choices, Apt Feelings, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbard, Allan (2003): Thinking How to Live, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gibbard, Allan (2014): Meaning and Normativity, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Giere, Ronald (2006): Scientific Perspectivism, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gigerenzer, Gerd (2007): Gut Feelings: The Intelligence of the Unconscious, London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Gigerenzer, Gerd (2008): Rationality for Mortals: How People Cope with Uncertainty, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gigerenzer, Gerd (2021): “Axiomatic Rationality and Ecological Rationality”, Synthese, vol. 198, pp. 3547–3564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gigerenzer, Gerd and Selten, Reinhard (eds.) (2001): Bounded Rationality: The Adaptive Toolbox, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gigerenzer, Gerd, Hertwig, Ralph, and Thorsten, Pachur (eds.) (2011): Heuristics: The Foundations of Adaptive Behavior, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gigerenzer, Gerd, Todd, Paul, and the ABC Group (1999): Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gintis, Herbert (2009): Game Theory Evolving, 2nd ed., Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Glanzberg, Michael (ed.) (2018): The Oxford Handbook of Truth, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glymour, Clark (1980): Theory and Evidence, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gomperz, Heinrich (1939): Interpretation: Logical Analysis of a Method of Historical Research, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Goodin, Robert and Spiekermann, Kai (2018): An Epistemic Theory of Democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grandy, Richard (1973): “Reference, Meaning, and Belief”, Journal of Philosophy, vol. 70(14), pp. 439–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, Gabriel (2013): “Beyond Resemblance”, Philosophical Review, vol. 122, pp. 215–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gross, Paul and Levitt, Norman (1994): Higher Superstition: The Academic Left and Its Quarrels with Science, Baltimore and London: The John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Grundmann, Thomas (2017): Analytische Einführung in die Erkenntnistheorie, 2nd ed., Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guala, Francesco (2009): The Methodology of Experimental Economics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Guala, Francesco (2016): Understanding Institutions, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen (1965/1969): “Erkenntnis und Interesse”, in Habermas, Jürgen (ed.): Technik und Wissenschaft als “Ideologie”, 3rd ed., Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, pp. 146–168.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen (1969a): “Analytische Wissenschaftstheorie und Dialektik. Ein Nachtrag zur Kontroverse zwischen Popper und Adorno”, in Adorno, et al. (eds.): (1969), pp. 155–191.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen (1969b): “Gegen einen positivistisch halbierten Rationalismus”, in Adorno, et al. (eds.): (1969), pp. 235–266.Google Scholar
Hacking, Ian (1983): Representing and Intervening, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadfield, Gillian and Weingast, Barry (2014): “Constitutions as Coordinating Devices”, in Galiani, Sebastian and Sened, Itai (eds.): Institutions, Property Rights, and Economic Growth: The Legacy of Douglass North, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 121–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hahn, Frank (1982): “Reflections on the Invisible Hand”, Lloyds Bank Review, vol. 144, pp. 1–21.Google Scholar
Hall, Peter A. (1986): Governing the Economy: The Politics of State Intervention in Britain and France, Oxford: Polity.Google Scholar
Hall, Peter and Taylor, Rosemary (1998): “Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms”, in Soltan, Karol, Uslaner, Eric, and Haufler, Virginia (eds.): Institutions and Social Order, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, pp. 15–43.Google Scholar
Hardin, Russell (1989): “Why a Constitution?”, in Grofman, B. and Wittman, D. (eds.): The Federalist Papers and the New Institutionalism, New York: Agathon Press, pp. 100–120.Google Scholar
Hare, Richard (1952): The Language of Morals, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Harvey, William (1628/1989): Exercitatio Anatomica de Motu Cordis et Sanguinis in Animalibus, English translation by Robert Willis in The Works of William Harvey, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatzimoysis, Anthony (2002): “Analytical Descriptivism Revisited”, Ratio, vol. 15, pp. 10–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatzis, Aristides (2015): “Moral Externalities: An Economic Approach to the Legal Enforcement of Morality”, in Aristides and Nicholas Mercuro (eds.): Law and Economics: Philosophical Issue and Fundamental Questions, London and New York: Routledge, pp. 226–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich A. von (1960): The Constitution of Liberty, London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich A. von (1973/1982): Rules and Order, Vol. I of Law, Legislation and Liberty, London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich A. von (1976/1982): The Mirage of Social Justice, Vol. II of Law, Legislation and Liberty, London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich A. von (1979/1982): The Political Order of a Free People, Vol. III of Law, Legislation and Liberty, London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Heesen, Remco (2017): “Communism and the Incentive to Share in Science”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 84, pp. 698–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heiner, Ronald (1993): “The Origin of Predictable Behavior”, American Economic Review, vol. 73, pp. 560–595.Google Scholar
Hempel, Carl (1942/1965): “The Function of General Laws in History”, Journal of Philosophy, vol. 39, pp. 35–48 and reprinted in: Carl Hempel: Aspects of Scientific Explanation, New York: Free Press, pp. 231–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hempel, Carl (1965): “Science and Human Values”, in Hempel, Carl (ed.): Aspects of Scientific Explanation, New York: Free Press, pp. 81–96.Google Scholar
Henschen, Tobias (2021): “How Strong Is the Argument from Inductive Risk?”, European Journal for Philosophy of Science, vol. 11, p. 92, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-021-00409-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicks, Daniel J. (2014): “A New Direction for Science and Values”, Synthese, vol. 191, pp. 3271–3295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas (1651/1991): Leviathan, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Holman, Bennett and Wilholt, Torsten (2022): “The New Demarcation Problem”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, vol. 91, pp. 211–220.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holland, John, Holyoak, Kenneth, Nisbett, Richard, and Thagard, Paul (1986): Induction: Processes of Inference, Learning and Discovery, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holt, Charles A. (2019): Markets, Games, and Strategic Behavior: An Introduction to Experimental Economics, 2nd ed., Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Holyoak, Kenneth and Thagard, Paul (1995): Mental Leaps: Analogy in Creative Thought, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Honneth, Axel (2017): “Is There an Emancipatory Interest? An Attempt to Answer Critical Theory’s Most Fundamental Question”, European Journal of Philosophy, vol. 25, pp. 908–920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howson, Colin and Urbach, Peter (2006): Scientific Reasoning: The Bayesian Approach, 3rd ed., Chicago: Open Court Publishing House.Google Scholar
Hoyningen-Huene, Paul (2023): “Objectivity, Value-Free Science, and Inductive Risk”, European Journal for Philosophy of Science, vol. 13, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-023-00518-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, Robert (2016): “Why We Should Not Reject the Value-Free Ideal of Science”, Perspectives on Science, vol. 24, pp. 167–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hull, David L. (1988): Science as a Process, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hull, David (1997): “What’s Wrong with Invisible-Hand Explanations?” Philosophy of Science, vol. 64, pp. S117–S126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, David (1748/1968): Treatise of Human Nature, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ivanova, Milena (2010): “Pierre Duhem’s Good Sense as a Guide to Theory Choice”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, vol. 41, pp. 58–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ivanova, Milena (2011): “Good Sense in Context: A Response to Kidd”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, vol. 42, pp. 610–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ivanova, Milena and Paternotte, Cedric (2013): “Theory Choice, Good Sense and Social Consensus”, Erkenntnis, vol. 78, pp. 1109–1132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Frank (1998): From Metaphysics to Morals: A Defence of Conceptual Analysis, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, Frank and Pettit, Philip (1995): “Moral Functionalism and Moral Motivation”, Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 45, pp. 20–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaeger, Werner (1936–1947): Paideia, 3 volumes, Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
James, William (1896): “The Will to Believe”, New World, vol. 5, pp. 327–347.Google Scholar
Jardine, Nick and Frasca-Spada, Marina (1997): “Splendours and Miseries of the Science Wars”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, vol. 28, pp. 219–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarvie, Ian (2001): The Republic of Science: The Emergence of Popper’s Social View of Science 1935–1945, Atlanta: Rodopi.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, Thomas (1789/1958): “Letter to James Madison, 6 September 1789”, in Oberg, Barbara B. (ed.): The Papers of Thomas Jefferson, vol. 15, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Jeffrey, Richard (1956): “Valuation and Acceptance of Scientific Hypotheses”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 22, pp. 237–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
John, Stephen (2019): “Science, Truth and Dictatorship: Wishful Thinking or Wishful Speaking?”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, vol. 78, pp. 64–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
John, Stephen (2021): Objectivity in Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson-Laird, Philip (1983): Mental Models, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson-Laird, Philip (2006): How We Reason, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Jones, Eric L. (2003): The European Miracle, 3rd ed., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalligas, Paul (2016): “Platonic Astronomy and the Development of Ancient Sphairopoiia”, Rhizomata, vol. 4(2), pp. 176–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keuth, Herbert (1989): Wissenschaft und Werturteil, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Keuth, Herbert (1993): Erkenntnis oder Entscheidung?, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Khalifa, Kareem (2017): Understanding, Explanation, and Scientific Knowledge, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kidd, James (2011): “Pierre Duhem’s Epistemic Aims and the Intellectual Virtue of Humility: A Reply to Ivanova”, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, vol. 42, pp. 185–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kincaid, Harold, Dupré, John, and Wylie, Alison (eds.) (2007): Value-Free Science? Ideals and Illusions, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitcher, Philip (1981): “Explanatory Unification”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 48, pp. 251–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitcher, Philip (1989): “Explanatory Unification and the Causal Structure of the World”, in Kitcher, Philip and Salmon, Wesley (eds.): Scientific Explanation, volume 13 of Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, pp. 410–505.Google Scholar
Kitcher, Philip (1990): “The Cognitive Division of Labor”, Journal of Philosophy, vol. 87, pp. 5–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitcher, Philip (1993): The Advancement of Science, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kitcher, Philip (2001): Science, Truth, and Democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitcher, Philip (2011a): Science in a Democratic Society, New York: Prometheus Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitcher, Philip (2011b): The Ethical Project, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitcher, Philip (2021): Moral Progress, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitcher, Philip (2023): “Scientific Progress and the Search for Truth” in Gonzalez, Wenceslao (ed.): Current Trends in the Philosophy of Science (Chapter 9) Synthese Library, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Knight, Jack (1992): Institutions and Social Conflict, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koethe, John (2002): “Stanley and Williamson on Knowing How”, Journal of Philosophy, vol. 99, pp. 325–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koertge, Noretta (ed.) (1998): A House Built on Sand: Exposing Postmodernist Myths About Science, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koertge, Noretta (2000): “Science, Values, and the Value of Science”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 67, pp. S45–S57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine (1996): The Sources of Normativity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine (2003): “Realism and Constructivism in 20th Century Ethics”, Journal of Philosophical Research, vol. 28(Supplement), pp. 99–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koskinen, Inkeri (2020): “Defending a Risk Account of Scientific Objectivity”, British Journal for Philosophy of Science, vol. 71, pp. 1187–1207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koskinen, Inkeri (2022): “How Institutional Solutions Meant to Increase Diversity in Science Fail”, Synthese, forthcoming.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koskinen, Inkeri (2023): “Participation and Objectivity”, Philosophy of Science, forthcoming, https://doi.org/10.1017/psa.2022.77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krementsov, Nicolai (1997): Stalinist Science, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kuhlmann, Wolfgang (1985): Reflexive Letztbegründung: Untersuchungen zur Transzendentalpragmatik, Freiburg i.Br.: Alber Verlag.Google Scholar
Kuhlmann, Wolfgang (2010): Unhintergehbarkeit: Studien zur Transzendentalpragmatik, Würzburg: Verlag Königshausen & Neumann.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas (1962/1970): The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd ed., Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas (1977): “Objectivity, Value Judgment and Theory Choice”, in The Essential Tension, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, pp. 320–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacey, Hugh (1999): Is Science Value-Free? Values and Scientific Understanding, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lacey, Hugh (2005): “On the Interplay of the Cognitive and the Social in Scientific Practices”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 72, pp. 977–988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakatos, Imre (1970): “Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes”, in Lakatos, Imre and Musgrave, Alan (eds.): Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 91–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landemore, Hélène (2012): “Collective Wisdom: Old and New”, in Landemore, Hélène and Elster, Jon (eds.): Collective Wisdom: Principles and Mechanisms, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lange, Marc (2016): Because without Cause: Non-Causal Explanations in Science and Mathematics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larkin, Jill H. and Simon, Herbert (1987): “Why a Diagram Is (Sometimes) Worth Ten Thousand Words”, Cognitive Science, vol. 11, pp. 65–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latour, Bruno, and Woolgar, Steve (1979/1986): Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts, 2nd ed., Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Laudan, Larry (1977): Progress and Its Problems: Towards a Theory of Scientific Growth, Los Angeles and London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Laudan, Larry (1981): “A Problem-Solving Approach to Scientific Progress”, in Hacking, Ian (ed.): Scientific Revolutions, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 144–155.Google Scholar
Laudan, Larry (1984): Science and Values, Berkeley; Los Angeles; London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Laudan, Larry (1987): “Progress or Rationality? The Prospects for Normative Naturalism”, American Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 24, pp. 19–31.Google Scholar
Laudan, Larry (1990): Science and Relativism, Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laudan, Larry (2004): “The Epistemic, the Cognitive, and the Social”, in Machamer, Peter and Wolters, Gideon (eds.): Science, Values and Objectivity, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, pp. 14–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leonard, Thomas C. (2002): “Reflections on Rules in Science: An Invisible-Hand Perspective”, Journal of Economic Methodology, vol. 9, pp. 141–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levi, Isaac (1960): “Must the Scientist Make Value Judgments?”, Journal of Philosophy, vol. LVII, pp. 345–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levi, Isaac (1962): “On the Seriousness of Mistakes”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 29, pp. 47–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levi, Margaret (1988): Of Rule and Revenue, Berkeley; Los Angeles; London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, John David (2011): “Constitutional and Fundamental Law: The Lesson of Classical Greece”, in Paul, Ellen Frankel, Fred D., Miller, Jr., and Jeffrey, Paul (eds.): What Should Constitutions Do?, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 25–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindquist, K., Wager, T. D., Kober, H., Bliss-Moreau, E., and Barrett, L. F. (2012): “The Brain Basis of Emotion: A Meta-Analytic Review”, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol. 35(3), pp. 121–143.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
List, Christian and Pettit, Philip (2011): Group Agency, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locke, John (1690): An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, London: Thomas Basset.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longino, Helen (1990): Science as Social Knowledge, Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longino, Helen (2002): The Fate of Knowledge, Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longino, Helen (2013): Studying Human Behavior, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorenz, Konrad (1941): “Kants Lehre vom Apriorischen im Lichte gegenwärtiger Biologie”, Blätter für deutsche Philosophie, vol. 15(1), pp. 95–124.Google Scholar
Loughlin, Martin (2022): Against Constitutionalism, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Love, Alan C. (2015): “Collaborative Explanation, Explanatory Roles and Scientific Explaining in Practice”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, vol. 52, pp. 88–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Machamer, Peter, Darden, Lindley, and Craver, Carl (2000): “Thinking about Mechanisms”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 67, pp. 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacFie, Alec (1971): “The Invisible Hand of Jupiter”, Journal of the History of Ideas, vol. 32, pp. 595–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magnus, P. D. (2013): “What Scientists Know Is Not a Function of What Scientists Know”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 80, pp. 840–849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magnus, P. D. (2022): “The Scope of Inductive Risk”, Metaphilosophy, vol. 53, pp. 17–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahoney, James and Thelen, Kathleen (eds.) (2015): Advances in Comparative-Historical Analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malpighi, Marcello (1661/1929): De Pulmonibus epistolae II ad Borellium, 1661, English translation by James Young: Malpighi’s “De Pulmonibus”, Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine, vol. 23, 1929, pp. 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malzbender, T. and Gelb, D. (2006): Polynomial Texture Mapping, Hewlett-Packard Mobile and Media Systems Laboratory. www.hpl.hp.com/research/ptm/.Google Scholar
Mantzavinos, C. (2001): Individuals, Institutions, and Markets, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mantzavinos, C. (2005): Naturalistic Hermeneutics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mantzavinos, C. (2013): “Explanatory Games”, Journal of Philosophy, vol. CX, pp. 602–632.Google Scholar
Mantzavinos, C. (2014): “Text Interpretation as a Scientific Activity”, Journal for General Philosophy of Science, vol. 45, pp. 45–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mantzavinos, C. (2016): Explanatory Pluralism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mantzavinos, C. (2021a): “Science, Institutions, and Values”, European Journal of Philosophy, vol. 29, pp. 379–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mantzavinos, C. (2021b): “Institutions and Scientific Progress”, Philosophy of the Social Sciences, vol. 51, pp. 243–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mantzavinos, C., North, Douglass, and Shariq, Syed (2004): “Learning, Institutions, and Economic Performance”, Perspectives on Politics, vol. 2, pp. 75–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
March, James (1999): The Pursuit of Organizational Intelligence, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
McAdams, Richard (1997): “The Origin, Development, and Regulation of Norms”, Michigan Law Review, vol. 96(1997), pp. 338–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCauley, Robert (2000): “The Naturalness of Religion and the Unnaturalness of Science”, in Keil, Frank and Wilson, Robert (eds.): Explanation and Cognition, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 61–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDowell, John (1998): “Virtue and Reason”, in Mind, Value, and Reality, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 50–73.Google Scholar
McIlwain, Charles Howard (1940): Constitutionalism: Ancient and Modern, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
McMullin, Ernan (1983/2012): “Values in Science”, in Asquith, Peter D. and Nickles, Thomas (eds.): Proceedings of the 1982 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, 1, East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 3–28, reprinted in: Zygon, vol. 47, 2012, pp. 686–709.Google Scholar
Meier, Georg Friedrich (1757/1996): Versuch einer allgemeinen Auslegungskunst, mit einer Einleitung und Anmerkungen, (eds.) Axel Bühler and Luigi Cataldi Madonna, Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Menger, Carl (1871/1968): Grundsätze der Volkswirtschaftslehre, Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).Google Scholar
Menger, Carl (1871/1976): Principles of Economics, Arlington, VA: The Institute for Humane Studies.Google Scholar
Mercier, Hugo and Sperber, Dan (2017): The Enigma of Reason, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Merton, Robert (1943/1973): “The Normative Structure of Science”, in Merton, Robert (ed.): The Sociology of Science, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, pp. 268–278.Google Scholar
Meyer, John (2010): “World Society, Institutional Theories, and the Actor”, Annual Review of Sociology, vol. 36, pp. 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mill, John Stuart (1843/1974): A System of Logic Ratiocinative and Inductive, The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, vol. VIII, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Montesquieu, Charles de Secondat Baron de (1748/1989): The Spirit of the Laws, trans. A. Cohler, B. Miller, and H. Stone, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, Mary (2012): The World in the Model: How Economists Work and Think, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moe, Terry (2005): “Power and Political Institutions”, Perspectives on Politics, vol. 3, pp. 215–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mueller, Dennis (2003): Public Choice III, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagel, Ernest (1961): The Structure of Science, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagel, Thomas (1986): The View from Nowhere, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nagel, Thomas (2012): Mind and Cosmos, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nau, Heino Heinrich (ed.) (1996): Der Werturteisstreit. Die Äußerungen zur Werturteilsdiskussion im Ausschuß des Vereins für Socialpolitik (1913), Marburg: Metropolis Verlag.Google Scholar
Nee, Victor and Brinton, Mary (eds.) (1998): The New Institutionalism in Sociology, New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
Nee, Victor and Ingram, Paul (1998): “Embeddedness and Beyond: Institutions, Exchange and Social Structure”, in Nee, Victor and Brinton, Mary C. (eds.): The New Institutionalism in Sociology, New York: Russell Sage Foundation, pp. 19–45.Google Scholar
Needham, Joseph (1978): The Shorter Science and Civilization in China (prepared under the supervision by Colin A. Ronan), vol. 1, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nehamas, Alexander (1981): “The Postulated Author: Critical Monism as a Regulative Ideal”, Critical Inquiry, vol. 8, pp. 133–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nehamas, Alexander (1985): “Convergence and Methodology in Science and Criticism”, New Literary History, vol. 17 on Philosophy of Science and Literary Theory, pp. 81–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nehamas, Alexander (1987): “Writer, Text, Work, Author”, in Cascardi, A. J. (ed.): Literature and the Question of Philosophy, Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, pp. 267–291.Google Scholar
Nelson, Richard (1959): “The Simple Economics of Basic Scientific Research”, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 67, pp. 297–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nersessian, Nancy (2008): Creating Scientific Concepts, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newell, Allen and Simon, Herbert (1972): Human Problem Solving, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Nickelsen, Kärin (2022): “Cooperative Division of Cognitive Labour: The Social Epistemology of Photosynthesis Research”, Journal for General Philosophy of Science, vol. 53, pp. 23–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nickles, Thomas (2021): “Historicist Theories of Scientific Rationality”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2021 Edition), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2021/entries/rationality-historicist/.Google Scholar
Niiniluoto, Ilka (2014): “Scientific Progress as Increasing Verisimilitude”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, vol. 46, pp. 73–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Niiniluoto, Ilka (2023): “The Semantic Approach: Scientific Progress as Increased Truthlikeness”, in Shan, Yafeng (ed.): New Philosophical Perspectives on Scientific Progress, New York and London: Routledge, pp. 27–45.Google Scholar
Nisbett, Richard and Ross, Lee (1980): Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
North, Douglass C. (1981): Structure and Change in Economic History, New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
North, Douglass C. (1990): Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, Douglass C. (1994): “Economic Performance through Time”, American Economic Review, vol. 84, pp. 359–368.Google Scholar
North, Douglass C. (2005): Understanding the Process of Economic Change, Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, Douglass C., Wallis, John, and Weingast, Barry (2009): Violence and Social Orders: A Conceptual Framework for Interpreting Recorded Human History, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norton, John (1993): “The Determination of Theory by Evidence: The Case for Quantum Discontinuity, 1900–1915”, Synthese, vol. 97, pp. 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norton, John (2008): “Must Evidence Underdetermine Theory?”, in Martin, Carrier, Howard, Don, and Kourany, Janet (eds.): The Challenge of the Social and the Pressure of Practice: Science and Values Revisited, Pittsburgh: Pittsburgh University Press, pp. 17–44.Google Scholar
Ober, Josiah (2015): The Rise and Fall of Classical Greece, Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oddie, Graham (2014): “Truthlikeness”, in Zalta, Edward N. (ed.): The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2014 Edition), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2014/entries/truthlikeness/.Google Scholar
Opp, Karl-Dieter (1982): “The Evolutionary Emergence of Norms”, British Journal of Social Psychology, vol. 21, pp. 139–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oppenheim, Heinrich Bernhard (1871): “Manchesterschule und Kathedersozialismus”, National-Zeitung, vol. 7. Dezember, Nr. 573, 24, p. 1.Google Scholar
Ordeshook, Peter (1992): “Constitutional Stability”, Constitutional Political Economy, vol. 3, pp. 137–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, Elinor (1990): Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, Elinor (2005): Understanding Institutional Diversity, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Papineau, David (1999): “Normativitiy and Judgment”, Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume, vol. 73, pp. 17–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmieri, Paolo (2012): “Signals, Cochlear Mechanics and Pragmatism: A New Vista of Human Hearing?”, Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, vol. 24, pp. 527–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pamuk, Zeynep (2021): Politics and Expertise. How to Use Science in a Democratic Society, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Parfit, Derek (2011): On What Matters, Vol. 2, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Parker, Wendy and Winsberg, Eric (2018): “Values and Evidence: How Models Make a Difference”, European Journal for Philosophy of Science, vol. 8(125), pp. 125–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, Wendey (2020): “Model Evaluation: An Adequacy-for-Purpose Approach”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 87, pp. 457–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pascal, Blaise (1670/2000): Pensées, Paris: Librairie Générale Française.Google Scholar
Penn, Derek C. and Povinelli, Daniel J. (2007): “On the Lack of Evidence that Non-human Animals Possess Anything Remotely Resembling a ‘Theory of Mind’”, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B, vol. 362, pp. 731–744.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perini, Laura (2005a): “The Truth in Pictures”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 72, pp. 262–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perini, Laura (2005b): “Visual Representations and Confirmation”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 72, pp. 913–926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettit, Philip (1997): Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pettit, Philip (2012): On the People’s Terms: A Republican Theory and Model of Democracy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Picavet, Emmanuel (2020): “Ways of Compromise-Building in a World of Institutions”, in Andina, Tiziana and Peter Bojanic (eds.): Institutions in Action. The Nature and Role of Institutions in the Real World, Heidelberg and New York: Springer, pp. 135–145.Google Scholar
Pierson, Paul (2004): Politics in Time: History, Institutions and Social Analysis, Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plutynski, Anya (2018): Explaining Cancer: Finding Order in Disorder, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Poincaré, Henri (1919): La Morale et la Science: Dernières Pensées, Paris: Ernest Flammarion.Google Scholar
Polanyi, Michael (1958): Personal Knowledge, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Polanyi, Michael (1962): “The Republic of Science”, Minerva, vol. I, pp. 54–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polanyi, Michael (1966): The Tacit Dimension, Gloucester, MA: Peter Smith.Google Scholar
Pollock, Ethan (2008): Stalin and the Soviet Science Wars, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl (1934/2003): The Logic of Scientific Discovery, London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl (1944/1957): The Poverty of Historicism, first published in Economica, N.S., vol. XI, no. 42 and 43, 1944 and vol. XII, no 46, 1945 and appeared as a book in London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl (1945/2002): The Open Society and Its Enemies, London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl (1963): Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge, London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl (1972): Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl (1994): The Myth of the Framework: In Defence of Science and Rationality, London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Potochnik, Angela (2017): Idealization and the Aims of Science, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, Derek de Solla Price (1974): “Gears from the Greeks: The Antikythera Mechanism – A Calendar Computer from ca. 80 B.C.”, Transactions of the American Philosophical Society New Series, vol. 64, pp. 1–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pryke, Louise (2016): “Religion and Humanity in Mesopotamian Myth and Epic”, Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Religion, https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199340378.013.247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Psillos, Stathis (1999): Scientific Realism: How Science Tracks Truth, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Psillos, Stathis (2015): “Evidence: Wanted, Alive or Dead”, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, vol. 45, pp. 357–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Hilary (1981): Reason, Truth and History, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Hilary (2002): The Collapse of the Fact/Value Dichotomy and Other Essays, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Quine, Willard van Orman (1951/1980): “Two Dogmas of Empiricism”, in From a Logical Point of View, 2nd ed., Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 20–46.Google Scholar
Quine, Willard van Orman (1960): Word and Object, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Raatikainen, Panu (2022): “Truth and Theories of Truth”, in Stalmaszczyk, Piotr, (ed.): The Cambridge Handbook of the Philosophy of Language, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 217–232.Google Scholar
Radnitzky, Gerhard (1981): “Wertfreiheitsthese: Wissenschaft, Ethik und Politik”, in Radnitzky, Gerhard and Andersson, Gunnar (eds.): Voraussetzungen und Grenzen der Wissenschaft, Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), pp. 47–126.Google Scholar
Railton, Peter (1981): “Probability, Explanation and Information”, Synthese, vol. 48, pp. 233–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Railton, Peter (1986): “Moral Realism”, Philosophical Review, vol. 95, pp. 163–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John (1971): A Theory of Justice, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reichenbach, Hans (1938): Experience and Prediction, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Reichenbach, Hans (1951): The Rise of Scientific Philosophy, Berkeley; Los Angeles: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reiss, Julian (2015): “A Pragmatist Theory of Evidence”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 82, pp. 341–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reiss, Julian and Sprenger, Jan (2020): “Scientific Objectivity”, in Edward N. Zalta (ed.): Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.Google Scholar
Rescher, Nicholas (1997): Objectivity: The Obligations of Impersonal Reason, Notre Dame, IN and London: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Resnik, David (1998): The Ethics of Science: An Introduction, London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Resnik, David and Elliott, Kevin (2019): “Value-Entanglement and the Integrity of Scientific Research”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 75, pp. 1–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Resnik, David and Elliott, Kevin (2023): “Science, Values, and the New Demarcation Problem”, Journal for General Philosophy of Science, published online 22 February 2023.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rice, Collin (2021): Leveraging Distortions: Explanation, Idealization and Universality in Science, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rickert, Heinrich (1929): Die Grenzen der naturwissenschaftlichen Begriffsbildung: Eine logische Einleitung in die historischen Wissenschaften, 5. Auflage, Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).Google Scholar
Riker, William (1980): “Implications from the Disequilibrium of Majority Rule for the Study of Institutions”, American Political Science Review, vol. 74, pp. 432–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rolin, Kristina (2015): “Values in Science: The Case of Scientific Collaboration”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 82, pp. 157–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rorty, Richard (1979/2018): Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenfeld, Tobias (2004): “Is Knowing-How Simply a Case of Knowing-That?”, Philosophical Investigations, vol. 27, pp. 370–379.Google Scholar
Rothschild, Emma (1994): “Adam Smith and the Invisible Hand”, American Economic Review (Papers and Proceedings), vol. 84, pp. 319–322.Google Scholar
Rothschild, Emma (2002): Economic Sentiments, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rowbottom, Darrell (2014): “Aimless Science”, Synthese, vol. 191, pp. 1211–1221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudner, Richard (1953): “The Scientist qua Scientist Makes Value Judgments”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 20, pp. 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryle, Gilbert (1949): The Concept of Mind, London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Rysiew, Patrick (2021): “Epistemic Contextualism”, in Edward N. Zalta (ed.): Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.Google Scholar
Salmon, Wesley (1984): Scientific Explanation and the Causal Structure of the World, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sankey, Howard (2019): “Objectivity in Science”, in: PhilPapers.Google Scholar
Sankey, Howard (2021): “Realism and the Epistemic Objectivity of Science”, Kriterion – Journal of Philosophy, vol. 35, pp. 5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiffer, Stephen (2002): “Amazing Knowledge”, Journal of Philosophy, vol. 99, pp. 200–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schindler, Samuel (2018): Theoretical Virtues in Science: Uncovering Reality through Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schopenhauer, Arthur (1851): “Über Religion: Ein Dialog”, in Parerga and Paralipomena, §174, Kapitel 15, Berlin: Verlag A. W. Hayn.Google Scholar
Schrödinger, Erwin (1958): Mind and Matter, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schroeder, Andrew S. (2017): “Using Democratic Values in Science: An Objection and (Partial) Response”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 84, pp. 1044–1054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schroeder, Andrew S. (2021): “Democratic Values: A Better Foundation for Public Trust in Science”, British Journal for Philosophy of Science, vol. 72, pp. 545–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schroeder, Andrew S. (2022): “The Limits of Democratizing Science: When Scientists Should Ignore the Public”, Philosophy of Science, forthcoming.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schroeder, Mark (2008): Being For: Evaluating the Semantic Program of Expressivism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schurz, Gerhard and Carrier, Martin (eds) (2013): Werte in den Wissenschaften. Neue Ansätze zum Werturteilsstreit, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Scriven, Michael (1972): “The Exact Role of Value Judgments in Science”, PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 219–247.Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya (2006): “What Do We Want from a Theory of Justice?”, Journal of Philosophy, vol. CIII, pp. 175–208.Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya (2009): The Idea of Justice, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Servetus, Miguel (1553/2008): Christianismi Restitutio, Vienne, English translation: The Restoration of Christianity, by Christopher A. Hoffmann and Marian Hiller, Lewiston, NY: The Edwin Mellen Press.Google Scholar
Shackle, G. L. S. (1979): Imagination and the Nature of Choice, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Shan, Yafeng (2019): “A New Functional Approach to Scientific Progress”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 86, pp. 739–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shan, Yafeng (2023): “The Functional Approach. Scientific Progress as Increased Usefulness”, in Shan, Yafeng (ed.): New Philosophical Perspectives on Scientific Progress, New York and London: Routledge, pp. 46–61.Google Scholar
Shapin, Steven (1996): The Scientific Revolution, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shepsle, Kenneth (1986): “Institutional Equilibrium and Equilibrium Institutions”, in Weisberg, Herbert (ed.): Political Science: The Science of Politics, New York: Agathon, pp. 51–81.Google Scholar
Shepsle, Kenneth (1989): “Studying Institutions: Some Lessons from the Rational Choice Approach”, Journal of Theoretical Politics, vol. 1, pp. 131–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shepsle, Kenneth (2006): “Rational Choice Institutionalism”, in Rhodes, R. A. W., Binder, Sarah, and Rockman, Bert (eds.): Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 23–38.Google Scholar
Simon, Herbert (1983): Reason in Human Affairs, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Siraisi, Nancy (1981): Tadeo Alderotti and His Pupils: Two Generations of Italian Medical Learning, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin (1969): “Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas”, History and Theory, vol. 8, pp. 3–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, Quentin (1972): “Motives, Intentions and the Interpretation of Texts”, New Literary History, vol. 3, pp. 393–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, Quentin (1975): “Hermeneutics and the Role of History”, New Literary History, vol. 7, pp. 209–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skow, Bradford (2018): Causation, Explanation, and the Metaphysics of Aspect, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Adam (1759/1976): The Theory of Moral Sentiments, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Adam (1776/1976): An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, (ed.) Cannan, Edwin, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam (1759/1980): Essays in Philosophical Subjects, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Michael (1994): The Moral Problem, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Snell, Bruno (1946/2009): Die Entdeckung des Geistes: Studien zur Entstehung des europäischen Denkens bei den Griechen, 9th ed., Göttingen: Vandnhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Snow, P. C. (1959/1993): The Two Cultures, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sober, Elliott (2002): “What Is the Problem of Simplicity?” in Zellner, Arnold, Keuzenbach, Hugo, and McAleer, Michael (eds.): Simplicity, Inference and Econometric Modelling, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 13–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sokal, Alan (1996): “Transgressing the Boundaries: Towards a Transformative Hermeneutics of Quantum Gravity”, Social Text, vol. 46/47, pp. 217–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sokal, Alan and Bricmont, Jean (1997): Inpostures Intellectuelles, Paris: Éditions Odile Jacob.Google Scholar
Stanley, Jason (2011): Know How, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanley, Jason and Williamson, Timothy (2001): “Knowing How”, Journal of Philosophy, vol. 98, pp. 411–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steel, Daniel (2010): “Epistemic Values and the Argument from Inductive Risk”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 77, pp. 14–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steele, Katie (2012): “The Scientist qua Policy Advisor Makes Value Judgments”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 79, pp. 893–904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sterelny, Kim (2012): The Evolved Apprentice: How Evolution Made Humans Unique, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevenson, Charles Leslie (1937): “The Emotive Meaning of Ethical Terms”, Mind, vol. 46, pp. 14–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Street, Sharon (2006): “A Darwinian Dilemma for Realist Theories of Value”, Philosophical Studies, vol. 127, pp. 109–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strevens, Michael (2006a): “The Role of the Priority Rule in Science”, Journal of Philosophy, vol. C, pp. 55–79.Google Scholar
Strevens, Michael (2006b): “The Role of the Matthew Effect in Science”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, vol. 37, pp. 159–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strevens, Michael (2008): Depth: An Account of Scientific Explanation, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Strevens, Michael (2020): The Knowledge Machine: How an Unreasonable Idea Created Modern Science, New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Stump, David (2007): “Pierre Duhem’s Virtue Epistemology”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, vol. 38, pp. 149–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stump, David (2011): “The Scientist as Impartial Judge: Moral Values in Duhem’s Philosophy of Science: New Perspectives on Pierre Duhem’s The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory” (book symposium), in: Metascience, vol. 20, pp. 1–25.Google Scholar
Sturgeon, Nicholas (1988): “Moral Explanations”, in Sayre-McCord, Geoffrey (ed.): Essays on Moral Realism, Ithaca: Cornell University Press, pp. 229–255.Google Scholar
Svoronos, Ioannes N. (1908): Das Athener Nationalmuseum, Athens: Beck & Barth.Google Scholar
Teller, Paul (2008): “Representation in Science”, in Psillos, Stathis and Curd, Martin (eds.): The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Science, London and New York: Routledge, pp. 435–441.Google Scholar
Thagard, Paul (2012): The Cognitive Science of Science: Explanation, Discovery and Conceptual Change, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thelen, Kathleen (2004): How Institutions Evolve: The Political Economy of Skills in Germany, Britain, the United States and Japan, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, Michael (2016): A Natural History of Human Morality, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Topitsch, Ernst (1958): Vom Ursprung und Ende der Metaphysik: Eine Studie zur Weltanschauungskritik, Wien: Springer Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trout, J. D. (2016): Wondrous Truths: The Improbable Triumph of Modern Science, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsebelis, George (2002): Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work, Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsebelis, George (2017): “The Time Inconsistency of Long Constitutions”, Summer Bulletin of American Academy of Arts and Sciences, pp. 42–45.Google Scholar
Tullock, Gordon (1987): Autocracy, Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ullmann-Margalit, Edna (1977): The Emergence of Norms, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Ullmann-Margalit, Edna (1978): “Invisible-Hand Explanations”, Synthese, vol. 39, pp. 263–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Fraassen, Bas (1980): The Scientific Image, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Fraassen, Bas (2008): Scientific Representation, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vesalius, Andreas (1543): De Humani Corporis Fabrica Libri Septem, Basel: Johannes Oporinus, English translation: On the Fabric of the Human Body, by William Frank Richardson and John Burd Carman, vol. 5 containing Books VI: The Heart and Associated Organs and Book VI: The Brain (Novato CA: Norman Anatomy Series, No 5).Google Scholar
Virvidakis, Stelios (1996): La robustesse du bien: Essai sur le réalisme moral, Paris: Editions Jacqueline Chambon.Google Scholar
Voigt, Stefan (1999): Explaining Constitutional Change, Aldershot: Edward Elgar, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voigt, Stefan (2020): Constitutional Economics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallis, Charles (2009): “Consciousness, Context, and Know-How”, Synthese, vol. 160, pp. 123–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, Max (1904/1985): “Die ‘Objektivität’ sozialwissenschaftlicher und sozialpolitischer Erkenntnis”, Archiv für Sozialwissenschaft und Sozialpolitik, 1904 and reprinted in: Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre, ed. Johannes Winckelmann, 6th ed., Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, pp. 146–214.Google Scholar
Weber, Max (1913/1996): “Gutachten zur Werturteilsdiskussion im Ausschuß des Vereins für Sozialpolitik”, in Nau, Heino Heinrich (ed.): Der Werturteilsstreit. Die Äußerungen zur Werturteilsdiskussion im Ausschuß des Vereins für Sozialpolitik (1913), Marburg: Metropolis Verlag, pp. 147–186.Google Scholar
Weber, Max (1917/1985): “Der Sinn der >>Wertfreiheit<< der soziologischen und ökonomischen Wissenschaften” in Winckelmann, Johannes (ed.): Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre, 6th ed., Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, pp. 489–540.Google Scholar
Weber, Max (1917/2004): Science as a Vocation, Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing House.Google Scholar
Weber, Max (1922/1992): Wirschaft und Gesellschaft, 5th ed., Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).Google Scholar
Wedgwood, Ralph (2007): The Nature of Normativity, Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weingast, Barry (1997): “The Political Foundations of Democracy and the Rule of Law”, American Political Science Review, vol. 91, pp. 245–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weisberg, Michael (2007): “Three Kinds of Idealization”, The Journal of Philosophy, vol. 104, pp. 639–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weisberg, Michael (2013): Simulation and Similarity: Using Models to Understand the World, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitehead, Alfred North (1911): An Introduction to Mathematics, London: Williams and Norgate.Google Scholar
Wilholt, Torsten (2009): “Bias and Values in Scientific Research”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, vol. 40, pp. 92–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilholt, Torsten (2010): “Scientific Freedom: Its Grounds and Their Limitations”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, vol. 41, pp. 174–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilholt, Torsten (2013): “Epistemic Trust in Science”, British Journal for Philosophy of Science, vol. 64, pp. 233–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilholt, Torsten (2014): “Review of Philip Kitcher: Science in a Democratic Society”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 81, pp. 165–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilholt, Torsten (2016): “Collaborative Research, Scientific Communities, and the Social Diffusion of Trustworthiness”, in Brady, Michael and Fricker, Miranda (eds.): The Epistemic Life of Groups: Essays in the Epistemology of Collectives, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 218–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilholt, Torsten (2022): “Epistemic Interests and the Objectivity of Inquiry”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, vol. 91, pp. 86–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, Bernard (1966/1973): “Consistency and Realism”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Suppl. Volume 49 (1966), reprinted in Problems of the Self, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973, pp. 187–206.Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard (1985): Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Williamson, Oliver (1985): The Economic Institutions of Capitalism, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Williamson, Oliver (1996): The Mechanisms of Governance, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wimsatt, William (2007): Re-Engineering Philosophy for Limited Beings: Piecewise Approximations to Reality, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Windelband, Wilhelm (1894/1915): “Geschichte und Naturwissenschaft”, in Windelband, Wilhelm (ed.): Präludien: Aufsätze und Reden zur Philosophie und ihrer Geschichte, Band 2, 5. erweiterte Auflage, Tübingen: J.C.M. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), pp. 136–160.Google Scholar
Woodward, James (2003): Making Things Happen, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1922): Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, Translated from the German by C. K. Ogden, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Wodak, Daniel (2017): “Expressivism and Varieties of Normativity”, Oxford Studies in Metaethics, vol. 12, pp. 265–293.Google Scholar
Woody, Andrea (2015): “Re-orienting Discussions of Scientific Explanation: A Functional Perspective”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, vol. 52, pp. 79–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wootton, David (2015): The Invention of Science: A New History of Scientific Revolution, London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Wright, Cory (2015): “The Ontic Conception of Scientific Explanation”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, vol. 54, pp. 20–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zamora-Bonilla, Jesus (2002): “Scientific Inference and the Pursuit of Fame: A Contractarian Approach”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 69, pp. 300–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zamora-Bonilla, Jesus (2013): “Cooperation, Competition, and the Contractarian View”, Ethics and Politics, vol. 15, pp. 14–24.Google Scholar
Zollman, Kevin (2018): “The Credit Economy and the Economic Rationality of Science”, Journal of Philosophy, vol. CXV, pp. 5–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • C. Mantzavinos, University of Athens, Greece
  • Book: The Constitution of Science
  • Online publication: 05 December 2024
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • C. Mantzavinos, University of Athens, Greece
  • Book: The Constitution of Science
  • Online publication: 05 December 2024
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • C. Mantzavinos, University of Athens, Greece
  • Book: The Constitution of Science
  • Online publication: 05 December 2024
Available formats
×