Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Books
  3. Contemporary Aristotelian Metaphysics
  • Cited by 8
Publisher:
Cambridge University Press
Online publication date:
December 2011
Print publication year:
2011
Online ISBN:
9780511732256
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511732256
Subjects:
Epistemology and Metaphysics, Philosophy
Information

Book description

Aristotelian (or neo-Aristotelian) metaphysics is currently undergoing something of a renaissance. This volume brings together fourteen essays from leading philosophers who are sympathetic to this conception of metaphysics, which takes its cue from the idea that metaphysics is the first philosophy. The primary input from Aristotle is methodological, but many themes familiar from his metaphysics will be discussed, including ontological categories, the role and interpretation of the existential quantifier, essence, substance, natural kinds, powers, potential, and the development of life. The volume mounts a strong challenge to the type of ontological deflationism which has recently gained a strong foothold in analytic metaphysics. It will be a useful resource for scholars and advanced students who are interested in the foundations and development of philosophy.

Reviews

'… this book makes a number of powerful and original contributions to the literature on contemporary Aristotelian metaphysics.'

George Lăzăroiu Source: Review of Contemporary Philosophy

'… this collection is undoubtedly a remarkable addition to scholarship. … Tahko has succeeded in providing a stimulating presentation of what metaphysics is, according to contemporary Aristotelian philosophers.'

Luca Gili Source: Bryn Mawr Classical Review

Refine List

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

Contents

Contents
  • Chapter 1 - What is metaphysics?
    pp 8-25
  • View abstract

    Summary

    There are five main features that serve to distinguish traditional metaphysics from other forms of enquiry. They are: the aprioricity of its methods; the generality of its subject-matter; the transparency or 'non-opacity' of its concepts; its eidicity or concern with the nature of things; and its role as a foundation for what there is. In metaphysics these features come together in a single package and it is the package as a whole rather than any of the individual features that serves to distinguish metaphysics from other forms of enquiry. This chapter provides an account of these individual features and explains how they might come together to form a single reasonably unified form of enquiry. Metaphysics is not merely one form of enquiry among others, but one that is capable of providing some kind of basis or underpinning for other forms of enquiry.
  • Chapter 2 - In defence of Aristotelian metaphysics
    pp 26-43
  • View abstract

    Summary

    According to the author, Aristotelian metaphysics has more to do with Aristotle's philosophical methodology than his metaphysics. The core of this Aristotelian conception of metaphysics is the idea that metaphysics is the first philosophy. This chapter clarifies what this conception of metaphysics amounts to in the context of recent discussion on the methodology of metaphysics. It also identifies some methodological issues concerning the foundations of Aristotelian metaphysics. In the first section, the chapter compares the Aristotelian and what could be called a 'Quinean' conception of metaphysics. The second section considers the approach emerging from the critique by Ladyman and Ross; it aims to naturalize metaphysics. Finally, the chapter hints towards a programme for a rigorous methodology of Aristotelian metaphysics inspired by E. J. Lowe's work. According to this line of thought, metaphysics is primarily concerned with metaphysical possibility, which is grounded in essence.
  • Chapter 3 - Existence and quantification reconsidered
    pp 44-65
  • View abstract

    Summary

    This chapter talks about understanding quantifiers in natural language, and the thoughts expressed by using these words. The first section states the standard view; the problem that intentionality poses for this view is given in the second section. In the third, this problem is distinguished from problems about whether 'existence is a predicate' and whether there is a distinction between being and existence. The fourth section describes the current state of play about quantification. In the fifth section, the chapter argues that representation of the non-existent should not give us reason to change the standard way of understanding the semantics of quantifiers. The last section sketches how this interpretation should fit with an understanding of so-called 'existential' sentences. The chapter indirectly challenges the Quinean revisionary view. If we aim to give a systematic account of our actual thought and language, we have to make room for quantification over the nonexistent.
  • Chapter 4 - Identity, quantification, and number
    pp 66-82
  • View abstract

    Summary

    This chapter talks about the intimate connections between identity, quantification, and number. The precise relation between the uncountability thesis and the quantification and identity principles is not easy to establish. The falsity of any of the three principles (identity, quantification, and number) would appear to entail the uncountability thesis. Portions of stuff need not contrast in any way with their surroundings, and can have arbitrary boundaries. Peter Simons has proposed an argument suggesting that the truth conditions of certain sentences must appeal to uncountable things. The chapter argues that portions of gunk would be countable, and then goes on to define 'quasinumerical' descriptions. If the definitions of the quasinumerical descriptions make sense, there could be a population of beings who spoke a language identical to ours except that they use quasinumerical terms where we use genuine numerical ones. The chapter ends with an explanation on the number of things.
  • Chapter 5 - Ontological categories
    pp 83-93
  • View abstract

    Summary

    Metaphysics includes ontology and cosmology that are intertwined with one another. In particular, metaphysics seeks to develop a system of ontological categories which organizes everything that there is, or everything that there could be. The analytical task of providing a set of logically necessary and sufficient conditions for a meaningful well-formed predicate's properly expressing an ontological category differs from the ontological task of ascertaining the category to which ontological categories belong. This chapter elucidates the notion of an ontological category that makes use of the notion of a predicate's expressing or connoting a kind. It appears that Metaphysical disagreements are understood against the backdrop of at least three different conceptions of an ontological category. According to the first conception, a category must have an actual instance at some time. The second conception, a category possibly has an instance. The third conception, epistemically possible has an instance.
  • Chapter 6 - Are any kinds ontologically fundamental?
    pp 94-104
  • View abstract

    Summary

    E. J. Lowe regards kinds as ontologically fundamental although David Armstrong takes a reductive attitude towards natural kinds. This chapter examines Lowe's claim, and concludes that it is unwarranted. Lowe has an ontology of four categories, in which we have individual substances (objects, particulars), modes (property/relation instances, tropes), and two species of universal: attributes (non-substantial universals, properties/relations) and substantial universals (kinds). Lowe claims that his ontology has an advantage over Armstrong's when it comes to our understanding of the laws of nature. Lowe's account of laws does not provide a metaphysics that avoids the inference problem for Armstrong, and so does not give us an independent, metaphysical reason for adopting a category of kinds. The chapter argues that analogous metaphysical problems in accounting for the relationship of laws to particulars beset Lowe's four-category ontology as much as Armstrong's two category ontology.
  • Chapter 7 - Are four categories two too many?
    pp 105-125
  • View abstract

    Summary

    This chapter was originally written for an event honouring E. J. Lowe. The author considers Lowe a philosopher of the first rank, a philosopher who has resisted the idea that philosophical problems are to be addressed in ways that keep ontology at arm's length. Lowe's work is a fine example of what the Australians call ontological seriousness. The remarks presented in the chapter are meant less as objections to Lowe's 'four-category ontology' than as requests for clarification. Lowe and David Armstrong agree that universals depend on their instances; the instances are 'metaphysically prior' to the universals. The chapter presents Lowe's account of dispositionality. The discussion is concluded by mentioning three aspects of Lowe's view. First, according to Lowe kinds depend on attributes that characterize them. Second, Lowe tells us that kinds are characterized by attributes, properties, and relations regarded as universals. Third, is an instance of the salt kind.
  • Chapter 8 - Four categories – and more
    pp 126-139
  • View abstract

    Summary

    Jonathan Lowe has proposed that the four fundamental categories of things in the world are: substances, kinds, modes, and properties. In modern analytic philosophy, under the influence of predicate logic and its pioneers, this fourfold classification of things at the fundamental level was generally reduced to a twofold distinction between individual things and properties or attributes. Aristotle's categories are clearly intended to delimit the fundamentally different kinds of thing in the world: they are the supreme genera of being. The search for a good scheme of categories is a good place to start and pursue ontology. Fortunately, Lowe is one of the metaphysicians who are committed to the real-world relevance of their theories, and while the author does not see eye to eye on theory, he does agree substantially on the importance of the right attitude to metaphysics: realist, ambitious, yet realistically fallibilist, and above all, serious.
  • Chapter 9 - Neo-Aristotelianism and substance
    pp 140-155
  • View abstract

    Summary

    Neo-Aristotelianism in metaphysics is an extension of and/or in imitation of Aristotle's metaphysics. This chapter begins with a brief account of what Aristotle had to say about substance. It summarizes the features of Aristotle's metaphysics of substance that provide the basis for saying that a later philosopher defends a 'neo-Aristotelian' theory of substance. Chisholm also places the category of substance within a more general theory of categories, in much the same way that Aristotle did. Like both Aristotle and Chisholm, Jonathan Lowe's latest system of categories is intended to postulate what kinds of entities there are, and not just to represent what kinds of entities are epistemically possible. Aristotelian theories of substance both from those who would eliminate substances or reduce them to instances of some other ontological category or categories, and from metaphysical antirealists.
  • Chapter 10 - Developmental potential
    pp 156-173
  • View abstract

    Summary

    This chapter introduces, from an ontological point of view, the definition: development is a self-directed epigenetic process consisting of sequential phase changes, consequent on interaction of genome, epigenetic systems, and external environment, which transform a living thing into successive stages of an individual of its kind. A developmental potential is a type of capacity-developing capacity. The chapter undertakes to model an illustrative case, prenatal manifestation of human developmental potentials. It seeks a probabilistic model countenanceable not only within multipredicative monism, but when generalized, within rival ontological views on dispositions. We observe that acquisition of a capacity may occur gradually and involve the sequential acquisition of properties. We have introduced developmental potential as a capacity to develop a capacity, characterized such a capacity as a propensity, and related how a probability distribution may be said to project an organism's bounded set of such propensities.
  • Chapter 11 - The origin of life and the definition of life
    pp 174-186
  • View abstract

    Summary

    Paul Davies's principal thesis is that although nothing rules out the possibility of life having originated on some other planet, the oldest forms of life on Earth consist of bacteria and other micro-organisms which eat unappetizing substances like sulphur and hydrogen sulphide and live in scalding volcanic jets four kilometres down at the bottom of the sea. Davies's overall thesis is that the division between living and non-living beings coincides with the introduction of informational software in the form of the genetic code. The hardware is the DNA and RNA molecules; the software is the encoded message they convey to the protein-making factories, which assemble proteins out of amino acid components. A difference between DNA-based information, and the analog information suggested in this chapter to be underlying development, is that the former, based on nucleotide sequences, is one-dimensional, whereas the latter can be three-dimensional or four-dimensional.
  • Chapter 12 - Essence, necessity, and explanation
    pp 187-206
  • View abstract

    Summary

    Both Aristotle and Kit Fine, in their conception of the relation between essence and modality, rely on a distinction between what belongs to the essence of an object and what merely follows from the essence of an object. This chapter discusses Fine's way of drawing the distinction between what is part of the essence of an object and what merely follows from the essence of an object. It turns to Aristotle's account of the distinction between what belongs to the essence proper of a thing and what merely follows from the essence proper of a thing. In particular, as essences are the causal bedrock of Aristotle's metaphysics, so definitions, the linguistic counterparts of essences, are the explanatory bedrock of Aristotle's theory of demonstration. Both of these considerations strike me as important from the point of view of contemporary metaphysicians who are sympathetic to Fine's project of grounding modality in essence.
  • Chapter 13 - No potency without actuality: the case of graph theory
    pp 207-228
  • View abstract

    Summary

    Everything in the material universe is a mixture of act and potency. But the conclusion the author draws from his analysis of Alexander Bird and Randall Dipert seems a deal weaker, namely that if potency exists, so must actuality, but not necessarily wherever the potency is. In the infinite case, with a fairly narrow class of linear chains of directed edges, it might be possible for one to avoid any circularity at all and simply require a terminal actuality to preserve identity conditions all the way up the chain. To this the author makes the dialectical reply that the thesis of no potency without actuality has far more to be said in its favour than that the world is anything like the kind of restrictive, linear, directed infinite graph just supposed.
  • Chapter 14 - A neo-Aristotelian substance ontology: neither relational nor constituent
    pp 229-248
  • View abstract

    Summary

    Substance ontologies in the Aristotelian tradition are commonly thought of as being constituent ontologies, because they typically espouse the hylemorphic dualism of Aristotle's Metaphysics, a doctrine according to which an individual substance is always a combination of matter and form. A common presumption is that ontologies inspired by Aristotle are 'constituent' ontologies, whereas ones inspired by Plato are 'relational', a presumption founded on the notion that Aristotle's metaphysics is distinctively 'immanent' whereas Plato's is distinctively 'transcendent'. Hylemorphism certainly has many attractive features, and many advantages over the transcendent view. Aristotle articulates four-category ontology such as hylemorphic ontology, constituent ontology, relational ontology and transcendent ontology. The author concludes that the four-category ontology, properly understood, has to be excluded both from the class of relational ontologies and from that of constituent ontologies.
References
References
Aristotle, Ackrill, J. L. 1964 Aristotle: Categories and De InterpretationeOxfordClarendon Press
Allan, K. 1971 A Note on the Source of in Existential SentencesFoundations of Language 7 1
Aristotle, Thompson, D. W. 1907
Aristotle, Categories and De InterpretationeAckrill, J. L. 1963 OxfordClarendon Press
Aristotle, The Complete Works of Aristotle, The Revised Oxford TranslationBarnes, J. 1984 Princeton University Press
Armstrong, D. M. 1989 Universals: An Opinionated IntroductionBoulderWestview Press
Armstrong, D. M. 1989 A Combinatorial Theory of PossibilityCambridge University Press
Armstrong, D. M. 1997 A World of States of AffairsCambridge University Press
Armstrong, D. M.Martin, C. B.Place, U. T.Crane, T. 1996 Dispositions, A DebateLondonRoutledge
Balme, D. M. 1987
Balme, D. M. 1987
Barker, S. 2009 Dispositional Monism, Relational Constitution and QuidditiesAnalysis 69 242
Barnes, J. 1975
Barnes, J. 1981
Barnes, J. 1984 The Complete Works of AristotlePrinceton University Press
Barnes, J. 2002 Aristotle: Posterior AnalyticsBarnes, J.OxfordClarendon Press
Barnes, J.Schofield, M.Sorabji, R. 1975 Articles on AristotleLondonDuckworth
Barwise, J.Cooper, R. 1981 Generalized Quantifiers and Natural Language,Linguistics and Philosophy 4 159
Bealer, G. 1987 Philosophical Limits of Scientific EssentialismPhilosophical Perspectives 1 289
Bealer, G. 1999 A Theory of the A PrioriPhilosophical Perspectives 13 29
Ben-Yami, H. 2004 Logic & Natural Language: On Plural Reference and Its Semantic and Logical SignificanceAldershotAshgate
Ben-Yami, H. 2009 Generalized Quantifiers, and BeyondLogique et Analyse 208 309
Bergmann, G. 1967 Realism: A Critique of Brentano and MeinongMadison, WIUniversity of Wisconsin Press
Berti, E. 1981 Aristotle on Science: The Posterior AnalyticsPadovaEditrice Antenore
Bird, A. 2005 The Ultimate Argument Against Armstrong’s Contingent Necessitation View of LawsAnalysis 65 147
Bird, A. 2007 Nature’s Metaphysics: Laws and PropertiesOxfordClarendon Press
Bolton, R. 1987
Booth, A.Rowbottom, D. P.IntutionsOxford University Press
Boyd, R. 1999 Wilson, R. A.Species: New Interdisciplinary EssaysCambridgeMIT Press
Brentano, F. 1862 Von der mannigfachen Bedeutung des Seienden nach AristotelesFreiburgHerder
Butterfield, J. 1998 Craig, E.Routledge Encyclopedia of PhilosophyLondonRoutledge
Campbell, K. 1990 Abstract ParticularsOxfordBlackwell
Cartwright, N. 1989 Nature’s Capacities and Their MeasurementOxfordClarendon Press
Cartwright, N. 2007 Kistler, M.Gnassounou, B.Dispositions and Causal PowersAldershotAshgate
Chalmers, D. J. 1996 The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental TheoryOxford University Press
Chalmers, D. J.Manley, D.Wasserman, R. 2009 Metametaphysics: New Essays on the Foundations of OntologyOxford University Press
Chappell, V. C. 1970 Stuff and ThingsProceedings of the Aristotelian Society 71 61
Charles, D. 1990
Charles, D. 2002 Aristotle on Meaning and EssenceOxfordClarendon Press
Charles, D. 2010 Definition in Greek PhilosophyOxford University Press
Charles, D. 2010
Chisholm, R. 1996 A Realistic Theory of Categories: an Essay on OntologyCambridge University Press
Correia, F. 2008 Ontological DependencePhilosophy Compass 3 1013
Correia, F.Schnieder, B.Volume on non-causal explanationCambridge University Press
Crane, T. 2001 Elements of MindOxford University Press
Crick, F. H. C. 1958 On Protein SynthesisSymposium of the Society for Experimental Biology 12 138
Crystal, D 2004 Making Sense of GrammarLondonPearson Longman
Davies, P. C. W. 1999
Davies, P. C. W. 2006 Clayton, P.Davies, P.The Re-Emergence of EmergenceOxford University Press
Demos, R. 1948 Note on Plato’s Theory of IdeasPhilosophy and Phenomenological Research 8 456
Devereux, D.Pellegrin, P. 1990 Biologie, Logique et Métaphysique Chez AristoteParis 1990
Dewey, J. 1920 Reconstruction in PhilosophyNew YorkHenry Holt
Dipert, R. R. 1997 The Mathematical Structure of the World: The World as GraphJournal of Philosophy 94 329
Dummett, M. 1981 Frege: Philosophy of LanguageCambridge, MAHarvard University Press
Earman, J. 1986 A Primer on DeterminismDordrechtReidel
Ellis, B.Lierse, C. 1994 Dispositional EssentialismAustralasian Journal of Philosophy 72 27
Ellis, B. 2001 Scientific EssentialismCambridge University Press
Ellis, B. 2002 The Philosophy of Nature: A Guide to the New EssentialismCheshamAcumen
Evans, G. 1982 The Varieties of ReferenceOxford University Press
Fine, K. 1994 Tomberlin, J. E.Philosophical Perspectives 8: Logic and LanguageStanfordCSLI
Fine, K. 1995 Ontological Dependence,Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 95 269
Fine, K. 1995
Fine, K. 1995 The Logic of EssenceJournal of Philosophical Logic 24 241
Fine, K. 2001 The Question of Realism,Philosophers’ Imprint 1 1www.philosophersimprint.org/001001/
Fine, K. 2009
Fine, K.
Forbes, G. 1985 The Metaphysics of ModalityOxfordClarendon Press
Foster, J. 1982 The Case for IdealismLondonRoutledge & Kegan Paul
Frankel, J. 1989 Pattern Formation: Ciliate Studies and ModelsOxford University Press
Frede, M. 1994 Scaltas, T.Charles, D.Gill, M. L.Unity, Identity, and Explanation in Aristotle’s MetaphysicsOxford University Press
Frege, G. 1879 van Heijenoort, J.From Frege to Gödel: A Source Book in Mathematical LogicCambridge, MAHarvard University Press
Frege, G. 1884 Die Grundlagen der ArithmetikAustin, J. L.OxfordBlackwell
Geach, P. T. 1980 Reference and GeneralityIthaca, NYCornell University Press
Gendler, T. S.Hawthorne, J. 2002 Conceivability and PossibilityOxford University Press
Geurts, B.Beaver, D. I. 2007 http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2007/entries/discourse-representation-theory/
Gilbert, S. F.Opitz, J. M.Raff, R. A. 1996 Resynthesizing Evolutionary and Developmental BiologyDevelopmental Biology 173 357
Gill, M. L. 1989 Aristotle on Substance, The Paradox of UnityPrinceton University Press
Gillies, D. A. 2000 Philosophical Theories of ProbabilityLondonRoutledge
Glymour, C. 2003 Hütteman, AndreasDeterminism in Physics and BiologyPaderbornMentis
Gotthelf, A. 1987
Gotthelf, A.Lennox, J. G. 1987 Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s BiologyCambridge University Press
Gross, J.L.Yellen, J. 2004 Handbook of Graph TheoryBoca Raton, FLCRC Press
Guenin, L. M. 2008 The Morality of Embryo UseCambridge University Press
Guenin, L. M. 2011
Hamburger, V. 1957 Harris, D. B.The Concept of Development: An Issue in the Study of Human BehaviorMinneapolisUniversity of Minnesota Press
Harary, F 1969 Graph TheoryReading, MAAddison-Wesley Publishing Co
Heil, J. 2003 From an Ontological Point of ViewOxfordClarendon Press
Heil, J. 2009 Le Poidevin, R.Cameron, R.Routledge Companion to Metaphysics, pp. 310–21LondonRoutledge
Heil, J. 2010 McLaughlin, B. P.Oxford Handbook of the Philosophy of MindOxfordClarendon Press
Heil, J.Galluzzo, G.Loux, M. J.Lowe, E. J.
Hempel, C. G. 1965 Aspects of Scientific ExplanationNew YorkFree Press
Hempel, C. G. 1978 Tuomela, R.DispositionsDordrechtReidel
Hendry, R. F. 2006 Elements, Compounds, and Other Chemical KindsPhilosophy of Science 73 864
Hoffman, J.
Hoffman, J.Rosenkrantz, G. S. 1991 Are Souls Unintelligible?Philosophical Perspectives 5 183
Hoffman, J.Rosenkrantz, G. S. 1994 Substance Among Other CategoriesCambridge University Press
Hoffman, J.Rosenkrantz, G. S. 1997 Substance: Its Nature and ExistenceLondon and New YorkRoutledge
Hofweber, T. 2005 A Puzzle about OntologyNoûs 39 256
Hofweber, T. 2009
Husserl, E. 1900 Logical InvestigationsFindlay, J. N.LondonRoutledge
Huxley, J.de Beer, G.R 1934 The Elements of Experimental EmbryologyCambridge University Press
Ingarden, R. 1948 The Controversy over the Existence of the WorldKrakówPolska Akademia Umiejetności
Irwin, T. 1988 Aristotle’s First PrinciplesOxford University Press
Jackson, F. 1998 From Metaphysics to Ethics: A Defense of Conceptual AnalysisOxford: Clarendon Press
Jackson, F. 2010 Language, Names and InformationChichesterWiley-Blackwell
Kim, J. 1993 Supervenience and MindCambridge University Press
Koslicki, K. 2008 The Structure of ObjectsOxford University Press
Koslicki, K.
Kripke, S. 1980 Naming and NecessityCambridge, MAHarvard University Press
Ladyman, J. 2007 http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2007/entries/structural-realism/
Ladyman, J.Ross, D. 2007 Every Thing Must Go: Metaphysics NaturalizedOxford University Press
Laycock, H. 1972 Some Questions of OntologyPhilosophical Review 81 3
Laycock, H. 1975 Theories of MatterSynthese 31 411
Laycock, H. 2006 Words Without ObjectsOxford University Press
Lennox, J. G. 1987
Lennox, J. G. 1990
Lennox, J. G. 2010
Levinson, J. 1978 Properties and Related EntitiesPhilosophy and Phenomenological Research 39 1
Lewis, D. 1997 Finkish DispositionsPhilosophical Quarterly 47 143
Loeb, 1962 Aristotle: The Categories, On Interpretation, Prior AnalyticsCook, H.P.Tredennick, H.LondonWilliam Heinemann Ltd
Loux, M. J. 2006 Zimmerman, D.Oxford Studies in MetaphysicsNew YorkOxford University Press
Lowe, E. J. 1995 Honderich, T.The Oxford Companion to PhilosophyOxford University Press
Lowe, E. J. 1998 The Possibility of MetaphysicsOxford University Press
Lowe, E. J. 2002 Metaphysical Nihilism and the Subtraction ArgumentAnalysis 62 62
Lowe, E. J. 2003 Loux, M.Zimmerman, D.The Oxford Handbook of MetaphysicsOxford University Press
Lowe, E. J. 2006 The Four-Category Ontology: A Metaphysical Foundation for Natural ScienceOxfordClarendon Press
Lowe, E. J. 2009 More Kinds of BeingOxfordWiley-Blackwell
Lowe, E. J. 2009 Langlet, B.Monnoyer, J.-M.Gustav Bergmann: Phenomenological Realism and Dialectical OntologyFrankfurtOntos
Lowe, E. J. 2010 http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2010/entries/dependence-ontological/
Lowe, E. J. 2011 The Rationality of MetaphysicsSynthese 178 99
Lowe, E. J.Rami, A. 2009 Truth and Truth-MakingStocksfieldAcumen
Mackie, J. L. 1976 The Riddle of ExistenceProceedings of the Aristotelian Society 50 247
Maienschein, J. 2005 http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2005/entries/epigenesis/
Makin, S. 2006 Aristotle, Metaphysics ϴOxfordClarendon Press
Martin, C. B. 1994 Dispositions and ConditionalsThe Philosophical Quarterly 44 1
McGinn, C. 2001 Logical PropertiesOxford University Press
McKay, T. J. 2008 Critical Notice of Henry Laycock,Canadian Journal of Philosophy 38 301
McNally, L.Maienborn, C.von Heusinger, K.Portner, P.Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language MeaningThe Haguede Gruyter
Meinong, A. 1904 Levi, I.Terrell, D. B.Chisholm, R.Chisholm, R.Realism and the Background of PhenomenologyAtascadero, CARidgeview 1981
Mellor, D. H. 1974 In Defense of DispositionsPhilosophical Review 83 157
Millikan, R. 1999 Historical Kinds and the “Special SciencesPhilosophical Studies 95 45
Molnar, G. 2003 Powers: A Study in MetaphysicsMumford, S.Oxford University Press
Moro, A. 2007 Everaert, M.van Riemsdijk, H.Blackwell Companion to SyntaxOxfordBlackwell
Mumford, S. 1998 DispositionsOxford University Press
Nagel, E. 1961 The Structure of ScienceNew YorkHarcourt, Brace & World
Nagel, E. 1979 Teleology Revisited and Other Essays in the Philosophy and History of ScienceNew YorkColumbia University Press
Neale, S. 1990 DescriptionsCambridge, MAMIT Press
Needham, J. 1950 Biochemistry and MorphogenesisCambridge University Press
Oderberg, D. S. 2007 Real EssentialismLondonRoutledge
Oppenheim, P.Putnam, H. 1958 Feigl, H.Scriven, M.Maxwell, G.Concepts, Theories, and the Mind-Body ProblemMinneapolisUniversity of Minnesota Press
Parsons, J. 2009 Lowe, E. J.Rami, E.Truth and Truth-MakingStocksfieldAcumen Press
Peters, S.Westerståhl, D. 2006 Quantifiers in Language and LogicOxfordClarendon Press
Popper, K. 1934 The Logic of Scientific DiscoveryLondonHutchinson
Popper, K. 1957 Körner, StephanObservation and InterpretationLondonButterworths
Popper, K. 1959 The Propensity Interpretation of ProbabilityBritish Journal for the Philosophy of Science 10 25
Priest, G. 2005 Towards Non-BeingOxford University Press
Prior, E.Pargetter, R.Jackson, F. 1982 Three Theses About DispositionsAmerican Philosophical Quarterly 19 251
Quine, W. V. 1939 Journal of Unified ScienceCambridge, MAHarvard University Press
Quine, W. V. 1948 On What There IsReview of Metaphysics 2 21
Quine, W. V. 1953
Quine, W. V. 1960 Word and ObjectCambridgeMIT Press
Quine, W. V. 1961 From a Logical Point of ViewNew YorkHarper and Row
Quine, W. V. 1969 Ontological Relativity and Other EssaysNew YorkColumbia University Press
Quine, W. V. 1974 The Roots of ReferenceLaSalle, IL.Open Court
Quine, W. V. 1976 The Ways of Paradox and Other EssaysCambridgeHarvard University Press
Rescher, N. 1962 Plurality-Quantification: AbstractJournal of Symbolic Logic 27 373
Robinson, H. 1982 Matter and SenseCambridge University Press
Rosenkrantz, G. S. 2001 Cao, Tian YuProceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of PhilosophyBowling Green, OHPhilosophy Documentation Center
Ross, W. D. 1924 Aristotle’s Metaphysics, A Revised Text with Introduction and CommentaryOxfordClarendon Press
Ross, W. D. 1964 Aristotelis Analytica Priora et PosterioraRoss, W.D.Minio-Paluello, L.OxfordClarendon Press
Ross, W. D. 2004 AristotleLondonRoutledge
Russell, B. 1903 The Principles of MathematicsLondonRoutledge
Russell, B. 1903 The Principles of MathematicsCambridge University Press
Russell, B. 1919 Introduction to Mathematical PhilosophyLondonGeorge Allen and Unwin
Russell, B. 1959 My Philosophical DevelopmentLondonGeorge Allen and Unwin
Ryle, G. 1949 The Concept of MindLondonHutchinson
Sawyer, J. 1973 Existential Sentences: A Linguistic Universal?American Speech 48 239
Schaffer, J. 2009 Chalmers, ManleyWasserman,
Scheffler, I. 1985 Of Human PotentialLondonRoutledge & Kegan Paul
Schneider, L. 2009 The Logic of the Ontological SquareStudia Logica 91 25
Simons, P. 1987 Parts: A Study in OntologyOxford University Press
Sinnott-Armstrong, W.Raffman, D.Asher, N. 1995 Modality, Morality, and Belief: Essays in Honor of Ruth Barcan MarcusNew York, NYCambridge University Press
Smith, Q.Craig, W.L. 1993 Theism, Atheism and Big Bang CosmologyOxfordClarendon Press
Soames, S. 2003 Philosophical Analysis in the Twentieth CenturyPrinceton University Press
Sober, E. 2000 Philosophy of BiologyBoulder, COWestview Press
Spemann, H. 1938 Embryonic Development and InductionNew HavenYale University Press
Stalnaker, R. 1984 InquiryCambridge, MAMIT Press
Stanley, J.Szabó, Z. G. 2000 On Quantifer Domain RestrictionMind and Language 15 219
Swoyer, C. 1982 The Nature of Natural LawsAustralasian Journal of Philosophy 60 203
Tahko, T. E. 2008 A New Definition of A Priori Knowledge: In Search of a Modal BasisMetaphysica 9 57
Tahko, T. E. 2009 The Law of Non-Contradiction as a Metaphysical PrincipleThe Australasian Journal of Logic 7 32
Tahko, T. E. 2009 On the Modal Content of A Posteriori NecessitiesTheoria: A Swedish Journal of Philosophy 75 344
Tartar, V. 1956 Rudnick, Cellular Mechanisms in Differentiation and GrowthPrinceton University Press
Tartar, V. 1961 The Biology of StentorNew YorkPergamon Press
Tartar, V. 1962 Morphogenesis in StentorAdvances in Morphogenesis 2 1
Trendelenburg, A. 1845 Geschichte der KategorienlehreHildesheimOlms
Trudeau, R. J. 1976 Dots and LinesThe Kent State University Press
van Fraassen, B. C. 1970 An Introduction to the Philosophy of Time and SpaceNew YorkRandom House
van Fraassen, B. C. 1989 Laws and SymmetryOxford University Press
van Inwagen, P. 1990 Material BeingsCornell University Press
van Inwagen, P. 2002 The Number of ThingsPhilosophical Perspectives 12 176
van Inwagen, P. 2003 Loux, M.Zimmerman, D.The Oxford Handbook to MetaphysicsOxford University Press
van Inwagen, P. 2008 McGinn on ExistencePhilosophical Quarterly 58 36
Weiss, P. 1939 Principles of DevelopmentNew YorkHolt
Westerhoff, J. 2005 Ontological Categories: Their Nature and SignificanceOxford University Press
Westerståhl, D. 2007 Gabbay, D. M.Geunthner, FHandbook of Philosophical LogicBerlinSpringer
Wheeler, J. A. 1998 Geons, Black Holes, and Quantum FoamNew YorkW. W. Norton & Company
Whitehead, A. N. 1929 Process and RealityLondonMacmillan
Wiggins, D. 1980 Platts, M.Reference, Truth and Reality: Essays on the Philosophy of LanguageLondonRoutledge and Kegan Paul
Wiggins, D. 1995 Sinott-Armstrong, WalterModality, Morality and Belief: Essays in Honor of Ruth Barcan MarcusCambridgeCambridge University Press
Williams, D. C. 1959 Universals and ExistentsThe Australasian Journal of Philosophy 64 1
Williamson, T. 2007 The Philosophy of PhilosophyOxfordBlackwell
Wilson, R. J. 1996 Introduction to Graph Theory, 4th ednHarlowAddison Wesley Longman Ltd
Wittgenstein, L. 1922 Tractatus Logico-PhilosophicusOgden, C. K.LondonRoutledge & Kegan Paul
Wolpert, L. 1969 Positional Information and the Spatial Pattern of Cellular DifferentiationJournal of Theoretical Biology 25 1
Wolpert, L. 1971 Positional Information and Pattern FormationCurrent Topics in Developmental Biology 6 183
Wolterstorff, N. 1970 Bergmann’s Constituent OntologyNoûs 4 109

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.