Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-h6jzd Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2025-02-27T15:56:05.056Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 August 2022

Edited by
Carl Séan O'Brien  and
John Dillon
Carl Séan O'Brien
Affiliation:
Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Germany
John Dillon
Affiliation:
Trinity College Dublin
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Platonic Love from Antiquity to the Renaissance , pp. 289 - 312
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Aristotle, . De anima, ed. Ross, W. D.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1956.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . Ethica Nicomachea, ed. Bywater, I.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1894.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . The Nicomachean Ethics, trans. Rackham, H., rev. ed. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . Politica, ed. Ross, W. D.. Oxford Classical Texts. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1957.Google Scholar
Augustinus, Aurelius. Confessiones, ed. Skutella, M., Juergens, H. and Schaub, W.. Stuttgart: Teubner, 1969.Google Scholar
Augustinus, Aurelius. De diversis quaestionibus ad Simplicianum, ed. Mutzenbecher, A.. Turnhout: Brepols, 1970.Google Scholar
Augustinus, Aurelius. De utilitate credendi, intro. and trans. Hoffmann, A. (= Fontes Christiani 9), Freiburg: Herder, 1992.Google Scholar
Cicero, Marcus Tullius. De senectute, De amicitia, De divinatione, ed. and trans. Armistead Falconer, W.. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Euripides, . VII: Fragments: Oedipus, Chrysippus, Other Fragments, ed. and trans. Collard, C. and Cropp, M.. London and Cambridge, MA: Heinemann and Harvard University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Euripides, . Tragicorum Graecorum Fragmenta, vol. 5, Euripides, ed. Kannicht, R.. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht, 2004.Google Scholar
Lactantius, Lucius Caecilius Firmianus. Divinae Institutiones, ed. and trans. Monat, P.. Paris: Editions du Cerf, 1973–86.Google Scholar
Origen. The Song of Songs: Commentary and Homilies, trans. and annotated R. P. Lawson. London: Longmans, Green and Co., 1957.Google Scholar
Ovid, . Amores Medicamina Faciei Femineae; Ars Amatoria; Remedia Amoris, ed. Kenney, E. J.. Oxford University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Ovid, . Ars Amatoria, Book I, ed., intro. and comm. Hollis, A. S.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Plato, . Gorgias, trans. Irwin, T.. Oxford University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Plato, . Lachès et Lysis, ed., intro and comm. Vicaire, P.. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1963.Google Scholar
Plato, . Il Liside di Platone de l’amicitia, trans. Francesco Colombi. Venice, 1548.Google Scholar
Plato, . Lysis, Symposium, Gorgias, trans. Lamb, W. R. M. et al. Cambridge, MA: Loeb Classical Library, 1925; Harvard University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Plato, . Phaedo, ed. Rowe, C. J.. Cambridge University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Plato, . Phaedrus, trans., intro. and comm. Hackforth, R.. Cambridge University Press, 1952.Google Scholar
Plato, . Phaedrus, ed., trans. and comm. Rowe, C. J.. Warminster, Wiltshire: Aris and Phillips, 1986, 2nd ed. 1988.Google Scholar
Plato, . Opera omnia, trans. Marsilio Ficino. Venice: Bernardinus de Choris and Simon de Luere for Andreas Torresanus, 1491.Google Scholar
Plato, . Platonis opera, vol. 2, ed. Burnet, J.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1901 (repr. 1967).Google Scholar
Plato, . Platonis opera, vol. 3, ed. Burnet, J.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1903 (repr. 1968).Google Scholar
Plato, . Platonis opera, vol. 4, ed. Burnet, J.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1902 (repr. 1978).Google Scholar
Plato, . Symposium, ed., trans. and comm. Rowe, C. J.. Warminster, Wiltshire: Aris and Phillips, 1998.Google Scholar
Plato, . The Symposium, trans., intro. and notes. Gill, C.. London: Penguin Books, 1999.Google Scholar
Plato, . Symposium, ed. Dover, K.. Cambridge University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Plato, . Trois dialogues de l’amitié: Le Lysis de Platon, et Le Lælius de Cicéron, trans. de Vigenère, Blaise. Paris: Nicolas Chesneau, 1579.Google Scholar
Plotinus, . The Enneads, trans, MacKenna, S.. London: Faber and Faber, 1956.Google Scholar
Plotinus, . Enneads, ed. and trans. Armstrong, A. H., 6 vols. Cambridge, MA and London: Loeb Classical Library, 1966–88.Google Scholar
Plotinus, . The Enneads, ed. and trans. Gerson, L. P., trans. Boys-Stones, G., Dillon, J. M., King, R. A. H. and Wilberding, J.. Cambridge University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Plotinus, . Opera omnia: Cum latina Marsilii Ficini interpretatione et commentatione, ed. Toussaint, S., [Basel: Perna, 1580], Villiers-sur-Marne: Phénix, 2005.Google Scholar
Plotinus, . Plotini Opera, ed. Henry, P. and Schwyzer, H.-R.. Paris and Brussels: Desclée de Brouwer and L’Édition Universelle, 1951–73. (‘Editio maior’)Google Scholar
Plotinus, . Plotini Opera, ed. Henry, P. and Schwyzer, H.-R. Oxford University Press, 1964–82. (‘Editio minor’)Google Scholar
Plotinus, . Traité 19 (I, 2) Sur les vertus, intro., trans. and comm. O’Meara, D.. Paris: Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin, 2019.Google Scholar
Plotinus, . Traité 38 (VI, 7), intro., trans. and comm. Hadot, P.. Paris: Éditions du Cerf, 1988.Google Scholar
Plotinus, . Traité 50 (III, 5), intro., trans. and comm. Hadot, P.. Paris: Éditions du Cerf, 1990.Google Scholar
Plutarch, . Advice to the Bride and Groom, and a Consolation to his Wife, ed., trans. and comm. Pomeroy, S. B.. Oxford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Plutarch, . Dialog über die Liebe, trans. and comm. Görgemanns, H.. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2006.Google Scholar
Plutarch, . Dialogue sur l’amour, ed. Flacelière, R.. (Annales de la Université de Lyon, troisième série). Paris: Université de Lyon, 1952.Google Scholar
Plutarch, . Dialogue sur l’amour, ed. and trans. Flacelière, R. and Cuvigny, M.. Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 1980.Google Scholar
Plutarch, . Érotikos: Dialogue sur l’Amour, ed. and trans. Frazier, F.. Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 2008.Google Scholar
Plutarch, . Life of Antony, ed. Pelling, C. B. R.. Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Plutarch, . Moralia Volumes I–XV, ed. and trans. Babbitt, F. C., Cherniss, H. et al. London and Cambridge, MA: Heinemann and Harvard University Press, 1927–76.Google Scholar
Plutarch, . Moralia XV. Fragments, ed. and trans. Sandbach, F.. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press and Heineman, 1969.Google Scholar
Plutarch, Plutarchi Chaeronensis moralia, ed. Bernardakis, G. N. 7 vols. Leipzig: B. G. Teubner, 1888–96.Google Scholar
Plutarch, Plutarchi Chaeronensis Moralia IV, ed. Bernadakis, P. D. and Ingenkamp, H. G.. Athens: Academy of Athens, Institute of Greek and Latin Literature, 2016.Google Scholar
Plutarch, Selected Essays and Dialogues trans. Russell, D. A.. Oxford University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Proclus, . Proclus Diadochus: Commentary on the first Alcibiades of Plato, ed. Westerink, L. G.. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing, 1954.Google Scholar
Proclus, . Théologie Platonicienne, livre 2, Proclus, ed. and trans. Saffrey, H. D. and Westerink, L. G.. Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 1974.Google Scholar
Quintilian, . Institutio Oratoria, ed., intro. and comm. Colson, F. H.. Cambridge University Press, 1924.Google Scholar
Vitruvius Pollio, Marcus. On Architecture, 2 vols., vol. 1 trans. Granger, Frank, vol. 2 trans. Hickey Morgan, M., 1931–4, repr. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1962.Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

Aquinas, Thomas. Commentum in quatuor libros Sententiarum Magistri Petri Lombardi. Parma: Petrus Fiaccadori, 1856–58.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. In duodecim libros Metaphysicorum Aristotelis expositio, ed. Cathala, M. R. and Spiazzi, R. M.. Turin and Rome: Marietti, 1950.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. In librum Beati Dionysii De divinis nominibus expositi, ed. Pera, C.. Turin and Rome: Marietti, 1950.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Quaestiones disputatae de veritate. Opera Omnia, vol. 22. Rome: Commissio Leonina, 1970–76.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Scriptum super libros Sententiarum Magistri Petri Lombardi Episcopi Parisiensis, ed. Mandonnet, Pierre and Moos, Maria Fabianus. Paris: Lethielleux, 1929–47.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Sententia libri Ethicorum, Opera Omnia, vol. 47. Rome: Commissio Leonina, 1969.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Sententia libri Politicorum. Opera omnia, vol. 48. Rome: Commissio Leonina, 1971.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Summa Theologiae, cura et studio Instituti Studiorum Medievalium Ottaviensis. 5 vols. Ottawa: Garden City Press, 1941.Google Scholar
Dionysius the Areopagite (pseudo-). Corpus Dionysiacum I: Pseudo-Dionysius Areopagita, De divinis nominibus (= Patristische Texte und Studien 33), ed. Suchla, B. R.. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1990.Google Scholar
Dionysius the Areopagite (pseudo-). Corpus Dionysiacum II: Pseudo-Dionysius Areopagita. De coelesti hierarchia, de ecclesiastica hierarchia, de mystica theologia, epistula (= Patristische Texte und Studien 36), ed. Heil, G. and Ritter, A. M.. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1991, 7–59.Google Scholar
Eriugena, John Scotus. Periphyseon: The Division of Nature, trans. Sheldon-Williams, I. P., rev. O’Meara., J. J. Montréal: Éditions Bellarmin, 1987.Google Scholar
Eriugena, John Scotus. Iohannis Scotti seu Eriugenae Periphyseon, ed. Jeauneau, É., 5 vols. Turnhout: Brepols, 1996–2003.Google Scholar
Alberti, Leon Battista. On the Art of Building in Ten Books, trans. J. Rykwert, N. Leach and R. Tavenor. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Alberti, Leon Battista. On Painting and On Sculpture, ed. and trans. Grayson, C.. London: Phaidon, 1972.Google Scholar
Bembo, Pietro. Opere in volgare, ed. Marti, Mario. Florence: Sansoni, 1961.Google Scholar
Bembo, Pietro. Gli Asolani, trans. Gottfried, R. B.. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1954.Google Scholar
Betussi, Giuseppe, Sansovino, Francesco, d’Aragona, Tullia and Gottifredi, Bartolomeo. Trattati d’amore del Cinquecento, ed. Zonta, G.. Bari: Laterza, 1967 [1912].Google Scholar
Castiglione, Baldassare. The Book of the Courtier, ed. Javitch, D., trans. Singleton, C.. New York: W. W. Norton, 2002.Google Scholar
Castiglione, Baldassare. The Book of the Courtier, trans. Eckstein Opdycke, L.. New York: Dover, 2003 [1929].Google Scholar
Castiglione, Baldassare. Il Cortegiano, con una scelta delle Opere Minori, ed. Maier, B.. Turin: UTET, 1955.Google Scholar
D’Aragona, Tullia. Dialogue on the Infinity of Love, ed. and trans. Russell, R. and Merry, B.. University of Chicago Press, 1997.Google Scholar
De Condillac, Étienne. Traité des sensations. Paris, Fayard 1984 [1754].Google Scholar
Della, Mirandola, Pico, Giovanni. Commentary on a Poem of Platonic Love, trans. Carmichael, C.. Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 1968.Google Scholar
Des Périers, Bonaventure. Recueil Des Œuvres de Feu Bonaventure Des Périers. Lyon: Jean de Tournes, 1544.Google Scholar
Descartes, René. Œuvres, ed. Adam, C. and Tannery, P. (AT). Paris: Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin, 1996.Google Scholar
Ebreo, Leone. Dialogues of Love, ed. Pescatori, R., trans. Bacich, C. D. and Pescatori, R.. University of Toronto Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Equicola, Mario. Libro de natura de amore. Venice: Lorenzo Lorio da Portes, 1525.Google Scholar
Ficino, Marsilio. ‘Argumentum … in Platonis Lysidem, vel de Amicitia’, in Omnia Divini Platonis Opera, ed. Grynaeus, Simon. Basel: In officina frobeniana, 1532.Google Scholar
Ficino, Marsilio. Il commento di Marsilio Ficino sopra il Convito di Platone. Et esso Convito, trans. Barbarasa, Ercole. Venice: [Giovanni Farri e fratelli], 1544.Google Scholar
Ficino, Marsilio. Le commentaire de Marsile Ficin, Florentin: sur le Banquet d’amour de Platon, trans. de La Haye, Symon Silvius dit J.. Poitiers: À l’enseigne du Pélican, 1546.Google Scholar
Ficino, Marsilio. Commentaries on Plato, ed. Allen, Michael J. B., vol. 1: Phaedrus and Ion (= The I Tatti Renaissance Library 34). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Ficino, Marsilio. Commentaries on Plato, ed. Vanhaelen, Maude, vol. 2: Parmenides (= The I Tatti Renaissance Library 51–52). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Ficino, Marsilio. Commentarium in Convivium Platonis de Amore. Florence: Laurentius Venetii. 1484.Google Scholar
Ficino, Marsilio. Commentary on Plato’s Symposium on Love, trans. Jayne, S. R., 2nd ed. Dallas: Spring Publications, 1985 (repr. 1994).Google Scholar
Ficino, Marsilio Commentaire sur le Banquet de Platon, De l’amour. Commentarium in convivium Platonis, De amore, trans. Laurens, P.. Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 2002.Google Scholar
Ficino, Marsilio Commentary on Plotinus, trans. Gersh, Stephen, vol. 4, Ennead III, part 1 (= The I Tatti Renaissance Library 80). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Ficino, Marsilio Commentary on Plotinus, trans. Gersh, S., vol. 5, Ennead III, part 2; Ennead IV. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Ficino, Marsilio Lettere: Epistolarum familiarum liber I, ed. Gentile., Sebastiano Florence: Leo S., Olschki, 1990.Google Scholar
Ficino, Marsilio Lettere: Epistolarum familiarum liber II, ed. Gentile, Sebastiano. Florence: Leo S., Olschki, 2010.Google Scholar
Ficino, Marsilio The Letters of Marsilio Ficino, 7 vols. Translated by members of the Language Department of the School of Economic Science, London; pref. by Kristeller, P. O.. London: Shepheard-Walwyn, 1975–2009 (repr. 1994).Google Scholar
Ficino, Marsilio El libro dell’amore, ed. Niccoli, S.. Florence: Leo S. Olschki, 1987 (repr. 2001).Google Scholar
Ficino, Marsilio On Dionysius the Areopagite, vol. 1, Mystical Theology and The Divine Names, trans. Allen, M. J. B. (= I Tatti Renaissance Library 66–7). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Ficino, Marsilio On the Nature of Love: Ficino on Plato’s Symposium, trans. Farndell, A.. London: Shepheard-Walwyn, 2016.Google Scholar
Ficino, Marsilio Opera omnia, ed. Kristeller, P. O. and Sancipriano, M., 2 vols. Turin: Bottega d’Erasmo, 1983 [Basel, 1576].Google Scholar
Ficino, Marsilio Platonic Theology, vol. 4, ed. Hankins, James, trans. Allen, M. J. B. (= I Tatti Renaissance Library 13). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Fregoso, Giovanni Battista. Anteros sive contra amorem, ed. N. B. Bensimon. Manziana: Vecchiarelli, 2018.Google Scholar
Fulgosus, Baptista C. Anteros. Milan: Leonardo Pachel, 1496.Google Scholar
Héroët, A. La Parfaicte Amye. Lyon: Estienne Dolet, 1543.Google Scholar
Montaigne, M. de. The Complete Essays of Montaigne, trans. Frame, D.. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Platina, Bartholomeo. De Amore, in Platina, Dialogus de Flosculis Quibusdam Linguae Latinae ad Laelium, ed. Filelfo, Pietro Agostino. Milan: Antonius Zarotus, for Johannes de Legnano, 1481.Google Scholar
Speroni degli Alvarotti, Sperone. Dialogo d’amore [1542] in Trattatisti del Cinquecento, vol. 1, ed. Pozzi, M.. Milan and Naples: Ricciardi, 1978.Google Scholar
Albertini, T. 2010. ‘Marsilio Ficino (1433–1499): The Aesthetic of the One in the Soul, in Blum, P. R. (ed.) and McNeil, B. (trans.) Philosophers of the Renaissance. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 82–91.Google Scholar
Albury, W. R. 2014. Castiglione’s Allegory: Veiled Policy in The Book of the Courtier (1528). Burlington, VT: Ashgate (repr. 2016).Google Scholar
Alexandrakis, A. 2004. ‘Plotinus, Marsilio Ficino, and Renaissance Art’, in De Girolami Cheny, L. and Hendrix, J. (eds.), Neoplatonic Aesthetics: Music, Literature, and the Visual Arts. New York: Peter Lang, 187–95.Google Scholar
Allen, M. J. B. 1981. Marsilio Ficino and the Phaedran Charioteer. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Allen, M. J. B. 1984. The Platonism of Marsilio Ficino: A Study of his Phaedrus Commentary, its Source and Genesis. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Allen, M. J. B. 1995. ‘Cosmogony and Love: The Role of Phaedrus in Ficino’s Symposium Commentary’, in Allen, M. J. B., Plato’s Third Eye: Studies in Marsilio Ficino’s Metaphysics and its Sources. Aldershot: Variorum, 131–35.Google Scholar
Andia, Y. de. 1996. Henosis: l’union à Dieu chez Denys l’Aréopagite. Leiden: E. J. Brill.Google Scholar
Andreadis, H. 1989. ‘The Sapphic-Platonics of Katherine Philips, 1632-1664’, Signs 15, no. 1, 34–60.Google Scholar
Annas, J. 1977. ‘Plato and Aristotle on Friendship and Altruism’, Mind 86, 532–554.Google Scholar
Annas, J. 1981. An Introduction to Plato’s Republic. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Arendt, H. 1958. The Human Condition. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Arendt, H. 2018. Der Liebesbegriff bei Augustin: Versuch einer philosophischen Interpretation, ed. Kurbacher, F. A.. Hamburg: Felix Meiner. English version: Love and Saint Augustine, ed. Vecchiarelli Scott, J. and Chellus Stark, J.. University of Chicago Press 1996.Google Scholar
Armstrong, A. H. 1961. ‘Platonic eros and Christian agape’, Downside Review 79, 105–21.Google Scholar
Arnim, H. von. 1916. ‘Plato’s Lysis’, Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 71, 364–87.Google Scholar
Arnou, R. 1967. Le désir de Dieu dans la philosophie de Plotin. 2nd ed. Rome: Presses de l’Université Grégorienne.Google Scholar
Asmis, E. 1986. ‘Psychagogia in Plato’s Phaedrus’, Illinois Classical Studies 11, 153–72.Google Scholar
Ast, F. 1816. Platons Leben und Schriften. Leipzig: Weidmann, repr. Frankfurt am Main: Minerva, 1976.Google Scholar
Baker, P., Helmrath, J. and Kallendorf, C.. 2019. ‘Introduction’, in Baker, P., Helmrath, J. and Kallendorf, C. (eds.), Beyond Reception: Renaissance Humanism and the Transformation of Classical Antiquity. Berlin and Boston: Walter de Gruyter, 1–8.Google Scholar
Balthasar, H. U. von. 1969. Herrlichkeit: Eine theologische Ästhetik, II/1, 2nd ed. Einsiedeln: Johannes Verlag.Google Scholar
Barney, R., Brennan, T., and Brittain, C. (eds.), 2012. Plato and the Divided Self. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bartsch, S. 2005. ‘Eros and the Roman Philosopher’, in Bartsch, S. and Bartscherer, T. (eds.), Erotikon: Essays on Eros, Ancient and Modern. University of Chicago Press, 59–83.Google Scholar
Bauer, S. 2006. The Censorship and Fortuna of Platina’s Lives of the Popes in the Sixteenth Century. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
Beck, M. (ed.), 2014. A Companion to Plutarch. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Beecher, D. A. 1992. ‘Quattrocento Views on the Eroticization of the Imagination’, in Beecher and Ciavolella, 1992, 49–65.Google Scholar
Beecher, D. A. and Ciavolella, M.. 1990. ‘Jacques Ferrand and the Tradition of Erotic Melancholy in Western Culture’, in Jacques Ferrand, A Treatise on Lovesickness [De la Maladie d’Amour, ou Melancholie Erotique, 1623], trans. and ed. Beecher, and Ciavolella, . Syracuse University Press, 1–202.Google Scholar
Beecher, D. A. and Ciavolella, M.. (eds.), 1992. Eros and Anteros: The Medical Traditions of Love in the Renaissance. Ottawa: Dovehouse.Google Scholar
Beierwaltes, W. 1980a. Identität und Differenz. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.Google Scholar
Beierwaltes, W. (ed.) 1980b Eriugena: Studien zu seinen Quellen. Vorträge des III. Internationalen Eriugena-Colloquiums, Freiburg im Breisgau 27–30 August 1979. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Winter.Google Scholar
Beierwaltes, W. 1985. Denken des Einen: Studien zur neuplatonischen Philosophie und ihrer Wirkungsgeschichte. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.Google Scholar
Beierwaltes, W. 1988. Visio facialis – Sehen ins Angesicht: Zur Coincidenz des endlichen und unendlichen Blicks bei Cusanus. Munich: C. H. Beck.Google Scholar
Beierwaltes, W. 1994. Eriugena: Grundzüge seines Denkens. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.Google Scholar
Beierwaltes, W. 2007. Procliana: Spätantikes Denken und seine Spuren. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.Google Scholar
Beierwaltes, W. 2011. Fußnoten zu Plato. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.Google Scholar
Beierwaltes, W. 2014a. Platonismus im Christentum (= Philosophische Abhandlungen 73), 3rd expanded ed. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.Google Scholar
Beierwaltes, W. 2014b. Proklos: Grundzüge seiner Metaphysik, 3rd ed. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.Google Scholar
Belfiore, E. S. 2006. ‘Dancing with the Gods: The Myth of the Chariot in Plato’s Phaedrus’, American Journal of Philology 127, 185–217.Google Scholar
Belfiore, E. 2012. Socrates’ Daimonic Art: Love for Wisdom in Four Platonic Dialogues. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Beneker, J. 2008. ‘Plutarch on the Role of Eros in Marriage’, in Nikolaidis, A. G. (ed.), ‘Moralia’ Themes in the ‘Lives’, Features of the ‘Lives’ in the ‘Moralia’. Berlin and New York: Walter De Gruyter, 689–99.Google Scholar
Beneker, J. 2012. The Passionate Statesman: Eros and Politics in Plutarch’s Lives. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bensimon, N. B. 2015. ‘La mise à mort d’Eros: Anteros sive contra amorem de Battista Fregoso’, Revue Silène. Accessed online 20 June 2018.Google Scholar
Bensimon, N. B. 2018. ‘Introduzione’, in Fregoso, B., Anteros sive contra amorem, ed. Bensimon, N. B.. Manziana: Vecchiarelli, 9–130.Google Scholar
Benvenuti, A. Tissoni. 1986. ‘Due Schede per il Platina’, in Campana, A. and Medioli Masotti, P. (eds.), Bartolomeo Sacchi Il Platina (Piadena 1421—Roma 1481): Atti del Convegno Internazionale di Studi per il V Centenario. Padua: Editrice Antenore, 209–20.Google Scholar
Blair, A. 1997. ‘The Theatrum as a Dialogue’, in Blair, A., The Theatre of Nature: Jean Bodin and Renaissance Science. Princeton University Press, 49–64.Google Scholar
Blum, P. R. 2006. ‘Platonische Liebe – eine wahre Geschichte’, in Frank, G., Hallacker, A. and Lalla, S. (eds.), Erzählende Vernunft. Berlin: Akademie Verlag 19–28.Google Scholar
Blum, P. R. 2010. Philosophy of Religion in the Renaissance. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Bodei, R. 2015. Ordo amoris: Conflits terrestres et bonheurs célestes. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Bolotin, D. 1979. Plato’s Dialogue on Friendship: An interpretation of the Lysis with a New Translation. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Bonazzi, M. 2019. ‘Plutarch’s Reception in Imperial Graeco-Roman Philosophy’, in Xenophontos, S. and Oikonomopoulou, K. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to the Reception of Plutarch. Leiden and Boston: E. J. Brill, 56–65.Google Scholar
Boulogne, J. 1999. ‘Trois eros? Comment Plutarque réécrit Platon’, in Pérez Jiménez, García López, and Aguilar, 215–26.Google Scholar
Boulogne, J. 2009/2010. ‘La philosophie du mariage chez Plutarque’, Ploutarchos 7, 23–34.Google Scholar
Boys-Stones, G. 2018. Platonist Philosophy 80 BC to AD 250: An Introduction and Collection of Sources in Translation. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Braden, G. 1999. Petrarchan Love and the Continental Renaissance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Bray, A. 1982. Homosexuality in Renaissance England. London: Gay Men’s Press.Google Scholar
Brenk, F. E. 1988. ‘Plutarch’s Erotikos: The Drag Down Pulled Up’, in Marcovich, M., Brenk, F. E., Hershbell, J. P. and Stadter, P. A. (eds.), Plutarch (ICS 13.2), 457–72. Reprint in Brenk 1998, 13–27.Google Scholar
Brenk, F. E. 1992. ‘Plutarch’s life ‘Markos Antonios’: A Literary and Cultural Study’, ANRW II.33.6. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter, 4348–469; Indices, 4895–915. Reprint in L. Roig Lanzillotta and D. Leão (eds.), Frederick E. Brenk on Plutarch, Religious Thinker and Biographer, as ‘The life of Mark Antony’. Leiden and Boston: E. J. Brill, 2017, 133–266.Google Scholar
Brenk, F. E. 1995. ‘The Boiotia of Plutarch’s Erotikos: Beyond the Shadow of Athens’, in Chistopoulou, A. C. (ed.), Acts of the Society of Boeotian Studies 2. Athens: Society of Boeotian Studies, 1109–19. Reprint in Brenk 1998, 50–8.Google Scholar
Brenk, F. E. 1998. Relighting the Souls: Studies in Plutarch, in Greek Literature, Religion, and Philosophy, and in the New Testament Background. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Brenk, F. E. 2000. ‘All for Love: The Rhetoric of Exaggeration in Plutarch’s Erotikos’, in Van der Stockt, L. (ed.), Rhetorical Theory and Praxis in Plutarch. Leuven: Sociétés des Études Classiques and Peeters, 45–60.Google Scholar
Brenk, F. E. 2007. ‘Sliding Atoms or Supernatural Light: Plutarch’s Erotikos and the “On Eros” Literature’, in Ibáñez, Nieto and López, López, 19–26.Google Scholar
Brenk, F. E. 2012. ‘Most Beautiful and Divine: Graeco-Romans (especially Plutarch) and Paul on Love and Marriage’, in Aune, D. E. and Brenk, F. E. (eds.), Greco-Roman Culture and the New Testament: Studies Commemorating the Centennial of the Pontifical Biblical Institute. Leiden and Boston: E. J. Brill, 87–112.Google Scholar
Brenk, F. E. 2013. ‘Looking at Conjectures (Guesses?) in Plutarch’s Dialogue on Love’, in Pace, G. and Volpe Cacciatore, P. (eds.), Gli Scritti di Plutarco: Tradizione, Ricezione, Commento. Naples: D’Auria, 93–102.Google Scholar
Brenk, F. E. 2014. ‘Philo and Plutarch on the Nature of God’, Studia Philonica Annual 26: 1–14.Google Scholar
Brenk, F. E. 2016. ‘Plutarch’s Flawed Characters: The Personae of the Dialogues’, in Opsomer, J., Roskam, G. and Titchener, F. (eds.), A Versatile Gentleman: Consistency in Plutarch’s Writing. Leuven University Press, 89–100.Google Scholar
Brill, S. 2018. ‘Between Biography and Biology: Bios and Self-Knowledge in Plato’s Phaedrus’, in Ambury, J. and German, A. (eds.), Knowledge and Ignorance of the Self in Platonic Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, 113–31.Google Scholar
Brisson, L. 2006. ‘Agathon, Pausanias, and Diotima in Plato’s Symposium. Paiderastia and Philosophia’, in Lesher, J., Nails, D. and Sheffield, F. C. C. (eds.), Plato’s Symposium: Issues in Interpretation and Reception. Cambridge, MA and London: Center for Hellenic Studies, 229–51.Google Scholar
Brouillette, X. and Giavatto, A. (eds.), 2010. Les dialogues platoniciennes chez Plutarque: Stratégies et méthodes exégétiques. Leuven University Press.Google Scholar
Bürger, R. 1901. De Ovidi carminum amatoriorum inventione et arte. Wolfenbüttel: Göttingen.Google Scholar
Burger, R. 1980. Plato’s Phaedrus: A Defense of a Philosophic Art of Writing. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Burrhus, F. S. 1938. The Behaviour of Organisms: An Experimental Analysis. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Campbell, S. J. 2006. The Cabinet of Eros: Renaissance Mythological Painting and the Studiolo of Isabella d’Este. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Capra, A. 2014. Plato’s Four Muses: The Phaedrus and the Poetics of Philosophy. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Carabine, D. 2000. John Scottus Eriugena. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Carelli, P. 2015. ‘Psychic Representation in Plato’s Phaedrus’, Apeiron 48, 76–98.Google Scholar
Catana, L. 2014. ‘Readings of Platonic Virtue Theories from the Middle Ages to the Renaissance: The Case of Marsilio Ficino’s De Amore’, British Journal for the History of Philosophy 22, 680–703.Google Scholar
Celenza, C. S. 2007. ‘The Revival of Platonic Philosophy’, in Hankins, J. (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Renaissance Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, 72–96.Google Scholar
Ciavolella, M. 1976. La ‘malattia d’amore’ dall’antichità al medioevo. Rome: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
Bodei, R. 1994 . ‘Trois traités du XVe siècle italien sur Anteros: Contra Amores de Bartolomeo Sacchi, Anterotica de Pietro Edo et Anteros de Battista Fregoso’, in Langer, U. and Miernowski, J. (eds.), Anteros. Orleans: Paradigme, 61–73.Google Scholar
Ciordia, M. J. 2007. ‘El Movimiento Europeo Antierótico en las Artes de Amores de Fines del XV y Principios del XVI’, Bulletin of Spanish Studies 84, 989–1006.Google Scholar
Clay, D. 1975. ‘Platonic Studies and the Study of Plato’, Arion: A Journal of Humanities and the Classics 2, 116–32.Google Scholar
Cooper, K. 1992. ‘Insinuations of Womanly Influence: An Aspect of the Christianization of the Roman Aristocracy’, Journal of Roman Studies 82, 150–64.Google Scholar
Corrigan, K. 2004. Reading Plotinus: A Practical Introduction to Neoplatonism. West Lafayette IN: Purdue University Press.Google Scholar
Corrigan, K. 2018. Love, Friendship, Beauty and the Good: Plato, Aristotle and the Later Tradition. Eugene OR: Wipf and Stock.Google Scholar
Corrigan, K. and Glazov-Corrigan, E.. 2004. Plato’s Dialectic at Play: Argument, Structure and Myth in the Symposium. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Cox, V. 1992. The Renaissance Dialogue: Literary Dialogue in its Social and Political Contexts, Castiglione to Galileo. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Crawford, M. B. 1999. ‘Amatorius: Plutarch’s departure from the Περὶ ἔρωτος Literature’, in Pérez Jiménez, García López, and Aguilar, 288–98.Google Scholar
Dall’Orto, G. 1988. ‘“Socratic Love” as a Disguise for Same-Sex Love in the Italian Renaissance’, Journal of Homosexuality 16, no. 1/2, 33–65.Google Scholar
Daniélou, J. 1954. Platonisme et théologie mystique, 2nd ed. Paris: Aubier.Google Scholar
Davis, M. 2011. ‘Plato’s Phaedrus: Eros and the Structure of the Soul’, in Davis, M., The Soul of the Greeks: An Inquiry. University of Chicago Press, 192–204.Google Scholar
Davidson, J. 2007. The Greeks and Greek Love: A Radical Reappraisal of Homosexuality in Ancient Greece. London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. 1997. Politics of Friendship, trans. Collins, G.. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Devereux, J. A. 1969. ‘The Object of Love in Ficino’s Philosophy’, Journal of the History of Ideas 30, 161–70.Google Scholar
Dillon, J. 1977. The Middle Platonists. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Dillon, J. 2014. ‘Plutarch and Platonism’, in Beck, , 61–72.Google Scholar
Di Meo, P. 2020. ‘Plutarch’s Marriage Advice and the Tradition of the Poetic Epithalamium’, in Beneker, J. and Tsouvala, G. (eds.), The Discourse of Marriage in the Greco-Roman World. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 94–118.Google Scholar
Dorter, K. 1971. ‘Imagery and Philosophy in Plato’s Phaedrus’, Journal of the History of Philosophy 9, 279–88.Google Scholar
Dorter, K., 1992. ‘A Dual Dialectic in the Symposium’, Philosophy and Rhetoric 25, 253–70.Google Scholar
Dugas, L. 1894. L’amitié antique. Paris: Félix Alcan; repr. New York: Arno Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Ebbersmeyer, S. 2012. ‘The Philosopher as Lover: Renaissance Debates on Platonic Eros’, in Pickavé, M. and Shapiro, L. (eds.), Emotion and Cognitive Life in Medieval and Early Modern Philosophy. Oxford University Press, 133–55.Google Scholar
Edmonds, R. G. 2000. ‘Socrates the Beautiful: Role Reversal and Midwifery in Plato’s Symposium’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 130, 261–85.Google Scholar
Ferguson, G. 1997. ‘Montaigne’s Itch’, Montaigne Studies 9, 105–20.Google Scholar
Feldman, S. 2005. ‘Platonic Cosmologies in the Dialoghi d’amore of Leone Ebreo (Judah Abravanel)’, Viator: Medieval and Renaissance Studies 36, 557–82.Google Scholar
Ferrari, G. R. F. 1987. Listening to the Cicadas: A Study of Plato’s Phaedrus. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ferrari, G. R. F. 1992. ‘Platonic Love’, in Kraut, R. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Plato. Cambridge University Press, 248–76.Google Scholar
Ferrari, G. R. F. 2007. ‘The Three-Part Soul’, in Ferrari, G. R. F. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Plato’s Republic. Cambridge University Press, 165–201.Google Scholar
Finamore, J., Manolea, C. P. and Klitenic Wear, S. (eds.). 2020. Studies in Hermias’ Commentary on Plato’s Phaedrus. Leiden: E. J. Brill.Google Scholar
Finkelberg, M. 2019. The Gatekeeper: Narrative Voice in Plato’s Dialogues. Leiden and Boston: E. J. Brill.Google Scholar
Flasch, K. 1971. ‘Zur Rehabilitation der Relation: Die Theorie der Beziehung bei Johannes Eriugena’, in Niebel, W. F. and Leisegang, D. (eds.), Philosophie als Beziehungswissenschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Heiderhoff, 5–25.Google Scholar
Flasch, K. 1980. Augustin: Einführung in sein Denken. Stuttgart: Reclam.Google Scholar
Flasch, K. 1990. Logik des Schreckens (= Excerpta classica VIII). Mainz: Dieterich.Google Scholar
Floriani, P. 1978. Bembo e Castiglione: Studi sul classicismo del Cinquecento. Rome: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
Forster, L. 1969. The Icy Fire: Five Studies in European Petrarchism. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fossheim, H. J. 2010. ‘Non-Individuality in the Phaedrus’, Symbolae Osloenses 84, 49–61.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. 1984. Le souci de soi: Histoire de la sexualité, vol. 3. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Fraisse, J. C. 1984. Philia, la notion d’amitié dans la philosophie antique, 2nd ed. Paris: Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin.Google Scholar
Frazier, F. 2003. ‘L’Érotikos et les fragments Sur l’amour de Stobée’, in Ribeiro Ferreira, J. and Ferreira Leão, D. (eds.), Os fragmentos de Plutarco e a recepção da sua obra. Coimbra: Instituto de Estudos Clássicos, 63–87.Google Scholar
Frazier, F. 2005/2006. ‘L’Érotikos’: Un éloge du Dieu Éros? Une relecture du dialogue de Plutarque’, Ploutarchos, n.s. 3, 63–102.Google Scholar
Frazier, F. 2008. ‘Éros, Arès et Aphrodite dans l’Érotikos: Une reconsidération de la réponse à Pemptidès (ch. 13–18)’, in Ribeiro Ferreira, J., Van der Stockt, L. and Do Céu Fialho, M. (eds.), Philosophy in Society: Virtues and Values in Plutarch. Coimbra and Leuven: Universidade de Coimbra and Katholieke Universiteit, 117–36.Google Scholar
Frazier, F. 2009/10. ‘La philosophie du marriage chez Plutarque’, Ploutarchos 7, 23–34.Google Scholar
Frazier, F. 2019. ‘L’ apologie d’ Éros: Éros dieu de la tradition’, in Frazier, F., Quelques aspects du platonisme de Plutarque: philosopher en commun, tourner sa pensée vers dieu, ed. Roig Lanzillota, L.. Leiden and Boston: E. J. Brill, 83–104.Google Scholar
Freccero, C. 1994. ‘Cannibalism, Homophobia. Women: Montaigne’s Des Cannibales and De l’amitie’, in Hendricks, M. and Parker, P. (eds.), Women, ‘Race’, and Writing in the Early Modern Period. New York: Routledge, 73–83.Google Scholar
Gagarin, M. 1977. ‘Socrates’ Hybris and Alcibiades’ Failure’, Phoenix 31, 22–37.Google Scholar
Gasparini, C. 1984. ‘Appunti sulla Vita di Battista Fregoso’, Giornale Storico della Letteratura Italiana 161(515), 398–420.Google Scholar
Gasparini, C. 1985. ‘L’“Anteros” di Battista Fregoso’, Giornale Storico della Letteratura Italiana 162, 225–49.Google Scholar
Gautier-Vignal, L., 1937. Pic de la Mirandole. Paris: Grasset.Google Scholar
Gelston, A. 1992. The Eucharistic Prayer of Addai and Mari. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Georgiadou, A. 2010. ‘Plutarch’s Amatorius: Towards a Reconstruction of the Cult of Eros’, in Van der Stockt, L., Titchener, F., Ingenkamp, H. G. and Pérez Jiménez, A. (eds.), Gods, Daimones, Rituals, Myths and History of Religions in Plutarch’s Works: Studies Devoted to Professor Frederick E. Brenk by the International Plutarch Society. Logan: Utah State University; Málaga: Universidad di Málaga, 229–43.Google Scholar
Georgiadou, A. 2019. ‘Marriage, Cult, and City in Plutarch’s Erotikos’, in Leão, D. A. and Roig Lanzillota, L. (eds.), A Man of Many Interests: Plutarch on Religion, Myth, and Magic. Leiden and Boston: E. J. Brill, 280–94.Google Scholar
Gersh, S. 1990. ‘The Structure of the Return in Eriugena’s Periphyseon’, in Beierwaltes, W. (ed.), Begriff und Metapher: Sprachformen des Denkens bei Eriugena. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Winter, 108–25.Google Scholar
Ghinassi, G. 1969. ‘Fasi dell’elaborazione del Cortegiano’, Studi di filologia italiana 25, 156–194.Google Scholar
Gill, C. 2013. ‘Stoic erôs: Is there such a thing?’, in Sanders, et al., 143–58.Google Scholar
Gilson, É. 1969. Introduction à l’étude de Saint Augustin. Paris: Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin.Google Scholar
Gilson, É. 1984. Études sur le rôle de la pensée médiévale dans la formation du système cartésien. Paris: Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin.Google Scholar
Gilson, É. 1986. Pourquoi Saint Thomas a critiqué Saint Augustin. Paris: Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin.Google Scholar
Glaser, K. 1935. ‘Gang und Ergebnis des Platonischen Lysis’, Wiener Studien 53, 47–67.Google Scholar
Glidden, D. 1981. ‘The Lysis on Loving One’s Own’, Classical Quarterly 31, 39–59.Google Scholar
Goessler, L. 1999. ‘Advice to the Bride and Groom: Plutarch Gives a Detailed Account of his Views on Marriage’, in Plutarch’s Advice to the Bride and Groom, and A Consolation to His Wife, ed. Pomeroy, , 97–115.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. 1995. Foucault’s Virginity: Ancient Erotic Fiction and the History of Sexuality. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goldin, S. 2011. Jewish Women in Europe in the Middle Ages: A Quiet Revolution. Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Gonzalez, F. J. 1995. ‘Plato’s Lysis: An Enactment of Philosophical Kinship’, Ancient Philosophy 15, 69–90.Google Scholar
Gordon, J. 2012. Plato’s Erotic World: From Cosmic Origins to Human Death. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Görgemanns, H. 2006. ‘Einführung’, in Plutarch: Dialog über die Liebe, trans. and comm. Görgemanns, H.. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Gosling, J. C. B. and Taylor, C. C. W.. 1982. The Greeks on Pleasure. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Gottfried, R. B. 1954. ‘Introduction’, in Bembo, Pietro, Gli Asolani, trans. Gottfried, R. B.. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Gregory, T. 1969. ‘Vom Einen zum Vielen: Zur Metaphysik des Johannes Scotus Eriugena’, in Beierwaltes, W. (ed.), Platonismus in der Philosophie des Mittelalters. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 342–65.Google Scholar
Griswold, C. 1986. Self-Knowledge in Plato’s Phaedrus. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Grossman, A. 2004. Pious and Rebellious: Jewish Women in Medieval Europe. Waltham, MA: Brandeis University Press.Google Scholar
Grote, G. 1875. Plato and the Other Companions of Sokrates. London: J. Murray.Google Scholar
Guthrie, W. K. C. 1975. A History of Greek Philosophy, vol. 4: Plato, The Man and his Dialogues: Earlier Period. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Haden, J. 1979. ‘On Socrates, with Reference to Gregory Vlastos’, The Review of Metaphysics 33, 371–89.Google Scholar
Haden, J. 1983. ‘Friendship in Plato’s Lysis’, The Review of Metaphysics 3, 327–56.Google Scholar
Hadot, P. 1997. Plotin ou la simplicité du regard, 4th ed. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Halfwassen, J. 2015. Auf den Spuren des Einen: Studium zur Metaphysik und ihrer Geschichte (= Collegium Metaphysicum 14). Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Halfwassen, J. 2021. Plotinus, Neoplatonism and the Transcendence of the One, ed., trans. and intro. O’Brien, C. S.. Steubenville, OH: Franciscan University Press; Baltimore, MD: The Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
Halperin, D. M. 1986. ‘Plato and Erotic Reciprocity’, Classical Antiquity 5, 60–80.Google Scholar
Halperin, D. M. 2002. How to Do the History of Homosexuality. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hanegraaff, W. J. 2011. ‘Under the Mantle of Love: The Mystical Eroticisms of Marsilio Ficino and Giordano Bruno’, in Hanegraaff, W. J. and Kripal, J. J. (eds.), Hidden Intercourse: Eros and Sexuality in the History of Western Esotericism. New York: Fordham University Press, 175–207.Google Scholar
Hankins, J. 1990. Plato in the Italian Renaissance. 2 vols. Leiden: E. J. Brill.Google Scholar
Hankins, J. 2002. ‘Renaissance Philosophy and Book IV of Il Cortegiano’, in Castiglione, The Book of the Courtier, trans. Singleton, C. S. and ed. Javitch, D.. London: W. W. Norton, 377–88.Google Scholar
Hawley, R. 1999. ‘Practicing What You Preach: Plutarch’s Sources and Treatment’, in Plutarch’s Advice to the Bride and Groom, and A Consolation to His Wife, ed. Pomeroy, , 116–27.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. 1969–71. Werke in zwanzig Bänden: Theorie Werkausgabe, ed. Moldenhauer, E. and Michel, K. M., 20 vols. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Hirsch-Luipold, R. 2014. ‘Religion and Myth’, in Beck, , 163–76.Google Scholar
Hoerber, R. 1959. ‘Plato’s Lysis’, Phronesis 4, 15–28.Google Scholar
Horowitz, M. C. 1979. ‘The Image of God in Man: Is Woman Included?’, Harvard Theological Review 72, 175–206.Google Scholar
Horowitz, M. C. 1998. Seeds of Virtue and Knowledge. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Horowitz, M. C. 2003. ‘Humanist Horticulture: Twelve Agricultural Months and Twelve Categories of Books in Piero de Medici’s Studiolo’, Viator: Medieval and Renaissance Studies 34, 272–307.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. 2012. Plato and the Traditions of Ancient Literature: The Silent Stream. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hyland, D. A. 2008. Plato and the Question of Beauty. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Ingenkamp, H. G. 2006. ‘Nichts echter Plutarchisches? Kritisches zum Amatorius’ (review of Plutarch: Dialog über die Liebe, trans. and comm. H. Görgemanns), Göttingische Gelehrte Anzeigen 258, 183–93.Google Scholar
Ivánka, E. von. 1964. Plato Christianus: Übernahme und Umgestaltung des Platonismus durch den Vater. Einsiedeln: Johannes Verlag.Google Scholar
Jayne, S. 1985. ‘Introduction’, in Ficino, , Commentary, 1–32.Google Scholar
Jazdzewska, K. 2020. ‘Love in Many Dimensions: Hesiod and Empedocles in Plutarch’s Amatorius’, in Schmidt, T. S., Vamvouri, M. and Hirsch-Luipold, R. (eds.), The Dynamics of Intertextuality in Plutarch. Leiden and Boston: E. J. Brill, 459–74.Google Scholar
Jeauneau, É. 1991. ‘The Neoplatonic Themes of Processio and Reditus in Eriugena’, Dionysius 15, 3–29.Google Scholar
Jones, C. P. 1975. Plutarch and Rome. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kahn, C. H. 1990. ‘Plato as a Socratic’, Recherches sur la philosophie et le language 12, 287–301.Google Scholar
Kalligas, P. 2014. The Enneads of Plotinus: A Commentary, vol. 1. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Katsos, I. 2019. ‘The Metaphysics of Light in the Hexaemeral Literature: From Philo of Alexandria to Ambrose of Milan’, unpublished PhD thesis, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Kidwell, C. 2004. Pietro Bembo: Lover, Linguist, Cardinal. Montréal and Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 99–112.Google Scholar
Kleve, K. 1983. ‘NASO MAGISTER ERAT – sed quis Nasonis magister?’, Symbolae Osloenses 58, 89–109.Google Scholar
Kodera, S. 2009. ‘The Idea of Beauty in Leone Ebreo (Judah Abravanel)’, in Diemling, M. and Veltri, G. (eds.), The Jewish Body: Corporeality, Society, and Identity in the Renaissance and Early Modern Period. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 301–30.Google Scholar
Kolsky, S. 2003. Courts and Courtiers in Renaissance Northern Italy. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Konstan, D. 1994. Sexual Symmetry: Love in the Ancient Novel and Related Genres. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Konstan, D. 1997. Friendship in the Classical World. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Konstan, D. 2018. In the Orbit of Love: Affection in Ancient Greece and Rome. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, C. 1999. ‘Self-Constitution in the Ethics of Plato and Kant’, The Journal of Ethics 3, 1–29.Google Scholar
Krämer, H. J. 1959. Arete bei Platon und Aristoteles: Zum Wesen und zur Geschichte der platonischen Ontologie (= Abhandlungen der Heidelberger Akademie der Wissenschaften, Philosophisch-Historische Klasse 6). Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Winter.Google Scholar
Krämer, H. J. 2014. Gesammelte Aufsätze zu Platon, ed. Mirbach, Dagmar (= Beiträge zu Altertumskunde 321). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kraye, J. 1994. ‘The Transformation of Platonic Love in the Italian Renaissance’, in Baldwin, A. and Hutton, S. (eds.), Platonism in the English Imagination. Cambridge University Press, 76–85.Google Scholar
Kraye, J. 2019. ‘Renaissance Humanism and the Transformations of Ancient Philosophy’; in Baker, P., Helmrath, J. and Kallendorf, C. (eds.), Beyond Reception: Renaissance Humanism and the Transformation of Classical Antiquity. Berlin and Boston: Walter de Gruyter, 149–62.Google Scholar
Kristeller, P. O. 1943. The Philosophy of Marsilio Ficino, trans. Consant, V.. New York: Columbia University Press; repr. Gloucester, MA: P. Smith, 1964.Google Scholar
Kristeller, P. O. 1988. Il pensiero filosofico di Marsilio Ficino, rev. ed. Florence: Le Lettere.Google Scholar
Lacrosse, J. 1994. L’Amour chez Plotin: Eros hénologique, eros noétique, eros psychique. Brussels: Ousia.Google Scholar
Lanoue, A. 2019a. ‘L’interprétation du carme de Simonide dans le Protagoras: Une herméneutique de la censure philosophique’, Dionysius 37, 7–29.Google Scholar
Lanoue, A. 2019b. ‘Ermeneutica e verità nel Protagora di Platone’, Giornale di bordo (Serie III) 50, 1–19.Google Scholar
Lanoue, A. 2019c. ‘Plaidoyer en faveur d’un monisme platonicien: Regard sur le Timée de Platon’, Vivens Homo 30, 177–94.Google Scholar
Lanoue, A. 2021. ‘Sources mythologiques de l’Éros platonicien’, Rivista di filosofia neoscolastica 113, 687–706.Google Scholar
Larsen, J. K. 2010. ‘Dialectic of Eros and Myth of the Soul in Plato’s Phaedrus’, Symbolae Osloenses 84, 73–89.Google Scholar
Lefranc, A. 1897. ‘Marguerite de Navarre et le platonisme de la Renaissance’, Bibliothèque de l’École des Chartes 58, 259–92.Google Scholar
Leitao, D. D. 2012. The Pregnant Male as Myth and Metaphor in Classical Greek Literature. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lesher, J. H., Nails, D. and Sheffield, F. C. C. (eds.). 2006. Plato’s Symposium: Issues in Interpretation and Reception. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Leushuis, R. 2017. Speaking of Love: The Love Dialogue in Italian and French Renaissance Literature. Leiden: E. J. Brill.Google Scholar
Levy, D. 1979. ‘The Definition of Love in Plato’s Symposium’, Journal of the History of Ideas 40, 285–91.Google Scholar
Linck, M. 2003. ‘Unmastering Speech: Irony in Plato’s Phaedrus’, Philosophy & Rhetoric 36, 264–76.Google Scholar
Lochman, D. T., and López, M.. 2011. ‘The Emergence of Discourses: Early Modern Friendship’, in Lochman, D. T. and López, M. (eds.), Discourses and Representations of Friendship in Early Modern Europe, 1500–1700. Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 1–26.Google Scholar
Lorkovic, E. 2014. ‘Losing the Monstrous and the Multiform: The Lessons of Myth in Plato’s Phaedrus’, Philosophy and Literature 38, 462–78.Google Scholar
Lowes, J. L. 1914. ‘The Loveres Maladye of Hereos’, Modern Philology 11, 491–546.Google Scholar
Lucchesi, M. A. 2013. ‘Love Theory and Political Practice in Plutarch: The Amatorius and the Lives of Coriolanus and Alcibiades’, in Sanders, et al., 209–27.Google Scholar
Ludwig, P. W. 2002. Eros and Polis: Desire and Community in Greek Political Thought. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lutz, C. E. 1947. ‘Musonius Rufus, “the Roman Socrates”’, Yale Classical Studies 10, 3–147.Google Scholar
Martos Montiel, J. F. 2007. ‘Sexualidad en Plutarco’, in Nieto, Ibañez and López, López, 499–515.Google Scholar
Maso, S. 2020. ‘Emotions in Context: “Risk” as Condition for Emotion’, in Condiotto, L. and Renault, O. (eds.), Emotions in Plato. Leiden and Boston: E. J. Brill, 83-99.Google Scholar
Mathew, G. 1963. Byzantine Aesthetics. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
McClure, G. W. 1985. ‘Healing Eloquence: Petrarch, Salutati, and the Physicians’, Journal of Medieval and Renaissance Studies 15, 317–46.Google Scholar
McCoy, M. 2008. On the Rhetoric of Philosophers and Sophists. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McGibbon, D. D. 1964. ‘The Fall of the Soul in Plato’s Phaedrus’, Classical Quarterly 14, 56–63.Google Scholar
McInerney, J. 2003. ‘Plutarch’s Manly Women’, in Rosen, R. and Slutter, I. (eds.), Andreia: Studies in Manliness and Courage in Classical Antiquity. Leiden and Boston: E. J. Brill, 319–44.Google Scholar
McNamara, J. A. 1999. ‘Gendering Virtue’, in Plutarch’s Advice to the Bride and Groom, and A Consolation to his Wife, ed. Pomeroy, , 151–61.Google Scholar
Melczer, W. 1976. ‘Platonisme et aristotélisme dans la pensée de Léon l’Hébreu’, in Margolin, J. C. and Aquilon, P. (eds.), Platon et Aristote à la Renaissance. Paris: Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin, 293–306.Google Scholar
Menn, S. 1998. Descartes and Augustine. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Merrill, R. V. 1944. ‘Eros and Anteros’, Speculum 19, 265–84.Google Scholar
Mesch, W. 2020. ‘Aristoteles über Platons Vernachlässigung finaler Ursachen: Eine Kritik und die Frage nach ihrer Berechtigung’, in König, P. and Lindén, J. I. (eds.), Aristoteles – antike Kontexte, gegenwärtige Perspektive (= Heidelberger Forschungen 45). Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Winter, 77–136.Google Scholar
Milham, M. E. 1998. ‘Introduction’, in Platina, Bartolomeo, On Right Pleasure and Good Health: A Critical Edition and Translation of De Honesta Voluptate et Valetudine, trans. and ed. Milham, M. E.. Tempe, AZ: Medieval and Renaissance Texts and Studies, 1–95.Google Scholar
Milham, M. E. 2000. ‘Neglected Works of Platina’, in Schnur, R., Costas, J., Moreno, A., Green, R., Iurilli, A., McCutcheon, E., Mund-Dopchie, M. and Wiegand, H (eds.), Acta Conventus Neo-Latini Abulensis, Tempe AZ: Medieval and Renaissance Texts and Studies, 459–63.Google Scholar
Monfasani, J. 1976. George of Trebizond. Leiden: E. J. Brill.Google Scholar
Mooney, T. B. 2002. ‘Plato and the Love of Individuals’, The Heythrop Journal 43, 311–27.Google Scholar
Moore, C. 2014. ‘How to “Know Thyself” in Plato’s Phaedrus’, Apeiron 47, 390–418.Google Scholar
Moore, C. 2017. ‘Heracles the Philosopher (Herodotus, Fr. 14)’, Classical Quarterly 67, 1–22.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, J. M. E. 1972. ‘Reason and Eros in the “Ascent”-Passage of the Symposium’, in Anton, J. P. and Kustas, G. L. (eds.), Essays in Ancient Greek Philosophy. Albany: State University of New York Press, 285–302.Google Scholar
Moss, J. 2012. ‘Soul-Leading: The Unity of the Phaedrus, Again’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 43, 1–23.Google Scholar
Moulton, F. 2014. Love in Print in the Sixteenth Century: The Popularization of Romance. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Mueller, G. E. 1957. ‘Unity of the Phaedrus’, Classical Bulletin 33, 50–3.Google Scholar
Myerowitz, M. 1985. Ovid’s Games of Love. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.Google Scholar
Nead, L. 1992. The Female Nude: Art, Obscenity, and Sexuality. Florence: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Nelson, J. C. 1958. Renaissance Theory of Love: The Context of Giordano Bruno’s ‘Eroici furori’. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, Nuova, , J. 2011. ‘Leone Ebreo’s Dialoghi d’amore as a Pivotal Document of Jewish-Christian Relations in Renaissance Rome’, in Zinguer, I., Melamed, A. and Shaleve, Z. (eds.), Hebraic Aspects of the Renaissance: Sources and Encounters. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 62–77.Google Scholar
Neumann, H. 1965. ‘Diotima’s Concept of Love’, American Journal of Philology 86, 33–59.Google Scholar
Nichols, M. P. 2009. Socrates on Friendship and Community: Reflections on Plato’s Symposium, Phaedrus and lysis. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nichols, M. P. 2013. ‘Review of Belfiore, Socrates’ Daimonic Art’, Polis 30, 354–56.Google Scholar
Nicholson, G. 1999. Plato’s Phaedrus: The Philosophy of Love. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.Google Scholar
Nieto Ibáñez, J. M., and López López, R. (eds.). 2007. El Amor en Plutarco. León: Universidad de León.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, F. 1988. Jenseits von Gut und Böse. Stuttgart: Reclam.Google Scholar
Nikolaidis, A. G. 1997. ‘Plutarch on Women and Marriage’, Wiener Studien 110, 58–63.Google Scholar
Nurse, P. H. 1957. ‘Christian Platonism in the Poetry of Bonaventure Des Périers’, Bibliothèque d’Humanisme et Renaissance 19, 234–44.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. C. 2000. ‘Musonius Rufus: Enemy of Double Standards for Men and Women?’, in Pohlmann, K. (ed.), Double Standards in the Ancient and Medieval World. Göttingen: Duehrkohp and Radicke, 221–46.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. C. 2001. The Fragility of Goodness: Luck and Ethics in Greek Tragedy and Philosophy, rev. ed. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. C. 2002. ‘Erôs and Ethical Norms: Philosophers Respond to a Cultural Dilemma’, in Nussbaum, and Sihvola, , 55–119.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. C. 2003. Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of Emotions. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. C. and Sihvola, J. (eds.). 2002. The Sleep of Reason: Erotic Experience and Sexual Ethics in Ancient Greece and Rome. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Nygren, A. 1932–9. Agape and Eros. 2 vols. London, SPCK (repr. 1953).Google Scholar
O’Brien, C. S. 2012. ‘Dramatic Devices and Philosophical Content in Plato’s Symposium’, Archai: Revista de Estudos sobre as Origens do Pensamento Ocidental 9, 73–84. Electronic version available at http://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/7650Google Scholar
O’Brien, C. S. 2015. The Demiurge in Ancient Thought: Secondary Gods and Divine Mediators. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
O’Brien, C. S. 2019. ‘Plato on the Absolute’, in Plevrakis, E. and Rohstock, M. (eds.), Grundlegung des Absoluten? Paradigmen aus der Geschichte der Metaphysik. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Winter, 15–36.Google Scholar
O’Brien, C. S. 2020. ‘Hermias’ Theotaxonomy’, in Finamore, Manolea and Klitenic Wear, 169–86.Google Scholar
O’Brien, C. S. and Klitenic Wear, S.. 2017. ‘The Figure of the Diadochos from Socrates to the Late Antique Athenian School of Neoplatonism’, in Finamore, J. and Klitenic Wear, S. (eds.), Defining Platonism: Essays in Honor of the 75th Birthday of John M. Dillon. Steubenville, OH: Franciscan University Press; Baltimore, MD: The Catholic University of America Press, 253–70.Google Scholar
O’Meara, D. 2017. ‘Ethics in Plotinus and his Successors’, in Bobonich, C. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Ethics. Cambridge University Press, 240–61.Google Scholar
O’Meara, D. 2018. ‘The Legislation of the World and Human Legislation in Late Antique Platonism’, in Höfele, A. and Kellner, B. (eds.), Natur in politischen Ordnungsentwürfen der Vormoderne. Paderborn: Wilhelm Fink, 39–50.Google Scholar
Opsomer, J. 2006. ‘Eros in Plutarchs moralischer Psychologie’, in Plutarch: Dialog über die Liebe, trans. and comm. Görgemanns, H., 208–35.Google Scholar
Opsomer, J. 2009. ‘M. Annius Ammonius: A Philosophical Profile’, in Bonazzi, M. and Opsomer, J. (eds.), The Origins of the Platonic System: Platonisms of the Early Empire and their Philosophical Contexts. Leuven: Peeters, 149–79.Google Scholar
Osborne, C. 1994. Eros Unveiled: Plato and the God of Love. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Osborne, T. M. 2005. Love of Self and Love of God in Thirteenth-Century Ethics. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Panizza, L. 2011. ‘Platonic Love on the Rocks: Castiglione Counter-currents in Renaissance Italy’, in Clucas, S., Forshaw, P. J. and Rees, V. (eds.), Laus Platonici Philosophi: Marsilio Ficino and his Influence. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 199–226.Google Scholar
Panofsky, E. 1962. Studies in Iconology: Humanistic Themes in the Art of the Renaissance. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Patterson, C. 1999. ‘Plutarch’s Advice to the Bride and Groom: Traditional Wisdom through a Philosophic Lens’, in Plutarch’s Advice to the Bride and Groom, and A Consolation to His Wife, ed. Pomeroy, , 128–37 (= Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt II.33.5, 1991), 4709–23.Google Scholar
Penner, T. and Rowe, C.. 2005. Plato’s Lysis. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pérez Jiménez, A., García López, J., and Aguilar, R. M. (eds.), 1999. Plutarco, Platón, y Aristóteles. Madrid: Ed. Clásicas, 215–26.Google Scholar
Pescatori, R. 2007. ‘The Myth of the Androgyne in Leone Ebreo’s Dialoghi d’Amore’, Comitatus: A Journal of Medieval and Renaissance Studies 38, 115–28.Google Scholar
Pescatori, R. 2009. ‘Introduction: The Dialogues of Love of Leone Ebreo’, in Leone Ebreo, Dialogues of Love, ed. Pescatori, R., trans. Bacich, D.. University of Toronto Press, 3–19.Google Scholar
Peterson, S. 2011. Socrates and Philosophy in the Dialogues of Plato. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Petris, L. 2007. ‘L’amour divin par celluy de ce monde: Platonisme et Évangélisme dans l’Androgyne d’Antoine Héroët’, in Gendre, A. and Petris, L. (eds.), Par élévation d’esprit: Antoine Héroët le poète, le prélat et son temps. Paris: Honoré Champion, 179–208.Google Scholar
Pigler, A. 2002. Plotin: Une métaphysique de l’amour comme structure du monde intelligible. Paris: Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin.Google Scholar
Pohlenz, M. 1916. ‘Review of von Arnim, H. Platos Jugenddialogue und die Entstehungszeit des Phaidros’, Göttingische Gelehrte Anzeigen 5, 241–82.Google Scholar
Politis, V. 2016. ‘How Good is That Thing Called Love? The Volatility of eros in Plato’s Symposium’, Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 31: 1–34.Google Scholar
Pomeroy, S. B. 1999. ‘Reflections on Plutarch, Advice to the Bride and Groom’, in Pomeroy, S. B. (ed.), Plutarch’s Advice to the Bride and Groom, and A Consolation to His Wife. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Price, A. W. 1981. ‘Loving Persons Platonically’, Phronesis 26, 25–24.Google Scholar
Price, A. W. 1989. Love and Friendship in Plato and Aristotle. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Price, A. W. 1990. ‘Plato and Freud’, in Gill, C. (ed.), The Person and the Human Mind: Issues in Ancient and Modern Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 247–70.Google Scholar
Price, A. W. 2002. ‘Plato, Zeno, and the Object of Love’, in Nussbaum, and Sihvola, (eds.), 170–99.Google Scholar
Prus, R. and Camara, F.. 2010. ‘Love, Friendship and Disaffection in Plato and Aristotle: Toward a Pragmatist Analysis of Interpersonal Relationships’, Qualitative Sociology Review 6, 29–62.Google Scholar
Puech, B. 1992. Prosopographie des amis de Plutarch’, Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt II.33.6, 4831–93.Google Scholar
Pugliese, O. Z. 1986. ‘Variations on Ficino’s De amore: The Hymns to Love by Benivieni and Castiglione’, in Eisenbichler, K. and Zorzi Pugliese, O. (eds.), Ficino and Renaissance Neoplatonism. Ottawa: Dovehouse, 113–21.Google Scholar
Quondam, A. 2002. ‘On the Genesis of the Book of the Courtier’, in Castiglione, The Book of the Courtier, trans. Singleton, C. S. and ed. Javitch, D.. London: W. W. Norton, 283–95.Google Scholar
Race, W. H. 1983. Plato’s Lysis. Bryn Mawr, PA: Bryn Mawr Commentaries.Google Scholar
Ravaisson, F. 1999. De l’habitude. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
Ravaisson, F. 2007. La philosophie de Pascal. Paris: Sandre.Google Scholar
Rebhorn, W. 1978. Courtly Performances: Masking and Festivity in Castiglione’s Book of the Courtier. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.Google Scholar
Reeser, T. W. 2016. Setting Plato Straight: Translating Ancient Sexuality in the Renaissance. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Reeve, C. D. C. 2006. ‘Plato on Eros and Friendship’, in Benson, H. H. (ed.), A Companion to Plato. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 294–307.Google Scholar
Reid, J. A. 2009. King’s Sister – Queen of Dissent: Marguerite of Navarre (1492–1549) and her Evangelical Work. 2 vols. (= Studies in Medieval and Reformation Traditions 139). Leiden: E. J. Brill.Google Scholar
Reydams-Schils, G. J. 2004. ‘Musonius Rufus, Porphyry, and Christians in Counter-point on Marriage and the Good’, in Kijewska, A. (ed.), Metamorphoses of Neoplatonism. Lublin: Wydaw KUL, 151–68.Google Scholar
Richardson Lear, G. 2006. ‘Plato on Learning to Love Beauty’, in Santas, G. (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to Plato’s Republic. Oxford: Blackwell, 104–24.Google Scholar
Richlin, A. 2017. ‘Retrosexuality: Sex in the Second Sophistic’, in Richter, D. S. and Johnson, W. A. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the Second Sophistic. Oxford University Press, 115–38.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, P. 1960. Philosophie de la volonté. Tome II: Finitude et culpabilité. Paris: Aubier.Google Scholar
Rist, J. M. 1964. Eros and Psyche: Studies in Plato, Plotinus and Origen. Toronto University Press.Google Scholar
Rist, J. M. 1966. ‘A note on Eros and Agape in Ps-Dionysius’, Vigiliae Christianae 20, 235–43.Google Scholar
Rist, J. M. 1981. ‘Basil’s “Neoplatonism”: Its Background and Nature’, in Fedwick, P. J. (ed.), Basil of Caesarea: Christian, Humanist, Ascetic. A Sixteen-hundredth Anniversary Symposium, Volumes 1–2. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Biblical Studies, 137–220.Google Scholar
Rist, J. M. 2001. ‘Plutarch’s Amatorius: A Commentary on Plato’s Theories of Love?’, Classical Quarterly 51, 557–75.Google Scholar
Robichaud, D. J. J. 2018. Plato’s Persona: Marsilio Ficino, Renaissance Humanism, and Platonic Traditions. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Robin, L. 1908. La Théorie Platonicienne de l’Amour. Paris: Félix Alcan.Google Scholar
Robin, L. 1968 [1935]. Platon. Paris: Félix Alcan.Google Scholar
Robinson, D. B. 1986. ‘Plato’s Lysis: The Structural Problem’, Illinois Classical Studies 11, 63–83.Google Scholar
Robinson, D. M. 2003. ‘Pleasant Conversation in the Seraglio: Lesbianism, Platonic Love, and Cavendish's Blazing World’, The Eighteenth Century 44, nos. 2–3, 133–66.Google Scholar
Rocke, M. 1996. Forbidden Friendships: Homosexuality and Male Culture in Renaissance Florence. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rohstock, M. 2013. ‘Nicholas of Cusa’s ‘Not-Other’: The Absolute as Negative Self-Reference’, Dionysius 31, 117–26.Google Scholar
Rohstock, M. 2014. Der negative Selbstbezug des Absoluten: Untersuchungen zu Nicolaus Cusanus’ Konzept des Nicht-Anderen (= Quellen und Studien zur Philosophie 119). Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Roth, M. D. 1995. ‘Did Plato Nod? Some Conjectures on Egoism and Friendship in the Lysis’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 77, 1–20.Google Scholar
Rowe, C. J. 1990. ‘Philosophy, Love and Madness’, in Gill, C. (ed.), The Person and the Human Mind: Issues in Ancient Philosophy. Oxford University Press, 241–46.Google Scholar
Rudebusch, G. 2006. ‘Socratic Love’, in Ahbel-Rappe, S., and Kamtekar, R. (eds.), A Companion to Socrates. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 186–99.Google Scholar
Ruderman, D. 1988. ‘Italian Renaissance and Jewish Thought’, in Rabil, A. Jr. (ed.) Renaissance Humanism, vol. 1: Foundations, Forms, and Legacy. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 382–434.Google Scholar
Saccone, E. 2002. ‘The Portrait of the Courtier in Castiglione’, in Castiglione, , The Book of the Courtier, 328–39.Google Scholar
Sallis, J. 1996. Being and Logos: Reading the Platonic Dialogues. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Sanders, E. C. Thumiger, C. Carey, and Lowe, N. (eds.). 2013. Erôs in Ancient Greece. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Santas, G., 1988. Plato and Freud: Two Theories of Love. Oxford: Blackwell (repr. 1991).Google Scholar
Santas, G., 2010. Understanding Plato’s Republic. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Schachter, M. D. 2008. Voluntary Servitude and the Erotics of Friendship: From Classical Antiquity to Early Modern France. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Schachter, M. D. 2015. ‘Translating Friendship in the Circle of Marguerite de Navarre: Des Périers’ Lysis and De Rozières’ Toxaris’, in Wilkin, R. and Seifert, L. (eds.), Men and Women Making Friends in Early Modern France. Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 99–118.Google Scholar
Scheler, M. 1973. Wesen und Formen der Sympathie (= Gesammelte Werke, Band 7). Bern, A. Francke Verlag.Google Scholar
Schelling, F. W. J. von. 1966. Philosophie der Mythologie, 2 vols. Originally published in Sämmtliche Werke, Augsburg, 1856 (vol. 11) and 1857 (vol. 12), Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Schindler, D. C. 2007. ‘Plato and the Problem of Love: On the Nature of Eros in the Symposium’, Apeiron 40, 199–220.Google Scholar
Schramm, M. 2013. Freundschaft im Neuplatonismus: Politisches Denken und Sozialphilosophie von Plotin bis Kaiser Julian. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Scott, D. 2000. ‘Socrates and Alcibiades in the Symposium’, Hermathena 168, 25–37.Google Scholar
Scott, G. A., and Welton, W. A.. 2008. Erotic Wisdom: Philosophy and Intermediacy in Plato’s Symposium. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Scully, S. 2003. Plato’s Phaedrus. Newburyport, MA: Focus Publishing.Google Scholar
Seifert, L. and Wilkin, R.. 2015. ‘Introduction: Men and Women Making Friends in Early Modern France’, in Seifert, L. and Wilkin, R. (eds.), Men and Women Making Friends in Early Modern France. Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 1–29.Google Scholar
Sheffield, F. C. C. 2006. Plato’s Symposium: The Ethics of Desire. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sheffield, F. C. C. 2011. ‘Beyond Eros: Friendship in the Phaedrus’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 111, 257–73.Google Scholar
Sheffield, F. C. C. 2012. ‘The Symposium and Platonic Ethics: Plato, Vlastos and a Misguided Debate’, Phronesis 57, 117–21.Google Scholar
Sheffield, F. C. C. 2017. ‘Eros and the Pursuit of Forms’, in Destrée, P. and Giannopoulou, Z. (eds.), Plato’s Symposium: A Critical Guide. Cambridge University Press, 125–41.Google Scholar
Sheffield, F. C. C. 2020. ‘Love and the City: Eros and Philia in Plato’s Laws’, in Candiotto, L. and Renaut, O. (eds.), Emotions in Plato. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 330–71.Google Scholar
Shorey, P. 1930. ‘The Alleged Fallacy in Plato Lysis 220e’, Classical Philology 25: 380–3.Google Scholar
Sihvola, J. 2002. ‘Aristotle on Sex and Love’, in Nussbaum and Sihvola, 200–21.Google Scholar
Skenazi, C. 2013. Aging Gracefully in the Renaissance: Stories of Later Life from Petrarch to Montaigne. Leiden: E. J. Brill.Google Scholar
Skinner, B. F. 1938. The Behaviour of Organisms: An Experimental Analysis. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Skinner, M. B. 2005. Sexuality in Greek and Roman Culture. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Smith, B. 1991. Homosexual Desire in Shakespeare’s England: A Cultural Poetics, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Smith Pangle, L. 2001. ‘Friendship and Human Neediness in Plato’s Lysis’, Ancient Philosophy 21, 305–23.Google Scholar
Stadter, P. A. 1995. ‘Subject to the Erotic: Male Sexual Behaviour in Plutarch’, in Innes, D., Hine, H., and Pelling, C. (eds.), Ethics and Rhetoric: Classical Essays for Donald Russell on his Seventy-Fifth Birthday. Oxford University Press, 221–36.Google Scholar
Stalley, R. F. 1983. An Introduction to Plato’s Laws. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett; London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Stäuble, A. 1985. ‘L’inno all’Amore nel quarto libro del Cortegiano’, Giornale storico della letteratura italiana 162, 481–519.Google Scholar
Stephenson, B. 2004. The Power and Patronage of Marguerite de Navarre. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Stimilli, D. 2004. The Face of Immortality: Physiognomy and Criticism. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Stoeber, M. 1992. ‘Phaedrus of the Phaedrus: The Impassioned Soul’, Philosophy and Rhetoric 25, 271–80.Google Scholar
Stone, D. 1996. ‘Women and Friendship’, Montaigne Studies 8, 23–34.Google Scholar
Summers, P. 1989. Celestial Ladders: Readings in Marguerite de Navarre’s Poetry of Spiritual Ascent. Geneva: Droz.Google Scholar
Swain, S. 2015. ‘Pagan and Christian Sex Lives in the Roman Empire’, in Ash, R., Mossma, J. and Titchener, F. B. (eds.), Fame and Infamy: Essays on Characterization in Greek and Roman Biography and Historiography. Oxford University Press, 335–52.Google Scholar
Syson, L. and Thornton, D.. 2001. Objects of Virtue: Art in Renaissance Italy. Los Angeles: J. Paul Getty Museum.Google Scholar
Szlezák, T. A. 1985–2006. Platon und die Schriftlichkeit der Philosophie. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Szlezák, T. A. 1999. Reading Plato. London and New York: Routledge. [Translation of Platon lesen, 1993. Stuttgart: Verlag Frommann-Holzboog.]Google Scholar
Tarabochia Canavero, A. 1975. ‘L’amicizia nell’epistolario di Marsilio Ficino’, Rivista di Filosofia Neo-Scolastica 67, no. 3, 422–31.Google Scholar
Tarabochia Canavero, A. 1978. ‘S. Agostino nella teologia platonica di Marsilio Ficino’, Rivista di Filosofia Neo-Scolastica 70, 626–46.Google Scholar
Tarrant, H. 1985. Scepticism or Platonism: The Philosophy of the Fourth Academy. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Telle, E. 1969. ‘La querelle des amyes’, in L’Œuvre de Marguerite d’Angoulême, reine de Navarre, et la Querelle des femmes. Geneva: Slatkine, 149–75.Google Scholar
Thompson, E. 2006. ‘Bonaventure des Périers’, in Conway, M. (ed.), Sixteenth-Century French Writers. Detroit: Thomson-Gale, 113–22.Google Scholar
Trapp, M. B. 1990. ‘Plato’s Phaedrus in Second Century Greek Literature’, in Russell, D. A. (ed.), Antonine Literature. Oxford University Press, 141–73.Google Scholar
Tsopurashvili, T. 2012. ‘The Theory of the Transcendentals in Meister Eckhart’, in Hackett, J. (ed.), A Companion to Meister Eckhart. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 185–203.Google Scholar
Tsouvala, G. 2014. ‘Love and Marriage’, in Beck, 191–206.Google Scholar
Valency, M. 1975. In Praise of Love: An Introduction to the Love-Poetry of the Renaissance. New York: Octagon.Google Scholar
Van Bremen, R. 1996. The Limits of Participation: Women and Civic Life in the Hellenistic East in the Greek and Roman Periods. Amsterdam: Gieben.Google Scholar
Van Oort, J. (ed.) 2013. Augustine and Manichaean Christianity: Selected Papers from the first South African Conference on Augustine of Hippo, University of Pretoria, 24–26 April 2012. Leiden and Boston: E. J. Brill.Google Scholar
Vanneste, J. 1959. Le Mystère de Dieu: Essai sur la structure rationnelle de la doctrine mystique de Pseudo-Denys l’Aréopagite. Bruges: Desclée de Brouwer.Google Scholar
Verheyen, E. 1971. The Paintings in the Studiolo of Isabella d’Este at Mantua. New York University Press.Google Scholar
Versenyi, L. 1975. ‘Plato’s Lysis’, Phronesis 20, 185–98.Google Scholar
Vlastos, G. 1981. ‘The Individual as Object of Love in Plato’, in Vlastos, G., Platonic Studies. Princeton University Press, 3–42.Google Scholar
Vogt, K. M. 2017. Desiring the Good: Ancient Proposals and Contemporary Theory. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Werner, D. 2007. ‘Plato’s Phaedrus and the Problem of Unity’, in Sedley, D. (ed.), Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 32, 91–137.Google Scholar
Werner, D. 2012. Myth and Philosophy in Plato’s Phaedrus. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
White, D. 1993. Rhetoric and Reality in Plato’s Phaedrus. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
White, F. C. 1989. ‘Love and Beauty in Plato’s Symposium’, Journal of the History of Ideas 109, 149–57.Google Scholar
White, F. C. 1990. ‘Love and the Individual in Plato’s Phaedrus’, Classical Quarterly 40, 396–406.Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, T. 2009. ‘Desire and the End of the Greek Novel’, in Nilsson, I. (ed.), Plotting with Eros: Essays on the Poetics of Love and the Erotics of Reading. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculum Press, 135–52.Google Scholar
Wolfsdorf, D. 2007. ‘Φιλία in Plato’s Lysis’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 103, 235–59.Google Scholar
Wolters, A. M. 1984. Plotinus ‘On Eros’: A Detailed Exegetical Study of Enneads III, 5. Toronto: Wedge.Google Scholar
Woodhouse, J. R. 1978. Baldesar Castiglione: A Reassessment of the Courtier. Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Wurm, A. 2008. Platonicus amor: Lesarten der Liebe bei Platon, Plotin und Ficino, (= Beiträge zur Altertumskunde 261). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Yavneh, N. 1991. ‘The Spiritual Eroticism of Leone’s Hermaphrodite’, in Brink, J. R., Horowitz, M. C. and Coudert, A. P. (eds.), Playing with Gender: A Renaissance Pursuit. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 85–98.Google Scholar
Yunis, H. 2005. ‘Plato’s Phaedrus and the Shape of Greek Rhetoric’, Arion: A Journal of Humanities and the Classics 13, 101–26.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Carl Séan O'Brien, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Germany, John Dillon, Trinity College Dublin
  • Book: Platonic Love from Antiquity to the Renaissance
  • Online publication: 25 August 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108525596.023
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Carl Séan O'Brien, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Germany, John Dillon, Trinity College Dublin
  • Book: Platonic Love from Antiquity to the Renaissance
  • Online publication: 25 August 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108525596.023
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Carl Séan O'Brien, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Germany, John Dillon, Trinity College Dublin
  • Book: Platonic Love from Antiquity to the Renaissance
  • Online publication: 25 August 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108525596.023
Available formats
×