Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T07:22:24.966Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 June 2021

Vasilis Politis
Vasilis Politis
Affiliation:
Trinity College Dublin
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Plato's Essentialism
Reinterpreting the Theory of Forms
 , pp. 235 - 242
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, R. E. (1997) Plato’s Parmenides, London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, A. (1969) ‘Socratic Reasoning in the Euthyphro’, The Review of Metaphysics, 22(3), 461–481.Google Scholar
Annas, J. (1981) An Introduction to Plato’s Republic, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Annas, J. (1982) ‘Aristotle on Inefficient Causes’, The Philosophical Quarterly, 32(129), 311–326.Google Scholar
Annas, J. (1986) ‘Classical Greek Philosophy’, in Boardman, J., Griffin, J. and Murray, O., eds., The Oxford History of the Classical World, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 234–253.Google Scholar
Annas, J., and Rowe, C. J. (2003) New Perspectives on Plato, Modern and Ancient, Centre for Hellenic Studies Colloquia 6, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Apelt, O. (1912) Platonische Aufsätze, Berlin: B.G. Teubner Verlag.Google Scholar
Archer-Hind, R. D. (1894) The Phaedo of Plato, 2nd ed., London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Balaudé, J.-F. (2004) Hippias Mineur, Hippias Majeur, Paris: Livre de Poche.Google Scholar
Bambrough, R. (1972) ‘The Disunity of Plato’s Thought’, Philosophy, 47(182), 295–307.Google Scholar
Bestor, T. W. (1996) ‘Plato’s Semantics and Plato’s Cave’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 14, 33–82.Google Scholar
Bluck, R. S. (1955) Plato’s Phaedo, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Bluck, R. S. (1956) ‘Logos and Forms in Plato: A Reply to Professor Cross’, Mind, 65(1), 522–529.Google Scholar
Bostock, D. (1986) Plato’s Phaedo, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Brisson, L. (2002) ‘“Is the World One?” A New Interpretation of Plato’s Parmenides’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 22, 1–20.Google Scholar
Broadie, S. (2011) Nature and Divinity in Plato’s Timaeus, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F. (1976) ‘Plato on the Grammar of Perceiving’, The Classical Quarterly, 26(1), 29–51.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F. (1982) ‘Idealism and Greek Philosophy: What Descartes Saw and Berkeley Missed’, The Philosophical Review, 91(1), 3–40.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F. ([1987] 2012) ‘Platonism and Mathematics: A Prelude to Discussion’, in Graeser, A., ed., Mathematics and Metaphysics in Aristotle, Proceedings of the Tenth Symposium Aristotelicum, Bern: P. Haupt, 213–240. Reprinted in M. F. Burnyeat, Explorations in Ancient and Modern Philosophy, vol. 2, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 145–172.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F., and Frede, M. (2015a) The Pseudo-Platonic Seventh Letter, Scott, D., ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F., and Frede, M. (2015b) The Seventh Platonic Letter: A Seminar, Scott, D., ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Carone, G. R. (2005) Plato’s Cosmology and Its Ethical Dimensions, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Castagnoli, L. (2010) Ancient Self-Refutation: The Logic and History of the Self-Refutation Argument from Democritus to Augustine, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Code, A. (1986) ‘Aristotle: Essence and Accident’, in Warner, R. and Grandy, R. E., eds., Philosophical Grounds of Rationality, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 411–439.Google Scholar
Cooper, J. M. (1970) ‘Plato on Sense-Perception and Knowledge (Theaetetus 184–186)’, Phronesis, 15(2), 123–146.Google Scholar
Cornford, F. M. (1935) Plato’s Theory of Knowledge: The Theaetetus and Sophist of Plato, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Cornford, F. M. (1939) Plato and Parmenides, London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co.Google Scholar
Crivelli, P. (2008) ‘Plato’s Philosophy of Language’, in Fine, G., ed., The Oxford Handbook of Plato, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 217–242.Google Scholar
Crombie, I. M. ([1963] 2013) An Examination of Plato’s Doctrines: II. Plato on Knowledge and Reality, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cross, R. C. (1954) ‘Logos and Forms in Plato’, Mind, 63(3), 433–450.Google Scholar
Dancy, R. M. (2004) Plato’s Introduction of Forms, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dillon, J. M. (1997) ‘The Riddle of the Timaeus: Is Plato Sowing Clues?’, in Joyal, M., ed., Studies in Plato and the Platonic Tradition: Essays Presented to John Whittaker, Abingdon: Routledge, 25–42.Google Scholar
Dillon, J. M. (2019) The Roots of Platonism: The Origins and Chief Features of a Philosophical Tradition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dodds, E. R. (1928) ‘The Parmenides of Plato and the Origin of the Neoplatonic “One”’, The Classical Quarterly, 22, 129–142.Google Scholar
Evans, D. (1996) ‘Platonic Arguments: I’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes, 70, 177–193.Google Scholar
Ferejohn, M. (2006) ‘Knowledge and the Forms in Plato’, in Benson, H. H., ed., A Companion to Plato, Malden: Blackwell, 146–161.Google Scholar
Fine, G. ([1978] 2003) ‘Knowledge and Belief in Republic V’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 60(2), 121–139. Reprinted in G. Fine, Plato on Knowledge and Forms: Selected Essays, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 66–84.Google Scholar
Fine, G. (1987) ‘Forms As Causes: Plato and Aristotle’, in Graeser, A., ed., Mathematics and Metaphysics in Aristotle, Bern: P. Haupt, 69–112.Google Scholar
Fine, G. ([1990] 2003) ‘Knowledge and Belief in Republic V–VII’, in Everson, S., ed., Epistemology, Companions to Ancient Thought, vol. 1, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Reprinted in G. Fine, Plato on Knowledge and Forms: Selected Essays, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 85–116.Google Scholar
Fine, G. (1992) ‘Inquiry in the Meno’, in Kraut, R., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Plato, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 200–226.Google Scholar
Fine, G. (1993) On Ideas: Aristotle’s Criticism of Plato’s Theory of Forms, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Fine, G. (2008) ‘Does Socrates Claim to Know That He Knows Nothing?’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 35, 49–85.Google Scholar
Fine, G. (2014) The Possibility of Inquiry: Meno’s Paradox from Socrates to Sextus, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fine, G. (2017) ‘Plato on the Grades of Perception: Theaetetus 184–186 and the Phaedo’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 53, 65–109.Google Scholar
Fine, K. (1994) ‘Essence and Modality’, Philosophical Perspectives, 8, 1–16.Google Scholar
Frede, M. (1967) Prädikation und Existenzaussage: Platons Gebrauch von “… ist …” und “… ist Nicht …” im Sophistes, Hypomnemata 18, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Frede, M. (1980) ‘The Original Notion of Cause’, in Schofield, M., Burnyeat, M. and Barnes, J., eds., Doubt and Dogmatism: Studies in Hellenistic Epistemology, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 217–249.Google Scholar
Frede, M. (1992) ‘Plato’s Sophist on False Statements’, in Kraut, R., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Plato, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 397–424.Google Scholar
Frege, G. (1892) ‘Über Sinn und Bedeutung’, Zeitschrift für Philosophie und Philosophische Kritik, N.F. 100, 25–50.Google Scholar
Gadamer, H.-G. (1985) Gesammelte Werke, Band 5: Griechische Philosophie I, Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr.Google Scholar
Gadamer, H.-G. (1991) Gesammelte Werke, Band 7: Griechische Philosophie III: Plato Im Dialog, Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr.Google Scholar
Gallop, D. (1975) Plato Phaedo, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Geach, P. T. (1966) ‘Plato’s Euthyphro: An Analysis and Commentary’, Monist, 50, 369–382.Google Scholar
Gerson, L. P. (2020) Platonism and Naturalism, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Gill, M. L. (2012) Philosophos: Plato’s Missing Dialogue, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gosling, J. C. B. (1973) Plato. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Gould, C. S. (1995) ‘Grube’s Translation of Republic 476a: A Response to Waterfield’, Ancient Philosophy, 15(2), 681–683.Google Scholar
Greene, B. (1999) The Elegant Universe: Superstrings, Hidden Dimensions, and the Quest for the Ultimate Theory, New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Hackforth, R. (1952) ‘Plato’s Republic’ [review of Murphy 1951], The Classical Review, N.S. 2(3/4), 158–160.Google Scholar
Hackforth, R. (1955) Plato’s Phaedo, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Harte, V. (2008) ‘Plato’s Metaphysics’, in Fine, G., ed., The Oxford Handbook of Plato, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 191–216.Google Scholar
Hamlyn, D. W. (1955) ‘The Communion of Forms and the Development of Plato’s Logic’, The Philosophical Quarterly, 5(21), 289–302.Google Scholar
Hestir, B. E. (2016) Plato on the Metaphysical Foundation of Meaning and Truth, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hintikka, J. (2007) Socratic Epistemology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Horan, D. (2015) ‘Plotinus’ Use of the Third Hypothesis of Plato’s Parmenides in Enneads: VI.6.13’, Dionysius, N.S. 33, 81–117.Google Scholar
Irwin, T. H. (1977) Plato’s Moral Theory: The Early and Middle Dialogues, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Johansen, T. K. (2004) Plato’s Natural Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kahn, C. H. (1985) ‘The Beautiful and the Genuine’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 3, 261–287.Google Scholar
Kahn, C. H. (1992) ‘Vlastos’s Socrates’, Phronesis, 37(2), 233–258.Google Scholar
Karamanolis, G., and Politis, V. (2018) The Aporetic Tradition in Ancient Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Karbowski, J. (2016) ‘Justification “by Argument” in Aristotle’s Natural Science’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 51, 119–160.Google Scholar
Keyt, D. (1969) ‘Plato’s Paradox That the Immutable Is Unknowable’, The Philosophical Quarterly, 19(74), 1–14.Google Scholar
Kirwan, C. (1974) ‘Plato and Relativity’, Phronesis, 19(2), 112–129.Google Scholar
vonKutschera, F. (1995) Platons Parmenides, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Larsen, P. D. (2018) ‘Are There Forms of Sensible Qualities in Plato?’, Journal of the American Philosophical Association, 4(2), 225–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lachance, G. (2016) ‘Platonic Contrariety (enantia): Ancestor of the Aristotelian Notion of Contradiction (antiphasis)?’, Logica Universalis, 10, 143–156.Google Scholar
Ledbetter, G. M. (1999) ‘Reasons and Causes in Plato’, Ancient Philosophy, 19(2), 255–265.Google Scholar
Lee, D. C. (2010a) ‘Dialectic and Disagreement in the Hippias Major’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 38, 1–35.Google Scholar
Lee, D. C. (2010b) ‘Interpreting Plato’s Republic: Knowledge and Belief’, Philosophy Compass, 5(10), 854–864.Google Scholar
Lee, D. C. (2013) ‘Drama, Dogmatism, and the “Equals” Argument in Plato’s Phaedo’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 44, 1–39.Google Scholar
Lorenz, H. (2006) The Brute Within: Appetitive Desire in Plato and Aristotle, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Ludlam, I. (1991) Hippias Major: An Interpretation, Stuttgart: F. Steiner.Google Scholar
Malcolm, J. (1968) ‘On the Place of the Hippias Major in the Development of Plato’s Thought’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 50(3), 189–195.Google Scholar
Malcolm, J. (1991) Plato on the Self-Predication of Forms: Early and Middle Dialogues, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Mann, W.-R. (2000) The Discovery of Things: Aristotle’s Categories and Their Context, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
McCabe, M. M. (1994) Plato’s Individuals, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
McCabe, M. M. ‘The Unity of Virtue: Plato’s Models of Philosophy’, Aristotelian Society, supplementary volume XC, 1–25.Google Scholar
Meinwald, C. C. (1991) Plato’s Parmenides, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, J. M. E. (1973) ‘The Anatomy of Plato’s Divisions’, in Lee, E. N., Mourelatos, A. P. D. and Rorty, R. M., eds., Exegesis and Argument: Studies in Greek Philosophy Presented to Gregory Vlastos, Assen: Van Gorcum, 324–348.Google Scholar
Moss, J. (2008) ‘Appearances and Calculations: Plato’s Division of the Soul’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 34, 35–68.Google Scholar
Muniz, F., and Rudebusch, G. (2004) ‘Plato, Philebus 15B: A Problem Solved’, The Classical Quarterly, N.S. 54(2), 394–405.Google Scholar
Murphy, N. R. (1951) The Interpretation of Plato’s Republic, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Natorp, P. (1903) Platos Ideenlehre: Eine Einführung in den Idealismus, Leipzig: Meiner.Google Scholar
Natorp, P. (2004) Plato’s Theory of Ideas: An Introduction to Idealism, International Plato Studies 18, Politis, V., ed., Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag.Google Scholar
Nehamas, A. (1973) ‘Predication and Forms of Opposites in the Phaedo’, The Review of Metaphysics, 26(3), 461–491.Google Scholar
Nehamas, A. (1975a) ‘Plato on the Imperfection of the Sensible World’, American Philosophical Quarterly, 12(2), 105–117.Google Scholar
Nehamas, A. (1975b) ‘Confusing Universals and Particulars in Plato’s Early Dialogues’, The Review of Metaphysics, 29(2), 287–306.Google Scholar
Nettleship, R. L. (1958) Lectures on the Republic of Plato, 2nd ed., London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Nightingale, A. (2004) Spectacles of Truth in Classical Greek Philosophy: Theoria in Its Cultural Context, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Oderberg, D. S. (2007) Real Essentialism, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
O’Reilly, K. R. (2019) ‘The Jellyfish’s Pleasures: Philebus 20b–21d’, Phronesis, 64(3), 277–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen, G. E. L. ([1957] 1986) ‘A Proof in the ΠΕΡΙ ΙΔΕΩΝ’, The Journal of Hellenic Studies, 77(1), 103–111. Reprinted in M. C. Nussbaum, ed., Logic, Science and Dialectic: Collected Papers in Greek Philosophy, New York: Cornell University Press, 65–84.Google Scholar
Pappas, N. (1995) Plato and the Republic, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Patterson, R. (1985) Image and Reality in Plato’s Metaphysics, Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Patterson, R. (2009) ‘Plato: Arguments for Forms’, in Le Poidevin, R., Simons, P., McGonigal, A. and Cameron, R. P., eds., The Routledge Companion to Metaphysics, London: Routledge, 18–28.Google Scholar
Petrucci, F. M. (2016) ‘L’autenticità dell’ Ippia Maggiore’, in Tulli, M., ed., Testo e Forme del Testo: Ricerche di Filologia Filosofica, Ricerche di Filologia Classica VII, Pisa: Fabrizio Serra, 105–143.Google Scholar
Politis, V. (2010) ‘Explanation and Essence in Plato’s Phaedo’, in Charles, D., ed., Definition in Greek Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 62–114.Google Scholar
Politis, V. (2012) ‘What Is Behind the ti esti Question?’, in Fink, J. L., ed., The Development of Dialectic from Plato to Aristotle, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 199–223.Google Scholar
Politis, V. (2015) The Structure of Enquiry in Plato’s Early Dialogues, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Politis, V. (2018a) ‘Plato’s Geach Talks to Socrates: Definition by Example and Exemplar in the Hippias Major’, Phronesis, 63(3), 223–228.Google Scholar
Politis, V. (2018b) ‘Aporia and Sceptical Argument in Plato’s Early Dialogues’, in Karamanolis, G. and Politis, V., eds., The Aporetic Tradition in Ancient Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Politis, V. (2020) ‘The Relation between Knowledge and Enquiry in the Phaedo’, History of Philosophy & Logical Analysis, 23(1), 51–73.Google Scholar
Politis, V. (forthcoming) ‘Note on Plato’s Statesman 275D8–E1’, The Classical Quarterly.Google Scholar
Politis, V., and Jun, S. (2017) ‘The Concept of Ousia in Metaphysics Alpha, Beta, and Gamma’, in Wians, W. and Polansky, R., eds., Reading Aristotle: Argument and Exposition, Leiden: Brill, 257–276.Google Scholar
Politis, V., and Steinkrüger, P. (2017) ‘Aristotle’s Second Problem about a Science of Being qua Being: A Reconsideration of Metaphysics iv 2’, Ancient Philosophy, 37(1), 59–89.Google Scholar
Prauss, G. (1966) Platon und der Logische Eleatismus, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Priest, G. (1998) ‘What Is So Bad about Contradictions?’, The Journal of Philosophy, 95(8), 410–426.Google Scholar
Prior, W. J. (1998) ‘Plato and the “Socratic Fallacy”’, Phronesis, 43(2), 97–113.Google Scholar
Reeve, C. D. C. (1989) Socrates in the Apology, Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Rickless, S. C. (2007) Plato’s Forms in Transition: A Reading of the Parmenides, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Robinson, R. (1950) ‘Forms and Error in Plato’s Theaetetus’, The Philosophical Review, 59(1), 3–30.Google Scholar
Rodriguez, E. (2019) ‘More Than a Reductio: Plato’s Method in the Parmenides and Lysis’, Études platoniciennes, 15. doi.org/10.4000/etudesplatoniciennes.1509.Google Scholar
Rodriguez, E. (2020) ‘Aristotle’s Platonic Response to the Problem of First Principles’, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 58, 449–469.Google Scholar
Ross, D. (1951) Plato’s Theory of Ideas, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Rowe, C. J. (2007) Plato and the Art of Philosophical Writing, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rowett, C. (2016) ‘Why the Philosopher Kings Will Believe the Noble Lie’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 50, 67–100.Google Scholar
Rowett, C. (2018) Knowledge and Truth in Plato: Stepping Past the Shadow of Socrates, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ruben, D.-H. (1990) Explaining Explanation, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ryle, G. ([1939] 1965) ‘Plato’s Parmenides’, Mind, 48(190/191), 129–151, 302–325. Reprinted in R. E. Allen, ed., Studies in Plato’s Metaphysics, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 97–147.Google Scholar
Ryle, G. (1990) ‘Logical Atomism in Plato’s Theaetetus’, Phronesis, 35(1), 21–46.Google Scholar
Santas, G. X. (1972) ‘The Socratic Fallacy’, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 10(2), 127–141.Google Scholar
Sayre, K. M. (2008) ‘[Rickless 2007] (review)’, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 46(1), 169–170.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. (1998) ‘Platonic Causes’, Phronesis, 43(2), 114–132.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. (2007a) ‘Equal Sticks and Stones’, in Scott, D., ed., Maieusis: Essays in Ancient Philosophy in Honour of Myles Burnyeat, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 68–86.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. (2007b) Creationism and Its Critics in Antiquity, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Sedley, D., and Long, A. (2010) Plato: Meno and Phaedo, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Silverman, A. (2002) The Dialectic of Essence, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, J. A. (1917) ‘General Relative Clauses in Greek’, The Classical Review, 31(3/4), 69–71.Google Scholar
Sorabji, R. (1988) Matter, Space, and Motion, London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Stenzel, J. (1931) Studien zur Entwicklung der platonischen Dialektik von Sokrates zu Aristoteles, 2nd ed., Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Storey, D. (2014) ‘Appearance, Perception, and Non-Rational Belief: Republic 602c–603a’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 47, 81–118.Google Scholar
Taylor, A. E. (1926) Plato: The Man and His Work, London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. C. W. (1969) ‘Forms As Causes in the Phaedo’, Mind, 78(309), 45–59.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. C. W. (2008) ‘Plato’s Epistemology’, in Fine, G., ed., The Oxford Handbook of Plato, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 165–190.Google Scholar
Teloh, H. (1981) The Development of Plato’s Metaphysics, University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Tuozzo, T. M. (2018) ‘“Appearing Equal” at Phaedo 74B4–C6: An Epistemic Interpretation’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 54, 1–26.Google Scholar
Vlastos, G. (1954) ‘The Third Man Argument in the Parmenides’, The Philosophical Review, 63(3), 319–349.Google Scholar
Vlastos, G. (1969) ‘Reasons and Causes in the Phaedo’, The Philosophical Review, 78(3), 291–325.Google Scholar
Vlastos, G. ([1985] 1994) ‘Socrates’ Disavowal of Knowledge’, The Philosophical Quarterly, 35(138), 1–31. Reprinted in M. Burnyeat, ed., Socratic Studies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 39–66.Google Scholar
Vlastos, G. ([1990] 1994) ‘Is the “Socratic Fallacy” Socratic?’, Ancient Philosophy, 10(1), 1–16. Reprinted in M. Burnyeat, ed., Socratic Studies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 67–86.Google Scholar
Wedgwood, R. (2018) ‘Plato’s Theory of Knowledge’, in Brink, D. O., Meyer, S. S. and Shields, C., eds., Virtue, Happiness, Knowledge: Themes from the Work of Gail Fine and Terence Irwin, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 33–56.Google Scholar
White, F. C. (1981) Plato’s Theory of Particulars, New York: Arno Press.Google Scholar
White, N. P. (1992) ‘Plato’s Metaphysical Epistemology’, in Kraut, R., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Plato, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 311–337.Google Scholar
Wolfsdorf, D. (2004) ‘The Socratic Fallacy and the Epistemological Priority of Definitional Knowledge’, Apeiron, 37(1), 35–68.Google Scholar
Wolfsdorf, D. (2005) ‘Αἴτιον and Αἰτία in Plato’, Ancient Philosophy, 25(2), 341–348.Google Scholar
Woodruff, P. (1982) Hippias Major, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Woodruff, P. (1987) ‘Expert Knowledge in the Apology and Laches: What a General Needs to Know’, Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy, 3(1), 79–115.Google Scholar
Woodruff, P. (1990) ‘Plato’s Early Theory of Knowledge’, in Everson, S., ed., Epistemology, Cambridge, 60–84.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Vasilis Politis, Trinity College Dublin
  • Book: Plato's Essentialism
  • Online publication: 25 June 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108986243.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Vasilis Politis, Trinity College Dublin
  • Book: Plato's Essentialism
  • Online publication: 25 June 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108986243.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Vasilis Politis, Trinity College Dublin
  • Book: Plato's Essentialism
  • Online publication: 25 June 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108986243.013
Available formats
×